Wesfacca MBS Power Point in New TLDs Revised Sept 13 11

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 32

New Top Level Domains: Brand Protection Considerations

WESFACCA September 13, 2011

Martin Schwimmer, Esq.


Leason Ellis LLP Intellectual Property Attorneys http://www.leasonellis.com

4/14/2012

Slide 1

How Many gTLDs Now?


4/14/2012

.COM .NET .ORG .INFO .BIZ .EU .EDU .GOV .NAME

.MOBI .CAT .ASIA .PRO .TRAVEL .COOP .AERO .JOBS .MUSEUM

.INT .TEL .MIL .ARPA

Slide 2 2

Domain Name Statistics

.COM 97M registrations .NET 14M .ORG 9M .INFO 8M (2/3 of all registrations)

4/14/2012

Slide 3 3

How Do gTLDs Fare?

4/14/2012

.COM 55.2% of all domains regs .NET 6.5% .ORG 4.2% .INFO 1.9% .BIZ 0.4% .EU - 0.4% .EDU 0.3% .GOV 0.1%

Slide 4 4

How Many New TLD Applications?

Estimated up to 500 New Applications in this Batch

4/14/2012

Slide 5 5

When Can We Apply?



Slide 6 6

January 12, 2012 Through April 12, 2012

4/14/2012

How Much Will Filing Cost?


$185,000 Application Fee Cost of Producing the Application


Cost of Maintaining a Registry

4/14/2012

Slide 7 7

What TLDs Are People Filing For?


Rumor lists: Registries.Tel NewDomains.Org Valideus.com/Resources/gtlds-list/

4/14/2012

Slide 8 8

What TLDs Are People Filing For?

Cities Geographical Regions Cultural communities Keywords Brands

4/14/2012

Slide 9 9

Dot Examples (Reported)

CITIES: .BERLIN, .KOLN, .NYC


REGIONS: .AND (Andalucia), .SCO (Scotland)

COMMUNITIES: .FRA (Francophone), .IRISH

4/14/2012

Slide 10 10

More Dot Examples


.KEYWORDS :
.SPORT .SECURE .BANK .MONEY .RADIO
4/14/2012

Slide 11 11

Dot Brands

.CANON .HITACHI

4/14/2012

Slide 12 12

Why Is ICANN Doing This?

ICANN FAQ: One of ICANN's key commitments is to promote competition in the domain name market while ensuring Internet security and stability. New generic Top-Level Domains (gTLDs) help achieve that commitment.

4/14/2012

Slide 13 13

Will New TLDs Change The Way The DNS Works?

Probably Not.

4/14/2012

Slide 14 14

Is This The Only Opportunity To Apply?

Probably not, but this round could take years to process.

4/14/2012

Slide 15 15

Who Gets The Money?

ICANN: [We are] a nfp and this is a nfp initiative. The program is designed to be self-funding . . . If the fee collection exceeds ICANN's expenses, the community will be consulted as to how that excess should be used.

4/14/2012

Slide 16 16

Who Gets The Money?

The $185k is for application processing by ICANN 1/3 of that is reserved for litigation. No provision for monies from Auctions

4/14/2012

Slide 17 17

WHAT SHOULD THE BRAND OWNER WORRY ABOUT?


Among Other Things: 1. Cyber-squatting 2. String-contention 3. Competition

4/14/2012

Slide 18 18

Cyber-Squatting

4/14/2012

Old Concepts: UDRP and Sunrise Periods New Concepts: Trademark Clearinghouse, Trademark Claims, Service, Uniform Rapid Suspension [Required of All new Registries]

Slide 19 19

Cyber-Squatting: Trademark Clearinghouse

A Repository For Storing Trademark Registration Information Submitted By Trademark Owners It is not conclusive evidence of rights

4/14/2012

Slide 20 20

Cyber-Squatting: Trademark Claims Service

Clearing house registrants will receive notification of third-party land-rush registrations

4/14/2012

Slide 21 21

Cyber-squatting: Sunrise

Clearinghouse Registrants will receive notice of third-party Sunrise registrations

4/14/2012

Slide 22 22

Cyber-Squatting: Uniform Rapid Suspension

UDRP lite Suspension, not Transfer. 2 to 3 Weeks Then the name is up for grabs

4/14/2012

Slide 23 23

String Objection Process

String Confusion Legal Rights Objections Community Objections Limited Public Interest Objections UDRP-like pricing After a publication of the TLD appn

4/14/2012

Slide 24 24

String Objection: String Confusion

May be brought by another applicant or an existing registry .WEB vs .WEB

4/14/2012

Slide 25 25

String Objection: Legal Rights Objections To Strings

May be brought by a Trademark Holder Coca Cola vs .cocacola

4/14/2012

Slide 26 26

String Objection: Community Objections

4/14/2012

Slide 27 27

Objection from a significant portion of the community explicitly or implicitly targeted, brought by an institution associated with that community. You do not represent my people!

String Objection: Limited Public Interest Objection


The

string is contrary to generally accepted legal norms of morality and public order. The anti-dirty word provision.
4/14/2012

Slide 28 28

ICANN Applicant Guidebook


http://www.icann.org/en

/topics/new-gtlds/dagen.htm

4/14/2012

Slide 29 29

Should We Apply?
Fundamentally

a marketing decision So marketing should pay for it.

4/14/2012

Slide 30 30

SHOULD WE APPLY? BRAND CONSIDERATIONS

Defensive String Contention? Defensive Keyword TLDs? Protecting Your Authorized Sales Channel Creating a Trusted Zone
4/14/2012

Slide 31 31

Marty Schwimmer, Esq. LEASON ELLIS LLP

@trademarkblog @leasonellis
Intellectual Property Attorneys E-mail: schwimmer@leasonellis.com Web: www.leasonellis.com One Barker Avenue, Fifth Floor White Plains, NY 10601 Phone: (914) 821-9075 Fax: (914) 288-0023

4/14/2012

Slide 32

32

You might also like