This document discusses Jane Jacobs' 1961 book "The Death and Life of Great American Cities" and summarizes some of its key points. The book presented a critique of traditional city planning and advocated for principles like mixed-use neighborhoods, high density, and old buildings integrated with new. It also discussed important features of cities like sidewalks, parks, and neighborhoods. The document then summarizes Jacobs' perspectives on the forces that can lead to decline in cities, such as lack of diversity, borders without activity, and "slumming" versus "unslumming" neighborhoods. It advocates for gradual investment over cataclysmic money to improve neighborhoods.
This document discusses Jane Jacobs' 1961 book "The Death and Life of Great American Cities" and summarizes some of its key points. The book presented a critique of traditional city planning and advocated for principles like mixed-use neighborhoods, high density, and old buildings integrated with new. It also discussed important features of cities like sidewalks, parks, and neighborhoods. The document then summarizes Jacobs' perspectives on the forces that can lead to decline in cities, such as lack of diversity, borders without activity, and "slumming" versus "unslumming" neighborhoods. It advocates for gradual investment over cataclysmic money to improve neighborhoods.
This document discusses Jane Jacobs' 1961 book "The Death and Life of Great American Cities" and summarizes some of its key points. The book presented a critique of traditional city planning and advocated for principles like mixed-use neighborhoods, high density, and old buildings integrated with new. It also discussed important features of cities like sidewalks, parks, and neighborhoods. The document then summarizes Jacobs' perspectives on the forces that can lead to decline in cities, such as lack of diversity, borders without activity, and "slumming" versus "unslumming" neighborhoods. It advocates for gradual investment over cataclysmic money to improve neighborhoods.
JANE JACOBS Reporter, Freelance writer, Assistant editor of Architecture forum responsible for reporting urban renewal. Slowly became skeptical about the traditional concept of City planning. PRESENTED BY Kalungi Emmanuel Kalyango Mousa Ssegane Henry Luwemba Paul Vincent Nimusiima Trust Ezra A CITY Vibrant cities have the following features; 1. Mixed primary uses of districts 2. Short and uninterrupted Streets 3. New buildings mixed with Old buildings 4. High Density population PART ONE: Characteristics of and Diversity within Big cities i. Sidewalks ii. Neighbourhood Gardens iii. City Neighbourhoods SIDEWALKS; safety Sidewalks offer more than just space for the passage function. They maintain safety, Social contact and assimilating Children to social norms. Unlike suburbs, big cities have numerous strangers every single day and one should feel safe while using the City street. Safety on a street isn’t a job of the Police but the Public Surveillance. SIDEWALKS; contact Different people meet on the streets and this continuous meeting creates a trust between these people. This in turn improves on the security. SIDEWALKS; assimilating children into society Here assimilating means that children learn public responsibility from Adults.
Children learn and imitate every
move they experience from adults. This can be through Offering directions, where to park to avoid being fined. NEIGHBOURHOOD GARDENS These offer one main purpose which is to collect all kinds of people no matter who they are. Improves on social contact and general well being of people PART THREE THE FORCES OF DECLINE AND REGENERATIO N THE SELF DESTRUCTION OF DIVERSITY Decline can be caused by crippling of one or four of the fore mentioned factors
• Tendency of outstanding success in the city causes it to destroy itself
1. In commercial areas 2. In residential areas
• Rich businesses buy out the smaller businesses
Solutions • zoning for diversity eg a. height restriction b. Protection of historical buildings • Staunchness of public buildings THE CURSE OF BORDER VACUUMS • Single use cities usually form borders making distinctive neighborhoods. Borders are usually shown by railways, highways and shorelines. • Borders tend to have very low population and aren’t lively. Therefore even the few people there tend to leave. • As a result there is high crime rate and therefore more decay • Borders are harmless for big cities, they can even be use to map out cities. • But for small blocks, they aren’t preferred. How to Improve this • Encourage day and night use • Should not be too big • Parks can include chess and checkers for fun • Skating can be added on parks near restaurants • Bicycle renting can also be added to parks • For shorelines, activities eg off loading boats should not be hidden
All in all we aim to create a seam and not a barrier.
For highways, it might be hopeless to remove this barrier but we may counterforce with very big populations UNSLUMMING AND SLUMMING SLUMMING • Dull neighborhoods make people to leave the areas giving opportunity for slum growth • People blamed slum development on presence of nearby slums, negros, Italians, and lack of parks • Rooms being rented to whites also contributed • Real estate agents played a role • Improved transport made it more rampant • Abandoned slums were ripe for relocation • Incase of differences in communities, rivalries are formed and therefore chaos follows UNSLUMMING AND SLUMMING UNSLUMMING • The fact the people aim towards leaving the slums has to be eliminated • People that gain money in a slum tend need to stay in the slums • Incase they leave, they are replaced by poor people • There is a general issue of no development in these areas • Creation of lively environment with sidewalk safety helps to keep people around • When they stay, community, strength, trust and familyhood grows • Welcoming outsiders is good because they can be middle income earners improving the community, especially those that come willingly, hence population diversification GRADUAL MONEY AND CATACLYSMIC MONEY FORMS OF MONEY
1) Credit extended by the conventional non governmental lending
institutions 2) Money provided from government 3) Money from investors GRADUAL MONEY AND CATACLYSMIC MONEY • Gradual money is good for unslumming and diversification • Savings are preferred when unslumming • Credit blacklisting caused by influence from city planning maps • Investor tend to take the houses of the people • Government is usually funds clearing the slums