Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Potential Cost Saving through Proposed Model

of Secondary Waste Collection by LWMC


Secondary Waste Collection
A B C D E F
Existing Existing
Proposed Proposed Cost
Total tonnage contractual Contractual cost %Saving
Sr# Town model rate per Annually (PKR)
Annually rate per Ton Annually (PKR) (C-E)/C*100
Ton (PKR) (AxD)
(PKR) (AxB)
1 Ravi 267,298 625 167,061,250 249 66,557,202 +60
2 Allama Iqbal 281,504 1113 313,313,952 769 216,476,576 +31
3 Nishtar 261,853 848 222,051,344 477 124,903,881 +44
4 Samnabad 274,195 745 204,275,275 302 82,806,890 +59
5 DGBT 285,487 689 196,700,543 282 80,507,334 +59
6 Shalimar 251,420 438 110,121,960 123 30,924,660 +72
7 Gulberg 201,597 645 130,030,065 312 62,898,264 +52
8 Aziz Bhatti 171,352 466 79,850,032 156 26,730,912 +67
9 Wagha 198,287 384 76,142,208 127 25,182,449 +67
Total 1,499,546,629 716,988,168 +52
Annual Saving PKR (ΣC-ΣE) 782,558,461
basis
• Sed the same amount of waste tonnage as agreed in the contract of secondary waste
collection
• Resources same as minimum agreed resources in the running contract of
• Distances for the proposed model tcp same. Additional distance is from parking yard
to tcp & tcp to landfill.
• Fuel rate of existing model PKR95, now fuel rate proposed model designed at PKR
227. This I,pact on saving can also be considered but not part of our calculation
• Fuel consumption as per approved SOP.
• Machinery which is not part of LwMC, it will be rental
• Proposed model HR cost is zero, existing staff engaged
• R&M cost is 10& of POL

You might also like