Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 3 (Handout)
Lecture 3 (Handout)
Lecture 3 (Handout)
Organising,
Correlational Generalising
summarising &
describing data
Relationships
Significance
Measured Variables
Measurement:
(Stevens 1946)
• Environmental
– Any characteristics relating to the organism’s
environment.
Levels of Measurement
1. Nominal Scale Lowest Level
2. Ordinal Scale
3. Interval Scale
Kelvin???
Ratio Scale
• Highest level of measurement
• An interval scale with an absolute zero point
• Subsumes all lower levels of measurement
GB =
USA = 38.07 s
38.08 s Ordinal = Gold
Silver Interval = 38.07 s
+.01 s Ratio = 100%
+.03%
Nigeria =
38.23 s
Bronze
+.16 s
+.42%
Quick Test
• Nominal, Ordinal, Interval or Ratio?
RPE = 6-20?
Heart Rate.
Discrete and Continuous Variables
• Continuous Variables:
– Can theoretically take any value between two points
on a continuum
– Are dependent on the accuracy of measuring tools
e.g.
Time = yr wk d h min s ms s ns ps…
IQ?
Indicators of Central Tendency
• Mode
– Most Frequently Occurring Score
• Median
– Middle Score
• Mean
– Arithmetic Average, etc.
Indicators of Central Tendency
Mode = 15 k.y-1
Annual
Salary: 10k 11k 11k 15k 15k 15k 19k 20k 21k 21k 22k 22k 24k 25k
Advantages
•Quick and easy to compute
•Unaffected by extreme scores
•Can be used at any level of measurement.
Indicators of Central Tendency
Mode = 15 k.y-1
Annual
Salary: 10k 11k 11k 15k 15k 15k 19k 20k 21k 21k 22k 22k 24k 25k
Disadvantages
•Terminal Statistic
• A given sub-group could make
this measure unrepresentative.
Indicators of Central Tendency
Median
Annual
Salary: 10k 11k 11k 15k 15k 15k 19k 20k 21k 21k 22k 22k 24k 25k
50th Percentile = n + 1
2
Indicators of Central Tendency
Median = 19.5 k.y-1
Annual
Salary: 10k 11k 11k 15k 15k 15k 19k 20k 21k 21k 22k 22k 24k 25k
Annual
Salary: 10k 11k 11k 15k 15k 15k 19k 20k 21k 21k 22k 22k 24k 25k
Advantages
•Unaffected by extreme scores
•Can be used at all levels above nominal.
Indicators of Central Tendency
Median = 19.5 k.y-1
Annual
Salary: 10k 11k 11k 15k 15k 15k 19k 20k 21k 21k 22k 22k 24k 25k
Disadvantages
•Only considers order- value ignored.
Indicators of Central Tendency
Mean
Douglas Bag drove 100 miles from Bath to
London at 100 miles∙h-1 but was caught in
traffic on his return journey, so was limited
to 50 miles∙h-1.
Annual
Salary: 10k 11k 11k 15k 15k 15k 19k 20k 21k 21k 22k 22k 24k 25k
∑X
X= n
Indicators of Central Tendency
Mean = 17.9 k.y-1
Annual
Salary: 10k 11k 11k 15k 15k 15k 19k 20k 21k 21k 22k 22k 24k 25k
251
(10+11+11+15+15+15+19+20+21+21+22+22+24+25)
X= 14
Indicators of Central Tendency
Mean = 17.9 k.y-1
Annual
Salary: 10k 11k 11k 15k 15k 15k 19k 20k 21k 21k 22k 22k 24k 25k
Advantages
•Very sensitive measure
•Takes into account all the available information
•Can be combined with means of other groups to give the overall mean.
Indicators of Central Tendency
Mean = 17.9 k.y-1
Annual
Salary: 10k 11k 11k 15k 15k 15k 19k 20k 21k 21k 22k 22k 24k 25k
Disadvantages
•Very sensitive measure
•Can only be used on interval or ratio data
•Can only be used when scores are symmetrical above and below X.
Distribution
• Often displayed graphically, where:
120
Number of People
100
80
60
40
20
120
Number of People
100
80
60
40
20
100
…but first described
80
mathematically by
Abraham De Moivre Carl Friedrich Gauss
in 1733…
60 Applied ND in 1809 to
…published 1924! establish the diameter
40 of lunar features
20
Mode
120
Number of People
100
Median
80
Mean
60
40
20
120 Point of
Number of People
100
Inflection
80
60
68.26%
40
20
40
20 2.15% 2.15%
13.59% 13.59%
0
20
2000
100 Z = +0.5
Platykurtic
80
60 68.26%
40
20
100
Mean
80
60
40
20
Median
100
Mean
80
60
40
20
180
160
Number of Press-Ups
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
1 2
Week
140 Mean SD
Week 1 Overall
120 Week 2
100
Number of Press-Ups
80
34.13% SD represents the
spread of our data
60
around the mean
Note:
34.13%
40 Requires ND
20
0
160
Standard Error of the Mean (SEM)
140
But does the mean we
120 calculated reflect the
Number of People
target population???
100
80
60 68.26%
40
20
(unknown)
100
80
SD of
60 68.26% Target Pop.
(unknown)
40
20
SD of Target Pop.
SEM =
n
Standard Error of the Mean (SEM)
SD of our sample.
SEM =
n
So the smaller our SD & the bigger our n,
the smaller our SEM will be…
140 Mean SEM
Week 1
120 Week 2
100
Number of Press-Ups
Overall
80
We can be
68% certain SEM represents
that the mean how accurate our
60 of the target mean is
pop. lies
40 within this
distance of our i.e. a measure of
mean sampling error
20
0
Median & Range or IQR
• The mean SD or SEM cannot be used for
non-normally distributed data
• Instead the median is often plotted along with
either the range or the IQR
Raw Data: 8, 10, 15, 20, 55, 75, 120, 179
e.g.
Median (Range) = 37.5 (8-179)
effect of extreme scores?
Median & Range or IQR
• The mean SD or SEM cannot be used for
non-normally distributed data
• Instead the median is often plotted along with
either the range or the IQR
e.g.
Median (IQR) = 37.5 (13.75-108.75)
Refer to the web page for notes on calculation of median and IQR.
200
180
160
Number of Press-Ups
140
120 SD
100
SEM Between
80 subject
Range variance
60
40 IQR
20
1 2
Week
200
180
160
Number of Press-Ups
140
120
100 Within
80 subject
60 variance
40
20
1 2
Week
Normalised Confidence Intervals
MSE
nCI = [criterion t (df)]
N
Put the data from each trial
into SPSS…
Week 2
Week 1
Select ‘Analyse’, ‘GLM’,
‘Repeated Measures’…
Move
variables …to here, click ok
from
here…
ANOVA Output
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: MEASURE_1
Type III Sum
Source of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
WEEK Sphericity Assumed 60.062 1 60.062 49.830 .000
Greenhouse-Geisser 60.062 1.000 60.062 49.830 .000
Huynh-Feldt 60.062 1.000 60.062 49.830 .000
Lower-bound 60.062 1.000 60.062 49.830 .000
Error(WEEK) Sphericity Assumed 8.438 7 1.205
Greenhouse-Geisser 8.438 7.000 1.205
Huynh-Feldt 8.438 7.000 1.205
Lower-bound 8.438 7.000 1.205
MSE
nCI = [criterion t (df)]
n
ANOVA Output
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: MEASURE_1
Type III Sum
Source of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
WEEK Sphericity Assumed 60.062 1 60.062 49.830 .000
Greenhouse-Geisser 60.062 1.000 60.062 49.830 .000
Huynh-Feldt 60.062 1.000 60.062 49.830 .000
Lower-bound 60.062 1.000 60.062 49.830 .000
Error(WEEK) Sphericity Assumed 8.438 7 1.205
Greenhouse-Geisser 8.438 7.000 1.205
Huynh-Feldt 8.438 7.000 1.205
Lower-bound 8.438 7.000 1.205
MSE
1.205
nCI = [criterion t (df)]
7
n8
t – Distribution Table (Google Search)
Degrees of Freedom Critical t-ratio
1 12.71
2 4.30
3 3.18
4 2.78
5 2.57
df= n-1 6 2.45
7 2.37
8 2.31
MSE
1.205
nCI = X 2.37 = 0.92
N8
140
Mean nCI
Week 1
120 Week 2
100
Number of Press-Ups
80
60
40
20
0
70 Mean nCI
Week 1
Week 2 Overall
65
nCI represent the difference
Number of Press-Ups
between means
60
55
50
Selected Reading
• Hopkins W. G. (2000) A New View of Statistics [Online]
Auckland: Internet Society for Sport Science. Available at:
www.newstats.org [accessed October 24th 2006]
Exceptions:
-Mean can be +1 d.p. if >100 raw scores averaged
-SD can be +1 d.p. for every additional whole unit in the mean
-Median/Range necessarily +1 d.p. if averaging the middle 2 raw
scores
-P-values should be reported as the first 1 or 2 non-zero values
The Shooting Room