Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Final Exam Prep
Final Exam Prep
CALLS
JB PRIESTLEY
F I N A L R E V I S I O N A N D P R E PA R AT I O N
FOR THE GCSE EXAM
J.B.PRIESTLEY
• Born 1984, Bradford.
• Was in the army during WW1 – he was
wounded and effected by the gas and
withdrew from active service.
• After the war he went to Cambridge and did
a degree in Modern History and Political
Science.
• After University he worked as a journalist
and a theatre critic.
LINKS BETWEEN
J.B.PRIESTLEY AND AIC
• He lived through the time period the play is set.
• He fought in the war that the Inspector predicts.
“Fire and blood and anguish”. Priestley saw these
sufferings first hand and wanted to avoid further
wars.
• He was always interesting in historical events and
politics.
• His play represents the conflicting views on
Capitalism and Socialism.
What is the social
background/context of
the play?
POLITICS IN THE PLAY?
Capitalism Socialism
Profit is the priority Production, distribution and
Sees life as a competition trade should be publicly
Survival of the fittest owned for the good of the
community as a whole
Private businesses control
Everyone has a collective
trade and industry
responsibility
Represented in Priestley’s
We should all look after each
time by the Conservatives
other
“Right Wing”
Represented in Priestley’s
time by the Labour party
“Left Wing”
What is the social
background/context of
the play?
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT
• Written in 1945 but set in 1912 – written just after WW2 and set just before WW1.
• By setting the play in the past Priestley can use DRAMATIC IRONY – the audience knows
what has happened but the characters in the play do not.
• Early 20th Century:
– Saw the start of a move away from an elite few controlling everything to society being more equal.
– An increase in the number of strikes
– Women were becoming more demanding of equality - suffragettes became militant during this
time.
– After the time the play is set there was an economic depression – not helped by the cost of war.
– WW1 – 1914 to 1918
– WW1 is used in AIC to show that mankind needs to change. Mr Birling’s comments make him
look foolish to the audience. The reference to war may also remind the audience what happens
when people stop caring for each other and instead seek personal power.
– Titanic sank on the 14th or 15th April 1912.
– 1940 – Winston Churchill becomes Prime Minister.
– 1945 – a socialist Government comes to power.
CAPITALISM
• 1912
– Country is still benefitting from new technology
– Still very Victorian society
– Rigid class system
– Conservative politics and government (individual responsibility)
• 1945
– 2 World Wars had taken place
– Class system was less rigid
– Women could now vote
– Politics were more socialist (collective responsibility)
PLOT SUMMARY – ACT 1
• The Birling family (Arthur, Sybil, Sheila and Eric) and Gerald Croft, are
having a meal to celebrate the engagement of Sheila and Gerald.
• Arthur Birling makes a toast. In it, he informs the younger members of the
family that their future looks bright and that it is important to look after
themselves. Priestley makes use of dramatic irony to undermine Arthur
Birling – Birling says there won’t be a war and talks about the success of
the Titanic.
• Just as Mr. Birling says, “a man has to mind his own business and look
after himself and his own”, the doorbell rings. Shortly after, the maid
shows Inspector Goole into the room.
• The Inspector explains that a young woman has died after drinking bleach.
He questions Mr. Birling, who admits to having her sacked after she was
involved in a strike at the factory. The Inspector then questions Sheila, who
admits to having the girl sacked from Milwards because she was jealous
that the girl looked better in the dress she liked than she did.
PLOT SUMMARY – ACT 2
• The Inspector’s attention falls on Gerald. When questioned, he admits that
he knew the girl. After meeting her at the Palace Music Hall in Brumley,
Gerald set her up in the flat of a friend and they became lovers. After a
happy period, it came to an end and Eva / Daisy left Brumley and went to
the seaside. After the questioning, Gerald goes for a walk.
• The Inspector questions Mrs. Birling next. She admits that the girl came
to her charitable organisation and asked for help, as she was pregnant and
could not ask the father for money. Mrs. Birling believes the girl is putting
on graces and is offended that she uses the name “Mrs. Birling”. She
therefore persuades the other members of the charity to refuse her request.
Mrs. Birling is defiant and refuses to accept she did anything wrong. She
tells the Inspector that the father of the child is to blame and it is the
Inspector’s “duty” to arrest him.
• Instead of leaving as Mrs. Birling hoped, the Inspector waits to “do his
duty.”
PLOT SUMMARY- ACT 3
• Eric returns to the house and into the firing line. He knows that his
secret is already out but does explain what happened – he had an affair
with the girl and she fell pregnant. He offered to marry her but she
declined, knowing that he didn’t love her. Eric gave her money to begin
with, which he stole from his father’s business. When she realised the
money was stolen, she refused to take any more.
• The Birling family appear to have learnt their lesson and seem sorry for
what they have done. The Inspector tells them that we all have to look
after each other and that there are plenty of other people in the world
like Eva Smith. He then leaves.
• Shortly after, Gerald Croft returns from his walk. He brings into doubt
the identity of the Inspector (having spoken to a policeman who has
never heard of him) and even explains that it is possible that Eva Smith
never existed.
PLOT SUMMARY – ACT 3
CONTINUED.
• Quickly convinced by Gerald’s arguments, Mr. and Mrs. Birling decide
that it was a joke and laugh the whole thing off. They have not really
learnt anything.
• Eric and Sheila are not so easily swayed. They argue with their parents
that this doesn’t change anything – they are still responsible for the
terrible things they did.
• The telephone rings – it is for Mr. Birling. A young woman has just
died at the infirmary and a police inspector is on his way to the house.
• The play ends on this bombshell.
WHO ARE THE
MAIN
CHARACTERS???
ARTHUR BIRLING
• What does his first line tell us about his character? “Giving us the
Port, Edna? That’s right”. How do you think this would be spoken?
• What do you think of Arthur Birling so far and why? You can refer
to the words below, however you must justify your opinions.
Selfish Overbearing
MR BIRLING
1.Birling is arrogant
2.Birling is insecure
3.Birling is selfish
4.Birling only cares about appearances, not reality
5.Birling cares about social status
6.Birling is used to getting his own way
7.Birling cares more about his business than his family
8.Birling’s attitude is unchanged by the events of the play
SYBIL BIRLING
• What do we notice about the role of Sybil in the play? Is she more or less
important that her husband?
• Do you think she is a good mother from what we have read so far? Explain
why
• Snobby and stubborn and at times prudish (doesn’t like slang!)
• Yawn!! (she isn’t a very exciting character!)
• Believes she is always right (she doesn’t change her opinion for anyone!)
and BORING!
• Ignorant – She is set in her own ways and class, and doesn’t believe a girl
can have “fine feelings” (completely disinterested in anyone that is not
within her class)
• Lifeless and uncaring – She dismisses Eva/Daisy as just another girl “of
that class” or Loyal ( to Mr. B)
SYBIL BIRLING
• He is like the ‘Black Sheep’ of the family (They don’t know their son as well as
they think!)
• Priestley uses the stage directions not quite at ease, half shy, half assertive to
describe Eric. What could this tell us about his character?
• He is a heavy drinker. What could be the reasons for this?
• Do you think Eric is a good character so far?
• ….. Later in in the Play we see that Eric represents two types of characters:
Victim and Villain (Can you predict why!?)
In Act 3, Mrs.
He got
Birling reveals
Eva/Daisy
“I am ashamed
pregnant
of you” to Eric.
ERIC BIRLING
Right! Aggressive
WHAT COULD ‘AN INSPECTOR CALLS’ SAY
ABOUT THE ROLES OF MEN AND WOMEN AT
THE START OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY?
WOMEN MEN
• Remember that one of the things the examiner is looking for is your
personal response, so be prepared to state an opinion.
EVA SMITH
• Of course, we never see Eva Smith on stage in the play: we only have
the evidence that the Inspector and the Birlings give us.
• The Inspector, Sheila Gerald and Eric all say that she was "pretty."
Gerald describes her as "very pretty - soft brown hair and big dark
eyes."
• Her parents were dead.
• She came from outside Brumley: Mr Birling speaks of her being
"country-bred."
• She was working class.
EVA SMITH CONTINUED
• The Inspector says that she had kept a sort of diary, which helped him
piece together the last two years of her life:
• However, in Act 3 we begin to wonder whether Eva ever really
existed. - Gerald says, "We've no proof it was the same photograph
and therefore no proof it was the same girl." - Birling adds, "There
wasn't the slightest proof that this Daisy Renton really was Eva
Smith." Yet the final phone call, announcing that a police inspector is
shortly to arrive at the Birlings' house to investigate the suicide of a
young girl, makes us realise that maybe Eva Smith did exist after all.
What do you think?
• Think about Eva's name. Eva is similar to Eve, the first woman created
by God in the Bible. Smith is the most common English surname. So,
Eva Smith could represent every woman of her class.
WHAT ARE THE
THEMES OF THE
PLAY?
THE GENERATION GAP
The Younger Generation The Older Generation
• In the play, the younger generation • In the play, the older generation
(Eric and Sheila) show that they are (Mr. & Mrs. Birling) seem
capable of change. The express incapable of real change. They are
sympathy for the strikers in Act 1 set in their ways and see Sheila
and they also show greater sympathy and Eric as “foolish” “children”.
for Eva Smith. Through the play,
• They have little sympathy for Eva
they are honest about their actions
and refuse to go back on what they Smith and are only sorry that she
have learnt. has died because it could impact
on their lives.
• Sheila and Eric’s ability to change
means that Priestley can end the play • Priestley uses Mr. & Mrs. Birling
with an element of hope. It is to represent old-fashioned ideas.
possible that the next generation can He discredits them, abd what they
make society better. Without this, the represent, by making them look
play would end hopelessly, with the foolish and by catching them out at
characters co the end.
RESPONSIBILITY
• Responsibility is arguably the most important theme in the play. The
words ‘responsible’ and ‘responsibility’ appear a considerable number
of times.
• At the beginning of the play, Mr. Birling gives his interpretation of
‘responsibility’ in his speech. Towards the end of the play, the
Inspector gives his alternative interpretation.
• These speeches reflect the opposing viewpoints in the play:
• Individual responsibility vs. collective responsibility
• Conservatism vs. Socialism
• Think about how Priestley makes it clear that he supports one view
and opposes the other.
RESPONSIBILITY
When thinking about this theme, consider:
• Personal responsibility – each character is forced to consider to what extent
they are responsible for Eva’s death;
• Towards the end of the play the Inspector tells the family that they can
divide responsibility amongst themselves after he has left;
• The different generations respond differently to the Inspector’s visit – who
really takes responsibility for their actions?
• Mrs. Birling is part of a Charitable Organisation – is this because she wants
to take responsibility or because it makes her look good?
• Eric tries to take responsibility for Eva and the baby but does it by stealing;
• The characters’ failure to fully take responsibility leads to the second
telephone call – would the telephone have rung if they’d learnt from their
mistakes?
• Who else is supposed to learn to take responsibility?
FAMILY
At the beginning of the play, Gerald thinks the Birlings are “a nice well behaved
family”, but…Gerald and the audience soon learn that there are murky secrets lurking
behind their polite, well polished behaviour.
• In 1912, family members were expected to know their role and to be content with
their position. The parents are in charge, the children are obedient and unquestioning.
• Gender roles were well defined for the wealthy and middle class:
– Men worked to support their families and they were to protect their wives and daughters.
– Women were to marry into money so that they didn’t have to work and they planned
parties, visited friends and had children.
• The Birlings want everyone to think they are the perfect family.
• The gender roles are shown when the women depart the scene to let the men talk.
• Mrs Birling always correct her families social mistakes.
• Sheila teases her brother about his behaviour last summer.
FAMILY
• The hierarchy shown at the start of the play is destroyed by the
Inspectors arrival.
• The children can think for themselves without their parents influence:
– Sheila doesn’t know if she will marry Gerald anymore, she wants time to
decide for herself.
– Eric says his mother doesn’t “understand anything” and that Birling is
not “the kind of father a chap could go to for help”.
The family is ultimately a mess. Sheila and Eric refuse to behave the way they used
to: they don’t want to pretend anymore. The parents have lost their authority over the
children.
The family is tied together by lies. There is hatred, envy, theft, prostitutes and even
the responsibility for the death of your own grand-child.
SOCIAL CLASS
Social class is very important in the play. Class influences the Birlings
behaviour and makes them treat people differently.
The pay shows how Priestly saw society – he uses the Birlings to represent all the middle classes.
Priestley saw the working class as victims of the class system – Eva’s story is unique but the miseries
she suffered were common – EVA SMITH COULD HAVE BEEN ANYONE.
SOCIAL CLASS
• Eva – should have low moral as she is working class but she refuses to
accept stolen money even though she is desperate.
• Eric and Sheila – they change by the end of the play and turn against
their own class. Priestley uses them to say that it doesn’t matter what
class you are from, you can break out and choose to act differently.
• The Inspector does not fit into the class system – he wants everyone to
be treated equally.
JUDGEMENT
Priestley leaves the end of the play a mystery – it leaves the audience to figure out what has
happened and who to judge.
Morality Plays:
• Morality plays were religious plays written in the Late Middle Ages. They tried to teach
people how to behave and were warnings to the audience.
• AIC follows this idea – it points out everyone's sins and then tries to get them to confess and
repent.
The Inspector:
• He is there to teach the Birlings a lesson but who learns from it:
– Gerald, Arthur and Sybil all decide it is a hoax. They are relieved that the Inspector is a fraud and
they think they have been let off the hook.
– Sheila and Eric waver when they find out there was no suicide. But...they have learnt an important
lesson - that even if there wasn’t a tragic end to their story, there could have been.
Sheila and Eric hold true to their moral instincts however the
others react selfishly and never take responsibility for their
actions.
WHO IS
INSPECTOR
GOOLE?
WHO IS THE INSPECTOR???
The Birlings:
• “chaps” “jingo” they use the language of their social class.
• Slang was popular with the younger generation but not with the older generation – “squiffy” Sybil is shocked when
Sheila says this.
The Inspector:
• He doesn’t mess about, he speaks his mind.
• He uses plain and direct language so that there cannot be any confusion.
• He also uses silence – he stares at a person before he speaks to them.
• The Birlings find him offensive because of his manner and language.
Sheila:
• At the start of the play she uses childish and simple language e.g. “daddy” and “mummy”.
• By the end of the play her language is more confident and assertive – she uses plain language just like the Inspector.
• She directly disagrees with her parents and tell them they were wrong to think that it was all a hoax.
HOW TO ANSWER
THE QUESTION
Arthur Birling says, ‘If we were all responsible for everything that
happened to everybody we’d had anything to do with, it would be
very awkward, wouldn’t it’? How does Priestley present ideas about
responsibility in ‘An Inspector Calls’?
In pairs, place the paragraphs in order and justify your reasons. How do
you structure an essay? Focus particularly on the introduction and the
conclusion.
INTRODUCTION
BREAK DOWN THE QUESTION
Evaluation of Priestley’s
purpose and his
intended effects on his
audience Use literary terms e.g. imagery,
euphemism, dramatic irony.
CHOOSE 1 QUESTION AND IN PAIRS, PLAN
OUT YOUR PARAGRAPHS.
1. How important do you think social class is in An Inspector Calls and how does
Priestley present ideas about social class?
2. In the opening stage directions, Priestley refers to Eric as ‘not quite at ease, half shy,
half assertive’. How does Priestley present these and other ideas about Eric in An
Inspector Calls?
3. How does Priestley present ideas about gender in ‘Ann Inspector Calls’?
4. What do you think is the importance of Eva Smith in ‘An Inspector Calls’ and how
does Priestley present her?