Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Thesis PPT of Mr. Rohit
Thesis PPT of Mr. Rohit
Thesis PPT of Mr. Rohit
1. Manual Handling
2. Being hit/trapped by another object
3. Slips and falls
CONTROL MEASURES AT INDUSTRIES
• Graph plotting
SCOPE OF THE STUDY
1. This research might give an exact framework for safety
management systems in Industries.
firms that the gadget was created and verified to be effective. Here is a
follows:
1. Safety Education
3. Management Commitment
Accident Vs Management
4.5
3.5
2.5
1.5
0.5
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
3.5
2.5
1.5
0.5
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
3.5
2.5
Days Lost r,= -0.76
2 Accidental rate r,- =0.06
Worker Involvement =3
1.5
0.5
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
3.5
2.5
Days Lost r,= -0.76
2 Accidental rate r,- =0.06
Feedback =3.2
1.5
0.5
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Acc. Rate SC
Results and Discussion
•An in-depth study of the report's results may be found further down on this
page.
3.5
2.5
2
Days Lost r,= -0.76
Accidental rate r,- =0.06
1.5
Policy =3.5
0.5
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Acc. Rate SP
SUMMARY
•An effort was made to explore the connection between safety management
practices and self-reported accident rate with the use of empirical research.
Investigations have also been done on how safety management practices are
affected by system accreditation for industrial safety. For the different studies,
answers gathered from the workers utilizing a survey and questionnaire were
employed.
•ANOVA was first used to test a hypothesis (Ho) in order to see if there are any
notable differences between the study industries in terms of the safety management
techniques found in this investigation. A set of hypotheses (HI to H7) has been
constructed to investigate the correlation between each safety management strategy
and accident rate since the findings indicated considerable differences across
businesses.
ISRS Standards
Planned inspections
General promotion
Leadership and administration Programmed evaluation system
Personal communication
Management Training Organizational rules
Emergency preparedness Employee training
Personal protective equipment
Off-the-job safety
Health control
Engineering controls
Group meetings
Accident/incident investigation
Purchasing controls
Task observation Accident/incident analysis
Task analysis and procedures Hiring and placement
IDENTIFICATION OF DETERMINANTS AND COMPONENTS OF
SAFETY PERFORMANCE AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH
SAFETY MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, PERSONAL ATTRIBUTES,
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CERTIFICATION, AND ACCIDENTS
• Employee motivation enhances their knowledge, interest, and desire to act in ways
that improve their own personal safety and health, as well as the safety and health
of their coworkers, and that promote the stated aims and objectives of an
individual level, individual variations like motivation for safety should be taken into
account.
• Although precise safe work procedures provide many benefits, it is not always
possible to regulate the attitudes and motivation of the people who use them
(Hofmann et al., 1995). The workforce should be encouraged to consider safety and
strategies:
• Three groups of respondents have been created, each based on one of the
following qualifications, in order to examine the relationship between
employee qualification and the factors that affect safety performance. poor
academic credentials Exceedingly low, by ten meters or more A medium
level of education is defined as any level of schooling between high school
(10th grade) and postsecondary degree work (+2, ITI, diploma, etc.).
•In order to investigate the connection between the ages of workers and the
factors that determine their level of safety performance, the respondents were
divided into three age categories based on the information provided below.
•An analysis of variance with one component as the independent variable was
used to evaluate the effect of age on the other variables that determine safety
performance (ANOVA).
Influence of tenure on safety performance
predictors
•In order to investigate the connection between the number of years a person has
been employed and the factors that determine their level of safety performance, the
the factors that determine safety performance. In the beginning, each group is
combined into one, and the test of the null hypothesis Ho is performed.
Accidents' effects on factors that determine
safety performance
• HO: When it comes to the factors that affect the efficiency of safety
measures, there is no discernible difference between the groups.
Safety Compliance
•Both operating safely and adhering to established safety rules are essential
in terms of adherence to specific safety laws and directives and identified a good
supporting the safety program at work, displaying initiative, and making an effort
management.
Impact of age on components of safety
performance
whether or not the null hypothesis Ho held true across all three age groups.
•Ho: When it comes to the many aspects of safety performance, there is not a
•According to the findings, there are large gaps in COM between each of the
different groups. A piece of the null hypothesis, often known as Ho, has had a
KNO 3.894 0.54 4.110 0.46 17.629 0.000
3.8 0.671 1 6
65
MOT 4.3 0.539 4.470 0.45 4.553 0.38 10.977 0.000
95 9 7
Performance Vs Qualification
Dependent Variables
4.8
4.6
4.4
4.2
3.8
3.6
3.4
1 2 3
KNO MOT
Performance Vs Age
4.4
4.2
3.8
3.6
3.4
1 2 3
KNO MOT
Effects of management system certification on
safety performance metrics
• At its most basic level, the goal of the multivariate statistical method known as
factor analysis is to reveal the structure hidden inside a data matrix. By creating
conducted (correlations). The researcher may break down the structure into its
constituent parts and assess how well each variable is characterized by a certain
dimension using factor analysis. After the researcher has disassembled the
• According to Hair et al. (1998), before determining whether or not a scale is valid,
one must first examine the scale to see whether or not it is acceptable in terms of
[Source(s) must be cited] The degree to which a particular piece of measuring gear
Although there are a variety of methods that may be used, the one that has
garnered the most attention as the most efficient, particularly in the context of field
much higher than the minimum of 0.6 needed for use in exploratory.
CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS
In a Confirmatory Factor Analysis, the researcher will first hypothesize a
model, where the model is a specific set of connections between the
observed variables and their underlying components, and then will run
statistical tests on this model, assessing how well it matches with the data
that is readily available. Finally, the researcher will draw conclusions
about the model based on the results of the tests. The purpose of this kind
of analysis is to establish whether or not the researcher's original
hypothesis was correct. When used in a circumstance that calls for
verification, factor analysis is placed to the test in order to establish
whether or not a hypothesized connection exists between a group of
variables. This strategy takes into consideration a variety of the theory's
potential applications in the actual world.
Hypotheses to be tested
The following hypotheses were formulated to test validity:
H1.1: The phrase "Management attitude and actions for safety" has a
substantial inverse link with the number of accidents that take place.
H1.2: There is a considerable inverse association between "Workers'
knowledge and compliance to safety" and the accident rate. This
correlation has been shown to exist.
H1.3: There is a considerable inverse link between "Workers' attitude
toward safety" and the accident rate. This correlation is noteworthy.
H1.4: The phrase "Workers engagement and dedication to safety" has a
substantial inverse link with the number of accidents that take place.
H1.5: “There is significant negative correlation between Safeness of work
SUMMARY
Exploratory main element component evaluation the usage of SPSS
10 statistical software program was once used to pick out the
underlying elements or dimensions of protection local weather from
the responses to the questionnaire used to measure security
administration practices, the determinants and elements of security
performance, and some extra questions to measure the protection of
the work surroundings. This was done so that we could better
understand the many components of a secure working environment.
The data used in this research were selected at random for 75% of
the sample, with the remaining 25% reserved for verification. Eight
factors were identified by factor analysis, which together accounted
for 52.147% of the total variance.
Identification of Safety Performance Components
4.1
3.9
3.8
3.7
3.6
3.5
3.4
1 2 3
COM PAR
MODELLING SAFETY
PERFORMANCE
• Safety management methods could only predict 23%
of the variance in safety knowledge (R2=0.23) and
8% of the variation in safety motivation (R2=0.08),
as shown by a multiple linear regression study
(Section 5.3.3.1). Similarly, Multiple Linear
Regression analysis revealed that KNO and MOT,
both of which are factors in safety performance,
predicted 39% of the variation (coefficient of
determination R2=0.41) but only 33% of the variation
in safety participation (coefficient of determination
R2=0.33). This is due to the fact that although both
KNO and MOT have a role in ensuring that safety
regulations are followed, safety participation plays a
role in ensuring that those regulations are followed.
Hypothesized model
Dimensions of the organization and the quantity of things
200
150
100
50
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
X2 5142.524
DF 1352
x2/ DF 3.85
p 0
CFI 0.551
TLI 0.581
Conclusion
• The safety climate factor structure from the chemical and process” sector was put to
the test by using the input that was received from the engg. and construction sectors.
It was found that the model that was initially built for the chemical industry did not
fit the reality in each scenario that it was applied to.
• Exploratory factor analysis was used to have a better understanding of the factors
that individually contribute to a dangerous work environment in the engineering and
construction industries. The engineering industry only created five different
variables, and those five factors were exactly the same as the five out of eight
components that existed in the chemical and process sector. The construction
industry yielded a total of five characteristics, two of which, "Safety Knowledge"
and "Worker Apathy," were discovered for the first time. It was found that all three
different types of sectors have the same three characteristics, which is evidence that
there are some aspects of the safety climate that are universal and apply to all
businesses.
• REFERENCES
• Alfaro, Laura (2003). Foreign Direct Investment and Growth: Does the
Sector Matter? Harvard Business School.
• Avinash Panwar, Bimal Nepal, Rakesh Jain and Om Prakash Yadav (2012)
“Implementation of benchmarking concepts in Indian automobile industry –
an empirical study” Benchmarking: An International Journal Vol. 20 No. 6,
2013 pp. 777-804 q Emerald Group Publishing Limited 1463-5771 DOI
THANKYOU