Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Topic 3 - OP1-Tania
Topic 3 - OP1-Tania
• Introduction
• Precipitation and co-precipitation methods
• Deposition-precipitation method
• Impregnation method
• Ion exchange
2
INTRODUCTION
3
INTRODUCTION
The optimum catalyst is the one that provides the necessary combination of
properties (activity, selectivity, lifetime, ease of regeneration and toxicity) at an
acceptable cost.
Handbook of heterogeneous catalysts. 4
INTRODUCTION
5
Designs of heterogeneous catalysts for fuels and chemicals processing: An overview.
PRECIPITATION AND
CO-PRECIPITATION
Precipitation
• is mainly used for the production of oxidic catalysts and also for the manufacture of
pure support materials (supported and Bulk catalysts).- Ex: aluminum and silicon
oxides, iron oxides, titanium oxides or zirconias.
• Is the process in which the solid formation can be induced by addition of an agent
which initiates a chemical reaction or which reduce the solubility. (favorable ions are
nitrates, carbonates or ammonium, which decompose to volatile products during
calcination).
• Very pure materials can be obtained.
• Product needs to be separated from the solution.
• Generate a large volumes of salt-containing solutions
6
PRECIPITATION AND
CO-PRECIPITATION
Co-Precipitation
7
PRECIPITATION AND
CO-PRECIPITATION
• An amorphous or crystalline
precipiate or a gel is
obtained, wich is washed
(until salt free).
• The dimension of the crystals depends on the ratio of speeds of nucleation to crystal
growth, the greater this ratio the smaller the crystals but in hight quantity. In this
condition amorphous precipitates can be obtained.
• If crystals are allowed time in contact with the mother solution, the system tends to
evolve toward its most stable thermodynamics state, the small crystals disappear in
favor of large crystals.
PRECIPITATION AND
CO-PRECIPITATION
Basically, all process parameters influence the quality of the final precipitates, and fine tuning of the
parameters is necessary in order*pH
to produce the required
directly controls the material. *Time for which precipitate
degree of supersaturation. is left in the mother liquor
*When are ions which under precipitation
can be occluded conditions.
repeated washings steps
are necessary. *Most frequently additives
are organic molecules
(pores).
*Precursors are usually
*As nucleation rates are
chosen for the easily to
extremely sensitive to
volatile products.
temperature changes (affect
crystallite sizes, areas, and
phases)
*The concentration and *The use of organic solvents
composition impact the (more expensive than
supersaturation and water), can be good due low
affects the dimension of solubilities of the precursor
the crystals. (low crystallization )
14
Fundamentals in the preparation of heterogeneous catalysts.
PRECIPITATION AND
CO-PRECIPITATION
16
PRECIPITATION AND
CO-PRECIPITATION
EXAMPLE:
• The CuO–ZrO2–CeO2–Al2O3
catalysts for production of
hydrogen via methanol steam
reforming were prepared by
the homogeneous precipitation
method using urea hydrolysis.
17
PRECIPITATION AND
CO-PRECIPITATION
EXAMPLE:
• Catalytic performance tests proved the good practicability and high
stability of synthesized catalysts via the homogeneous precipitation
method for steam reforming of methanol.
18
DEPOSITION-
PRECIPITATION
Supported catalysts
The method of deposition-precipitation is a modification of the precipitation methods
in solution. It consists of the conversion of a highly soluble metal precursor into
another substance of lower solubility, which specifically precipitates onto a support
and not in solution.
20
DEPOSITION-
PRECIPITATION
Supported catalysts
Depending upon of the active component, two different types of supported catalyst may
be distinguished.
2. With less costly active components (base metal oxides or sulfides), a maximum active surface area per unit
volume is most attractive
A high active surface area causes a relatively small catalytic reactor volume to be sufficient to achieve a
technically satisfactory conversion.
• When the cost of the reactor dominate, is most favorable that the support maximize the active surface
area per unit volume.
• When the costs of the active component are most important, the maximum active surface area per
unit weight of active component is desired.
Handbook of heterogeneous catalysts. 22
DEPOSITION-
PRECIPITATION
Supported catalysts
CHARACTERISTICS
23
DEPOSITION-
PRECIPITATION
Supported catalysts
• An effective method to obtain a uniform precipitation is to use urea rather than conventional alkalis.
Urea dissolves in water but decomposes very slowly at 90°C giving a uniform concentration of OH- in
the bulk and in the pores. So precipitation takes place homogeneously over the support surface.
Anatase TiO2DT-51 was used as support material. The Mn/TiO2 catalysts were prepared by two methods:
impregnation and deposition precipitation.
25
DEPOSITION-
PRECIPITATION
Supported catalysts
EXAMPLE:
The Mn/TiO2catalysts were prepared by slow addition of solutions of precipitating agents(urea (1 M),
ammonium nitrate (1 M), ammonium hydroxide(20 vol.%) and ammonium carbamate (1 M), Aldrich). The water
of the resulting slurry was slowly evaporated with continuous stirring followed by calcination.
This catalyst show a superior low-temperature SCR (selective catalytic reduction) of NO with NH3. The superior
catalytic activity is probably due to the presence of amorphous phases of manganese oxide, iron oxide, high
surface area, high total acidity, acid strength. 26
DEPOSITION-
PRECIPITATION
Supported catalysts
EXAMPLE:
27
IMPREGNATION
Impregnation.
In the impregnation process, active components with thermally unstable anions (e. g.,
nitrates, acetates, carbonates, hydroxides) are used. The support is immersed in a
solution of the active component under precisely defined conditions (concentration,
mixing, T, t). Depending on the production conditions, selective adsorption of the active
component occurs on the surface or in the interior of the support.
To achieve the best possible impregnation, the air in the pores of the support is removed
by evacuation, or the support is treated with gases such as CO 2 or NH3 prior to
impregnation. After impregnation, the catalyst is dried and calcined.
29
Applied heterogeneous catalysis. Design, manufacture use of solid catalysts. J.F. Le Page
IMPREGNATION
In incipient wetness impregnation the precursor salt is dissolved in a volume of solvent
equal to the catalyst pore volume, and this solution is slowly added to the support in
which capillary forces of up to several hundred atmospheres draw the liquid into the
pores.
For large-scale manufacture the incipient wetness impregnation (also called pore
volume, or dry or capillary impregnation) is the most advantageous method.
30
Fundamentals in industrial catalytic processes. Farrauto
IMPREGNATION
Stages of the preparation of supported catalyst by impregnation.
wet impregnation
31
IMPREGNATION
After impregnation the catalysts are dried, and the metal salts are decomposed to the corresponding
oxides by heating. The rate of drying (determined by T and flow rate of the gas), affects the deposition of
the active material in the pores.
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
• Relative simplicity • Sometimes material is nonuniformly
deposited along pores and through
• rapidity and the pellet,
• capability for depositing the • Tendency for deposited base metal
precursor at high metal loading. precursors to be oxidized in the
• Waste water is not produced aqueous solution to oxides that
• Active phase precursors are not interact strongly with alumina or
lost silica supports and which are difficult
to reduce.
• Several impregnation steps might be
needed.
Drying important (can result in uneven distribution if not done properly. 33
IMPREGNATION VS
PRECIPITATION
EXAMPLE:
Steam reforming is the most effective method to produce hydrogen from liquid hydrocarbons with a high yield.
34
IMPREGNATION VS
PRECIPITATION
EXAMPLE:
Al2O3 supported Ni–Al spinel catalysts, prepared by co-
precipitation and wet impregnation, were produced, analysed and
tested on commercial diesel steam reforming.
35
IMPREGNATION VS
PRECIPITATION
EXAMPLE:
Both preparation methods resulted in catalysts showing a metastable ‘NiAl10O16’ phase supported on alumina.
However, impregnated catalyst showed a second active spinel ‘NiAl2O4’ phase, which grows at the expense of the
metastable phase, under reforming conditions. This spinel phase has been proven to be very active and coke resistant
for several hours as in the case of the Al2O3–YSZ-supported catalyst [10]. Although
the co-precipitation method provided a more homogeneous catalyst with higher surface area than impregnation
method,
the Impr-catalyst exhibited a higher catalytic performance and stability over time than the Copr-catalyst. The main
phenomenological reason for this different behaviour is thought to be the higher carbon formation/deposition
tendency shown by the Coprcatalyst. This tendency is attributed to the way the NiAl10O16 is formed and dispersed 36 in
IMPREGNATION VS
PRECIPITATION
EXAMPLE:
• Thus, the catalyst produced via the co-precipitation method (Co-precipitation) (a)
suffered rapid deactivation from carbon deposition; (b) produced 5 times more
methane than the catalyst produced via the wet impregnation method
(Impregnation) and (c) showed a decreasing hydrogen production.
• The Impregnation catalyst exhibited a higher stability for diesel steam reforming
with no signs of carbon formation or activity loss.
37
ION EXCHANGE
Ion exchange consists of replacing an ion in an electrostatic interaction with the surface of
a support by another ion species.
The support containing ions A is plunged into an excess volume (compared to the pore
volume) of a solution containing ions B.
Ions B gradually penetrate into the pore space of the support, while ions A pass into the
solution, until equilibrium is established corresponding to a given distribution of the two
ions between the solid and the solution. The solid is then washed, and finally separated.
𝐴 𝑍 + 𝐵𝑆 ↔ 𝐵 𝑍 + 𝐴 𝑆
Where:
z= is the support and
s= the solution Fundamentals in industrial catalytic
processes. Farrauto
38
ION EXCHANGE
Generally in salt-support systems involving slow adsorbtion or ion exchange, uniform deposition of the
catalytic material is favored.
In salt support systems involving strong and/or rapid adsorbtion or exchange, deposition may not be unifor
along pores and across pellets.
CHARACTERISTICS
• Support material in metal salt solution adsorbs metal salt ions.
• Require a period of time like min or hours.
• Good method for depositing small amounts (maximum of 2-3%wt).
• Efficient and convenient method for obtaining uniformly and strongly deposited
catalyst precursors (ex: low metal loadings are desired, as for expensive noble
metals).
• Useful in removing harmful agents and adding promoters.
40
ION EXCHANGE
Materials Characteristics
Zeolites Exchange and adsorb cations strongly
Silica Adsorbs cations weakly
Alumina (amphoteric) Adsorbs both cations and anions weakly
Titania (amphoteric) Adsorbs both cations and anions (more acidic than alumina)
Carbon Adsorbs cations weakly
Magnesia Adsorbs anions strongly
41
ION EXCHANGE
The amount of adsorbed is determine by:
Concentra Number of
adsorbtion
tion of ions sites on the
in solution support
The
amount
adsorbed is
determine
by:
Equilibri
pH um
constant
42
ION EXCHANGE
Experimental key parameters (for supported catalysts)
• Point of zero charge of the oxide support: essential parameter to
initiate the electrostatic interaction between the metal complex and the
oxide support. One method involves the change of T of the
impregnating solution, and the second method involves selective doping
of the support surface with various types of ions.
43
ION EXCHANGE
Experimental key parameters (for supported catalysts)
• Type of ligand: can affects both the nature and strength of the metal
complex-surface interaction. Some aspects must be considered: its
charged, bulkiness, presence of an adequate element (N, O, Cl, H) favors
the formation of hydrogen bonds with the surface, nature of ligand
(organic, citrated-deposit as amorphous compound).
44
ION EXCHANGE
Experimental key parameters (for supported catalysts)
• kinetics: the speciation of the deposited phase may be controller to a
large extent via the parameters that control the kinetics (T, and duration
of the preparation steps).
46
ION EXCHANGE
EXAMPLE:
• Significant variations in product distribution and catalytic activity
were observed when the exchange degree of mordenite changed. The
acid site density and distribution over the catalysts were directly
related to the degree of ion-exchange of sodium in mordenite.
• The change of support acidity led to different anchoring modes and
dispersion of Mo species on the support which further resulted in the
different reduction behavior of Mo species under olefin atmosphere.
47
ION EXCHANGE
EXAMPLE:
48
Supersaturation curve
• Supersaturation is reached by
means of physical
transformations (change in
temperature or solvent
evaporation) or chemical
processes (addition of bases or
acids, use of complex forming
agents).
51
What is the Point of zero
charge of the oxide support?
Most oxide supports develop a surface charge when immersed in
aqueous solution. Involving H+ and OH- ions, and are therefore
controlled by the pH.
• Low pH, the suface is positivily charged and preferentially adsorbs
anions.
• Hight pH, the suface is negativily charged and preferentially adsorbs
cations.
• At intermediate pH, a zero net charge will result (called point of zero
charge or isoelectric point).
The PZC is a useful criterion for classification of oxides into acidic (silica, silica-
alumina, zeolites), basic (MgO, ZnO) or amphoteric (alumina, titania).
52
REFERENCES
• Handbook of heterogeneous catalysts. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. 2008.
• Applied heterogeneous catalysis. Design, manufacture use of solid catalysts. J.F. Le Page.
Institut francais du petrole publications. 1987.
• Heterogeneous catalysis in industrial practice. Charles Satterfield. McGraw-hill. 1991
• Mn/TiO2and Mn–Fe/TiO2catalysts synthesized by depositionprecipitation—promising for
selective catalytic reduction of NO withNH3at low temperatures. Siva Sankar Reddy Putlurua,
Leonhard Schilla,b, Anker Degn Jensenb, Bernard Siretc,Franck Tabariesc, Rasmus Fehrmanna.
Applied catalyst B. Environmental. 165, pag. 628-635. 2015.
53
REFERENCES
54