Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3 - Wieting
3 - Wieting
Innovative examples of energy efficiency in the German sugar industry - dewatering and drying process for sugar beet pulp Dipl.-Ing. Christian Vo Dr.- Ing. Joachim Wieting
joachim.wieting@uba.de
Structure
1. Introduction (targets and development of the specific energy requirement) 2. Mechanical dewatering process for sugar beet pulps in the sugar industry as regards energy 3. Drying processes (drum drying, low temperature drying and evaporation drying) 4. Energy aspects of pulp drying 5. Comparison of energy consumption and the economics of different types of installations with examples 6. Characterisation of the technology economic and ecological aspects
With the finalisation of the Council Directive 96/61/EC concerning Integrated pollution prevention and control, the so-called IPPC Directive, the concept of an integrated approach to reduce environmental pollution is being pursued at European Community level for the first time, with all installations covered by the directive now requiring permits. The EU Commission is supporting the implementation of the directive as part of its exchange of information by having leaflets compiled on the best available techniques (BAT) by the European Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Bureau in Sevilla, Spain.
The food, drink and milk BREF gives information at community level on the best available techniques in the sugar industry to help promote the use of these techniques and to support the member countries effectively in their efforts to protect the environment.
Introduction
Agreement between German sugar industry and the government board signed on 19.12.2000:
Reduction of the specific CO2 emissions of 41 45 %
by 2005/06 Base year 1990: CO2 emissions/beet Target year 2005/06: achieved 2000/01: 148 kg/t 81 87 kg/t 84 kg/t with 288.5 kWh/ton of beet
Target achievement:
almost 100 %
Introduction
Specific energy consumption in the German sugar industry
125 kWh / 100 kg beets 100 75 50 25 0 1950 1960 1970 year 1980 1990 current 1996: 30,6 basis 1990: 35,6
ABL = old Federal states NBL = new Federal states D = Germany as a whole
Introduction
Specific energy consumption in the German sugar industry
Since 1990 > 300 Million have been invested in projects for combined heat and power generation (CHP). Degree of efficiency of heat and power combinations > 90 % re-use of the heat several times normalf = 7 8 Future: physical limits increasing technical expenditure (costs) marginal energy savings
______________________________________________________ Personal remarks on sugar market regulation
Introduction
Energy conversion in a beet sugar factory and VDI extra edition 2594
Main flows of energy and technical processes are more closely interlinked than in any other sector of industry.
VDI-Guideline 2594 Emission reduction in pulp drying plants in the sugar industry, First printed August 2004
Energy aspects
of the dewatering process for beet cossettes Production of dried pulp with 90 % dry substance and 10 % water from extracted cossettes with 10 (- 14) % dry substance and 90 % water in 2 dewatering stages: mechanical thermal approx. 3.000 100
Energy aspects
pulp outlet
Energy aspects
32 30 28 26 24 22 20
80
Campaign
Dry-substance content in % Watercarying in kg Water/kg Dry-substance content
SZ-Pressing target before drying: 32.5 % dry substance in the pressed pulp
Energy aspects
Other mechanical dewatering processes % dry substance in the pressed pulp Diffusive dewatering: 65 in combination with evaporation plant to concentrate the press water Disadvantage: no suitable separation of solids/liquids High-pressure, multi-layer pressing: 50 Filter band press: 300 bar; 15 min. pressing time Disadvantage: no suitable filter cloth quality no reliable control of the 300 hydraulic control loops Extraction under alkaline conditions Pilot installations in France, Germany and England 45 50
Energy aspects
of dewatering process for beet cossettes Combination of electroporation and alkaline extraction
Alkaline extraction results in increased deposits of calcium ions
calcium ions
- opening the cell membranes by high voltage impulses high voltage impulses: a voltage of several hundred kV for the duration of approx. 1 sec low energy demand: approx. 1 kWh/t beet
Energy aspects
Changes in the mechanical properties of beet due to electroporation Electroporation increases the flexibility of the cossettes considerably and
enables them to stand up to heavier mechanical stress.
Energy aspects
be et s
electroporation
mash
* patent
Drying process
85 25
25 3
3 bar 3 bar VD 1
4,5 MW
Gas turbine
Boiler
14,7 MW
25 bar
3,3 bar
VT 1
VT 2
DU 1
DU 3
Drying process
Legend: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Cossette feed screw in cell 1 Stationary guide vanes Cylinder with cyclone effect Cyclone over cell 16 for separating entrained cossettes Steam inlet into cyclone Stationary guide vanes for steam return Superheater for secondary steam Blower fan for creating fluidised bed Generated steam exit Feed screw for cossette output from cell 16
In order to consider the energy aspects of the installations described, the general data of the factories with both direct and indirect dewatering systems have been standardised as follows: Beet processing 10.000 tons/day . Length of campaign (season) 90 days p.a. Mass flow of pressed pulp: 160 kg/t beet processed = 66,7 tons/h Dry substance content of the pressed pulp 31 % Dry substance content of the dried pulp 90 % Steam consumption of a sugar factory for 200 kg/t processed beet = 83.4 t/h Live steam pressure 85 bar Live steam temperature 525 C Thermal value of the fuel 40.195 kJ/kg
Electrical energy demand of the sugar factory without drying 10.4 MW = 24.96 kWh/t beet processed Complete crystallisation of the thick juice in the beet . campaign
These norms pre-suppose that the factories have the following technical installations:
A steam generator with 85 bar and 525 C. A corresponding back pressure turbine 3 bar back pressure to supply the evaporation station or 3 bar back pressure and 25 bar extraction pressure to supply the steam dryer.
Additional energy costs in comparison to a factory without dryers for the individual variations:
High temperature dryers Low/high temperature dryers Steam dryers
comparison to lower fuel costs in operation)
268 103
Investment costs plus net running costs of the dryer for the individual variations:
High temperature dryers Low/high temperature dryers Steam dryer 38.4 Mio. 40.7 Mio.
40.9 Mio.
Main achievement - Improvements for the environment with regard to emissions and energy consumption:
Emissions are avoided by direct primary use of energy for drying. No application of steam-volatile and odorous vapours. Energy consumption 30% less than in a factory with direct drying.
Inter-media effects
Transfer of the exhaust fumes into the effluent (approx. 1.200 m3
effluent with a chemical oxygen requirement of 1.500 mg/l and a NH4content of 25 mg/l).
THANK YOU
In conclusion we should like to thank all those who participated the members of the VDI working group 2594, the participating companies in the Sugar Association and all of you for your attention. THANK YOU