Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evaluation Table - Group II - R2 Staff Operator Natanail 2017
Evaluation Table - Group II - R2 Staff Operator Natanail 2017
PERSONAL DETAILS
NATANAIL
Name Department Operation
TARIGAN
Panel Man
ID 212022 Position
VDU
• Evaluator should evaluate evaluatee base on objective fact and judgment for achieving performance
during normal management activities.
Evaluatee Evaluator
Performance Evaluation
▶ Major Activities Plan and Result
※ Evaluatee should describe performance after making subject / work scope according to Job description
- 2 Page -
Evaluatee Evaluator
Performance Evaluation
▶ Major Activities Plan and Result
※ Evaluatee should describe performance after making subject / work scope according to Job description
Performance Evaluation
▶ Major Activities Plan and Result
※ Evaluatee should describe performance after making subject / work scope according to Job description
1. Shutdown Activities
- Conduct Plant Shutdown
- Conduct LGO flushing, Oil sloping,
De-inventory, Steam Purging,
N2 floating, Blind installation
Complitation of TA CDW 2. Start-up Activities
Unit, Change Catalyst - Monitoring and check 100% progress
5 mechanical works
CD-R0201 - Conduct Blind removal, PSSR, Steam
Purging, N2 purging,
LGO flushing, Plant Start Up
3. Start-up and Shutdown Report Lesson
Learn
4. Change catalyst CD-R0201 succsess
1. Operator Skill Improvement Program
- Conduct job rotation in shift team
(Min 1 time / 2 year)
- Conduct in-house training programs
Competency (1 time / year)
6 Development - No external training on this year
- Conduct training for New Panel Man
Program (1 time / month)
- Conduct Operator Assessment
- 4 Page -
Evaluatee Evaluator
Satisfaction √
Very Good Good Normal Bad Very Bad
for Job
Satisfaction for √
Very Good Good Normal Bad Very Bad
Position
Satisfaction for
Very Good √ Good Normal Bad Very Bad
Salary
Satisfaction for
Very Good Good Normal √ Bad Very Bad
Welfare
Atmosphere of
Very Good √ Good Normal Bad Very Bad
Department
C Conducting work so-so but making mistake sometimes need to check the result.
D Conducting work with very many mistake and result must be checked
1st Evaluator 『 』
2nd Evaluator 『 』
- 5 Page -
Evaluatee Evaluator
Making all his/her best effort for ensuring corporate survival and
S growth with self-ownership and sacrificing him or herself by regarding all
activities in team as his or her work while achieving team target and strategy
Having an ownership for ensuring corporate survival and growth and
A conducting work with the challenging and positive attitude and strong
responsibility to achieve team target and strategic.
Making an effort and doing work with responsibility for task given in order
B
to achieve team target and strategic while having an ownership for corporate
Having good understanding for company management policy and behaving
C
with an effort and responsibility to achieve team target and strategic
Not enough for corporate growth, ownership, effort, and responsibility to
D
achieve team target/strategy.
- 6 Page -
Evaluatee Evaluator
■ Spirit
Positive Thinking
Determination
Thoroughness in one’s working
Conducting work perfectly with faith and determination of “I can do it” even though
S
work seems impossible by challenging with positive and ambitious spirit
Conducting his or her work better than expectation with self-confidence through
A
finding problem solution progressively under very difficult environment
Conducting his or her work compactly and firmly and absorbing in his or her
B
work voluntarily and willingly under difficult environment
Dealing with work progressively always, conducting his or her work
C
sincerely and work result is acceptable.
D Not having self-confidence for his or her work and work result is not correct.
■ Teamwork
Cooperation
Coordination
Communication
Recognizing by high trust and respect and respect in the team by putting devot-
S edly team target and task in common on higher priority than his or her own work.
Conducting perfect coordination and communication with other teams .
Being taken high trust by considering team target and common task as
A his own work and approaching the work with positive attitude. Conducting
coordination and communication with other teams excellently
Having positive and participative attitude for the team target and common task and
B
conducting coordination and communication with other teams well.
Showing participative and cooperative attitude relatively and conducting
C
coordination and communication with other teams acceptably
Having negative attitude for team target and making trouble with
D
coordination and communication with other teams frequently.
- 7 Page -
Evaluatee Evaluator
Overall Evaluation
■ Overall Evaluation (By Evaluator)
• Evaluator should conduct Overall Evaluation referring to periodic individual Performance and
individual compliance with Patra SK values and carry out 2 ways interview with employee/
evaluatee.
Performance
S 『○』 A 『○』 B 『○』 C 『○』 D 『○』
Evaluation
1st Patra SK Value
S 『○』 A 『○』 B 『○』 C 『○』 D 『○』
Evaluator Evaluation
Overall
S 『○』 A 『○』 B 『○』 C 『○』 D 『○』
Evaluation
Performance
S 『○』 A 『○』 B 『○』 C 『○』 D 『○』
Evaluation
2nd Patra SK Value
S 『○』 A 『○』 B 『○』 C 『○』 D 『○』
Evaluator Evaluation
Overall
S 『○』 A 『○』 B 『○』 C 『○』 D 『○』
Evaluation
Overall
Reviewer S 『○』 A 『○』 B 『○』 C 『○』 D 『○』
Evaluation
※ Corporate Guideline
S A B C D
Strength
1st
Evaluator
Weakness
Strength
2 Evalua-
nd
tor
Weakness
• Do you have an interview with evaluator for evaluation process and procedure?
Final
○ Yes ○ No
Conformation
of • Do you agree with evaluation result ?
Evaluatee
○ Yes ○ No ( 『 Describe the reason : 』)
- 8 Page -