ERC Sira ERC Sira: How To Do It: How To Do It: How To Do It: How To Do It

You might also like

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

ARMS in a Nutshell Safety event/data Quick Reference Guide

START HERE
ERC SIRA Used for:
• Safety Issues
Event Risk Classification First step for all incoming data Safety Issue Risk Assessment • Safety Assessments, when quantifiable
(Management of Change process)
HOW TO DO IT: HOW TO DO IT:
Define the Safety Issue precisely:
Question 2 • Scope the issue in terms of hazards, locations, a/c types, etc. See section 4.8 for detail.
What was the effectiveness of the remaining Question 1
barriers between this event and the most If this event had escalated into an Investigations
credible accident scenario? accident outcome, what would have Develop the related potential accident scenarios:
Effective Limited Minimal Not effective been the most credible outcome? Typical accident scenarios
Loss of control, mid air collision,
• There may be several accident scenarios within one Safety Issue (see glossary)
50 102 502 2500
Catastrophic
Accident
Loss of aircraft or multiple
fatalities (3 or more)
uncontrollable fire on board, explosions,
total structural failure of the aircraft,
• Select the most critical scenarios (one or more) for the risk assessment
collision with terrain
1 or 2 fatalities, multiple
10 21 101 500 Major Accident serious injuries, major
High speed taxiway collision, major Triggering EVENT ACCIDENT OUTCOME
turbulence injuries
damage to the aircraft
Maintenance error
Minor Injuries Minor injuries, minor damage Pushback accident, minor weather Catastrophic
2 4 20 100 or damage to aircraft damage

Any event which could not escalate into


Data Analysis Flight ops hazard
accident (e.g. mid
air collision)
No accident No potential damage or an accident, even if it may have
1 outcome injury could occur operational consequences (e.g. diversion, Undesirable Major accident (e.g.
delay, individual sickness) Hazard on ground operational overrun)
state
ATC hazard
Minor safety
Safety Issue occurrence (e.g.
Answer Question 1: Weather hazard turbulence bruises)
•Think how the event could have escalated into an accident outcome (see examples to Technical
Negligible
the right of the ERC matrix). Typically, the escalation could be due to actions by the hazard

people involved, the way the hazard interferes with the flight, and barrier behaviour. 1. FREQUENCY 2. EFFECTIVENESS 3. EFFECTIVENESS 4. ACCIDENT
• Do not filter out improbable scenarios. Question 2 will take the (low) probability OF TRIGGERING OF AVOIDANCE OF RECOVERY SEVERITY
Actions to EVENT
into account. BARRIERS BARRIERS
• Among the scenarios with an accident outcome, pick the most credible, and select reduce risk
the corresponding row in the matrix. Analyse (each) Scenario using the SIRA model (above):
• Identify the accident outcome of the scenario
Answer Question 2: • Identify what is considered the triggering event (see section 6.9 for detail)
•To assess the remaining safety margin, consider both the number and robustness of • Decide what you consider as the UOS.
the remaining barriers between this event and the accident scenario identified in • List the avoidance and recovery barriers and review their robustness
Question 1. Safety
• Barriers, which already failed are ignored Run the SIRA with numbers:
Performance
•Select the column of choice. See section 4.2 for detailed guidance. • Consider using the SIRA Excel tool
Monitoring
• Select a known or an estimated value for each of the 4 SIRA components

RESULT*: RESULT*: (see section 4.8 for detail)


 Immediate action & further investigation required Stop  “Stop”: Discontinue the concerned part of the operation until acceptable risk level.
 More refined Risk Assessment and/or investigation required. Hazard Improve  “Improve”: Still unacceptable risk but tolerable for a short time. Action required.
 No action required. Contributes to the Safety Database. Analysis
Secure  “Secure”: Frequent monitoring required, as the item is at the limit of acceptable.
Monitor  “Monitor”: Monitor through the routine database analysis.
21 ERC Risk Index number  Use in database analysis (trending & statistics) Safety Assessment Accept
 “Acceptable”. No specific action required.

* Examples only. To be customised at each organisation.


START HERE ARMS Working Group Final Report 2007-2010

You might also like