“ A STUDY ON EMPLOYEES ATTITUDE TOWARDS

THE ORGANIZATION IN SRIRAM ENGINEERS”

PARTHIBAN S
40740243
BCOM GENERAL A-5
INTRODUCTION

Employee Attitude Towards Organization." The study aimed to investigate the factors that shape
employee attitudes towards their organization and examine the impact of these attitudes on job
performance, job satisfaction, and employee retention. Employee attitudes towards their organization
are critical as they can significantly affect an organization's success. Positive attitudes lead to better job
performance, higher job satisfaction, and increased employee retention, while negative attitudes can
result in poor job performance, low job satisfaction, and high employee turnover. Therefore,
understanding the factors that influence employee attitudes and taking appropriate measures to
maintain positive attitudes among employees is essential for organizations. This study aimed to explore
these factors and their impact on organizational performance.
INDUSTRY PROFILE

The metal fabrication industry involves the manufacturing and processing of various metal products
through processes such as cutting, bending, welding, and assembling. The industry is a vital
component of the manufacturing sector and plays a crucial role in the production of many goods,
including transportation equipment, machinery, and consumer products.

The industry is highly diversified, with companies specializing in a wide range of products and
services. Some companies focus on the production of large-scale industrial equipment, while others
specialize in the production of smaller consumer goods.
Overall, the metal fabrication industry is an essential component of the manufacturing sector and
plays a crucial role in the production of many goods. The industry is highly diversified and constantly
evolving, driven by technological advancements and regulatory requirements.
COMPANY PROFILE

Sriram Engineers in Kakkalur Industrial Estate, Tiruvallur is known to satisfactorily cater to the demands
of its customer base. The business came into existence in 2002 and has, since then, been a known
name in its field. It stands located at No 165/6, Indian Bank Colony Behind Aavin Dairy, Kakkalur

Customer centricity is at the core of Sriram Engineers in Kakkalur Industrial Estate, Tiruvallur and it is
this belief that has led the business to build long-term relationships. Ensuring a positive customer
experience, making available goods and/or services that are of top-notch quality is given
prime importance.

This business has a wide range of product offerings and the product/ catalogue list includes Aluminum
Powder Coating Services, Aluminum Powder Coating Services, Coatings Service, Powder Coating for
Aluminum, Clamp etc.
OBJECTIVES OF STUDY

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 

 To study the employee attitude towards the organization.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVE

 To analyze the employee’s awareness towards the organization

 To identify the employee's satisfaction level towards their job

 To analyze the employee's expectations from the organization

 To suggest strategies to improve the employee satisfaction level

SCOPE OF THE STUDY

 The researcher aims at determining the attitudes among the Employees.

 To study the effects of personnel, policy and strategy changes.

 To study the organization's current state of maturity 

 To measure the effects of company management

LIMITATIONS

• This study has some limitations.

 They are Only 110 sample size has been taken for this study.

 The answer given by the respondents have to be believed and have to be taken granted as truly
reflecting their perception

 So, if this study is conducted to maximum persons, it may give accurate overall attitude
of the employees.
RESEARCH DESIGN

Research design have been classified by various authors in different types of research design have
emerged on account of different perspective from which a research study can be viewed. In this
project Descriptive Research design is used
SOURCE OF DATA
Data collection is the term used to describe a process of preparing and collecting data.

 Primary Data – Questionnaire given to 110 respondents

 Secondary Data - Websites and online journals, Published reports & Review of literature from
published articles

TOOLS USED FOR DATA ANALYSIS

ANALYTICAL TOOLS

 Percentage analysis were used to analyze the data.

 Weighted Average Method

DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
4.1.1 TABLE SHOWING AGE GROUP OF EMPLOYEES

S.NO AGE GROUP NO OF % OF

RESPONDENTS RESPONDENTS NO OF RESPONDENTS
100
90
1 BELOW 25 11 10
80
70
2 26 TO 35 30 27 60
50
3 36 TO 45 34 31 40
30
20
4 46 TO 55 28 26
10
0
5 ABOVE 55 7 6 BELOW 26 27 TO 35 37 TO 45 47 TO 55 ABOVE 56 TOTAL
1 2 3 4 5
10 27 31 26 6 100
  TOTAL 110 100 11 30 34 28 7 110
BELOW 25 26 TO 35 36 TO 45 46 TO 55 ABOVE 55 TOTAL
1 2 3 4 5

INTERPRETATION
 
According to the table, 31% of the employees belong to the age group of 36 to 45, while 27% belong
to the age group of 26 to 35. Similarly, 26% of the employees are aged between 46 and 55, 10% are
below 25 years old, and 6% are above 55 years old.
  

4.1.2 TABLE SHOWING GENDER OF THE EMPLOYEES

S.NO GENDER NO. OF % OF RESPONDENTS

RESPONDENTS Chart Title
120

1 MALE 97 88 100

80

60
2 FEMALE 13 12
40

20

  TOTAL 110 100 0

MALE FEMALE TOTAL
1 2

NO. OF RESPONDENTS % OF RESPONDENTS

INTERPRETATION:
 
The table indicates that 88% of the employees in the organization are male, while the remaining 12%
are female. This suggests that there is a significant gender imbalance in the workplace, with male
employees being much more prevalent than female employees.
 
4.1.3 TABLE SHOWING EDUCATION OF THE EMPLOYEES

S.NO EDUCATION NO. OF % OF RESPONDENTS

RESPONDENTS Chart Title
120
100
1 H.S.C 19 17 80

2 ITI 4 4 60

3 U. G 42 38 40

4 P. G 29 26 20

5 OTHERS 16 15 0
H.S.C ITI U. G P. G OTHERS TOTAL
  TOTAL 110 100 1 2 3 4 5

NO. OF RESPONDENTS % OF RESPONDENTS

INTERPRETATION:
 
It Is Interpreted from The Table 38% Of the Respondents Belongs to Below Ug, 26% Of Respondents
Belongs to Pg,17% Of Respondents Belongs To H.S.C And 15% Of Respondents Belongs to
Others,4% Of Respondents Belongs To ITI.
4.1.4 TABLE SHOWING MARITAL STATUS OF THE EMPLOYEES

S.NO MARITAL STATUS NO. OF % OF RESPONDENTS

RESPONDENTS Chart Title
120

1 MARRIED 91 83 100

80

60
2 UNMARRIED 19 17
40

20

  TOTAL 110 100

0
MARRIED UNMARRIED TOTAL
1 2

NO. OF RESPONDENTS % OF RESPONDENTS

 
INTERPRETATION:
 
It is interpreted from the table 83% of the respondents belongs to married, 17% of respondents
belongs to single.
4.1.5 TABLE SHOWS WHETHER THE EMPLOYEES SATISFIED WITH WORKING ENVIRONMENT
IN THE ORGANIZATION

S.NO DOES THE EMPLOYEE NO OF % OF

SATISFIED WITH WORKING RESPONDENTS RESPONDENTS Chart Title
ENVIRONMENT
120
100
80
60
1 HIGHLY SATISFIED 61 55 40
20
2 SATISFIED 32 29 0

HIGHLY DISSATISFIED
HIGHLY SATISFIED

SATISFIED

DISSATISFIED
NEUTRAL

TOTAL
3 NEUTRAL 15 14

4 DISSATISFIED 2 2

5 HIGHLY DISSATISFIED 0 0
1 2 3 4 5
  TOTAL 110 100
NO OF RESPONDENTS % OF RESPONDENTS

INTERPRETATION:
 
It Is Interpreted in The Table 55% Of the Respondents Are Highly Satisfied with Working Environment,
29% Of Respondents Are Satisfied And 14% Of the Respondents Are Neutral And 2% Of the
Respondents Are Dissatisfied
4.1.6 TABLE SHOWS HOW THE EMPLOYEES SATISFIED WITH THE OPPORTUNITIES FOR
COLLABORATION AND TEAMWORK WITHIN THE ORGANIZATION

S.NO ARE YOU SATISFIED NO OF RESPONDENTS % OF RESPONDENTS

WITH THE Chart Title
OPPORTUNITIES FOR
COLLABORATION AND 120
TEAMWORK WITHIN 100
THE ORGANIZATION 80
60
40
20
0
1 HIGHLY SATISFIED 54 49

HIGHLY SATISFIED

HIGHLY DISSATISFIED
SATISFIED

DISSATISFIED
NEUTRAL

TOTAL
2 SATISFIED 45 41
3 NEUTRAL 11 10
4 DISSATISFIED 0 0
5 HIGHLY DISSATISFIED 0 0
1 2 3 4 5

  TOTAL 110 100 NO OF RESPONDENTS % OF RESPONDENTS

NTERPRETATION:
It Is Interpreted in The Table 49% Of the Respondents Are Highly Satisfied with Opportunities and
Collaboration, 41% Of Respondents Are Satisfied And 10% Of the Respondents Are Neutral
4.1.7 TABLE SHOWS WHAT IS OPINION ABOUT CO WORKER RELATIONSHIP

S.NO WHAT IS OPINION NO OF % OF

ABOUT YOUR RESPONDENTS RESPONDENTS Chart Title
COWORKER
RELATIONSHIP 120
100
80
60
1 HIGHLY SATISFIED 72 65 40
20
2 SATISFIED 22 20
0

HIGHLY SATISFIED

DISSATISFIED

HIGHLY DISSATISFIED
SATISFIED

NEUTRAL

TOTAL
3 NEUTRAL 16 15
4 DISSATISFIED 0 0
5 HIGHLY 0 0
DISSATISFIED
1 2 3 4 5
  TOTAL 110 100
NO OF RESPONDENTS % OF RESPONDENTS

INTERPRETATION:
 
The table show that 65% of the respondents are highly satisfied of supervisor relationship.20% of the
respondents are satisfied on supervisor relationship, and only 15% of respondents are neutral on
supervisor relationship.
4.1.8 TABLE SHOWS THE EMPLOYEES THROUGH WHOM DID THEY JOIN THIS ORGANIZATION

S.NO THROUGH WHOM DID NO OF % OF RESPONDENTS

YOU JOIN THIS RESPONDENTS Chart Title
ORGANIZATION 120
100
80
60
40
1 HELP OF 35 32 20
FRIENDS/RELATIVES 0

TOTAL
OPEN CALL FOR
HELP OF FRIENDS/RELATIVES

LEGAL HEIRS

HRD CONSULTANTS
2 LEGAL HEIRS 18 16

3 HRD CONSULTANTS 40 37

4 OPEN CALL FOR 17 15

1 2 3 4
  TOTAL 110 100
NO OF RESPONDENTS % OF RESPONDENTS

INTERPRETATION:
 
The Table Shows That 32% Of the Respondents Belongs Help of Friend 16% Of Respondents Say
That Legal Heirs, 37% Of the Respondents Through HRD Consultants and the 15% Respondents
Says from Open Call for Option
4.1.9 TABLE SHOWS THAT DOES THE EMPLOYEE SATISFIED WITH RECOGNIZE OF HIS
PERFORMANCE BY THE COMPANY

S.NO DOES THE COMPANY NO OF RESPONDENTS % OF RESPONDENTS

RECOGNIZE Chart Title
PERFORMANCE OF
THE EMPLOYEES 120
100
80
60
40
1 HIGHLY SATISFIED 59 54 20
0
2 SATISFIED 34 31

HIGHLY SATISFIED

HIGHLY DISSATISFIED
SATISFIED

DISSATISFIED
NEUTRAL

TOTAL
3 NEUTRAL 17 15
4 DISSATISFIED 0 0
5 HIGHLY DISSATISFIED 0 0
1 2 3 4 5
  TOTAL 110 100 NO OF RESPONDENTS % OF RESPONDENTS

INTERPRETATION:
The Table Show That 54 % Of the Respondents Are Highly Satisfied with Recognize of Performance, 31%
Of the Respondents Are Satisfied with Recognize of Performance, 15% Of the Respondents Are Neutral
with Recognize of Performance
4.1.10 TABLE SHOWS THAT DOES THE COMPANY ACCEPT THE SUGGESTION THAT
EMPLOYEES GIVEN

S.NO DOES THE NO OF % OF

COMPANY ACCEPT RESPONDENTS RESPONDENTS Chart Title
SUGGESTION THAT 120
YOU HAVE GIVEN 100
80
60
40
1 HIGHLY SATISFIED 57 52 20
0

HIGHLY DISSATISFIED
HIGHLY SATISFIED

SATISFIED

DISSATISFIED
NEUTRAL

TOTAL
2 SATISFIED 34 31
3 NEUTRAL 15 13.5
4 DISSATISFIED 4 3.5
5 HIGHLY 0  
DISSATISFIED 1 2 3 4 5

  TOTAL 110 100 NO OF RESPONDENTS % OF RESPONDENTS

INTERPRETATION:
The Table Show That 52% Of the Respondents Are Highly Satisfied of Acceptance of Suggestion,
31% Of the Respondents Are Satisfied on Acceptance of Suggestion, 13.5% Of the Respondents Are
Neutral on Acceptance of Suggestion Given And 3.5% Are Dissatisfied
4.1.11 TABLE SHOWS WHAT IS OPINION ABOUT SUPERVISOR RELATIONSHIP

S.NO WHAT IS OPINION NO OF % OF

ABOUT YOUR RESPONDENTS RESPONDENTS Chart Title
SUPERVISOR
RELATIONSHIP 120
100
80
60
1 HIGHLY SATISFIED 66 60
40
20
0
2 SATISFIED 25 23

HIGHLY DISSATISFIED
HIGHLY SATISFIED

SATISFIED

DISSATISFIED
NEUTRAL

TOTAL
3 NEUTRAL 15 14
4 DISSATISFIED 4 3
5 HIGHLY 0 0
DISSATISFIED
1 2 3 4 5
  TOTAL 110 100 NO OF RESPONDENTS % OF RESPONDENTS

INTERPRETATION:
The table show that 60% of the respondents are highly satisfied of supervisor relationship. 23% of the
respondents are satisfied on supervisor relationship, and 14% of respondents are neither satisfied nor
dissatisfied on supervisor relationship. And only 3% of the respondents are dissatisfied on supervisor
relationship.
4.1.12 TABLE SHOWS WHETHER THE EMPLOYEES SATISFIED AND COMFORTABLE WITH
THEIR JOB

S.NO ARE YOU SATISFIED NO OF % OF RESPONDENTS

AND COMFORTABLE RESPONDENTS Chart Title
WITH YOUR JOB
120
100
80
60
1 HIGHLY SATISFIED 73 66 40
20
0

HIGHLY SATISFIED

SATISFIED

HIGHLY DISSATISFIED
DISSATISFIED
2 SATISFIED 24 22

NEUTRAL

TOTAL
3 NEUTRAL 13 12
4 DISSATISFIED 0 0
5 HIGHLY DISSATISFIED 0 0
1 2 3 4 5
  TOTAL 110 100 NO OF RESPONDENTS % OF RESPONDENTS

INTERPRETATION:
The Table Show That 66% Of the Respondents Are Highly Satisfied with Their Job 22% Of the
Respondents Are Satisfied And 12% Of Respondents Are Neutral with Their Job
4.1.13 TABLE SHOWS DOES THE EMPLOYEE SATISFIED WITH TRAINING PROCEDURE

S.NO ARE YOU SATISFIED NO OF % OF RESPONDENTS

WITH TRAINING RESPONDENTS Chart Title
PROCEDURE
120
100
80
60
1 HIGHLY SATISFIED 57 52 40
20
0
2 SATISFIED 48 44

HIGHLY DISSATISFIED
HIGHLY SATISFIED

SATISFIED

DISSATISFIED
NEUTRAL

TOTAL
3 NEUTRAL 5 4
4 DISSATISFIED 0 0
5 HIGHLY DISSATISFIED 0 0
1 2 3 4 5

NO OF RESPONDENTS % OF RESPONDENTS
  TOTAL 110 100

INTERPRETATION: 
The table show that 52% of the respondents are highly satisfied with training procedure, 44% of the
respondents are satisfied with training procedure, 4 % of the respondents are neutral with training
procedure.
4.1.14 TABLE SHOWS DOES THE EMPLOYEE SATISFIED WITH CANTEEN FACILITY

S.NO ARE YOU SATISFIED NO OF % OF

WITH CANTEEN RESPONDENTS RESPONDENTS Chart Title
FACILITY
120
1 HIGHLY SATISFIED 12 11 80
40
2 SATISFIED 58 53
0

HIGHLY SATISFIED

DISSATISFIED

HIGHLY DISSATISFIED
SATISFIED

NEUTRAL

TOTAL
3 NEUTRAL 31 28

4 DISSATISFIED 9 8

5 HIGHLY 0 0 1 2 3 4 5
DISSATISFIED
NO OF RESPONDENTS % OF RESPONDENTS
  TOTAL 110 100

INTERPRETATION:
The table shows that 11% of employees highly satisfied with the canteen facility and 53% of
employees are satisfied, and 28% are neutral and, only 8% of employees are dissatisfied with canteen
facility.
 4.15 TABLE SHOWS DOES THE EMPLOYEE SATISFIED WITH HIGH LEVEL OF
MOTIVATION IN THE COMPANY

S.NO ARE YOU SATISFIED NO OF % OF RESPONDENTS

WITH HIGH LEVEL OF RESPONDENTS Chart Title
MOTIVATION
120
100
80
60
1 HIGHLY SATISFIED 24 22
40
20
0
2 SATISFIED 44 40

DISSATISFIED

HIGHLY DISSATISFIED
HIGHLY SATISFIED

SATISFIED

NEUTRAL

TOTAL
3 NEUTRAL 35 32
4 DISSATISFIED 7 6
5 HIGHLY DISSATISFIED 0 0
1 2 3 4 5
  TOTAL 110 100 NO OF RESPONDENTS % OF RESPONDENTS

INTERPRETATION:
The table shows that 22% of the respondents are highly satisfied with the high level of motivation, and
40% of respondents are satisfied, and 32% of respondents are neutral
6% of the respondents are dissatisfied with high level of motivation in the company
4.16 TABLE SHOWS DOES THE EMPLOYEES SATISFIED WITH THEIR ORGANIZATION TO
DEVELOP THEIR SKILLS

S.NO ARE YOU SATISFIED NO OF % OF RESPONDENTS

WITH THEIR RESPONDENTS Chart Title
ORGANIZATION TO
DEVELOP THEIR 120
SKILLS 80
40
1 HIGHLY SATISFIED 45 41
0

HIGHLY DISSATISFIED
HIGHLY SATISFIED

SATISFIED

DISSATISFIED
NEUTRAL

TOTAL
2 SATISFIED 54 49
3 NEUTRAL 11 10
4 DISSATISFIED 0 0
5 HIGHLY DISSATISFIED 0 0
1 2 3 4 5

  TOTAL 110 100 NO OF RESPONDENTS % OF RESPONDENTS

INTERPRETATION:
 
The Table Shows That 41% Of the Respondents Are Highly Satisfied with Their Organization to
Develop Their Skills, and 49% Of Respondents Are Satisfied, And Only 10% Of Respondents Are
Neutral with Their Organization to Develop Their Skills
FINDINGS
• Majority 31% of the respondent are from the age group above 36 to 45

• Majority 88% of the respondents are from the gender male

• Majority 88% of the respondents belongs to married

• Majority 38% of the respondents belongs to ug

• Majority 37% of the respondents join this organization through HRD consultants

• Majority 66% of the respondents are highly satisfied with their job

• Majority 55% of the respondents are highly satisfied with their working environment
• Majority 54% of the respondents are highly satisfied with recognize of his performance

• Majority 65% of the respondents are highly satisfied of co-worker relationship.

• Majority 52% of the respondents are highly satisfied with their company for suggestion given

• Majority 60% of the respondents are highly satisfied of co-worker relationship.

• Majority 52% of the respondents are highly satisfied with their training procedure

• Majority 53% of the respondents are satisfied with their canteen facility

• Majority 40% of the respondents are satisfied with their motivation in the company

• Majority 49% of the respondents are satisfied with their company for develop their skills
SUGGESTIONS
• Encourage open communication between management and employees to build trust and foster a
positive work environment.
• Establish clear performance expectations and provide regular feedback to help employees
understand their roles and responsibilities.
• Provide a safe and healthy work environment by addressing concerns related to physical and
mental well-being.
• Offer flexible work arrangements to promote work-life balance and reduce stress.
• Provide opportunities for professional development and career growth to help employees feel
valued and invested in the organization
• Having fair and consistent policies and procedures in place can help to reduce employee turnover
by promoting a sense of trust and stability within the organization
Develop and communicate a clear company mission and vision to help employees understand the
organization's purpose and direction
• Develop a clear mission and vision statement that aligns with employee values and priorities.

• Create opportunities for social connection and team building to help employees feel connected to
their colleagues and the organization.

• Provide competitive compensation and benefits packages to attract and retain top talent.
CONCLUSION
A study on employees’ attitude towards the organization this study has revealed that employees'
attitudes towards their organization are influenced by several factors, including job satisfaction,
leadership styles, communication, and perceived organizational support. Overall, the findings suggest
that when employees feel satisfied with their jobs, have supportive leaders who communicate
effectively, and believe that their organization cares about their well-being, they are more likely to have
positive attitudes towards their organization. On the other hand, when employees experience job
dissatisfaction, feel unsupported or undervalued, and perceive communication breakdowns, their
attitudes towards their organization tend to be negative.
It is recommended that organizations pay attention to these factors and take appropriate measures to
improve them, such as offering training and development opportunities, providing clear and frequent
feedback, recognizing and rewarding employees' achievements, and creating a positive work
environment. By doing so, organizations can promote positive attitudes among their employees, which
can lead to better performance, reduced turnover, and increased organizational effectiveness.
REFERENCE
• K. Aswathappa (2013). Human resource management-Tata McGraw hill publication
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting behavior. Englewood Cliffs,
NJ: Prentice-Hall.

• Dr G. Agila, Dhamayanthi Arumugam,” A Study on Effectiveness of Promotional Strategies At

Prozone Mall with Reference to Visual Merchandising”, International Journal of Innovations in
Scientific and Engineering Research, Vol. 5, Issue .6, 2018, Pp.47-56

• Davis, S. J., & Schuler, R. S. (1985). The relationship between organizational structure and
organizational attitudes. Human Relations, 38(3), 251-267.

• Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits--self-esteem,

generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability--with job satisfaction and job
performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80-92
• Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human
Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.

• Ostroff, C., Kinicki, A. J., & Tamkins, M. M. (2003). Organizational culture and climate. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, &
R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 565-593).
Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

• Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 87(4), 698-714.

• Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications.

• Weiss, H. M. (2002). Deconstructing job satisfaction: Separating evaluations, beliefs and affective experiences. Human
Resource Management Review, 12(2), 173-194.