Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Corporate Insolvency Part 2
Corporate Insolvency Part 2
crystallisation
EVA TAM 2023
ENFORCEMENT OF CHARGES – RECEIVERSHIP
As provided in the instrument creating the charge (self-help remedy)
triggered by event of default
Receiver gets in and sells the charged assets to settle the sum secured
Receiver has no power to carry on chargor company’s business unless
also a manager
Board still functions unless receiver is also manager
Chargor company needs not go into winding-up
Receiver owes duty to chargee only, not to the chargor company
6
EVA TAM 2023
RECEIVERS VS LIQUIDATORS
Receivers Liquidators
- Appointed by creditor under the relevant security - Appointed by court/members/creditors under
document CWUMPO
- Appointment does not terminate Board’s management - Appointment terminates Board’s management powers,
powers; trading may continue after appointment and trading power of the company
- Company may not need to go into liquidation after - Liquidator only appointed where company going to be
appointment liquidated/wound up
- Duty to secured creditor to protect the creditor’s interest - Duty to company to protect the interests of unsecured
creditors
- Security document normally provides that the receiver - Acts at agent of the company in exercising his powers
acts as agent of the debtor company to minimise potential subject to court’s control and/or directions of
liability of the creditor creditors/contributories in general meeting 7
Meaning (s.265E):
Gifts or company receiving no consideration
Consideration received by the company significantly less
than the value provided by the company
- An existing creditor/guarantor
- The creditor/guarantor is preferred at the
relevant time
- The debtor company is influenced by a
desire to prefer the creditor/guarantor
- The debtor company is insolvent at the
‘relevant time’
(s.266)
EVA TAM 2023 16
UNFAIR PREFERENCE (2)
‘Unfair Preference’:
Placing the creditor/guarantor in a position better than he would have been in
(in an insolvent liquidation) if the preference had not been made (s.266A(1)(b)
& (2))
Examples: Repayment of the debt over other like debts; Release of the
guarantee earlier than others; Giving security over a previously unsecured debt
Debtor company influenced by a desire to prefer (s.266(4))
Note presumption in the case of persons connected with company (otherwise
than by reason only of being an employee) (s.266(5))
17
18
EVA TAM 2023
UNFAIR PREFERENCE (4)
2)The company becomes unable to pay its debts as a result of the preference
EVA TAM 2023
COURT ORDERS
20
21
For chargees not connected with the company: (ss267 & 267A(2))
floating charge could be set aside if winding up commences within 12
months
“new” monies and interest are secured
“old” monies are unsecured if company was insolvent at the time of
the creation of the floating charge or as a consequence of the
transaction under which the floating charge is created
EVA TAM 2023 24
INVALIDATION OF FLOATING CHARGES (5)
Wages and salary owing to employees during the 4 months prior to the
commencement of the winding-up subject to monetary limit
Statutory debts are debts owed to the Government during the 12 months
prior to the commencement of the winding-up
Wages and salary have priority over statutory debts (s.265(3))
31