Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AFS Group4 Tyre Market Final
AFS Group4 Tyre Market Final
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
AGENDA
1. 2.
3.
4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
Indian Automobile Industry Indian Tyre Industry Global Trends Balance sheet: Comparison Income statement: Comparison Ratio Analysis SWOT Analysis Bibliography
about 4 per cent in India's (GDP) Generates direct and indirect employment Well developed & globally competitive support
2005-06
2006-07 2007-08
27,011
34,285 36,612
2008-09
38,238
971 Lakhs
36
GLOBAL TRENDS
Focus
Consumers
are increasingly sophisticated and educated Competition between international & domestic car manufacturers Companies preferring contract employees
Production of passenger and commercial vehicles has reached to more than 80 million units in 2010 There has been an addition of 25 million vehicle production since 1997 A majority of this growth is coming from the AsiaPacific region The production in Western Europe, NAFTA and Japan stand still
Vehicle Type
Two wheelers
Passenger vehicles Three wheelers CV TOTAL
Incorporated in 1958; Flagship company of RPG Enterprises Market Share: 11% Net Sales: Rs. 2816.50 Cr Net Profit: 161.04 cr Book value per share: 183.6 Market value per share: 97.1
Registered as a company in 1976 Market Share: Around 22% Net Sales: Rs. 5044.99 Cr Net Profit: 412 cr Book value per share: 34.26 Market value per share: 56.4
SHAREHOLDING PATTERN
Ceat
Corporate Bodies & Public 17%
Apollo
Promoters 40%
FIIs 4%
FIIs 29%
Liabilities
Ceat: Liabilities
Apollo Tyres: Liabilities
Net worth 50% 30% 20% Current Liabilities Total Debt 36% 25% 39%
Assets
Ceat: Assets Apollo Tyres: Assets
Net Block 19% 6% 2% 73% Capital WIP 62% Investment s Current Assets 23% 7% 8%
1% 1%
Net Sales
98%
Stock adjustment
Apollo Tyres
Raw materials
Employee cost
Selling and Admin expenses Miscellaneo us expenses
80%
80%
RATIO ANALYSIS
LIQUIDITY RATIOS
1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 Ceat CR Apollo CR Ceat Quick Ratio Apollo Quick Ratio
0.2
0 08-Mar 09-Mar 10-Mar
1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 08-Mar 09-Mar 10-Mar
EFFICIENCY RATIO
Sales
6000 5046
3000
1000
843.27
500
1000
Ceat Sales
Apollo sales
2.5
0.5
0 08-Mar 09-Mar 10-Mar 14 12 10 8 Ceat Inventory T/O Ratio Apollo Inventory T/O Ratio
08-Mar
10-Mar
50
45
40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 08-Mar 09-Mar 10-Mar
8
6 4 2 0 08-Mar 09-Mar 10-Mar Apollo, 5.3
EPS
Ceat Apollo
43.4 4.49
-4.71 2.15
47.1 8.23
Equity Dividend
Ceat Apollo
40 50
0 45
40 75
Book Value
Ceat Apollo
145.96 25.1
141.25 26.84
183.6 34.9
PROFITABILITY RATIO
PROFITABILITY RATIO
Operating Profit Margin Net Profit Margin
18 16 14 12
9 8 7 6 Ceat Operating Profit margin % Apollo Operating Profit Margin% 5 4 3 Ceat Net Profit Margin % Apollo Net Profit Margin %
10
8 6 4 2 0
2
1 0 08-Mar -1 09-Mar 10-Mar
08-Mar
09-Mar
10-Mar
Year
Return on Assets
Apollo 25
Ceat 25.61
Apollo 24.1
Ceat 183.6
Apollo 34.26
March 09
4.29
13.2
-3.33
7.99
141.25
26.89
March 08
22.2
24.6
29.73
17.89
145.96
25.15
SWOT ANALYSIS
Good brand image Seeking to working close to customers through CEAT Shoppe, and CEAT Hubs
Improve operating efficiency Could seek better supplier deals Growth in overseas markets
Imports from neighbouring countries at competitive prices Raw material price volatility
Dominant player in the industry segment of truck and bus tyres Economies of transportation cost, because of closeness to natural rubber growing belt Global sourcing of raw materials
Tap the commercial vehicle segment Growth in overseas markets Imports from neighbouring countries at competitive prices Raw material price volatility
BIBLIOGRAPHY
http://www.atmaindia.org http://www.cci.gov.in http://www.moneycontrol.com http://www.apollotyres.com http://www.ceattyres.in