Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Willingness To Communicate
Willingness To Communicate
communicate
Table of contents
Article 2
01 General concept 03 Willingness to communicate of
EFL learners in Turkish context
Article 1 Article 3
02 EFL students’ views of 04 Willingness to Communicate and
willingness to communicate in
the extramural digital (ED) Second Language Proficiency:
A Correlational Study
context
General concept
01
Definition
Role in Language teaching
L2 WTC was defined as “a readiness to enter into
discourse at a particular time with a specific person
or persons, using a L2” (p. 547)
Learners who have a higher WTC are more likely to use the target language in
social situations (MacIntyre et al., 2003).
Learners with low WTC may need additional support to feel comfortable using
the language (McCroskey & Richmond, 1991).
WTC can impact their language proficiency, motivation, and comfort level with
using the language.
EFL students’ views of willingness to
communicate in the extramural digital
(ED) context
Research questions
What factors may have positive or negative influences on EFL
learners’ L2 WTC when engaging with ED activities?
Findings
Socio-political variable
Contextual variables
Familiarity with interlocutors:
Korea’s K-12 instruction lowered
students’ amount of L2 Close interaction with a communication
communication not only in the partner can decrease L2 anxiety and facilitate
classroom but also in ED context more effective communication in English in
the ED context.
Individual variables
L2 self-confidence L2 anxiety
Participants
The present study was conducted in an EFL teacher education program at a major
state university in Turkey. A total of 134 EFL learners (male: N = 34 and female: N
= 100)
Procedures
The data for the present study were collected using questionnaires about the
participants' WTC, communication apprehension, communication competence, and
affective factors constraining communication.
RESULTS
- A weak relationship between self-perceived of language use and self-perceived WTC and
students’ proficiency.
Reasons:
WTC is related to speaking - productive skill, but proficiency was measured based on receptive skills in
the English proficiency test.
Reasons:
Not all proficient students can use English to communicate with confidence in
the EFL context, but once they are proficient enough, they can overcome
affective barriers more easily to communicate.
Implications
As proficiency is most strongly related to students’ confidence, teachers can:
+ create the language tasks that require interactive and meaningful communication for all
members should be given, rather than relying on the proficient ones. This can help highly
proficient students but lacking confidence in using the target language to communicate.
+ provide opportunities for all students to communicate more can boost their confidence
and willingness to use the language.
Implications
+ get students to have a sense of belonging in group work tasks by clarifying each
group member's role.