Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit 1 Statistics
Unit 1 Statistics
Total 100
The term scientific method denotes the principles that guide scientific
research and experimentation, and the philosophical bases of those
principles.
The scientific method of inquiry is characterized by the following
convictions:
that the process must be objective to reduce bias in methods and
interpretation of results.
that the process should be systematic in that it ought to involve certain
standard procedures.
enquiry should be conducted through a process of systematic
observation that can be verified by experience (empiricism).
There should be careful recording, documenting, archival and sharing
of all data and methodology (full disclosure) to make it available for
scrutiny by other researchers, thereby allowing them to verify results
by attempting to reproduce them.
Characteristics of the Scientific Method
It involves gathering new data or using existing data for a new purpose. It is not merely
reproducing information such as would be produced by a student when asked to ‘research’ on a
topic and write a paper.
It is directed towards the solution of a problem. The ‘problem’ is the focus of the whole research
process in that the entire design aims at how the problem can be solved or how the research
question(s) can be answered.
It relies on empirical evidence, i.e. on events or data that can be verified by observation.
This distinguishes formal research from informal research whose findings and conclusions are
based on popular belief, dogma, hearsay, hunches, guess work and other subjective methods that
people resort to when seeking answers to questions.
It is systematic in procedures of planning, collection of data, analysis and reporting.
It follows clearly stipulated procedures. All these must be carefully recorded and described.
Research ethics require that terms are defined, limiting factors stated, procedures described,
references given and results reported faithfully. The report should also be availed for scrutiny by
other interested researchers.
It aims at generalizing findings to larger groups by discovering general principles that will be
helpful in predicting future occurrences.
This calls for careful sampling procedures to ensure that the sample is representative of the larger
group.
It requires careful and accurate observation and description.
It is logical and objective; every possible step is taken to ensure validity of procedure, tools and
conclusions. The researcher strives to eliminate personal feelings and bias.
These could be intended or unintended. The emphasis is on testing rather than proving the
hypothesis.
• Kothari and Garg (2014) defines research‘ refers to the systematic
method consisting of enunciating the problem, formulating a
hypothesis, collecting the facts or data, analyzing the facts and
reaching certain conclusions either in the form of solution (s) towards
the concerned problem or in certain generalizations for some
theoretical formulation.
Objectives of research
To gain familiarity with a phenomenon or to achieve new insights into it
(studies with this object in view are termed as exploratory or formulative
research studies).
To portray accurately the characteristics of a particular individual, situation
or a group (studies with this object in view are known as descriptive
research studies).
To determine the frequency with which something occurs or with which it is
associated with something else (studies with this object in view are known
as diagnostic research studies).
To test a hypothesis of a causal relationship between variables (such studies
are known as hypothesis-testing research studies).
Type of Research
• Descriptive research describes the state of affairs as it exists at present.
It includes surveys and fact-finding enquiries of different kinds. The
researcher only reports what has happened or what is happening but he
has no control over the variables. On the other hand in analytical
research, the researcher has to use facts or information which are
already available, and analyze these to make a critical evaluation of
the material.
• Applied research is conducted in response to a specific problem,
which requires a solution. The major purpose of applied research is to
answer practical and useful question about policies, programs,
projects, procedures, or organizations (Pant, 2009. p.6). The basic
purpose of applied research is to find a solution for an immediate
problem facing by existing structure. It is concerned with knowledge
that has immediate applications.
• Fundamental research is mainly concerned with generalizations and with the
formulation of a theory. It is undertaken for the sole purpose of adding to our
knowledge that is fundamental and generalizable. It is called pure or basic
research.
• The research works of professors, scholars, and other researchers devoted to
generate new knowledge in particular areas of their interest can be called
fundamental research (Pant, 2009, p.7).
• It is not applied to find the solution of immediate problem but to generate more
knowledge and understanding of the phenomena and problems that occur in
several areas and to build theories based on the research results.
• Such theories become the foundation for further study of the phenomena. This
process of building on existing knowledge is the genesis for theory building
(Sekaran, 2000). It is thus typical kind of research that can contribute to formation
of new theory
• Quantitative research is based on the quantitative measurements of
some characteristics. It is applicable to phenomena that can be
expressed in terms of quantities.
• Qualitative research is concerned with qualitative phenomenon. For
instance, when we are interested in investigating the reasons for
human behavior (why people think or do certain things), we can use
qualitative research. This type of research aims at discovering the
underlying motives and desires using in depth interviews for the
purpose. It is important in the behavioral sciences to discover the
underlying motives or behaviors of people.
• Conceptual research is related to some abstract idea(s) or theory. It is
used by philosophers and thinkers to develop new concepts or to
reinterpret existing ones.
• Empirical is data-based research, coming up with conclusions which
are capable of being verified by observation or experiment. It is called
as experimental type of research. Such researches aim at discovering
of facts based on the empirically gathered primary data (Saravanavel,
2005, p. 14). In empirical research, the evidences are gathered through
experiments or empirical studies which are considered to be the most
powerful support possible for testing a given hypothesis
WHAT YOU CAN DO WITH RESEARCH?
• The word statistics has been derived from Latin word ‘status’ or Italian ‘Statista’
meaning statesman. Professor Gott Fried Achenwall used it in the 18th century.
During early period, these words were used for political state of the region.
• The word ‘Statista’ was used to keep the records of census or data related to wealth
of a state. Gradually, its meaning and usage extended and there onwards its nature
also changed.
• The word statistics is used to convey different meanings in singular and plural sense.
Therefore it can be defined in two different ways.
• The term “statistics” is used in two senses: first in plural sense meaning a collection
of numerical facts or estimates—the figure themselves. It is in this sense that the
public usually think of statistics, e.g., figures relating to population, profits of
different units in an industry etc.
• Secondly, as a singular noun, the term ‘statistics’ denotes the various methods
adopted for the collection, analysis and interpretation of the facts numerically
represented. In singular sense, the term ‘statistics’ is better described as
statistical methods. In our study of the subject, we shall be more concerned with the
second meaning of the word ‘statistics’.
• Statistics has been defined differently by different authors and each author has
assigned new limits to the field which should be included in its scope. We can do
no better than give selected definitions of statistics by some authors and then come
to the conclusion about the scope of the subject.
Definition
A.L. Bowley defines, “Statistics may be called the science of counting”. At another
place he defines, “Statistics may be called the science of averages”. Both these
definitions are narrow and throw light only on one aspect of Statistics.
According to King, “The science of statistics is the method of judging collective,
natural or social, phenomenon from the results obtained from the analysis or
enumeration or collection of estimates”.
Many a time counting is not possible and estimates are required to be made. Therefore,
Boddington defines it as “the science of estimates and probabilities”. But this definition
also does not cover the entire scope of statistics. The statistical methods are methods for
the collection, analysis and interpretation of numerical data and form a basis for the
analysis and comparison of the observed phenomena.
In the words of Croxton &Cowden, “Statistics may be defined as the
collection, presentation, analysis and interpretation of numerical data”.
Horace Secrist has given an exhaustive definition of the term satistics in
the plural sense. According to him:“By statistics we mean aggregates
of facts affected to a marked extent by a multiplicity of causes
numerically expressed, enumerated or estimated according to
reasonable standards of accuracy collected in a systematic manner
for a pre-determined purpose and placed in relation to each other”.
This definition makes it quite clear that as numerical statement of facts, ‘statistic’ should
possess the following characteristics.
1. Statistics are aggregate of facts A single age of 20 or 30 years is not statistics, a series of
ages are. Similarly, a single figure relating to production, sales, birth, death etc., would not be
statistics although aggregates of such figures would bestatistics because of their
comparability and relationship.
Descriptive
Based on
the Inferential
Functions
Correlational
DESCRIPTIVE Vs INFERENTIAL STATISTICS
• When analysing data, such as the marks achieved by 100 students for a piece of
coursework, it is possible to use both descriptive and inferential statistics in your
analysis of their marks. Typically, in most research conducted on groups of
people, you will use both descriptive and inferential statistics to analyse your
results and draw conclusions. So what are descriptive and inferential statistics?
And what are their differences?
Descriptive Statistics
The branch which deals with descriptions of obtained data is known
as descriptive statistics. On the basis of these descriptions a particular
group of population is defined for corresponding characteristics. The
descriptive statistics include classification, tabulation measures of
central tendency and variability. These measures enable the
researchers to know about the tendency of data or the scores, which
further enhance the ease in description of the phenomena
Inferential statistics: Inferential statistics deals with the drawing of
conclusions about large group of individuals (population) on the basis of
observations of few participants from them or about the events which
are yet to occur on the basis of past events. It provide tools to compute
the probabilities of future behaviour of the subjects.
Correlational statistics: The obtained data are disclosed for their inter
Introduction to Statistics correlations in this type of statistics. It includes
various types of techniques to compute the correlations among data.
Correlational statistics also provide description about sample or
population for their further analyses to explore the significance of their
differences.
Parametric
On the basis
of
Distribution
Data Nonparametric
statistics
Parametric statistics
. Statistical results might lead to fallacious conclusions by deliberate manipulation of figures and unscientific
handling. This is so because statistical results are represented by figures, which are liable to be manipulated. Also the
data placed in the hands of an expert may lead to fallacious results. The figures may be stated without their context or
may be applied to a fact other than the one to which they really relate. An interesting example is a survey made some
years ago which reported that 33% of all the girl students at John Hopkins University had married University teachers.
Whereas the University had only three girls student at that time and one of them married to a teacher.
Distrust of Statistics Due to limitations of statistics an attitude of distrust towards it has been developed.
There are some people who place statistics in the category of lying and maintain that, “there are three degrees
of comparison in lying-lies, dammed lies and statistics”. But this attitude is not correct. The person who is
handling statistics may be a liar or inexperienced. But that would be the fault not of statistics but of the
person handling them. The person using statistics should not take them at their face value. He should check
the result from an independent source. Also only experts should handle the statistics otherwise they may be
misused. It may be noted that the distrust of statistics is due more to insufficiency of knowledge regarding the
nature, limitations and uses of statistics then to any fundamental inadequacy in the science of statistics.
Medicines are meant for curing people, but if they are unscientifically handle by quacks, they may prove fatal
to the patient. In both the cases, the medicine is the same; but its usefulness or harmfulness depends upon the
man who handles it. We cannot blame medicine for such a result. Similarly, if a child cuts his finger with a
sharp knife, it is not a knife that is to be blamed, but the person who kept the knife at a place that the child
could reach it. These examples help us in emphasising that if statistical facts are misused by some people it
would be wrong to blame the statistics as such. It is the people who are to be blamed. In fact statistics are like
clay which can be moulded in any way.
Level of Measurement
Nominal Scale
• Nominal measurement is the lowest level of measurement in nominal measurement
numbers are used to name identify or classified persons,object groups etcIn this
level of measurement, words, letters, and alpha-numeric symbols can be used.
Suppose there are data about people belonging to three different gender
categories. In this case, the person belonging to the female gender could be
classified as F, the person belonging to the male gender could be classified as M,
and transgendered classified as T. This type of assigning classification is nominal
level of measurement
In nominal measurement member of any two groups are never equivalent.
• Following statistics can be used in this level of measurement counting frequency
percentage proportion mode and coefficient of country contingency .
• The limitation of nominal measurement is that it is most elementary and simple
Ordinal Scale
• Ordinal is the second level of measurement in which there is a property of magnitude but not of
equal interval or absolute zero.
• An ordinal measurement number denotes rank order of the object or individuals or number
arranged from highest to lowest or from lowest to highest in ordinal measurement individual may
be grouped according to physical or psychological traits to convey a relationship like greater than
or lesser than.
• Suppose a student scores the highest grade of 100 in the class. In this case, he would be assigned
the first rank. Then, another classmate scores the second highest grade of an 92; she would be
assigned the second rank. A third student scores a 81 and he would be assigned the third rank,
and so on. The ordinal level of measurement indicates an ordering of the measurements.
• The permissible statistical operational in ordinal measurement are median, percentile rank,
correlation coefficient plus all those which are permissible for the nominal measurement
Interval Scale
• This is the 3rd level of measurement and includes all characteristics of phenomenal and
ordinal scale of measurement.
• The main feature of interval measurement is that numerical the equal distance on the
scale indicates equal distance in the property of objects being measured.
• In other words here the unit of measurement is constant and equal.
For example, an interval level of measurement could be the measurement of anxiety
in a student between the score of 10 and 11, this interval is the same as that of a
student who scores between 40 and 41. A popular example of this level of
measurement is temperature in centigrade, where, for example, the distance between
940C and 960C is the same as the distance between 1000C and 1020C.
• The common statistics used in such measurement mean standard deviation Pearson r.
Ratio Scale
• It is the highest level of measurement and his all properties of nominal ordinal and interval
scale plus an absolute 0.
• The fourth level of measurement is the ratio level of measurement. In this level of
measurement, the observations, in addition to having equal intervals, can have a value of
zero as well. The zero in the scale makes this type of measurement unlike the other types of
measurement, although the properties are similar to that of the interval level of measurement.
In the ratio level of measurement, the divisions between the points on the scale have an
equivalent distance between them.
• The main feature of ratio scale is that ratio of any two numbers is independent of the unit of
measurement and therefore it can meaningfully be equated for example the ratio 16:28 is
equal to 4:7
• In ratio scale there is a true zero not arbitrary.