Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 8 - Evaluation
Lecture 8 - Evaluation
(CNSCC.202)
• Laboratory studies
• Field Studies
Laboratory studies
• Advantages:
– specialist equipment available
– uninterrupted environment
• Disadvantages:
– lack of context
– difficult to observe several users cooperating
• Appropriate
– if system location is dangerous or impractical for
constrained single user systems to allow controlled
manipulation of use
Field Studies
• Advantages:
– natural environment
– context retained (though observation may alter it)
– longitudinal studies possible
• Disadvantages:
– distractions Involves repeated observations
of same variables over short/long
– noise periods of time.
• Appropriate
– where context is crucial for longitudinal studies
The aspects of evaluation
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7517300
Analysis
• Effectiveness
– Pen position detection accuracy (under
various conditions)
– Accuracy of constraints checking
• Efficiency
– Response time
• Satisfaction
– SUS evaluation
Discussion: CAPFF chooses which? Why?
• Two ways to assign conditions to participants:
– Within-subjects: each participant is tested on each
condition (aka repeated measures)
– Between-subjects: each participant is tested on
one condition only
– Example: An IV with three test conditions (A, B, C):
Between-subjects
Within-subjects
Human Computer Interaction
(CNSCC.202)
• Begin with…
• Variables
• Examples:
– interface, device, feedback mode, button layout,
visual layout, age, gender, background noise,
expertise, etc.
Examples of IVs
• Environmental circumstance:
– Example: background noise (quiet, noisy), room
lighting (sun, incandescent, fluorescent), vibration
level (calm, in a car, in a train), etc.
IV: Test Conditions
• An independent variable (IV) must have at least
two levels (values)
• The levels (values) for an IV are the test conditions
– Arriving, welcoming
– Signing a consent form
– Instructions given to participants about the
experiment task
– Demonstration trials, practice trials
– Management of questionnaires or interviews
Instructions
• Very important (best to prepare in advance; write out)
• Goal: “to proceed as quickly and accurately as possible but at a
pace that is comfortable”
• Give the same instructions to all participants
• If a participant asks for clarification, do not change the
instructions in a way that may cause the participant to behave
differently from the other participants (keep the consistency)
Participants
• Experimental results need to apply to people not
actually tested – a population
• Examples:
– Computer-literate adults, teenagers, children,
people with certain disabilities, left-handed
people, engineers, musicians, etc.
• For results to apply generally to a population,
the participants used in the experiment must be…
– Members of the desired population
– Selected at random from the population
How Many Participants?
• Too few experimental effects fail to achieve
statistical significance
• Too many statistical significance for effects,
but not practical
• The correct number:
– Use the same number of participants as used in
similar research1 (empirically)
1
Martin, D. W. (2004). Doing psychology experiments (6th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA. 29
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Questionnaires
• Questionnaires are used in most HCI
experiments
• Two purposes
– Collect information about the participants
• Demographics (gender, age, first language, handedness,
visual acuity, etc.)
• Prior experience related to the current research
– Obtain feedback, comments, impressions,
suggestions, etc., about participants’ use of the
experimental apparatus
• Questionnaires are usually brief for clarity
Information Questions
• Questions constructed according to how the information will be
used
Ratio-scale
data
Ordinal-scale
data
Open-ended
Closed
Participant Feedback
• Using NASA Task Load Index (TLX):
• ISO 9241-9:
Data Collection
• Participants Recruiting