Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HIV Vaccine Clinical Trial Updates and Novel Vaccine Design (Punnee Pitisuttithum)
HIV Vaccine Clinical Trial Updates and Novel Vaccine Design (Punnee Pitisuttithum)
Punnee Pitisuttithum, MBBS,DTM&H,FRCPT Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University AIDSVACCINE Conference ,BKK Sept 13,2011
Whole-inactivated virus
Live-attenuated virus
Randomized, Double Blind Evaluation of Late Boost Strategies for HIV-uninfected Participants in the HIV Vaccine Efficacy Trial RV 144: Aventis Pasteur* Live Recombinant ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521) Priming with VaxGen**gp120 B/E (AIDSVAX B/E) Boosting in HIV-uninfected Thai Adults
Primary Objective
Characterize and compare cellular and humoral responses in the systemic and mucosal compartments following late boosts for each strategy tested Assess the safety and tolerability of late boost regimens consisting of the RV144 combination of regimen or one component of the combination (AIDSVAX B/E or ALVAC-HIV)
Secondary Objective
Evaluate mucosal immune responses (humoral and cellular) for each boost regimen Evaluate systemic and mucosal activation of T cell target for HIV infection for each boost regimen compare innate immune responses between each boost regimen Define the residual humoral and cellular immune response since completing the primary prime-boost series within RV144
Mode of Administration:
GROUP Number of subjects Vaccine/Placebo 0 45 I 9 ALVAC-HIV + AIDSVAX B/E ALVAC-HIV placebo + AIDSVAX placebo AIDSVAX B/E AIDSVAX placebo ALVAC-HIV Week of Study 24 ALVAC-HIV + AIDSVAX B/E ALVAC-HIV placebo + AIDSVAX placebo AIDSVAX B/E AIDSVAX placebo ALVAC-HIV
45
II
9 45
III
ALVAC-HIV placebo
ALVAC-HIV placebo
Schedule of Assessments
Visit no.
week Informed Consent Test of understanding Enrollment & Randomization Vaccination & Diary card Physical exam Medical history & Vital Signs Concomitant Medications HIV Risk Reduction Counseling (pre and/or post) Urine Pregnancy Test X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
2
0
3
2
4a
24
4b
5
26
6
48
6a
50
7
72
8 Exit
74
X X
X
I
I I I I I I
Ad26.ENVA.01
Ad5HVR48.ENVA.01 CN54gp140-hsp70 Conjugate vaccine DCVax-001 Extention HVTN 073E/SAAVI 102 HIVIS 05 HIVIS 07
Ad26.EnvA-01
Ad5HVR48. ENVA.01 CN54gp140 DCVax-001 Sub Cgp140 HIVIS-DNA/ MVA-CMDR
48
48
A
A
24 48
HVTN 076
45
A,B,C
Ib
HVTN 077
192
Ongoing Trials(3)
Phase Ib Trial ID HVTN 078 Strategy Candidate No of subject 80 Clade Viral Vector NYVAC-B/VRCPox/viral HIVADV038-00Vector-Adeno VP DNA/Viral VRC-HIVDNA Vector-Adeno 016-00-VP/ VRC-HIVADV 014-00-VP Viral VectorAdeno/Viral VectorAdeno /Viral Vector-Adeno Viral VectorAdeno/Viral VectorAdeno VRC-HIVADV 038-00-VP/ VRC-HIVADV 052-00-P/VRCHIVADV027-00VP VRC-HIVADV 054-VP/VRCHIVAVD014-00VP 180 A,B
HVTN 082
HVTN 083
I/II
HVTN 084
IIa
HVTN 205
225
II
HVTN 505
2,200
IAVI B001
56
IAVI B003
212
MV1-F4
PedVacc001& PedVacc002
48
RV138; B011
36
RV 262
92
A,B,C, D,E
I
I
TAMOVAC-01-MZ
Three Russian HIV Vaccines
DNA/Viral Vector-Pox
HIVIS-DNA/ MVA-CMDR
24
21
35
Viral Vector- VRCAdeno HIVADV01400-VP DNA/Viral VectorAdeno VRC-HIVDMA 016-00-VP/ VRC-HIVADV 014-00-VP
31
A,B,C
24
Trial Design: Why are Phase IIb trials an important step in evaluating AIDS vaccine?
Phase I,II trials involve a small number of volunteers Safety and immunogenicity of vaccine The phase III trials require large numbers of volunteer take a long time to set up and complete be the final step before a vaccine can get approval for licensure for FDA
Vaccine being tested will be effective To be not designed to establish the efficacy The number of volunteers is smaller, only 2-5,000 volunteers Easier to design and manage and less cost
Disadvantage Phase IIb trials are run in smaller populations, the precision of the trial is less A vaccine can not be licensed based on the results of Phase IIb testing
Why are test of concept trials especially useful for AIDS vaccines?
The first Phase IIb trial of an AIDS vaccine candidate, which is being conducted by Merck and the HIV Vaccine Trials Network. MRKAd5 in approximately 3,000 volunteers. The MRKAd5 candidate primarily generates a cellular immune response US-based Merck and GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals tested their respective vaccine candidates for human papilloma virus in Phase IIb trials.
Trial Design
Adaptive Clinical Trial Design
Test multiple candidates simultaneously, Comparing to the same placebo group in a randomized, blinded, phase IIb trial to if they are able to prevent HIV infection Adaptive trials allow investigators to modify the trial while its underway More flexibility to drop candidates that dont seem to be working It would allow investigators to rank the different candidates