Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Business Ethics in Action Lecture & Seminar 2
Business Ethics in Action Lecture & Seminar 2
ACTION LAW: AN
INTRODUCTION
LECTURE 2: EXAMINING
ETHICS
Sanjiv Sachdev
Exercise 1.
Is this a good
question?
Define ‘Good’
What constitutes a ‘Good’ Q?
Provokes thought, stimulates
discussion, leads to interesting &
innovative ideas?
Prompts the Q – What is a ‘bad’
question?
Unstructured, vague?
Structure
Introduction: Tutor, Module Handbook, Content and
Assessment, Resources
What are ethics?
Definitions
Why are they important?
Business ethics
Morality & ethics
What is
The Business Ethics in Action
team
Module leader & Course Leader: Sanjiv
Sachdev Sanjiv.Sachdev@uwl.ac.uk
Lecturer: Vivek Chitran
Vivek.Chitran@uwl.ac.uk
Module administrator: Susan
Broomfield
Susan.Broomfield@uwl.ac.uk
Aim of the module
Understand the main conceptual frameworks that
inform ethical judgment.
Enhance a contemporary outlook of ‘ethical’ debates
Assignment 2: Coursework (group
work: a maximum of 4 students in
each).
A video presentation outlining the content of the ethical audit. Each
a)
should be a maximum of 5 mins. (10% of the final mark).
video
b) A written report: You are a group of ethical consultants. You are
required to prepare an ‘ethical audit’ of an organisation with which
you are familiar (90%). This entails a critical evaluation of TWO
of the following:
c) The organisations approach to Corporate Governance.
d) The organisations approach to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR).
e) A critical appraisal of the organisations systems and processes for the
management of Business Ethics.
f) The organisations approach to Sustainability .
Assignment 2
Weighting: 50%
Submit by: 6th April 11.59pm (Week 12) via
turnitin
Word count: 2000
Readings
• Beauchamp, T. Bowie, N. and Arnold, D. (2009) Ethical theory & Business, Pearson
• Crane, A. and Matten, D. (2016) Business Ethics, Oxford
• Fisher, C. and Lovell, A. (2009) Business Ethics and Values, Prentice Hall
• Mallin, C. (2010) Corporate Governance, Oxford
• Mele, D. (2009) Business Ethics in Action, Palgrave Macmillan
• Tricker, B. (2012) Corporate Governance Oxford
• Chryssides, G. and Kaler, J. (1999) “Essentials of Business Ethics” McGraw Hill
• De George, R. T. (2006) Business Ethics (6th Edition) Pearson
• Dienhart, J. W. (2000) Business, Institutions, and Ethics OUP
• McIntosh, M. et al (2003) Living Corporate Citizenship, Prentice Hall
• Post, J., Lawrence, A. and Weber, J. (2005) Business & Society, McGraw Hill
• Wicks, A., Freeman, R., Werhane, P. and Martin, K. (2010) Business Ethics, PrenticeHall
Learning Resources
• www.ibe.org.uk - Institute of Business Ethics
• www.eoa.org - Ethics Officers Association
• www.sustainability.co.uk - Company that developed ‘triple bottom
line’ methodology
• www.worldbank.org - The World Bank
• www.weforum - World Economic Forum
• www.bsr.org - Business for Social Responsibility
• www.wto.org - World Trade Organization
• www.wtowatch.org - NGO oversight group
Podcasts
FT Big Read
FT World Weekly
BBC Analysis
Ethics … to
rationalises produce …that can
morality … ethical be applied
theory … to any
Potential
Morality Ethics Ethical situation.
solutions to
theory ethical
problems
Ethics & the law
Ethics
grey
area
Why is Business ethics important?
1. Business has huge power in society
2. Business can make a major contribution to society
3. Businesses can inflict enormous harm
4. Increasing demands from stakeholders
5. Employees face significant pressures to compromise
ethical standards
6. Continued occurrence of ethical infractions/dilemmas
7. Evaluating different ways of managing business ethics
Why do firms pay attention to
ethics?
• Recover Image
• Enhance Corporate Reputation
• Enhance Stakeholder Relationship
• Act with real commitment
Ethics in large companies. Source:
Ethics Resource Center (2013)
%
Differences across organisational
types
Stakeholders Large Small Civil society Public sector
corporations businesses organisations organisations
Formal, public
Approach to Informal, trust- Informal, values- Formal,
relations and/or
managing ethics based based bureaucratic
systems-based
Shareholder
Main constraints Lack of Lack of resources Inertia, lack of
orientation; size
resources and and formal training transparency
and complexity
attention
Globalisation
• According to Scholte (2005) globalisation is NOT
– ‘internationalization’
– ‘liberalization’
– ‘universalization’
– ‘westernization’
• Globalisation is: ‘a process which diminishes the
necessity of a common and shared territorial basis for
social, economic, and political activities, processes,
and relations’.
– ‘deterritorialization’
Ethical impact of globalisation
Stakeholders Ethical impacts of globalisation
Globalisation provides potential for greater profitability, but also greater risks. Lack of
Stakeholders Globalisation
regulation provides
of global potential
capital forleading
markets, greatertoprofitability, but also greater
additional financial risks.
risks and Lack of
instability.
Stakeholders regulation of global capital markets, leading to additional financial risks and instability.
Corporations outsource production to developing countries in order to reduce costs in
Employees global marketplace - this provides jobs but also raises the potential for exploitation of
Employees
employees through poor working conditions.
Global products provide social benefits to consumers across the globe, but may also
Global
meet products
protests aboutprovide social
cultural benefitsand
imperialism to consumers across
westernization. the globe, but
Globalisation canmay
bringalso
Consumers meet protests
cheaper prices toabout culturalbut
customers, imperialism
vulnerable and westernization.
consumers Globalisation
in developing canmay
countries bring
Consumers cheaper
also prices
face the to customers,
possibility but vulnerable
of exploitation by MNCs. consumers in developing countries may
also face the possibility of exploitation by MNCs.
Suppliers & Suppliers in developing countries face regulation from MNCs through supply chain
Suppliers & Suppliers in developing
management. Small scalecountries
indigenous face regulationexposed
competitors from MNCs through global
to powerful supplyplayers.
chain
competitors management. Small scale indigenous competitors exposed to powerful global players.
competitors
Global business activities brings the company in direct interaction to local
Civil society Global business activities brings the company in direct interaction
Civil society communities with possibility for erosion of traditional community life; to local active
globally
(NGOs, etc) communities
pressure groupswith possibility
emerge for erosion
with aim to “police“of traditional community
the corporation wherelife; globally active
governments are
(NGOs, etc) pressure groups emerge with aim to “police“ the corporation where governments are
weak and tolerant.
Globalisation weakens
weak and tolerant. governments and increases the corporate responsibility for
Government & Globalisation
jobs, weakens governments
welfare, maintenance and increases
of ethical standards, the corporatealso
etc. Globalisation responsibility
confronts for
Government &
regulation jobs, welfare,
governments maintenance
with corporations of from
ethical standards,
different etc.expectations
cultural Globalisationabout also issues
confronts
such
regulation governments with corporations from different
as bribery, corruption, taxation, and philanthropy. cultural expectations about issues such
as bribery, corruption, taxation, and philanthropy.
Sustainability
• Sustainable development is development that
meets the needs of the present without
compromising the ability of future generations to
meet their own needs. (World Commission on
Environment and Development, 1987)
Economic Social
Environmental
The triple bottom line
• Coined by John Elkington
• Bottom line thinking suggests sustainability
as a goal
• Three dimensions:
– Environmental perspectives
– Economic perspectives
– Social perspectives
Questions