The document proposes a new model for secondary waste collection that could save costs for LWMC. According to the analysis, the existing model costs PKR 1,499,546,629 annually to collect waste from 9 towns, while the proposed model would cost PKR 716,988,168, saving PKR 782,558,461 or 52% annually. The proposed model standardizes collection rates per ton of waste across towns and reduces rates compared to existing contracts, lowering overall costs. It assumes the same waste tonnage, resources, and distances as current operations but with fuel costs adjusted to a new rate. Maintenance costs are set at 10% of fuel costs and no additional staff are needed under the new model
The document proposes a new model for secondary waste collection that could save costs for LWMC. According to the analysis, the existing model costs PKR 1,499,546,629 annually to collect waste from 9 towns, while the proposed model would cost PKR 716,988,168, saving PKR 782,558,461 or 52% annually. The proposed model standardizes collection rates per ton of waste across towns and reduces rates compared to existing contracts, lowering overall costs. It assumes the same waste tonnage, resources, and distances as current operations but with fuel costs adjusted to a new rate. Maintenance costs are set at 10% of fuel costs and no additional staff are needed under the new model
The document proposes a new model for secondary waste collection that could save costs for LWMC. According to the analysis, the existing model costs PKR 1,499,546,629 annually to collect waste from 9 towns, while the proposed model would cost PKR 716,988,168, saving PKR 782,558,461 or 52% annually. The proposed model standardizes collection rates per ton of waste across towns and reduces rates compared to existing contracts, lowering overall costs. It assumes the same waste tonnage, resources, and distances as current operations but with fuel costs adjusted to a new rate. Maintenance costs are set at 10% of fuel costs and no additional staff are needed under the new model
Secondary Waste Collection A B C D E F Existing Existing Proposed Proposed Cost Total tonnage contractual Contractual cost %Saving Sr# Town model rate per Annually (PKR) Annually rate per Ton Annually (PKR) (C-E)/C*100 Ton (PKR) (AxD) (PKR) (AxB) 1 Ravi 267,298 625 167,061,250 249 66,557,202 +60 2 Allama Iqbal 281,504 1113 313,313,952 769 216,476,576 +31 3 Nishtar 261,853 848 222,051,344 477 124,903,881 +44 4 Samnabad 274,195 745 204,275,275 302 82,806,890 +59 5 DGBT 285,487 689 196,700,543 282 80,507,334 +59 6 Shalimar 251,420 438 110,121,960 123 30,924,660 +72 7 Gulberg 201,597 645 130,030,065 312 62,898,264 +52 8 Aziz Bhatti 171,352 466 79,850,032 156 26,730,912 +67 9 Wagha 198,287 384 76,142,208 127 25,182,449 +67 Total 1,499,546,629 716,988,168 +52 Annual Saving PKR (ΣC-ΣE) 782,558,461 basis • Sed the same amount of waste tonnage as agreed in the contract of secondary waste collection • Resources same as minimum agreed resources in the running contract of • Distances for the proposed model tcp same. Additional distance is from parking yard to tcp & tcp to landfill. • Fuel rate of existing model PKR95, now fuel rate proposed model designed at PKR 227. This I,pact on saving can also be considered but not part of our calculation • Fuel consumption as per approved SOP. • Machinery which is not part of LwMC, it will be rental • Proposed model HR cost is zero, existing staff engaged • R&M cost is 10& of POL