CPD MODEL

By
Azmat Siddique
Course Coordinator (R&DL), DSD Punjab
 Why CPD ?
No linkage between Pre service & In service
education & training
Training courses centrally designed without
TNA
Training organized on ad-hoc basis
No follow up & support
Untrained & poorly qualified trainers
Inadequate incentives
Lack of monitoring & evaluation
 Major Shift in Conceptual Structure
New Model
Pre-service Education
Previous Conceptual In-service Education &Training
Structure & Training

Pre-Service
In-Service
Education Other Pedagogical
Education Training Follow-Up
& Training Support
& Training
(GCETs)

Incentives
Accountability

Lack of
Support
and Accreditation and
Licensing ISO 9001 - 2008
Follow-up
 Improved Student Learning
CPD Framework
Self learning Professional/
Life long learner

Certification/
short
Pay/Grade Licensing
Courses/ PD activity
Structure Accreditation
Assessment/
Degree
PERs
Teacher
Courses
Awards Standards

Dist Education Quality Support&

Govt. /Training Assurance follow up
Incentives & Edu. DSD Mentoring
PITE GCETs
Accountability Deptt Follow up
Materials
Distance edu.
Coordination with key stakeholders
Partnerships other
Modification in CPD Framework
Old CPD Framework New CPD Framework
Teacher Specific School Specific

10-15
schools per
DTE
22 LQTs per
DTE Cluster radius
All teachers
16 km

Cluster 10-75
1-5 DTEs per
2 DTEs per schools per
radius 16 CTSC
CTSC cluster
km
 Training Network
 DSD plans, designs & executes various training and
professional development programmes as close to
the schools as possible in the districts through
Cascade Model
A. At Provincial Level–Campus of DSD
B. At District Level – DTSCs (36)---22 DTSCs are
housed in GCETs and
14 DTSCs are in the buildings of High Schools
C. At Cluster Level – CTSCs (1988)—On an
average 60 CTSCs in one district, 10-20 CTSCs
in one tehsil and 20-30 schools in each cluster
Top Management of CPD
School Education Dept.
Punjab (Secretary)

Programme Director
DSD Punjab

Course Deputy
Coordinators Additional Programme Directors
(5) Director (5)

RPM-IV RPM-HQ
RPM-I RPM-II RPM-III
Rwp + Fsd + Bwp + Multan+
DGKhan Lah+Office
Guj Sgd Swl
Middle Management of CPD
Regional Programme Manager

DTSC Head DTSC Head DTSC Head

District-1 District-2 District-3,4,5,6,7,8

TE (A&F)
TE-1 TE-2 TE-1
Cluster(1-20) Cluster(21-40) Cluster(41-60)
DTSC
 Bottom Management of CPD
Teacher Educator (1-3)

CTSC Head CTSC Head CTSC Head

Cluster-1 Cluster-2 Cluster-3,4,5,6,…..60

DTE-1 DTE-2 DTE-3 DTE-4 DTE-5

School (1-15) School (1-15) School (1-15) School (1-15) School (1-15)
Components of CPD Model
1. Planning
2. Assessment
3. Mentoring
4. Professional Development
(continuously)
5. Reporting
6. Coordination
7. Monitoring
8. Management (Supportive Role)
Assessment of Students (G3-5) by DTE
Assessment of Students in G3,4 & 5
• Time required: 8 days per
month
• Time spent by DTE for
one school (2 hours)
• SLOs based Papers
preparation at DSD
• Selection of paper by
DTE out of 5 papers
• Translation / Correction of
paper by DTE
• Printing of paper by DTE
Assessment of Students in G3,4 & 5
• Payment of paper by HT
from FTF
• Conduct of paper by
concerned teachers (1.5
hour per month)
• Marking by other school
teachers (3 days)
• 10% Rechecking by
DTEs
• Result compilation by
DTE
Assessment of Students in G3,4 & 5
• Benefits to students:
• Proper time allocation
for topics
• Reflection on learning
• Provides comparison
regarding class fellows
• Provides practice for
PEC exams
Grade 3,4 & 5 Students Coverage for assessment
activity in 2010-11 , 2011-12 & 2015-16
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
May September October November December January

Year-2010 Year-2011 Year-2016

Meeting of DTE with HT
• Indicators:
• DTE Meeting File contains
• HT Meeting Form
• Mentoring Visit Form
• Monthly Assessment Report
• Display of schools ranking
at main gate
• Display of teachers
grading in HT office
• Display of student grades
in classrooms
Display of Ranking & Grades
Display of School Ranking Display of Teachers Grading
Mentoring Areas
Teaching & Assessment

• Taleemi Calendar
• Lesson Planning
• Use of support material

Requirement
Observation Using MVF 1/5
Observation Using MVF 2/5
Observation Using MVF 3/5
Observation Using MVF 4/5
Observation Using MVF 5/5
ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL OF MENTORING AREAS IN % DURING THE YEAR
2015-16

Student Learning Check

Activity based Teaching & Learning
Assigning and checking written

Adherence to lesson plan

Classroom Management
Interaction with students
Student Assessment
Taleemi Calendar
Teacher Diary

Visual Aids
work
Overall

All Punjab
May 2015 69.84 72.39 71.32 68.58 66.63 72.71 66.23 75.68 77.08 70.91 50.71

September 71.99 73.72 73.39 70.80 68.89 75.13 68.09 77.73 78.92 72.93 53.43

October 76.47 76.47 76.73 73.95 72.00 77.80 71.07 80.19 81.41 76.00 57.52

November 78.04 77.93 78.28 75.83 73.89 79.35 73.14 81.50 82.88 77.95 57.57

December 79.41 79.77 80.36 77.55 75.59 80.91 75.13 82.76 84.31 79.59 60.29

January 2016 80.26 80.85 81.77 79.11 77.04 82.20 76.68 83.94 85.39 80.84 62.09
Gender Mentioned Schools In Mentoring Data
(May 2016)

Teachers
Teachers Mentored
Count of Count of
per @4
Schools Teachers
school teachers /
school
Gender On duty M.Leave C.Leave Absent

Male 17663 52351 2.96 50036 803 216 513 63

Female 18161 52750 2.90 50451 619 697 561 74

All 35824 105101 2.93 100487 1422 913 1074 137

 Score on Mentoring Indicators
May 2016

Assigning Activity
Adherenc Classroo
and based Student Interactio Student
Taleemi Visual e to m
Gender Teacher Diary checking
Calendar
Teaching
Aids
Assessm
lesson
n with
Managem
Overall learning
written & ent students check
plan ent
work Learning

Male 72.95 76.56 75.97 72.17 68.63 77.80 69.55 80.90 82.69 75.35 58.86

Female 79.23 79.00 78.07 74.75 72.50 78.88 72.21 82.13 84.20 77.98 59.48

Female
performing
better 6.27% 2.44% 2.11% 2.58% 3.87% 1.07% 2.66% 1.23% 1.51% 2.63% 0.61%
An
27 example of good teacher diary providing evidence of both planning and reflection

December 26, 2012 Teacher diary

TG Assessment
Gra Subjec
page SLOs Activities Visual aids / written
de t
no. work
5 Science 124 1) To know what different Activities no. 1, 3, Board, charts and Questions 2.3 and 5
animals eat 5 of teacher guide animals around as oral assessment
2) To be able to classify animals and 1,3,4 from
based on what they eat teacher guide as
written work in
class

5 Maths 22 1) To know what unitary method Activity no. 2, 3, Board, pencils, Questions 4,5, 6 of
is 6 of teacher guide chairs, students textbook as written
2) To be able to use unitary themselves assessment
method to find values of

2 English N/A 1) To know what a noun is (1)Work in group Board, textbook, Questions 2,3,10
2) To understand use of a noun in and list 10 nouns. charts, things in the from textbook as
a sentence 2) Call students surrounding e.g. oral assessment.
at board and chairs, tables, etc Assign students task
make them use to identify 1o nouns
nouns in and use them in
sentences sentences as H.W.
Reflection:The use of chart as visual aid was quite helpful in the first lesson. In the second lesson, I could not deal with
distracted students effectively. Next time think of a strategy to engage distracted students
2 Islamic N/A 1) To know who is a prophet 1)Read from book Board and textbook Questions 3,4,5
Studies 2) To know names of some and discuss from exercise of
popular prophets among class. 2) textbook. Assign
Professional Development
Professional Development Days at CTSCs

• Total clusters in district = 60

• Total groups in districts = 20 (3 clusters / group)
• PD Day at one cluster of each group monthly on last
working day of the month
• Months for Cluster-1 of each group
January, April, October
• Months for Cluster-2 of each group
February, May, November
• Months for Cluster-3 of each group
• March, September, December
PD-Day at CTSC by DTEs
PD-Day at DTSC by LTEs
Functions of DTSCs and CTSCs
DTSCs
• TNA of ESTs, SSTs & SS
• Preparation of Action Plans for
CPD activities
• Coordination at district level for
CPD activities
• In-service training organization
at district
• Provision of professional support
to teachers & managers
• Monitoring, evaluation and
quality assurance of trainings at
district level
CTSCs
• TNA of PSTs
• Provision of professional
support to PSTs through
mentoring and follow up
• Coordination at cluster
level for CPD activities
• Host for all teacher
development activities
• Provision of feedback to
DTSC and DSD.
 Reporting

CTSC •Preparation of CTSC File

•Delivery of reports to schools

DTSC •Preparation of district reports

•Delivery of reports to CTSC Heads, D.C.C

DSD •Preparation of provincial reports

•Delivery of reports to provincial and district authorities
Comparison of Students Performance in CPD From
2010-11 to 2013-14

37,700
Monthly Assessment Results 2015-16
Grade-3 Grade-4 Grade-5 All

Average Score Average Score Average Score Average Score Students

Months in % in % in % in % Appered in %
May 41.13 61.24 62.40 54.95 93.58%
September 68.29 62.46 64.09 64.87 95.60%
October 71.29 64.38 66.23 67.18 96.44%
November 70.23 64.08 65.86 66.61 96.28%
December 71.57 65.14 66.46 67.63 97.07%
January 72.59 65.78 67.36 68.47 97.25%

Gain 31.45 4.54 4.95 13.51 3.67%

Gain % 76.46% 7.41% 7.94% 24.59% 3.92%

Subjects Improvement Trend in 2012-13
Monthly Assessment Scores
(May 2016)

Appeared in School result School result

Month District Gender Area
G-3,4 & 5 in % in %

May All Punjab All All 2,304,281 56.50 56.50

May All Punjab Male Rural 834845 54.31

54.94
May All Punjab Male Urban 161281 58.19
May All Punjab Female Rural 678202 57.25
58.55
May All Punjab Female Urban 223083 62.48
May All Punjab Combined Rural 147737 53.70
54.86
May All Punjab Combined Urban 30500 60.48
 District Wise Schools Ranking
(based upon monthly assessment scores)
DISTRICTS RANKING FOR THE MONTH OF May 2016 DISTRICTS RANKING FOR THE MONTH OF May 2016
Male Female Combined Male Female Combined
Sr. No. District All Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Sr. No. District All Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban
1 ATTOCK 12 10 5 11 3 32 2 19 LODHRAN 13 13 7 7 25 18 31
2 BAHAWALNAGAR 33 33 28 32 29 29 29 20 MANDI BAHUDDIN 21 22 32 17 13 8 #N/A
3 BAHAWALPUR 25 25 27 25 16 28 24 21 MIANWALI 14 14 10 16 19 12 27
4 BHAKKAR 15 15 9 18 12 6 1 22 MULTAN 6 12 6 12 5 15 12
5 CHAKWAL 19 18 21 22 15 17 3 23 MUZAFFARGARH 4 4 2 8 17 10 8
6 Chiniot 35 35 35 35 35 35 32 24 NANKANA SAHIB 5 5 4 10 4 7 5
7 D.G.KHAN 29 28 31 30 28 26 19 25 NAROWAL 31 29 19 33 33 33 15
8 FAISALABAD 11 7 14 13 22 3 7 26 OKARA 28 26 30 29 27 27 26
9 GUJRANWALA 20 23 23 21 23 9 21 27 PAKPATTAN 9 6 25 5 7 21 30
10 GUJRAT 23 24 26 24 26 20 22 28 RAJANPUR 36 36 36 36 36 36 33
11 HAFIZABAD 30 30 22 31 30 30 25 29 RAWALPINDI 8 11 15 9 8 5 16
12 JHANG 34 34 33 34 32 34 28 30 RAHIMYAR KHAN 26 21 20 23 31 24 18
13 JHELUM 16 19 11 15 11 22 20 31 SAHIWAL 17 17 17 19 10 16 #N/A
14 KASUR 2 3 3 2 2 2 11 32 SARGODHA 10 8 18 3 9 14 17
15 KHANEWAL 24 27 12 26 21 25 6 33 SHEIKHUPURA 7 9 8 6 6 4 14
16 KHUSHAB 32 32 34 28 34 31 13 34 SIALKOT 27 31 16 27 14 23 23
17 LAHORE 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 35 TOBA TEK SINGH 22 20 24 14 24 19 10
18 LAYYAH 3 2 13 4 18 13 #N/A 36 VEHARI 18 16 29 20 20 11 9
Comparison of Results of DSD and PEC For
Grade-5 (2011)
Difference
Average
Monthly of Monthy
February Tests and
Tests PEC
 Details November December January (PEC)

Score in % 33.49 38.33 39.15 44.84

Sample
ALL Size in % 25.88 28.70 38.02 100.00
PUNJAB 37.32 7.52
No. of
students 2,02,785 2,24,946 2,97,913 7,83,670
Total
Working
DTEs 2182 2182 2182 2182
Meeting of Departmental Coordination
Committee (D.C.C)
Frequency: Once a month
Head of committee: DCO
Secretary: DTSC Head
Member-1: EDO (Education)
Member-2: DMO
Member-3,4,5: DEOs
Member-6,7,8,9: Tehsil CTSC Heads
Visiting Member: RPM
Place of meeting: DCO Office
Functions:
1. To address issues reported by their subordinates
2. To propose solution of un-resolved issues
3. To send minutes of meeting to concerned RPM
Monitoring in CPD Framework
Through report file
Telephonically
Physically
Through smart phone
Monitoring by RPM, DTSC Head, TEs,
DTEs according to plan,
Monitoring by EDO
Monitoring by DMO
Monitoring by CTSC Heads
Grading Indicators For Teachers
• Average Mean score per student
• Example:
• Students in class = 20

• Appeared in Maths = 18 Score =140

• Appeared in Science =18 Score =120

• Total Students =40 Total Score = 260

• Average score =(260/40) =6.5 Grade=C

Grading Criteria in CPD
• Grade A Above or equal 90%
• Grade B below 90%
• Grade C below 75%
• Grade D below 60%
• Grade E below 40%
• Grade F below 20%
Note: Persons are graded but institutions / clusters /
Tehsils / Districts are ranked
PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS GRADING DURING
2015-16

COUNT OF TEACHERS IN GRADES

Months A B C D E F All
May 2015 1327 14770 38918 58096 23676 3360 140147
September 1361 19156 55438 61486 9830 1072 148343
October 1639 24013 63093 55580 8149 970 153444
November 865 17367 63644 52861 6088 623 141448
December 860 17950 67782 47487 3506 255 137840
January 2016 1044 21360 70580 45817 3671 271 142743

Avearge 1183 19103 59909 53555 9153 1092 143995

Gain -283 6590 31662 -12279 -20005 -3089 2596
-
Gain % 21.33% 44.62% 81.36% -21.14% -84.49% -91.93% 1.85%
Display of Grades
• Teacher In Head Teacher office
• In training room during PD Day
• Head Teacher In CTSC Heads Office
• In meeting of HTs at CTSC
• DTEs In CTSC Heads office
• In TEs office
• CTSC Head In DTSC Heads Office
• In CTSC Heads meeting at DTSC
• TEs In DTSC Heads office
• In RPM office
• DTSC Head In RPMs Office
• In Bi-annual meetings at DSD
Impact of training conducted in 2012
Teachers assessed in 2011-12 = 72000
Teachers categorized in E & F Grade = 28998

Teachers assessed in 2012-13 = 133000

Teachers categorized in E & F Grades= 28813

Teachers tracking discontinued = 8546 (29.47 %)

Teachers improved = 16409 (56.58 %)
Teachers not improved = 4043 (13.95 %)
Impact of Trainings on PSTs in Punjab
 Coordination in CPD
Sr. Coordination between Frequency
No.
1 PSTs and DTEs Bi-monthly
2 PST and CTSC Head Quarterly
3 HT and CTSC Head Monthly
4 DTE and CTSC Head Daily
5 CTSC Head and TEs Quarterly
6 TEs and DTSC Head Daily
7 CTSC Head and DTSC Head Monthly
8 DTSC Head, EDO and DMO Monthly
9 DTSC Head, TEs and DSD Bi-annually
10 EDO, DEOs and DSD Bi-annually
Role of Head teachers in CPD 1/2
1. To implement Taleemi Calendar & Curriculum
2. To implement period system in primary section
3. To conduct fair and complete assessment of
students
4. To complete in time standard marking and
provision of award lists to DTEs
5. To provide report cards of students to parents
6. To display grades of teachers in Head teacher
office
Role of Head teachers in CPD 2/2
7. To guide teachers on mentoring report of DTEs
8. To attend meeting called by CTSC Head / TE
9. To ensure attendance of his PSTs at PD Day of
PSTs
10. To ensure 100% attendance of staff on visit day
of DTE
11. To complete tasks awarded by DTE / CTSC
Head
12. To keep record and display required reports in
school
Grading Indicators for HTs
• Ranking of students displayed at Schools (8 marks)
• Ranking of staff displayed at Schools (8 marks)
• Ranking of school written at Main Gate
(4 marks)
• Percentage of students appeared in assessment
(20 marks)
• Implementation of mentoring areas (40 marks)
• Cooperation of Head Teacher during visit (10 marks)
• Attendance of staff on visit day (10 marks)
News Letter
• Structure of Newsletter • Issuance of News Letter
• Assessment Results of 3 best • Maximum Pages = 4
schools • Issue copy to
• Interviews of 3 best teachers in • all attached schools
Pedagogy • Concerned AEO
• Interview of best Head Teacher • Concerned TE
• Student’s Result of Competition at • Concerned Dy. DEO
CTSC Level • Concerned DEO
• Ranking of Cluster in District • Concerned EDO
• Good practices in attached schools • Concerned DTSC Head
• Detail of vacant posts of teachers • DCO
in clusters
• Uploading on discussion board
• Detail of teachers on special duty
• Due Date: 5th of every month
• Pictorial view of activities
Development of e-learning material
Objectives:
• To provide additional learning resource for teachers /
students
• To cover subject specific shortage of teachers
Targets:
• Identification of hard areas for material development
• Preparation of materials
• Delivery of materials at CTSCs / DTSCs / DSD
• Improve learning environment at class rooms
Way Forward
 Teacher development body (regulating teaching
profession) through:
o Teacher certification and licensing (TC&L)
o Think-tank for advice to policymakers on teachers’
capacity issues
 Third Party Validation for impact assessment of CPD
Program
 Construction of buildings for 14 DTSCs in districts
without GCETs / Training Academies
 Up-scaling of CPD up to Secondary Level
THANKS