Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 33

RADAR Technique

Implemented by Group 5:

Eslam Samir Elsbaaei (19222107)


Eslam Al Sayad (18225377)
Khaled Elkhateeb (20221421)
Presented to: Ihab Moustafa Ibrahim (20221429)
Dr. Ashraf Labib Moamed Talha (20221242)
RADAR Technique

CONTENT
o Concept of EFQM Model
o RADAR Technique
o RADAR Technique Scoring
o EFQM Excellence Model Criteria
o FEQM Fundamental Concepts:
Concept of EFQM Model
European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) Excellence
Model.

EFQM Excellence model is a non-prescriptive framework for


continuous quality improvement that can be used by any kind of
organization, regardless of sector, size, structure, or maturity. The term ‘excellence’ is used because the Excellence Model
focuses on:
(1) What an organization does?
The essential elements that constitute the EFQM are the fundamental
(2) What an organization could do?
concepts of excellence. to provide an excellent service or product to its customers,
service users or stakeholders
EFQM Excellence Model is one of the self-assessment tools helping
companies in regularly questioning their own activities and results of
activities and determining strong and weak points.

Five Versions is present for EFQM (1991, 1999, 2003, 2010 2013).
European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) Excellence
EFQM Model Model.

The aim of this study is to investigate the relation


between results of basic performance, leadership,
partnership and resources, and process parameters of a
company operating manufacturing industry.

EFQM Excellence Model is a practical tool that The term ‘excellence’ is used because the Excellence Model
focuses on:
indicates the position of business organizations on (1) What an organization does?
excellence path helps them to determine their (2) What an organization could do?
shortcomings and encourages appropriate solutions. to provide an excellent service or product to its customers,
service users or stakeholders

EFQM Excellence Model was presented as an outline


framework at the beginning of 1992 for the
organizations that assess European Quality Award.

The aforementioned model is now used widely as an


organizational framework in Europe and provides a
basis for both national and regional quality awards as
well.
Concept of EFQM Model
•Excellence is not a theory.
The prominent theme of the model is customer satisfaction, It is necessary that the evidence concerning performance at
fundamental field of activities and processes are available.
employee satisfaction and excellent business results in The evidence is not limited to financial results indicating past
society. performance. Among evidence is customer satisfaction and
loyalty, employee motivation and competence, measured
excellence result concerning society loyalty as well.
Based on fact that numerous approaches may exist in order
to carry out sustainable excellence at all dimensions that are EFQM Excellence Model always updates the model by
related to performance (Comprehensive + Dynamic). gathering inputs of the best applications that are executed
inside and outside Europe. Thus, the model is being dynamic
and provides current views about the management.
EFQM Excellence Model is based the statement “Excellent
results reflecting on performance, clients, employees and
Accordingly, the model was reviewed four times in 1997,1999,
society can be achieved with aid of an appropriate 2003 and 2010 and current information and new approaches
understanding of policy and strategy, employees, resources were enhanced. As a result of the review in 1999, the model
and processes. was named “EFQM Excellence Model”
RADAR Technique
EFQM Model has a logic called RADAR in its heart (as seen in
Figure).

RADAR is a dynamic assessment framework and powerful tool


management that provides a structural approach for the purpose of
examining the performance of any organization.

RADAR states that an organization must take the followings into


consideration:
 Determine the results; it is aiming for assessment consider trends,
targets, comparisons, causes and scopes.
 Plan and develop an integrated set of sound approaches to attain the
results.
 Deploy approaches in a systematic way.
 Assess and review the approaches by monitoring and analyzing the
results achieved.
RADAR Technique
As seen in Figure. RADAR Scoring Matrix is composed of these
components and elements:
- Results
- Approach
- Deployment
- Assessment
- Review
RADAR Technique
Trend

Target

Results: Benchmarking

Causality
 Result dimension indicates what an organization has
obtained. Scope

 In an organization having reached excellence, the results


must always indicate positive tendency and/or a good
performance

 The targets must become appropriate and reachable; the


performance must become high when comparing to other
organizations;

 All results must be emerged from the approach. In addition


to these, the results must contain relevant areas and
activities.
Results:

Trend

Show the data obtained from the measurement processes of the results at successive time periods, allowing comparison
between these results and an estimate of the extent of their improvement or decline during this period.

Evaluation: The pattern of results is positive when there is a continuous improvement in the results and/or stability
in the positive results.

Target

The goal/objective or performance indicator that the organization seeks to achieve through the application of a certain
methodology, process or procedure.

Evaluation: The extent to which the results of the objective or indicator are achieved. The suitability of the
objective or indicator set (realistic, ambitious and challenging).
Results:

Benchmarking

Benchmarking / inter-comparison of the achieved results with corresponding results of the best organizations in the field
being compared.

Evolution: Compare the results with those of similar and distinguished institutions locally and globally.
Comparative analysis and determination of the institution's position in relation to those institutions

Causality

Organizations diagnose the causal relationship between the achieved results and the approaches and activities that cause
them.

Evaluation: The extent to which the organization relates the results to the approaches that cause them and to
identify improvement and development opportunities
Results:

Scope

Extent of coverage of the results of all areas and aspects related to the organization of services, products and relevant
categories.

Evaluation:
 The results cover all areas, measures and indicators related to the organization.
 The results are categorized into all targeted units, services, groups and sectors.
Soundness:
RADAR Technique
• The logic in the approach used is clear and
specific to the methodology, specific and clear
work procedures and mechanisms
• The approach focuses on the needs of
customers and stakeholders
Approach:
Integration:

 The approach contains what and why an organization • The extent to which the methodology
plans. supports policy and strategy
• The extent to which the methodology is
interconnected with other methodologies
 In an organization having reached excellence, the approach
must become well based; that is it is expected that the
approach must be set a clear basis.

 Documented and established approach for doing the work.


 It must become well-defined and have the developed
 The approach ensures continuity and is not dependent on people.
processes and focus on shareholder’s requirements clearly  The approach supports policy and strategy.
and become integrated.  The approach is holistic, logical, flexible and interconnected.
 The approach focuses on the needs of the dealers.
 The approach contains specific procedures and responsibilities,
 On the other hand, it must comply with the policy and
within a time schedule.
strategy of organization as well as becoming associated  The approach ensures effective and efficient implementation.
with other approaches.  The approach is measurable and trackable.
 The approach ensures continuous review and update.
Implementied
RADAR Technique
• The extent of the actual application of the
methodologies and methods documented
within the methodology.
• Evaluation: Apply the methodology in a
holistic manner, horizontally and vertically,
Deployment within all departments and administrative
units and at all organizational levels and
categories of stakeholders.

 The deployment contains what an organization does in


order to actualize its approach.

 In an organization having reached excellence, it is expected Systematic


that the approach is carried out systematically for relevant
areas. • Apply documented methodologies in a
consistent, orderly, and continuous manner
without dependency on people.
• Evaluation: The methodology is applied in a
systematic manner, and implementation
mechanisms are documented and planned,
and are carried out in a sound, consistent and
continuous manner, in a manner that ensures
the effectiveness of the application of the
methodology.
RADAR Technique

Measurement

Assessment and Review: Learning

Improvement

 This dimension contains an organization’s approach and


what it does so as to assess and review the deployment of
approach.

 In an organization having reached excellence, it is expected


that approach and its deployment are measured regularly
and learning activities are performed.

 As a result of these two activities, enhancement practice of


obtained information is determined. The priorities related
to this issue are determined and the approach is used so as
to plan and carry out enhancement.
Assessment and Review:

Measurement

Measuring the effectiveness of the methodologies used and the effectiveness of their application and measuring the
extent to which the desired results are achieved.

Evaluating the effectiveness of the review and “evaluation”:


• Periodic measurement of the effectiveness of the methodologies and methods used
• Periodic measurement of the effectiveness of applying methodologies in
• Achieving targeted results
• Appropriate measurement methods for the achieved results

Learning
Extent to use different learning activities (intercomparison, self or external evaluation, management review meetings,
audit) to identify appropriate opportunities for improvement.

Evaluation: Use learning activities and outcomes to learn about Best practices followed and identification of
appropriate improvement opportunities.
Assessment and Review:

Improvement

Analyzing the outputs derived from the means of measurement and information extracted from the various learning
activities for use in the improvement and development processes.

Evaluation: The extent to which the outcomes of assessment, measurement, and learning activities are analyzed to
identify areas for improvement, prioritize, plan, and implement improvements
RADAR Technique Scoring
Each component of RADAR Scoring Matrix must be associated with
sub-criteria of “Input” at EFQM Excellence Model in Figure and
“Results” criteria must be associated with sub-criteria of “Result”.

When an organization is scored in accordance with RADAR, a separate


weight coefficient is used for each criterion in order to determine total
score. These weight coefficients were first determined as a result of
extensive agreement all over the Europe in and the weight coefficients
are regularly reviewed by EFQM and the weight coefficients being
valid as 0f 2010 are shown in Figure.

In general, criterion weight coefficients are distributed to sub-criterion


equally. The score is given for each sub-criterion out of 100 points by
using RADAR assessment table that is the first step of scoring. This
scoring is carried out by taking dimensions and elements of RADAR
table being related to criteria.

As a consequence of putting these scores given out of 100 points in


relevant parts of summary table, total scoring is calculated out of 1000
points.
RADAR Technique Scoring

Enables Results

Inputs Weighting Results Weighting


Leadership (10%) 100 points Customer Results (9%) 90 points
Employees (9%) 90 points Employee Results (20%) 200 points
Policy & Strategy (8%) 80 points Society Results (6%) 60 points
Partnership & Resources (9%) 90 points Key Performance Results (15%) 150 points
Processes (14%) 140 points

Total Enables 500 points


Total Results 500 points
RADAR Technique Scoring
Element Feature 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
No Some evidence Clear Comprehensive
evidence evidence evidence evidence
Approach Rationality /
Soundness
Integration

2 Enables Deployment Implementation


Systematic

Assessment & Measurement


Review Learning
Improvement

No Results ¼ of ½ of ¾ of All Results


Results Results Results
Results Trend
Target
1 Results Benchmarking
Causality
Scope
EFQM Excellence Model Criteria
• INPUT CRITERIA
• 1. Leadership
• 2. Policy & Strategy
• 3. People
• 4. Partnership & Resources
• 5. Processes

• RESULT CRITERIA
• 6. Customers Results
• 7. Employees Results
• 8. Society Results
• 9. Key Performance Results

As the basis of EFQM Excellence Model, each concept has a direct


or indirect relationship with different criteria and sub-criteria. In
the model, there are 32 criteria in total, 24 of them are input
criteria while 8 of them result criteria. Sub-criteria consist of a
Arrows underside and upside of figure indicate dynamics
wide range of questions to be answered in the course of
assessment. of the model. These arrows indicate learning, creativity
and innovation approach providing enhancements at
Moreover, each main concept has an influence on the other. inputs and therefore leading to enhancements at results.
Criteria and sub-criteria
EFQM Excellence Model Criteria
EFQM Excellence Model Criteria

1. Leadership. This criterion shows how top managers shape the future state of
the organization, demonstrate the management flexibility and the
ability to quickly respond to changing business environment
conditions.

The criterion consists of five sub-criteria:

1 a. Mission, vision, values, moral principles, significance of the


EFQM model.

1 b. Development and application of the management system.

1 c. Interaction with customers, partners and society.

1 d. Internal interactions, motivation and efforts to develop a


model of improvement.

1 e. Identification and commitment to organizational change.


EFQM Excellence Model Criteria

2. Strategy. The criterion shows how the mission and vision take into account
the interests of all stakeholders. Evaluation by this criterion allows
to understand how the organization's development strategy is
implemented through policies, plans, goals and processes.

This criterion consists of four sub-criteria:

2 a. Current/future needs of stakeholders.

2 b. Execution, measurement, research and study.

2 c. Development, analysis and revision.

2 d. Relationship and deployment key processes.


EFQM Excellence Model Criteria
The personnel are one of the main values of the organization.
3. People.
This criterion evaluates the ability to achieve the organization and personnel goals
on a mutually beneficial basis.

The EFQM model takes into account the organization's ability to reward and
recognize the staff advantages, motivate employees, create conditions for the
development of skills and abilities and use these abilities for the organization
benefit.

The criterion consists of five sub-criteria:

3 a. Planning, management and improvement of human resources.

3 b. Knowledge and competencies.

3 c. Engagement and trust.

3 d. Two-way interaction.

3 e. Reward, recognition and care.


EFQM Excellence Model Criteria
This criterion evaluates how the organization plans interaction and manages external
4. Partnership & Resources. partners, suppliers and internal resources.

It is considered how these actions ensure the implementation of strategies, policies


and effective execution of processes.

The criterion consists of five sub-criteria:

4 a. External partners.

4 b. Financial resources.

4 c. Buildings, equipment and materials.

4 d. Technologies.

4 e. Information and knowledge.


EFQM Excellence Model Criteria
This criterion evaluates the ability of an organization to develop, manage and
5. Processes, Products & Services. improve processes, products and services.

These actions should give to increased value for consumers and other stakeholders.

The criterion includes five sub-criteria:

5 a. Development and management.

5 b. Process improvement.

5 c. Design and development.

5 d. Production, delivery and service.

5 e. Customers.
EFQM Excellence Model Criteria
The criterion consists of two sub-criteria:
This criterion evaluates the ability of an
6. Customers results organization to achieve outstanding results for 6 a. Performance indicators.
current needs of customer's satisfaction and
6 b. Customer perception measuring.
anticipating their future needs.

The criterion consists of two sub-criteria:


The EFQM model evaluates how an
7. People results organization achieves outstanding results for 7 a. Performance indicators.
current and future needs of employee's
satisfaction. 7 b. Employee's perception measuring.

This criterion evaluates how the organization The criterion includes two sub-criteria:
achieves outstanding results for current and
8. Society results. future needs of society and other 8 a. Performance indicators.
stakeholders.
8 b. Society perception measuring.

It evaluates how the organization achieves The criterion includes two sub-criteria:
9. Business results. outstanding results for current and future
9 a. Activity performance indicators.
needs of the business environment.
9 b. Result performance indicators.
FEQM Fundamental Concepts:
Eight core values or key management principles that drive
sustainable success

In today’s organizations, the word “quality” is replaced by the


word “excellence.” The word “excellence” refers to strategy,
culture and philosophical change rather than a system.

Excellence is total efforts in order to have a long-term success by


estimating shareholder’s (customer, employees, society,
shareholders) satisfaction or having a skill to create extraordinary
results and sustain them for shareholders.

When viewed from this aspect, excellence can be created and


sustained by excellent cooperation established by employees and
necessary processes to satisfy customers.

To create sustainable success for any organization, a number of


main concepts are necessary.

These concepts can be used principal of necessary factors for an


excellent organizational culture. Main Concepts constitute a
common language of senior management.

These concepts are main concepts of excellence in some ways.


Main concepts of excellence creating the basis of EFQM
Excellence Model are valid irrespective of sector, industry or size
and relationships among concepts are shown in Figure.
FEQM Fundamental Concepts:
Actualizing Balanced Results Adding Value for Customers

Excellent organizations meet short-term and long-term Customer is the one who assesses product and service quality on the last
requirements of all shareholders (shareholders, employees, phase. The best way to create customer loyalty, gain customer and
customers and society) in a planned way and therefore actualize obtain market share is to focus on the requirements of available and
their mission thanks to balanced results and head for their vision. potential customers clearly.
The primary benefits are: Excellent organizations are aware of innovations for their customers by
• To create a value for all stakeholders, understanding or estimating customer’s requirements or expectations and
• To ensure sustainable long-term success, basic reason of customer’s existence as well as adding value to their
• To establish mutually beneficial relationships, customers.
• To make the measurements associated with all stakeholders, • The primary benefits are:
including the leading domestic indicators. • To increase in market share,
• To produce value for the customer,
• To minimize transaction costs,
• Long-term success.

Visionary, Inspiring and Total Leadership Management via Processes


Excellent organizations are managed thanks to processes by which
Excellent organizations have leaders who shape and actualize the evidence based decisions are taken to create consistent, balanced and
future and set an example in line with organization values and sustainable results. The organizations show their best performances when
ethic values. A leader’s behaviors within an organization provide decisions that all related activities are managed systematically and
clarity of target and cooperation and create an atmosphere where processes and enhancement take place are taken.
both organization and employees are able to reach the excellence. The primary benefits are:
The primary benefits are; • Focus on the desired results,
• To maximize the stability and effectiveness of employees, • The highest level of employee evaluation and resources,
• To find out more clearly the direction of the organization, • Consistency and variability of the results to be kept under control,
• A respectable position in the market, • Based on the data to determine realistic goals and strategic
• All of the activities in a structured and systematic process, orientation in relation to governance.
enterprise-wide implementation of consistent and widespread.
FEQM Fundamental Concepts:
Achieving With Employees Creativity and Maintaining Innovation
Excellent organizations value their employees and create an By prompting creativity of their shareholders, excellent organizations
authorization culture where individual targets are actualized in a create value and performance levels increased by permanent and
balanced way. Common values and a reliable and authorization systematic innovation. If an organization’s performance is managed and
culture should be available in order that potential of employees in shared by enhancement culture, permanent learning and innovation, its
an organization can be actualized ultimately. Such an atmosphere performance increases to top level.
enables everybody to take part in activities. The primary benefits are:
The primary benefits are; • Business agility,
• Highest level of participation, positive attitude and high morale, • Cost reduction,
• Gain and retention of members, effective sharing of data • Additional opportunities,
retention, • Removing the optimum level of performance,
• Provide opportunities for learning and developing new skills to • Improvement of all employees in their daily work activities
employees.
Creating Cooperation Taking Responsibility for a Sustainable Future

Excellent organizations create reliable relationships with various The core culture of excellent organizations is composed of ethical
organizations and improve and sustain them in order to guarantee approach, well-defined values and high standards regarding
mutual success. The cooperation can be created thanks to organizational behavior. These factors provide the sustainability of
customers, society, basic supplier, educational institution or non- organizations in terms of economic, social and natural environment.
governmental organization. Whether an organization shows the Securing long-term benefits of the organization and its employees
best performance depends on creating reliability with other depends on adopting an ethical approach and exceeding social
organizations; sharing knowledge; integration and creating mutual expectations and available regulations.
beneficial relationships. The primary benefits are: The primary benefits are:
• To create value for all relationships, • the organization's reputation increases,
• To gain a competitive edge through continuous relationships, • Performance increases
• Creating synergies on costs and resources. • Price increases,
• Community awareness, security, and self-confidence in others
Advantage of EFQM Excellence Model
1. The model is regularly revised and updated, incorporating the contributions of EFQM consultants. Therefore, the set of constructs
underlying the model is not limited to a single researcher’s view of TQM, which also guarantees its comprehensiveness, dynamism and
tracking of the latest developments in TQM.

2. The model provides an extensive set of sub-criteria to detail the exact meaning of each criterion. This facilitates the items’ identification
in the scale development.

3. Additionally, award models are intended to be instruments for comparing an organization with its competitors in order to achieve and/or
maintain competitive advantage.

When survey data based on these models is provided to the firms, the self-assessment of TQM implementation and the identification of
areas for improvement in relation to the firm’s closest competitors is substantially facilitated, which increases the practical implications of
the research.

The EFQM Excellence Model has obvious prestige among European firms as a sound quality standard and there is an ever-increasing
number of firms involved in the recognition process to achieve the European Quality Award (EQA). As this happens, the benchmarking
utility of the model increases.
Advantage of EFQM Excellence Model

4. In the case of the EFQM Excellence Model, the increasing convergence of European markets dissipates any concern regarding the
universalism issue. Therefore, empirical evidence relative to the effects on performance of TQM practices according to this model acquires
great relevance for all firms competing in the European Union.

5.Creating comprehensive framework for improvement, spreading the culture of continuous improvement, sustaining excellence,
enhancing
leadership skills and encouraging employees to innovate.

6.Optimizing resources by focusing on strategically important projects.



7.Roadmap for enhancing motivation for improvement.

Improving competitiveness by focusing on what matters.

8.Top management commitment to quality and to continuous organizational development which helps to develop the performance of
the institution.
Thanks ……….

You might also like