Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No Name - Heart Rate Predictor Heart Failure Journal Reading Kardio Ugm
No Name - Heart Rate Predictor Heart Failure Journal Reading Kardio Ugm
No Name - Heart Rate Predictor Heart Failure Journal Reading Kardio Ugm
BACKGROUND
• An elevated HR at admission for AHF whatever the EF has been associated with higher risk of
death and worsening HF at 7 days.
• The influence of HR at admission on prognosis disappeared after a few weeks in HFrEF patients in
sinus rhythm (SR) hospitalised for AHF.
• HR was not found to be a predictor of one year mortality in AHF in the INHF registry whatever the
EF
• The relationship between heart rate (HR) on admission with medium- and long-term prognosis as
well as the impact of ejection fraction (EF) of patients with acute heart failure (AHF) is unknown.
06/06/2023
• Exclusion Criteria :
• Patient with :
• - Cardiogenic shock
• - Resuscitation before admission
• - AHF secondary to high output AHF (mainly due to thyroid storms or
anaemia), AHF from surgical or non-cardiac etiology.
• - Pulmonary embolism
• - Severe valve disease
• - Arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, ventricular tachycardia,
junctional rhythm, supraventricular tachycardia)
• - Atrioventricular block ≥ degree 2
06/06/2023
• Inclusion Criteria :
• Patient with :
STATISTICAL METHODS
STATISTICAL METHODS
06/06/2023
STATISTICAL METHODS
• The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 23.0.0.0 :
- Baseline patient characteristics of all patients and three groups according to EF were
described using absolute & relative frequencies for categorical variables & median
supplemented by 5th–95th percentile.
• - All parameters were included in the full multivariate models & a multivariate logistic
regression model using a backward stepwise algorithm.
• - Predictors of 6 and 12-month mortality (outside of HR) were then adopted for
computation of mortality residuals stratified by ejection fraction categories.
• - The final multivariate model for the analysis of independent predictive factors for 6 and
12-month mortality in the three groups of patients (HFrEF, HFmrEF, HFpEF) was developed
using a forward stepwise algorithm for selection of independent predictors with heart rate
and pre-selected independent predictors forced into the model
06/06/2023
RESULTS
• 1. Baseline characteristics
• - HFpEF patients were more often women and older, they had more
often hypertension in their medical history and a higher systolic blood
pressure at admission but their HR at admission was significantly lower
than HFrEF patients (80 bpm vs. 91 bpm, p < 0.01).
RESULTS
06/06/2023
RESULTS
• 2. Patient mortality
• Optimal prognostic
cutoffs of HR were
identified for both 6
and 12 months.
•;
• 1. For HFrEF at 100
bpm,
• 2. For HFmEF at 90
bpm
• 3. For HFpEF at 80 bpm
06/06/2023
RESULTS
• 3. HR as a predictor of all-cause 6 and 12-month mortality
• Increased age, decreased diastolic BP, lack of PCI during hospitalization, increased
creatinine level and increased HR (with different cut-offs according to EF
categories) were found as predictors whatever the EF.
06/06/2023
CRITICAL APPRAISAL
•Journal Characteristics :
Journal Characteristics
•Foreground question
•Does heart rate an independent predictor of long-term mortality in acute
heart failure patients in sinus rhythm according to their ejection fraction. ?
P= acute heart failure patients in sinus rhythm with reduced EF, Preserved EF, and mid-
range EF.
I = Elevated HR at admission
C = No Elevated HR at admission
O = Long-term Prognosis
06/06/2023
Journal Characteristics
validity assessment
• Section A: Was the study sample used, using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a
representative sample? YES
06/06/2023
Journal Characteristics
validity assessment
• Section B: Was the sample observation carried out at the same disease stage? YES
• Section C: Was the sample observation period sufficient and complete ? NO, sample
observation period is sufficient But Incomplete
06/06/2023
Journal Characteristics
validity assessment
• Section D: Was the outcome to be studied carried out using objective criteria and carried out in a
"blind" manner? YES
• Section E: Were subsamples with different prognoses equalized for important prognostic factors
and validated? YES
06/06/2023
Journal Characteristics
Importance assessment
• Section A: How likely is it that an outcome will occur in a given timeframe? Survival rates at 6
and 12 months were 84.8% and 78% respectively
Journal Characteristics
Applicability assessment
• Section A: Were the characteristics of the sample in the study similar to patients in our practice?
• NO, because the physical characteristics of race, lifestyle, level of economic industrialization,
and Indonesian climate can be different from the Czech country, so the predictor factors can also
be different from the journal.
Section B: Do the results of the study influence our decisions about what to do or to tell our
patients?
No, 1. Because the resources, facilities and infrastructure of the ICU and even the ICCU to treat heart
failure patients (HFeRF, HFmRF, HFpRF) are not evenly distributed in all health facilities or hospitals. 2.
Most Indonesians have comorbidities (comorbidities), where if the management of comorbidities is not
good (patients and or the patient's family tends to hope for instant recovery so that "doctor shopping"
occurs, which will worsen the prognosis of his heart failure
TERIMA KASIH
SALAM SEHAT SELALU