Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 263

Collision Theory

6/2/2008

15/07/23 09:48
CH 344: CHEMICAL KINETICS AND
ELECTROCHEMISTRY (2 units)
Dr. E.B. Mubofu and G. Kinunda

• Course Outline (2 lectures/w and 2Tutorial/w)


– Microscopic theories of reaction rates: Collision and transition state
theories
– Elementary reactions
– Rates and mechanisms of chemical reactions (reactions rates and
equilibria, enzyme catalysed reactions)
– Electromotive force and electrochemical cells
– Electrolytes in solutions
– The Debye-Huckel theory of interionic interaction and ionic activity
coefficient

15/07/23 09:48
ASSESSMENT MODE:
1. Set of questions to be distributed for the tutorials
2. There will be 2 tests, each carry 20 Marks
3. Final examination: 60 Marks
Section A: 30 Marks
Section B: 30 Marks, 3 Questions answer 2
References:
1. P.W. Atkins Physical chemistry (5th, 6th or 7th
ed.)
2. G.M. Barrow Physical chemistry 3rd ed. 1973 or
later ed.
3. B. G. Segal Chemistry experiment and theory, 1985
4. Any advanced physical chemistry book
15/07/23 09:48
Collision Theory

6/2/2008

15/07/23 09:48
• The pharmacokinetics of artensunate is that
following oral administtration …….. reaches Cmax
within 45 to 90 minutes. The product is ………
effective against malaria by the same mechanism
of action.

15/07/23 09:48
•You may recall that thermodynamics can predict whether
or not a reaction will proceed but cannot tell us how fast
or slow will the reaction occur! NOW
• Chemical kinetics deals with the understanding of
the factors that affect the rate of a chemical
reaction and elucidates information about the
mechanism of the reaction
• (A reaction mechanism is a series of steps that defines the order
in which bonds are broken and new ones are formed, until the
final product is obtained)
• chemical reaction kinetics is concerned with the
rates at which chemical reactions occur
• NB: Generally, a rate is a change in some quantity wrt time

15/07/23 09:48
What factors affect the rate of a chemical reaction?
• Nature of reactants: Each reaction proceeds at its own rate.
Changing the nature of reactants will, in general, change the
rate of the reaction
• The concentration of reactants: For a chemical reaction to
occur, the reactants must come close together and collide.
Because collisions are more frequent when concentrations
increase, then the reaction rates increase as the concentration
of the reactants increase
• The temperature: In general, increasing the temperature
increases the rate of the reaction. The rate of most reactions
increases by a factor of 2 or 3 for a 10oC rise in temperature!
• The nature of the solvent:Although not all reactions occur in
solution, but for those carried in solution, changing the solvent
will generally change the rate of the reaction
• The presence of the catalyst
15/07/23 09:48
Molecular reaction dynamics
• Why do reactions occur?
• How?! i.e pathways and rate/speed
• This is the heart and the cornerstone of chemistry
(why?) because here we examine the details of
what happens to molecules at the climax of
reactions and hence we can establish mechanisms
of reactions
• The simplest quantitative account of reaction rates at
microscopic level is in terms of collision theory which
can be used only for discussion of reactions between
simple species in the gaseous phase

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
Collision Theory of bimolecular gas reaction

• Generally, a theory is an explanation for


something which happens AND
• Collision Theory is a theory that assumes
that, in order for a reaction to occur,
reactant molecules must COLLIDE with
an ENERGY GREATER than some
minimal value and with a PROPER
ORIENTATION

15/07/23 09:48
Collision Theory
• In other words, collision theory maintains that the
rate constant for a reaction is the product of three
factors.
1. Z, the collision frequency
2. f, the fraction of collisions with sufficient energy to
react
3. p, the fraction of collisions with the proper
orientation to react
4. Mathematically,

15/07/23 09:48
Collision frequency

• Z is only slightly temperature dependent.

• This is illustrated using the kinetic theory of gases, which


shows the relationship between the velocity of gas
molecules and their absolute temperature.

or

15/07/23 09:48
This implies that the higher the temperature, the higher the root mean square
speed of the molecules, and at a given temperature heavy molecules travel
more slowly than light molecules

c  T/M

15/07/23 09:48
 A collision will only be successful
only if the kinetic energy exceeds a
minimum energy value,  a of
the
reaction THUS
 The rate constant should also be
proportional to a Boltzmann factor
Ea

of the form e , so we can



RT

anticipate that
-Ea/RT
k2  (T/M)e
15/07/23 09:48

Moreover, not every collision will
lead to reaction even if the energy
requirement is satisfied, because the
reactants may need to collide in a
certain orientation. The steric
requirement suggests that another
factor, p, should be introduced, and
-Ea/RT
thus k2  p(T/M)e
 Indeed this is what is predicted by the collision theory!
It reflects that for a successful reaction/effective
collision:-
k2  encounter rate x minimum energy x steric requirement
15/07/23 09:48
Collision Theory-Collision energy
• That is, f, the fraction of molecules with
sufficient threshold energy turns out to be very
temperature dependent.
• This is the primary factor relating temperature increases to
observed rate increases.

15/07/23 09:48
Collision Theory and reaction rates
• The reaction rate dependence on the
fraction of collisions with the proper
orientation, p, is independent of
temperature changes
• So, with changes in temperature, Z and p
remain fairly constant.
• We can thus use that fact to derive a
mathematical relationship between the rate
constant, k, and the absolute
temperature.

15/07/23 09:48
The Arrhenius Equation
• If we were to combine the relatively
constant terms, Z and p, into one constant,
and call it A. We obtain the Arrhenius
equation:

• The Arrhenius equation expresses the dependence of the


rate constant on absolute temperature and activation
energy.

15/07/23 09:48
The Arrhenius Equation
• It is useful to recast the Arrhenius equation
in logarithmic form.

•We can relate this equation to the (somewhat rearranged) general


formula for a straight line.

y = b +mx
• A plot of ln k versus (1/T) should yield a straight line with a slope
of (-Ea/R) and an intercept of ln A.

15/07/23 09:48
The Arrhenius Equation
• A more useful form of the equation emerges
if we look at two points on the line this
equation describes that is, (k1, (1/T1)) and
(k2, (1/T2)).
• With this form of the equation, given the activation
energy and the rate constant k1 at a given
temperature T1, we can find the rate constant k2
at any other temperature, T2.

15/07/23 09:48
Now, let us compare k2 = NAp(T/M)e-Ea/RT with

15/07/23 09:48
Note: The above equation has the Arrhenius form
k2 =Ae-Ea/RT AND
• We therefore identify the activation energy with the
minimum kinetic energy along the line of approach that is
needed for a reaction and
• That the pre-exponential factor A is a measure of the rate of
collisions occurring in gas

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
Collision rates in gases-The collision frequency z
NOTE: = Collision cross-section =d2 (Fig
below), and d = 1/2(dA + dB)

15/07/23 09:48
END

END

END

15/07/23 09:48
CH344
13/2/2008

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
A Simple approach to calculate the collision frequency Z of the
molecules we consider the following hypothetical ‘collision tube’

Fig. 1
A: Freeze the positions of all molecules except one
B: Note what happen when the mobile molecule travels through the gas with
a mean speed C for a time t
C: Upon travelling, the molecule sweeps out a ‘collision tube’ of cross-
sectional area  = d2 and length Ct and thus volume = Ct

miss

hit
d >d
<d hit
Fig 1
<d
hit >d <d
Collision cross-section
15/07/23 09:48 miss
•The number of stationary molecules with centres
inside the collision tube is given by the volume of the
tube times the number density (N = NA[A] ) and is
NCrelt = NA[A] Crelt
 The collision frequency (the number of collisions per unit time) is
therefore NA[A] Crel where [A] = the molar concentration of
molecule A, NA = the Avogadros constant and Crel = is the relative
mean speed of the molecules
 For collision between different types of molecule, the
mean relative speed is
Crel = (8kT/μ)1/2 where μ = reduced mass = mAmB/mA + mB
 Thus the collision frequency is
ZAB= (8kT/μ)1/2 NA2[A][B] and for similar molecules
the collision frequency is ZAA= (8kT/μ)1/2 NA2[A]2
15/07/23 09:48
The energy requirement
• According to collision theory, the rate of change in [A]
molecules results from the collision density and the
probability that a collision occurs with sufficient energy

• The energy requirement is incoporated by writing the


collision cross-section  as a function of the kinetic energy
of approach of the two colliding species

• Also, the cross-section () can be set equal to zero if the


kinetic energy of approach is below a certain threshold
value, a

Thus, d[A]/dt = -()relNA[A][B]


15/07/23 09:48
•The relative KE, rel, and the speed are related by rel
= 1/22rel

d A 

dt = -{ 0    rel f()d}NA[A][B]

• gives the average Boltzmann disribution of energies and


hence the rate constant is recognized as


k2 = NA 0   rel f()d

15/07/23 09:48
• Assuming that the reactive collision cross-section is zero
below a, then we see that the variation of reactive cross-
section () with energy is expressed by

a
   = ( 1 - )

• THUS k2 = NACrele-Ea/RT

15/07/23 09:48
The steric requirement: Consider the Arrhenius
parameters in the table below

Reaction A/(Lmol-1s-1) A(Lmol-1s-1) Ea/ A exp


experiment theory (kJmol-1) p
A Theory

2NOCl
→ 2NO + 2Cl 9.4 X109 5.9 X 1010 102.0 0.16

2ClO
Cl 2 + O2 6.3 X 107 2.5 X 1010 0.0 2.5 X 10-3
H2 + C2H4→
C 2H 6 1.24 X 106 7.4 X 1011 180.0 1.7 X 10-6
K + Br2→
KBr + Br 1.0 X 1012 2.1 X 1011 0.0 4.8

15/07/23 09:48
The Arrhenius parameters data in the table above
show that :
• There is a fair agreement between theory and
experiment
• There are discrepancies
• There are some cases where there are several orders
of magnitude smaller than experimental
• It therefore shows that the collision energy is not the only
criterion for reaction and that some other feature such as
the relative orientation of the colliding species is important
• NB: Larger than theory implies the reaction occurs more
quickly than the particles collide

15/07/23 09:48
•The disagreement between theory and experiment
is accommodated by introducing a steric factor, p,
and expressing the reactive cross-section, σ*
A
as a multiple of the cross-section, σ* = pσ = σ A
exp

Theory

Thus the rate constant becomes


k2 = pσ(8kT/)1/2 NAe-Ea/RT
15/07/23 09:48
Weaknesses of Collision theory (SCT):
• Noway to compute P from molecular
parameters
• No way to compute a from first principles.
Theory not quantitative or predictive.
Strengths of Collision theory (SCT):
•Qualitatively consistent with observation
(Arrhenius equation).
• Provides plausible connection between microscopic
molecular properties and macroscopic reaction rates.
• Provides useful guide to upper limits for rate constant
k.

15/07/23 09:48
SCT : a summary.
• The major problem with SCT is that the threshold
energy a is very difficult to evaluate from first
principles.
• The predictions of the collision theory can be critically
evaluated by comparing the experimental pre-
exponential factor with that computed using SCT.
• We define the steric factor P as the ratio between
the experimental and calculated A factors.

15/07/23 09:48
• We can incorporate P into the SCT expression for the
rate constant.
• For many gas phase reactions P is considerably less
than unity.
• Typically SCT will predict that Acalc will be in
the region 1010-1011 L mol-1s-1 regardless of
the chemical nature of the reactants and products.
• What has gone wrong? The SCT assumption of hard
sphere collision neglects the important fact that
molecules possess an internal structure.
• We need a better theory that takes molecular
structure into account. The activated complex theory
does just that .

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
Transition state theory (TST) = Activated complex
theory (ACT) = Absolute rate theory

15/07/23 09:48
END

END

END

15/07/23 09:48
CH344

20/2/2008

15/07/23 09:48
RECAP: SCT HAS WEAKENESSES!

• What has gone wrong? The SCT assumption of hard


sphere collision neglects the important fact that
molecules possess an internal structure.

• We need a better theory that takes molecular


structure into account. The activated complex theory
(ACT) does just that .

15/07/23 09:48
RECALL:
 An activated complex forms between reactants as they
collide and begin to assume the nuclear and electronic
characteristic of products
 We know that the change in potential energy associated
with formation of the activated complex accounts for the
activation energy of the reaction
 ACT considers a more detailed calculation of rate
constants using the concept of statistical thermodynamics

 ACT is an attempt to identify the principal features


governing the size of a rate constant in terms of a model
of the events that take place in the reaction
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
• After the maximum, the potential energy falls as
the atoms rearrange in the cluster, and it reaches
a value characteristic of a product
• Here the reactant molecules have come to such a
degree of closeness and distortion that a small
further distortion will result into the product

Note:This crucial configuration is called transition state of the


reaction and some molecules entering the transition state
might revert to reactants BUT if they pass through this
configuration then it is inevitable that products will be formed
from the encounter
NB: The activated complex is the area near the
potential maximum whereas the transition state
corresponds
15/07/23 09:48 to the maximum itself
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
END

END

END

15/07/23 09:48
CH344
21/2/2008

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
Thermodynamic aspects of TST
 The concept of an equilibrium between reactants and the
activated complex enables us to treat activation processes in
terms of thermodynamic functions
 If we accept K in the Eyring equation as an equilibrium
constant, then we can express it in terms of a Gibbs energy of
activation, G through the definition
G   RTInK or G   RTInK p
Where
G = G (activated complex) - G (reactants)
o o

and K and K are equilibrium constants


p

15/07/23 09:48
 G
Thus K= Kp e= RT
and therefore from Eyring equation

Then the rate constant becomes

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
HOW?
Now from the formal definition of activation energy,
E a  RT 2 In k , then gives E  H  2 RT for reactions in gases

T a

and E  H  RT for reactions in solution (NOTE: All


a

thermodynamic quantities are in standard states)

15/07/23 09:48
So substituting H in the rate equation we get

kT RT 2 S  R  Ea RT
k2  ee e
h p 
in gases

Whereas for reactions in solution, we get


kT RT S  R 1  Ea RT
k2  e ee
h p 
in solution

15/07/23 09:48
 Furthermore, H  U  pV where for reactions occurring
  

in solution, the term pV is quite small compared to U


 

and can therefore be neglected


 For the gas-phase reactions however, we have pV  RTn
where n is the change in moles from reactants to the
activated complex (NB: For unimolecular reaction n = 0.)
For gas-phase reactions H  U  RTn   

In general, in solution we have

kT RT S  R  H  RT kT RT S  R  U  RT
k2  
e e  
e e
h p h p
and in gas phase
kT RT S  R  H  RT kT RT S  R  n  U  RT
k2  
e e  
e e e
h p h p
15/07/23 09:48
When compared with the empirical Arrhenius equation
Ea

k 2  Ae RT
, we then see that in gases, the frequency factor
kT RT 2 S  R
e e
A= h p  for gases
While for reactions in solution
kT RT S 
ee R
A= h p 

What is the significance of S and H ?  

These equations enable us to interpret the probability factors


in terms of entropy of activation and thus
 The entropy of activation is negative when two reactant
species come to form one species

15/07/23 09:48
 If reactants are only atoms or simple molecules, then
there is a relatively small amount of rearrangement of
energy among the various degrees of freedom in the
activated complex
 Consequently, S will be either a small positive or

S 
negative number, so that e R and thus steric factor p is
close to unity. This implies that the reaction will proceed
much faster than predicted by the collision theory

 On the other hand, if complex molecules are involved in


a reaction, S will be either a large positive or negative

number and this means a much slower rate will be


observed
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
It is useful to compare the expression of rate
constants discussed so far:

• Empirical Arrhenius equation

• Collision theory • k2 = pσ(8kT/)1/2 NAe-Ea/RT


kT RT 2 S  R  Ea RT
k2  ee e
• TST h p 
in gases
kT RT S  R 1  Ea RT
k2  e ee
h p 
in solution
15/07/23 09:48
END

END

END

15/07/23 09:48
CH344
27/2/2008

15/07/23 09:48
• The pharmacokinetics of artensunate is that
following oral administtration …….. reaches Cmax
within 45 to 90 minutes. The product is ………
effective against malaria by the same mechanism
of action.

15/07/23 09:48
•You may recall that thermodynamics can predict whether
or not a reaction will proceed but cannot tell us how fast
or slow will the reaction occur! NOW
• Chemical kinetics deals with the understanding of
the factors that affect the rate of a chemical
reaction and elucidates information about the
mechanism of the reaction
• (A reaction mechanism is a series of steps that defines the order
in which bonds are broken and new ones are formed, until the
final product is obtained)
• chemical reaction kinetics is concerned with the
rates at which chemical reactions occur
• NB: Generally, a rate is a change in some quantity wrt time

15/07/23 09:48
What factors affect the rate of a chemical reaction?
• Nature of reactants: Each reaction proceeds at its own rate.
Changing the nature of reactants will, in general, change the
rate of the reaction
• The concentration of reactants: For a chemical reaction to
occur, the reactants must come close together and collide.
Because collisions are more frequent when concentrations
increase, then the reaction rates increase as the concentration
of the reactants increase
• The temperature: In general, increasing the temperature
increases the rate of the reaction. The rate of most reactions
increases by a factor of 2 or 3 for a 10oC rise in temperature!
• The nature of the solvent:Although not all reactions occur in
solution, but for those carried in solution, changing the solvent
will generally change the rate of the reaction
• The presence of the catalyst
15/07/23 09:48
•Reactions we would like to speed up.
–Drug delivery
–Paint drying
–Destruction of air pollutants in auto exhaust
–Most industrial chemical processes
–Breakdown of synthetic plastics in land fill sites
etc.

•Reactions we would like to slow down.


–Food decay (hence food additives)
–Rubber decay
–Human aging (antioxidants)
–Fading of clothes (detergent additives)
–Fires (fire retardents added to consumer products)
–Ozone layer destruction (a big problem, CFC’s etc)
–Rusting of metallic objects etc

15/07/23 09:48
To get the picture of rate in chemical kinetics let us

•From the stoichiometry for the reaction it follows


that
d D 1 C  d A 1 d B
dt
= 3 dt
= 
dt
= 
2 dt
so there are several rates connected with the
reaction and as such , any one of them can
be considered the rate of the reaction!

15/07/23 09:48
More elaboration on definition of rate

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
Rate law

15/07/23 09:48
General rate expression: rate =  = k[A]m[B]n….

• Where k = The rate constant of the reaction and is


independent of the concentrations of the reactants but
depends on temperature, the solvent (if in solution), the
particular reaction, and the catalyst (if any) that are present
in the reaction mixture
• The exponents m, n, … in the rate expression are small
integers (0,1,2,3,…) or small fractions (1/2, 3/2, …)
– An experimentally determined equation of this kind is the rate law of the
reaction
• A formal definition of a rate law: A rate law is an equation that expresses
the rate of reaction as a function of the concentrations of all the species
present in the overall chemical equation at some time i.e
 = f([A],[B], ….)

15/07/23 09:48
•For homogeneous gas-phase reactions, it is often more
convenient to express the rate law in terms of partial pressures,
which are related to molar concentrations by
Pj = RT[A] thus,  = f(PA, PB …)

• NB: The rate law of a reaction is determined


experimentally, and cannot in general be inferred
from the chemical equation for the reaction
– What is the importance of a rate law in chemistry?
• Once we know the rate law and the value of the
rate constant, we can:-

15/07/23 09:48
– Predict the rate of reaction from the composition of the
mixture

– Predict the composition of the reaction mixture at a later


stage of the reaction

– It serves as a guide to the mechanism of the reaction, for


any proposed mechanism must be consistent with the
observed rate law

15/07/23 09:48
Units of rates and rate constant
• The units of the rate of any reaction are
moles per liter per unit time, which may be
mol.L-1s-1.
• The units the rate constant, k, however,
depend on the order of the reaction

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
END

END

END

15/07/23 09:48
CH344
7/3/2006

15/07/23 09:48
Determination of reaction order
• Before anything can be said about the mechanism of a reaction, the first task is
to determine the order of the reaction. This can be achieved by several methods
such as isolation, differential, half-life, integrated and relaxation methods.

15/07/23 09:48
Differential method (suggested by van’t Hoff in 1884!)
• Since rate = = k[A]n, then by taking logarithms of
both sides, we obtain
• log = nlog[A] + logk
– Then by measuring  at different concentration of A, we
can obtain the value of n from a plot of log versus log[A]

A plot of log versus


log[A] gives a straight line
and the slope = order of
the reaction = n
slope = n
logV

15/07/23 09:48
log[A]
Integration method

NOTE: Zeromethod
Integration order isreactions are
an obvious relatively
procedure rare , you
whereby among the best
measure the
studied reactions are those that occur on metal surfaces
concentration of the reactant(s) at various time intervals of a reaction and

substitute the data into integrated rate equations

15/07/23 09:48
Plots for a zero order reaction

Rate [A]o -[A] Slope = k

concentration of A Time

We see that for zero order reactions, the


rate of the reaction is independent of the
15/07/23 09:48
reactant concentration
The exponential decay of the reactant in
a first order reaction. The larger the rate
constant the more rapid the decay

The expression [A] = [A]oe-kt shows that in a first-order reaction, the reactant
concentration decreases exponentially with time with a rate determined by k
15/07/23 09:48
•Plots for first order reaction

k Slope = -k

In[A]/[A]o
Rate

concentration of A Time

15/07/23 09:48
• The first expression shows
that a plot of 1/[A] vs t should
give a straight line with slope
=k
• The last expression lets us
predict the concentration of
A at any time after the start
of the reaction. It also shows
that the conc. of A
approaches zero more
slowly than in a first -order
reaction with the same initial
15/07/23 09:48 rate
d A
= -k[A][B]
dt
Note: The above rate law cannot be intergrated until we know how the concentration of B
is related to that of A.

Now consider the reaction A + B  P where P denotes product and [A]o and [B]o are
initial concentrations for A and B respectively.
From the stoichiometry of the reaction, it follows that when the conc. of A has fallen to
[A]o –X, the conc. of B will also have fallen to [B] o –X because for each A that
disappears entails the same disappearance of one B. It follows that
d A d A dx
= -k([A]o –x )([B]o- x) but because = - , the rate law becomes
dt dt dt
dx
= k([A]o –x )([B]o- x)
dt
dx
Thus = kdt
([ A]o  x)([ B]o  x)
15/07/23 09:48
with the initial condition that x = 0 when t = 0 and so the integration of the rate law by
partial fractions gives In
 [ B]
 [ B]
 o

= ([B]o – [A]o)kt


 [ A] 
 [ A]o 

Half Lives
The half life of a substance (reaction) is the time taken for
the concentration of the reactant to fall to half its initial
concentration
• This simple method is done by determining the dependence
of the half-life of a reaction on the initial concentration,
using the half life equation(s) from integrated rate laws.

15/07/23 09:48
Half Lives

0.693
k

15/07/23 09:48
 Unlike in the first order, the half-life of a substance in a
second-order reaction varies with the initial concentration

NOTE: A practical consequence of this dependence is that


species that decay by second-order reactions (sadly this
includes some environmentally unfriendly substances) may
persist in low concentration because their half-lives are long
when their concentrations are low!!.

15/07/23 09:48
Relaxation methods
• The term relaxation denotes the return of a system to equilibrium
• relaxation = return of a system to equilibrium
• Relaxation methods are used to measure rate constants.
• Apply a sudden perturbation to the equilibrium, e.g., a
temperature jump or a pressure jump, and monitor the relaxation
• Let us consider the response of a reaction rates to a sudden
change in temperature
• Recall that the equilibrium composition of a reaction depends on
the temperature (provided rH is nonzero), thus a shift in
temperature acts as a pertubation on the system [normally done
by LASER or microwave discharges)

15/07/23 09:48
When a sudden temperature increase is applied to
a simple A B equilibrium that is first-order in
each direction it can be shown that the
composition relaxes exponentially to the new
equilibrium composition:
• The exponential relation is
given by
t
x = xo e 

where  = ka + kb and x is the departure from equilibrium at


new temperature and xo is the departure from equilibrium after
the temperature jump.

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
END

END

END

15/07/23 09:48
CH344
13/3/2006

15/07/23 09:48
Reactions approaching equilibrium/Opposing reactions
• The rate laws we have considered so far disregard the
possibility that the reverse reaction is important , and none of
the laws describes the overall rate when the reaction is close
to equilibrium

•We know that most reactions are reversible to a certain extent,


so that we must consider both the forward and the reverse rate

At equilibrium, the products may be so abundant that


the reverse reaction must be considered. Thus for a
reversible reaction that proceeds by two elementary
steps:
k1
A B
k-1
15/07/23 09:48
d A
We represent the net rate of change of A as = -k1[A] + k-1[B]
dt
because when the concentration of A is reduced by the
forward reaction by a rate k[A] it is also increased by the
reverse reaction at a rate k-1[B]
Recall that at equilibrium, there is no net change in the concentration of A with time, that
d A
is, = 0 so that -k1[A] + k-1[B] = 0
dt
Thus k1[A] = k-1[B]
This leads to
B  k1
= =K
A k 1
Where K is the equilibrium constant for the reaction!

15/07/23 09:48
NB: This equation is very important in chemistry
because it relates the thermodynamic quantity, the
equilibrium constant, K, and the quantities relating to
rates i.e If one of the rate constants can be measured,
then the other may be obtained if the equilibrium
constant is known.
For a more general reaction, the overall equilibrium constants for all the intermediate
stages of the reaction mechanism is
k1 k 2
K = x x ……
k 1 k 2
Where the ks are the rate constants for the individual steps and the k - are for the
respective reverse steps
15/07/23 09:48
•The discussion of the relationship between reaction rates and
equilibria has its roots in a principle of great importance in
chemical kinetics and is called the principle of microscopic
reversibility!
• The principle states that at equilibrium the rates of the
forward and reverse process are equal for every elementary
reaction occurring
• This means that the process A B is exactly balanced by B A so
that the equilibrium cannot be maintained by a cyclic process, with the
reaction being A B and A C A on the opposite direction
• The usefulness of this principle in chemical kinetics is that it tells us that
the reaction pathway for the reverse of the reaction is opposite of the
pathway for the forward reaction!
• What does it mean when related to TST?
This means that the transition states (i.e the complex between the reactants
and products along the reaction pathway) for the forward and reverse reactions
are identical.

15/07/23 09:48
Consecutive elementary reactions
Some reactions proceed through a formation of an
intermediate (I) (i.e species that occur in the reaction
mechanism but do not appear in the overall reaction
as in the consecutive unimolecular reactions

Let us suppose that initially only A is


present, and that its concentration is [A]o
Remember that the first of the above rate
laws i.e ddtA = -ka[A] is a normal first order
and its
15/07/23 intergrated rate law is [A] = [A]o e
09:48
 ka
t
When [A] is substituted in equation
d[I ]
dt
= ka[A] - kb[I], we get
d[I ]
dt
+ kb[I] = ka[A]o e  ka
t

If we set [I]o = 0 the above differential


equation though is complex, it can be solved
to give the following solution:
-k t -k t
[I] = k  k (e -e )[A]o
k a a b

b a

At all times, [A] + [I] + [P] = [A]o, it


therefore follows that
[p] = {1 + k  k }[A]o
 kb t  kat
k e k e
a b

b a
15/07/23 09:48
If the three concentrations are plotted against time we
get the following figure
• We see that:
– Reactant A decays by
an ordinary first-order
– intermediates rises to a
maximum at tmax and
then falls to zero
– The concentration of
the product P rises from
zero and reaches [A]o

[p] = {1 + k e k  kk e }[A]o
 kb t  k at
a b

b a

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
•Generally, the rate determining step is the slowest step in a
mechanism and controls the overall rate of the reaction.

• NOTE: The rate determining step is not just the slowest step:
it must be slow and crucial gateway for the formation of
products! If a faster reaction can also lead to products, then the
slowest step is irrelevant because the slow reaction can then be
side-stepped (see Fig below)

15/07/23 09:48
The rate determining step (RDS)

15/07/23 09:48
•The rate law for a reaction with a rate determining step can
often be written down almost by inspection.
• For instance, if the first step in the reaction mechanism is rate
determining step, then the rate of the overall reaction is equal
to the rate of the first step because all subsequent steps are
so fast that once the first intermediate is formed it results
immediately in the formation of products (Fig below).

15/07/23 09:48
Pre-equilibrium
• We have dealt with a mechanism of a simple consecutive
reaction. NOW
• What happens if the intermediate reaches an equilibrium with
the reactants say A and B?:
ka kb
A+B I P
k'a
• This reaction involves pre-equilibrium, in which an
intermediate is in equilibrium with the reactants
NOTE: A pre-equilibrium arises when the rates of
formation of the intermediate and its decay back into
reactants are much faster than its rate of formation of
products, thus, the condition is possible when k' a >> kb
but not when kb >> k'a
• Because we assume A, B and I are in equilibrium, then
15/07/23 09:48 K = [I]/[A][B], K = ka/k'a
•The rate of formation of product P may therefore be
written d[P]/dt = kb[I], But [I] = K[A][B]

• Thus d[P]/dt = kbK[A][B] =k[A][B]


where k = kbK = kakb/k'a
• The above rate law has the form of a second-
order rate law with a composite rate constant.

NB: In writing these equations it is presumed that


the rate of reaction of I to form P is too slow to
affect the maintenance of the equilibrium

15/07/23 09:48
END

END

END

15/07/23 09:48
CH344
14/3/2006

15/07/23 09:48
The steady-state approximation
• You may have noticed a considerable
increase in mathematical complexity as
soon as the mechanism has more than a
couple of steps
• One approach to solving these complex
reactions is to integrate the rate laws
numerically and an alternative approach is
to make an approximation!
• This approximation is termed steady-
state approximation and it assumes
that, after an initial induction period,
an interval during which the
concentrations of intermediates, I,
rise from zero, and during the major
part of the reaction, the rates of
change of concentrations of all
reaction intermediates are negligibly
small i.e d [ I ]  0
dt
15/07/23 09:48
For instance, we can apply the approximation to the
consecutive first-order mechanism.
RECALL THAT

For SSA we set d[I]/dt = 0 such that ka[A] - kb[I]  0


Then [I]  ka [A] /kb
upon substituting this value on the above equation
d[P]/dt = kb[I] we get d[P]/dt = kb[I]  ka[A]!! We therefore
see that P is formed by a first order decay of A, with a rate
constant ka, the rate constant of the slower, RDS.

[P]  (1 - e-kat)[A]o showing that the formation of the final


product P depends on only the smaller of the two rate constants!
i.e 15/07/23
the rate09:48
of formation of P depends on the rate at which I is formed,
not on the rate at which I changes into product P
How the rate law is determined using Steady-State
Approximation?

1. First identify the intermediates (i.e species that occur in the


reaction but do not appear in the overall reaction)

2. Write expressions for their net rates of formation

3. Set all net rates of change of the concentrations of


intermediates approximately equal to zero

4. Solve the resulting equations algebraically.

15/07/23 09:48
Homework: Use the steady-state approximation to devise the rate law
for the decomposition of N2O5,
N2O5 (g) 4NO2 (g) + O2 (g)
on the basis of the following mechanism.

ka
N2O5 NO2 + NO3
k'a
kb NO2 + O2 +NO
NO2 + NO3
kc
NO + N2O5 NO2 + NO2 + NO2

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
•Catalytic reactions consist of a reaction cycle formed by a
series of elementary reaction steps for example DA reaction

R
N
O

+
N
O
2
4a R = H
4b R = NO2
4c R = OCH3 R
5a R = H
5b R = NO2
5c R = OCH3
15/07/23 09:48
Mechanism of Lewis acid catalysed DA in water
N
O

Cu
2+ O2N

N
NO2
O
2+ O2N
Cu N
O

N
O Cu
2+

NO2

15/07/23 09:48
Rates of catalysed reactions and groups of catalysts:

• Rate expression are indispensable in the application of


catalysed reactions, in the design of a chemical reactors, and
their process control
• The rate expression for a catalysed reaction is in general a
function of many parameters i.e  = f(catalyst, T, ki, Pi,
Ki..Keq)
Catalysts are conveniently placed into two groups
viz. Homogeneous and Heterogeneous
Homogeneous catalysts have the same phase as the
reactants
Heterogeneous catalysts: The catalyst has a different
phase from the reaction mixture.
15/07/23 09:48
Heterogeneous catalysts provide surface upon
which reactants bind; this binding facilitates
encounters between reactants and hence increase
the rate of the reaction

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
END

END

END

15/07/23 09:48
CH344

20/3/2006

15/07/23 09:48
Enzyme kinetics
• One of the most fascinating studies in chemical kinetics is the
investigation of enzyme catalysis
• An enzyme-catalysed reaction is usually characterised by a very
large increase in the rate (on the order of 106 to 1012) and high
specificity
• Specificity means that the enzyme molecule is capable of
selectively catalysing certain reactants, the substrate, while
discriminating against
• An enzyme usually contains one or more ACTIVE SITE(S)
where reactions with substrate take place
• An active site may contain only a few amino acid residue,
residue the
rest of the protein molecule is however required to maintain the
3-D integrity of the network

• WHY ENZYMES ARE SPECIFIC?


15/07/23 09:48
•In 1890s, Fischer proposed that enzyme specificity may be
explained in terms of Lock-and-Key theory. In this theory,
the active site is assumed to have a rigid structure,
similar to a lock whereas a substrate molecule has the
complimentary structure and function like a key
NOTE: This theory has been modified to take into account the
flexibility of proteins in solution and to explain the
phenomenon of cooperativity

15/07/23 09:48
In enzymology, we mostly study the basic mathematical

treatment of enzyme kinetics


• It is almost a custom to study enzyme kinetics by involving
the measurement of initial rate (o) of a reaction. Why??
– It minimises the rate of reverse reaction, since the rate increases
with the concentration of the product
– During the course of the reaction, there may be appreciable heat
and /or pH changes which may alter the conformation of the
enzyme and hence affect the rate of the reaction
– In some cases, the product formed may bind to the enzyme in
such a way it inhibits its function
– The initial rate corresponds to a known fixed substrate
concentration

• In enzyme kinetics we assume that the enzyme-substrate


binding ratio is 1:1 and when the reaction profile is followed,
the substrate concentration drops (Fig. next slide)
15/07/23 09:48
The rate increase rapidly at low concentrations of the
substrate but then gradually levels off at high
concentrations of substrate
Mathematical analysis show that
the relationship between the
initial rate o and [S] can be
defined in terms of the equation
of a rectangular hyperbola

aS 
o  b  S 
where a and b are constants

How do we explain the dependence of the initial rate on


the15/07/23
concentration
09:48 of a substrate?
Michaelis-Menten kinetics (1913)
• Michaelis and Menten proposed a theory to explain the
dependence of the initial rate on concentration
• They considered the following scheme:(Compare with pre-
equilibria!)
ka kb
VS A + B I P
k'a

E is the enzyme, S is the "substrate" (the molecule on


which the enzyme does its work), and ES is an
enzyme-substrate complex. (It is presumed that the
substrate must somehow bind to the enzyme before
the enzyme can do its work.)

15/07/23 09:48
• The initial rate of product formation o is given by
o =

• The concentrations of the enzyme and substrate at a time


shortly after the start of the reaction(initial time) are
[E] = [E]o - [ES] and [S] = [S]o - [ES]
• However experimental conditions are usually such that
[S]o >> [E]o so that [S]o >> [ES] or [S] ~ [S]o

• Michaelis and Menten assumed that k-1 >> k2 so that the first
step (i.e the formation ES complex) can be treated as a rapid
equilibrium process AND therefore the dissociation constant
is given by k
K s  1 
E S   E o  ES S 
k1 ES  ES 
15/07/23 09:48
Solving for [ES], we obtain
[ ES ] 
E o S 
K s  S 

• Substituting [ES] in the rate equation

d[ P] k 2 E o S  aS 
we get o   compare with
dt K s  S  b  S 

Note: a = k2[E]o and b = Ks


• The physical significance of a and b may be understood as
follows: At high substrate concentration i.e [S] >> b so that
aS  aS 
o    k 2 E o
b  S  S 
• At these conditions all the enzyme molecules are in the complex
form, so that the initial rate must be at its maximum value (max)

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
END

END

END

15/07/23 09:48
CH344

21/3/2006

15/07/23 09:48
If you postulate a short time after the enzyme and the substrate are mixed,
the concentration of the enzyme-substrate will reach a constant value can
you apply SSA? Yes you can! (Briggs and Halden did that in 1925)

d ES 
 k1 E S  k 1 ES  k 2 [ ES ]
dt
0  k1 E S   k 1 ES   k 2 [ ES ]
   
but E  E o  [ES ]
 0  k1 E o  ES S  k 1 ES  k 2 ES 
k1 E o  [ ES ]S   k 1  k 2 ES 
k1 E o S   k1[ ES ]S  k 1  k 2 ES 

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
k 2 E o S  k 2 E o S 
If we compare S   K with K  S  we see that both equations have
M s

similar dependence on substrate concentration, however a S


K M  K s unless k 1 >> k 2 because K  k  k ~ k M
1 b  S
2 1

k k 1 1

In this treatment we also define the maximum rate  max exactly the same as before such
 max S 
that  max = k 2 E o and hence the above equation can also be written as  o 
S   K M
In principle, this shows that both  max and K M can be
determined from a plot of  o versus [S] (see Fig.below)
max

Initial rate (o) 1/2 max

KM
15/07/23 09:48
[ S]
• In practice, it is not very useful determining the max since it is
difficult to determine the asymptotic value  at a very high
max

substrate concentrations
• A more satisfactory approach is by employing the
Lineweaver-Burk approach where you take a double
 max S 
reciprocal of equation o S   K
 
M

where you get

1 KM 1
 
o  max S  max
where
1 1
Versus gives a straight line
o S 
15/07/23 09:48
From the plot, K M and  max can be obtained from the
slope and intercepts of the straight line.

15/07/23 09:48
What is the significance of  max , k 2 and K M ??
 The maximum velocity  max represents the maximum rate
attainable, that is, it is the rate when the total enzyme concentration
is present as the enzyme-substrate complex!

 The kinetic constant k 2 (in units of s-1) in the equation  max = k 2 E o


is called the turnover number(also kcat). The turnover number of an
enzyme is the number of substrate molecules converted into
product per unit time, when the enzyme is fully saturated with the
substrate! NOTE: The TONs of most enzymes for their
physiological substrates fall in the range of 1 to 105 s-1.
 KM lacks a simple interpretation.
However when k >> k then K
1 can be2 M

equated to the dissociation constant Ks


When this condition is met, K becomes M

a measure of the strength of the ES


complex
15/07/23 09:48
 A large K indicates weak binding and
M

small K indicate strong binding


M

 Generally, K (in units of M) is


M

customarily reported together with k 2


and  max for enzyme-catalysed reactions.
This is because K depends on pH,
M

temperature, substrate etc., and thus, its


value serves to characterise a particular
enzyme-substrate system under certain
specified conditions.[In most cases K M

lies between 10-2 and 10-7M).

Enzyme inhibition
15/07/23 09:48
• Enzyme catalysed reactions are prone to inhibition by
molecules that interfere with the formation of the product
Inhibitors are compounds(negative catalysts) that decrease the rate of an enzyme-
catalysed reaction
• Actually, many drugs for the treatment of diseases are
designed to function by inhibiting enzymes!
NOTE: This is one of the strategy towards developing a
drug to treat AIDS. In this case, it involves a steady
administration of a specially designed protease
inhibitor I.e the drug inhibits an enzyme that is key to
the formation of protein envelope surrounding the
genetic material of the human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV). Without a properly formed envelope, HIV can not
replicate in the host organism.
15/07/23 09:48
Enzyme inhibition
There are two types of enzyme inhibitions: Reversible and irreversible

Enzyme Inhibition

Reversible Irreversible

Competitive Noncompetitive Uncompetitive

15/07/23 09:48
Competitive Inhibition
• In this case the substrate S and the inhibitor I compete
for the same active site. The reactions are:
E+ S ES P+ E

E+ I EI

where the complex EI does not form products


The situation can be treated by Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Applying the steady-state
approximation for ES, we obtain
o 
 max
where K 1 
E I 
 K    I   EI 
1   M  1   
 S     K 1 

The Lineweaver-Burk equation is given by

1 K  I   1  1 1 1
 M 1  Thus a straight line is obtained by plotting against at constant I 
 o  max  K 1  S   max o S 
15/07/23 09:48
END

END

END

15/07/23 09:48
CH344

27/3/2006

15/07/23 09:48
Competitive Inhibition
• In this case the substrate S and the inhibitor I compete
for the same active site. The reactions are:
E + S E S P + E

E + I E I

where the complex EI does not form products


The situation can be treated by Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Applying the steady-state
approximation for ES, we obtain
o 
 max
where K 1 
E I 
 K    I   EI 
1   M  1   
 S     K 1 

The Lineweaver-Burk equation is given by

1 K  I   1  1 1 1
 M 1  Thus a straight line is obtained by plotting against at constant I 
 o  max  K 1  S   max o S 
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
 max
 S  ( o ) inhibition 
Dividing equation  o  max
S   K M by  K    I  
1   M  1   
we
 S     K1 

o K M I 
1 
get  o inhibition = S K I  K M K I

NOTE: To overcome this competitive inhibition, we need to increase


the substrate concentration relative to the inhibitor; that is, at high
o K M I 
substrate concentration, [S]KI >> KM KI and  o inhibition  1
S K I 1

15/07/23 09:48
Noncompetitive Inhibition

 A noncompetitive inhibitor usually does not bind at the active site


Noncompetitive
of the enzyme. The reactions are: inhibition

E+S ES P+E
E+I EI
ES + I ESI

 Both EI and ESI do not form products. Noncompetitive inhibition


can not be reversed by increasing the substrate concentration.
 The initial rate is given by

Vmax S  E I   ES I 


o  , where K I 
K M  S 1   I K  EI  ESI  ,
The Lineweaver-Burk equation  is given I 
by
1 K 1
 M 
1 
1 
I  
 o Vmax S  Vmax  K I 
15/07/23 09:48 1 1
 o VS S  gives a straight line
15/07/23 09:48
 max S  Vmax S 
Dividing o 
S   K M by o  we get
 S 1   I  
 
K M K
  I 

o I 
 o inhibition =1+ KI

 NOTE: The results above confirms that the degree of


noncompetitive inhibition is independent of [S] and depends only
on [I] and KI

15/07/23 09:48
UNCOMPETITIVE NHIBITION
 An uncompetitive inhibitor does not bind to the enzyme; instead ,
it binds reversibly to the enzyme-substrate complex to yield an
inactive ESI complex. The reactions are:

E+S ES P+E
ES + I ESI

 The ESI does not form a product. Again, since I does not interfere
with the formation of ES, uncompetitive inhibition cannot be
reversed by increasing the substrate concentration. The initial rate is
given by
Vmax S  ES I 
o  where KI 
KM  S 1  I   ESI 
 KI 

15/07/23 09:48
The Lineweaver-Burk equation is given by

1 KM 1

1 
1 
I  
o = Vmax S  Vmax  KI 

1 1
A straight line is obtained by plotting o versus S  at constant I 

 S  1

KM 1

1 
1 
I  
Dividing  o  max
S   K M by  o Vmax S  Vmax  KI 
 we get

o K M  S 1  I  
 KI 
 o inhibition =
S  K M

If conditions are such that [S] >> KM , then the equation becomes
o K M  S 1  I   I 
KI 
 o inhibition = =1+

S  KI

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
The catalytic efficiency of Enzymes
k cat
• The catalytic efficiency, , of an enzyme is the ratio of K M
Now recall that KM 
k 1  k 2 and max = k2[E]o
k1
Thus k cat Vmax
X
k1

k1 k 2
KM =  = E o k 1  k 2 k 1  k 2
The higher the value of , the more efficient is the enzyme (catalyst).
NOTE: Because k1 is the rate constant for the formation of a complex
from two species that are diffusing freely in solution, the maximum
efficiency is related to the maximum rate of diffusion of E and S in
solution. This happens when k2 >> k-1!

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
END

END

END

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
Conductance and Conductivity
• The nature of molecular motion in solution can be obtained
by studying the motion of ions in solution (electrolytes).
 An electrolyte is an ionic conductor i.e solution, a liquid or a
solid.
 Electrolytes dissociate in aqueous solution and the ions
formed act, to a large extent, as free, independent entities (Cf
kinetic-molecular theory of ideal gases)
 The ions experience van der Waals forces, interactions of the
ions between themselves and interaction of ions with the
solvent
•By studying the transport of charge through electrolyte
solutions, it is possible to get a picture of how the events occur
and the results can be extrapolated to uncharged (neutral)
species
15/07/23 09:48
 The study of this motion of ions is done by measuring the electrical
resistance R, of the solution.
1
 The inverse of this resistance, R is the conductance, G, of the
1
solution (units  mho or SI unit siemens, S) i.e
1 G
R
 Conductance is proportional to the cross-sectional area and is
inversely proportional to length
A A
 That is G
l and therefore G 
l where   conductivi ty

l
Or 
A
G Cell constant x G

 With the conductance in siemens and the dimensions in metres; it


follows that the SI unit of conductivity (  ) are siemens per metre
(Sm-1)

15/07/23 09:48
 The conductivity of the solution depends on the number of ions
present in the solution and we normally introduce the molar
conductivity,  m , which is defined as

m  where c = the molar concentration of the added electrolyte
c
 The concentration dependence of molar conductivities show that
there are two classes of electrolytes i.e Strong and weak
electrolytes
 The characteristics of a strong electrolyte is that its molar
conductivity depends only slightly on the molar concentration
(generally decreases slightly as the concentration is increased)
 The characteristic of weak electrolyte on the other hand is that its
molar conductivity is normal at concentrations close to zero, but
falls sharply to low values as the concentration increases (Fig
overleaf)
NOTE: The classification is solvent dependent (a solute could be a
weak electrolyte in one solvent but strong in another)
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
STRONG ELECTROLYTES:
 Strong electrolytes are substances that are virtually fully ionized in
solution, and include ionic solids and strong acids.
 Due to this complete ionization, the concentration of ions in
solution is proportional to the concentration of strong electrolyte
added
 At low concentration the molar conductivities  m of strong
electrolytes vary linearly with the square root of the concentration:
 m  om   c This variation is called Kohlrausch′s law.
 The constant om is the limiting molar conductivity, the molar
conductivity in the limit of zero concentration (when the ions
are effectively infinitely far apart and do not interact with one
another).
 The constant  is found to depend more on the stoichiometry
of the electrolyte than on its specific identity
15/07/23 09:48
 Kohlrausch
′s also showed that om can be expressed as the sum of
contributions from its individual ions
 Let us denote the limiting molar conductivity of cations by
  and that of anions by   then Kohlrausch law of
independent migration of ions states that
om           where
  and  are the numbers of cations and anions per formula unit of
electrolyte (e.g      1 for HCl or NaCl where    1,    2 for
MgCl2)
WEAK ELECTROLYTES
 Weak electrolytes are not fully ionized in solution.
 The marked concentration dependence of their molar conductivities
arises from the displacement of the equilibrium towards products at
low molar concentrations.
HA (aq) + H2O (l) H3O+(aq) + A (aq)

15/07/23 09:48
a H O a A
Ka  3

a HA
 The conductivity depends on the number of ions in solution, and
therefore on the degree of ionization,  , of the electrolyte; and
for weak acids, we talk of the degree of deprotonation.
 For the acid HA at a molar concentration c, at equilibrium
[H3O+] = c, [A-] = c, [HA] = (1- )c
 Ignoring activity coefficients, the acidity constant Ka, is
approximately
 2c
Ka 
1   from which it follows that

 1

K   4c  2

  a 1    1
2c  K a  
 

15/07/23 09:48
 The acid is fully protonated at infinite dilution, and its molar
conductivity is then om . Because only a fraction  is actually
present as ions in the actual solution, the measured molar
o

conductivity m    m with  given above.

 By knowing the Ka, we can use it to predict the concentration


dependence of the molar conductivity

 We can also use the concentration dependence of  m in


measurements of the limiting molar conductance by rearranging
 2c 1 c
K 
equation a 1   into   1 
K a and by using
 m  om we
obtain
1 1  mc
 o 
 m  m K a om 2 (Ostwald′s dilution law)

15/07/23 09:48
1
This shows that a plot of  m against c  m , then the intercept at c = 0
1
will be om as shown in the figure below.

1 1  mc
 o 
 m  m K a om   2

15/07/23 09:48
END

END

END

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
THE MOBILITIES OF IONS
Why ions move at different speed? Why they have different molar
conductivities and why the molar conductivities of strong
electrolytes decrease with the square root of the molar concentration?
We shall see these when we study the drift speed, the ion mobility
and the transport numbers!
The drift speed:
 When the potential difference between two electrodes a distance
l apart is ∆, the ions in the solution between them experience a
uniform electric field of magnitude E where


l
In this field, an ion charge ze experiences a force of magnitude
ze
F  zeE 
l
15/07/23 09:48
NOW: A cation responds to application of the field by accelerating
to the negative electrode and the anion responds by accelerating to
the positive electrode
 However, as the ion moves through the solvent, it experiences a
frictional retarding force, Ffric, proportional to its speed.
 Assume Stokes formula for a sphere of radius a and speed s
applies at microscopic scale, then we can write this retarding
force as
Ffric = fs, where f = 6a and s = speed
 The two forces act in opposite directions, and the ions quickly
reach a terminal speed, the drift speed when the accelerating
force is balanced by the viscous drag.
zeE
s
 The net force is zero when f
 It follows that the drift speed of an ion is proportional to the
strength of the applied field. We write s  uE
15/07/23 09:48 where u is called the mobility of the ion
Recall that
zeE zeE
s  ............................1
f 6a
s  uE........................2
Comparing equation 1 and 2 we get
ze ze
Mobility, u  
f 6a
Ionic mobilities in water at 298 K, u/(10 -8 m2 s-1V-1)
H+ 36.23
+
Na 5.19
+
K 7.62
Zn2+ 5.47
-
OH 20.64
-
Cl 7.91
Br- 8.09
SO2-4 8.29

Why proton has a very high molar conductivity?


15/07/23 09:48
 The proton, although it is very small, has a very high molar conductivity. Both
proton and 17O-NMR show that the times characteristic of protons hopping
from one molecule to the next are about 1.5 ps, which is comparable to the time
that neutron scattering shows it takes a water molecule to reorient through
about 1 rad. According to the Grotthuss mechanism, there is an effective
motion of a proton that involves the rearrangement of bonds in a group of water
molecules.
 However, the actual mechanism is still highly debatable. Attention now focuses
on the H9O4+ unit in which the nearly trigonal planar H3O+ ion is linked to three
strongly solvating H2O molecules. This cluster of atoms is itself hydrated, but
the hydrogen bonds in the secondary sphere are weaker than in the primary
sphere. It is envisaged that the rate-determining step is the cleavage of one of
the weaker hydrogen bonds of this secondary sphere (Fig. a).

15/07/23 09:48
 After this bond cleavage has taken place, and the released
molecule has rotated through a few degrees (a process that takes
about 1 ps), there is a rapid adjustment of bond lengths and
angles in the remaining cluster, to form an H5O2+ cation of
structureH2O· · ·H+ · · ·OH2 (Fig. b).

03/04/2006 5:27

15/07/23 09:48
 Shortly after this reorganization has occurred, a new H 9O4+
cluster forms as other molecules rotate into a position where they
can become members of a secondary hydration sphere, but now
the positive charge is located one molecule to the right of its
initial location (Fig. c).

 According to this model, there is no coordinated motion of a


proton along a chain of molecules, simply a very rapid hopping
03/04/2006 5:30

between neighbouring sites, with a low activation energy. The


model is consistent with the observation that the molar
conductivity of protons increases as the pressure is raised, for
15/07/23 09:48
increasing pressure ruptures the hydrogen bonds in water.
 NOW again, because the drift speed governs the rate at which
the charge is transported, we expect the conductivity to decrease
with increasing solution viscosity and ion size.
 Experiments however confirm the prediction on size is true for
bulky ions (e.g R4N+, RCO-2) but not for small ions! Why?
 This can be explained when we notice that the radius a in the
Stokes formula is the effective radius in the solution taking into
account all the water molecules it carries in its hydration sphere
NOW
 Because small ions give rise to stronger electric fields than large
ones, it means small ions are more extensively solvated than big
ones (Note: The electric field at the surface of a sphere of radius r
ze
is proportional to r 2 )
 Thus, an ion of small ionic radius may have a large hydrodynamic
radius a,because it drags more solvent through the solution as it
migrates!
15/07/23 09:48
Mobility and conductivities
 Mobility gives us a link between measurable and theoretical
quantities
 ′sThe
mobility
relation
and
between
its molar
an conductivity
ion
is given by   zuF
Where F = The Faraday constant (F= NAe)
 Thus, for the solution itself in the limit of zero concentration
(i.e when there are no interionic interactions)
o
(recall that  m           ) then, the law of independent

migration of ions becomes m  z   u  z   u F


o

 For a symmetrical z:z electrolyte, such as CuSO4 with z = 2, the
above equation simplifies to m  z u  u  F
o

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
Transport numbers/Transference

 The transport number (transference), t  , is defined as the


fraction of total current carried by the ions of a specified type.
 Now, for a solution of two kinds of ions, the transport numbers
I
t 
of the cations t   and anions t   are I
 where I  is the current carried by the ions and I is the total
current through the solution
 Because the total current is the sum of the cation and anion
currents, it follows that t   t 1  1
o
t
 The limiting transport number,  , defined as the fraction
of the total current carried by the ions of specified type
for the limit of zero concentration of the electrolyt e
solution
15/07/23 09:48
 Note that the current that can be ascribed to each type of ion is
zucFA
related to the mobility of the ion by I  zucFAE
l
where E = Electric charge
z = charge
c = molar concentration of ion
F = Faraday constant
A = Cross-sectional area
l = length
 =Potential difference
o
 Hence the relationship between limiting transport number t 
and mobility u  is
o z  u
t 

z  u  z  u
 However, because z   = z   for any electrolyte, the
o u
t 
above
15/07/23 09:48
equation becomes 
u  u
 Moreover, because the ionic conductivities are related to
the mobilities by   zuF , therefore it follows that:
  
t o 
      
o
But recall that m           and thus

    
t o   o 
       m
o o
 For each type of ion t   m     

NB:As a result, because there are independent ways of measuring


transport numbers of ions, we can determine the individual ionic
conductivities and the ionic mobilities

Measurement of transport numbers


15/07/23 09:48
Measurement of transport numbers
 Transport numbers can be measured by methods such as Moving
boundary method or Hittorf method.
 In the Moving Boundary Method, the motion of a boundary
between two ionic solutions having a common ion is observed as
the current flows.
 Let MX (leading solution) be a salt of interest and NX
(indicator solution) a salt giving denser solution. The indicator
solution (NX) occupies the lower part of the vertical tube of
cross-section area A (Fig overleaf). The leading solution (MX)
occupies the upper part of the tube. There is a sharp boundary
between the two solutions. The indicator solution must be
denser than the leading solution, and the mobility of M ions
must be greater than that of N ions. Therefore, if any M ions
diffuse into the lower solution, they will be pulled upward
more rapidly than the N ions around them, and the boundary
will reform.
15/07/23 09:48
The interpretation of the experiment
makes use of the relationship between
the distance, l, moved by the
tboundary
∆ for in the time interval
which a current I is passed.
z  clAF
t 
It
Hence, by measuring the distance
moved, the transport number and
hence the conductivity and mobility
of the ions can be determined!

15/07/23 09:48
Conductivities and ion-ion interactions

How do we account why the molar conductivities of


stronger electrolytes decrease with the square root of the
o
molar concentration? Recall m   m  c

This can qualitatively be explained in terms of the


properties of the ionic atmosphere around each ion (Fig)

15/07/23 09:48
Ionic atmosphere causes (1) relaxation effect (2) Electrophoretic
effect
 To accommodate the effect of motion, the picture of an ionic
atmosphere looks as a spherical haze of charge
The ionic atmosphere based on Debye-Huckel theory in that there is
a tendency for anions to be found around cations and of cations to be
found around anions (cicled to emphasize). Note: The ions are in
ceaseless motion, and the figure represents a snapshot of their
motion.

15/07/23 09:48
 Now because the ions forming the atmosphere do not
adjust to the moving ion immediately, the atmosphere is
incompletely formed in front of the moving ion and
incompletely decayed behind the ion(Fig)

(a)In the absence of an electric field,


the ionic atmosphere is spherically
symmetric, BUT (b) when a field
is present it is distorted and the
centres of negative and positive
charge no longer coincide!)

15/07/23 09:48
 The overall effect is the displacement of the centre of charge of
the atmosphere a short distance behind the moving ion
 Because the two charges are opposite, the result is a retardation of
the moving ion and this reduction of the ions is what we call the
relaxation effect
 Another effect on the ionic atmosphere in the motion of ions is
that because moving ions experience a viscous drag; the drag is
enhanced because the ionic atmosphere moves in the opposite
direction to the central ion
 The enhanced viscous drag is called the electrophoretic effect
and reduces the mobility of the ions, and hence also reduces their
conductivities AND
It can therefore be shown that the decrease in molar conductivity
due to these two effects is proportional to the square root of
concentration!!
15/07/23 09:48
 A quantitative formulation is rather complex. Debye-Huckel-
Onsgager theory attempts to obtain the quantitative
expression.
 The theory leads to a Kohlrausch-like expression in which
 = A + B om
with
1
1 3
2
z eF 2
 2  2 qz F  2  2
A    B   
3  RT  24RT  RT 
where  = electric permittivity of the solvent
q = 0.586 for 1,1-electrolyte
NOTE: The slopes of the conductivity curves are predicted to depend
on the charge type of the electrolyte, in accord with Kohlausch law,
and comparisons between theory and experiment agree quite good at
very low concentration (0.001 M) depending on the charge type (Fig)

15/07/23 09:48
04/04/2004 20:47
15/07/23 09:48
Ionic atmosphere causes (1) relaxation effect (2) Electrophoretic
effect
 To accommodate the effect of motion, the picture of an ionic
atmosphere looks as a spherical haze of charge

15/07/23 09:48
 Many macromolecules, such as DNA, are charged and move
in response to an electric field . This motion is called
electrophoresis. Electrophoretic mobility is a result of a
constant drift speed, s, reached by an ion when the driving
force zeE (where, as usual, ze is the net charge and E is the
field strength) is matched by the frictional force fs.

zeE zeE
s 
f 6 a
 Therefore, the mobility of a macromolecule in an electric
field depends on its net charge, size (and hence molar
mass), and shape. The latter two factors are implied by the
dependence of s on f. in the above equation.
15/07/23 09:48
 Electrophoresis is a very valuable tool in the separation of
biopolymers from complex mixtures, such as those resulting
from fractionation of biological cells. We shall consider three
techniques commonly used: viz gel elctrophoresis, capillary
electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing. They differ in the
manner in which the drift speeds of biomolecules are
controlled in order to achieve separation of a mixture into its
components.
Gel Electrophoresis
 In gel electrophoresis, migration takes place through a gel slab. A
common gel material for the study of proteins is cross-linked
polyacrylamide. In most cases, the goal of the experiment is to
separate a sample according to the molar masses of its
components. However, the drift speed formula, states that the
shape and charge will also determine the drift speed. For example,
proteins with the same size but different net charge travel along the
slab at
15/07/23 different speeds.
09:48
 One way to avoid this problem and to effect a separation by
molar mass is to denature the proteins in a controlled way.
Sodium dodecyl sulphate is an anionic detergent that is very
useful in this respect: it denatures proteins, whatever their
initial shape, into rods by forming a complex with them.

 Moreover, most proteins bind a constant amount of ion, so


that the net charge per protein is well regulated. Under these
conditions, different proteins in a mixture may be separated
according to size only. The molar mass of each constituent
protein is estimated by comparing its mobility in its rod-like
complexes form with a standard sample of known molar
mass. However, molar masses obtained by this method are
not as accurate as those obtained by other techniques, such as
Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time Of Flight
(MALDI-TOF) and size exclusion microscopy.
15/07/23 09:48
Capillary Electrophoresis
 The drift speed attained by polymers in traditional
electrophoresis methods are rather low; as a result, several
hours are often necessary to effect good separation of
complex mixtures.

 According to drift speed formula, one way to increase the


drift speed is to increase the electric field strength. However,
there are limits to this strategy because very large electric
fields can heat the large surfaces of an electrophoresis
apparatus unevenly, leading to a non-uniform distribution of
electrophoretic mobilities and poor separation.
zeE zeE
s 
f 6 a
15/07/23 09:48
 In capillary electrophoresis, the sample is dispersed in a
medium (such as methylcellulose) and held in a thin glass or
plastic tube with diameters ranging from 20 to 100 µm. The
small size of the apparatus makes it easy to dissipate heat
when large electric fields are applied. Excellent separation
may be effected in minutes rather than hours.
Each polymer fraction emerging from the capillary can be
characterized further by other techniques, such as MALDI-TOF.

Isoelectric Focusing
 Naturally occurring macromolecules acquire a charge when
dispersed in water. An important feature of proteins and other
biopolymers is that their overall charge depends on the pH of
the medium.
15/07/23 09:48
 For instance, in acidic environments protons attach to basic
groups and the net charge is positive; in basic media the net
charge is negative as a result of proton loss. At the isoelectric
point, the pH is such that there is no net charge on the
biopolymer. Consequently, the drift speed of a biopolymer
depends on the pH of the medium, with s = 0 at the
isoelectric point.
 Isoelectric focusing is an electrophoresis method that
exploits the change of drift speed with pH. Consider a
mixture of distinct proteins dispersed in a medium with a pH
gradient along the direction of an applied electric field. Each
protein in the mixture will stop moving at a position in the
gradient where the pH is equal to the isoelctric point. In this
manner, the protein mixture can be separated into its
components.
15/07/23 09:48
END

END

END

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
RECAP
 You may recall from chemical equilibrium topic that the
equilibrium expression is not strictly constant if concentrations are
used as the measure of ‘active masses’ of the reacting species.
 Strong electrolytes though completely dissociate into ions in the
solid state, do not behave as though the ions are independent
particles in aqueous solutions.
 As you may remember, the physical properties of salt solutions,
such as conductivity and freezing point, suggest that the ions may
be ‘clustered’ together, with positive ions having more negative
than positive ions in their immediate neighbourhood, and negative
ions in turn having an excess of positive ions around them (IONIC
ATMOSPHERE).
 This time-averaged, spherical haze around the central ion, in which
counter ions outnumber ions of the same charge as the central ion, has a
net charge equal in magnitude but opposite in sign to that on the cenral
ion, and
15/07/23 09:48is called its ionic atmosphere
Ion activities:
 Under such conditions, the effectiveness of ions in
determining the rate of chemical reactions, and also in
altering physical properties of the solvent, is less than it
would be were each ion capable of acting independently.
Only in very dilute solutions are ions sufficiently free of the
influence of neighboring ions to act as independent
particles.
 In order to obtain agreement between experimental and
theoretical equilibrium, the chemist multiplies actual
concentrations (e.g. molalities, molarities) by certain
numbers, called activity coefficients  , to obtain effective
concentrations, called activities a.
 The activity of a species A is defined as follows: a =  [A].
From this definition, it can be seen that the more ideally a
solution behaves, the closer the activity coefficient to unity.
Indeed,
15/07/23 09:48 at infinite dilution,
 =1 and a = [A].
Alternatively,
 The activity a is a kind of ‘effective’ mole fraction of the
b
solution and is related to the molality, b by a   b  where
activity coefficient,  , depends on the composition,
molality, and temperature of the solution.
 As the solution approaches ideality (in that it obeys Henry’s
law) at low molalities, the activity coefficient tends towards
1.
b
  1 and a as b  0
b
 There is an enormous amount of experimental evidence to
indicate that electrostatic between ions and between ions and
solvent molecules can cause large differences between activity
and concentration. Such interactions are general, not just
between ions undergoing chemical reaction.
15/07/23 09:48
 For example, many compounds show increased solubility in the
presence of electrolytes containing no ions which react chemically
with ions of the precipitate! The solubility product constant, Ksp, of
BaSO4, for instance, increases from 1.0 x 10-10 in water to 2.9 x 10-
10
in 0.010 M aqueous KNO3 at 298 K. Clustering of NO-3 ions
about Ba2+ and of K+ ions about SO 2-4 tends to shield Ba2+ and SO
2-
4 ions from each other and to hamper their effectiveness in forming
BaSO4

 The term used to measure the magnitude of the electrostatic


environment of a solute is called ionic strength I, and this
will treated in the next lecture.
1 b
I   zi  i  
2 i  b 
Where zi is the charge number of an ion (positive for cations and
negative for anions) bi is its molality
15/07/23 09:48
Ion activities at standard states:
 Because interactions between ions are so strong, the
approximation of replacing activities by molalities is valid only
in very dilute solutions (infact less than 10-3mol kg-1 in total ion
concentration)
 Recall that the chemical potential of a solute in a real solution at

any molality is related to its activity a by     RT ln a
 where the standard state is a hypothetical solution with molality,
-1
b = 1mol kg in which the ions are behaving ideally.
Because all the deviations from ideality are carried in the activity
coefficient, the chemical potential can be written
    RTInb  RT ln   ideal  RT ln where  ideal is
the
chemical potential of the ideal-dilute solution of the same molality

15/07/23 09:48
Note: The geometric mean of activity coefficient of monovalent

       
1
2
solution is
Generally, for a salt with ions like Mn+ Xm-, the geometric mean
activity is
1/ n  m
   n m 

15/07/23 09:48
The Debye-Huckel Limiting law
 The long range and strength of the Coulombic interaction
between ions means that it is likely to be primarily responsible for
the departure from ideality in ionic solution and to dominate all
other contributions to nonideality
 This possible domination is the basis of the Debye-Hckel theory
of ionic solutions (Peter Debye and Erich Hückel 1923)
 A qualitative account of the theory is given
 Oppositely charged ions attract one another. As a result, anions
are likely to be found near cations in solution, and vice versa
 NB: Overall, the solution is electrically neutral, but near any
given ion there is an axcess of counter ions i.e Averaged over
time, counter ions are more likely to be found near any given ion

15/07/23 09:48
END

END

END

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
The Debye-Huckel Limiting law
 The long range and strength of the Coulombic interaction
between ions means that it is likely to be primarily responsible for
the departure from ideality in ionic solution and to dominate all
other contributions to nonideality
 This possible domination is the basis of the Debye-Hückel theory
of ionic solutions (Peter Debye and Erich Hückel 1923)
 A qualitative account of the theory is given
 Oppositely charged ions attract one another. As a result, anions
are likely to be found near cations in solution, and vice versa
 NB: Overall, the solution is electrically neutral, but near any
given ion there is an axcess of counter ions i.e Averaged over
time, counter ions are more likely to be found near any given ion

15/07/23 09:48
The Debye-Huckel Limiting law
DH theory is a quantitative theory of electrolyte solution which
is based on a rather simple model and allows us to calculate the
quantity of activity coefficient  from the basic properties of
the solution.
The mathematical details of DH’s treatment are too difficult
to present here rather a simple underlying assumptions will
be presented.
Debye and Huckel began by assuming the following:
1. Electrolytes are completely dissociated into ions in
solution
2. The solutions are dilute, that is, the concentration is
0.01 m or lower
3. On the average each ion is surrounded by ions of
opposite charge , forming the ionic atmosphere
15/07/23 09:48
The Debye-Huckel Limiting law
Working from these assumptions, Debye and Huckel calculated the
average electric potential at each ion caused by the presence of other
ions in the ionic atmosphere.

The Gibbs free energy of the ions was then related to the
activity coefficient of the individual ion.

Since neither   nor   could be measured directly, the final


result is expressed in terms of the mean activity coefficient of
the electrolyte as follows
6
1.824 x 10
log    3
zz I
T  2

15/07/23 09:48
The Debye-Huckel Limiting law
Since most studies are carried out in water at 298 K (we have
 = 78.54 and T = 298 K) and the above equation
becomes.simplified as written below:
 The model leads to the result that at very low concentrations the
activity coefficient can be calculated from the Debye-Hückel
limiting law
1
log    0.509 z  z  AI 2

where A= 0.509 for an aqueous solution at 298 K and I is the


dimensionless ionic strength of the electrolyte solution:
1  bi 
I = 2i
z i
 b 

In this expression z i is the charge number of an ion (positive for


cations and negative for anions) bi is its molality
15/07/23 09:48
 The model leads to the result that at very low concentrations the
activity coefficient can be calculated from the Debye-Hückel
limiting law
1
log     z  z  AI 2

where A= 0.509 for an aqueous solution at 298 K and I is the


dimensionless ionic strength of the solution:
1  bi 
I = 2i
z i
 b 

In this expression z i is the charge number of an ion (positive for


cations and negative for anions) bi is its molality

15/07/23 09:48
 It is important to realise that the sum extends over all the ions
present in the solution! For instance, a solution consisting two
types of ion of molalities b and b
1
I
2
b z 2  b z 2 / b 

Note: The ionic strength emphasizes the charges of the ions because
the charge numbers occur as their squares!

15/07/23 09:48
APPLICATION OF DH THEORY
The DH limiting law can be applied to study the solubility of
proteins. How soluble the protein is in the aqueous solution
depends on the temperature, pH, dielectric constant, ionic
strength, and other characteristics of the medium.
We shall only be concerned with the influence of ionic strength.
Suppose we want to investigate the effect of ionic strength on the
solubility of AgCl. The dissolution process is
AgCl(s) Ag+ (aq) + Cl (aq)

o
The thermodynamic solubility product for the process,
K sp is
o
K  a Ag  aCl -
sp
o
15/07/23 09:48 K  bAg   Ag bCl -  Cl
sp
Because, activity, a = molality x activity coefficient!
o
But K   Ag   Cl  K sp
sp

because K sp  bAg  bCl -

where K sp = the apparent solubility product!


Thus the thermodynamic solubility product represents the true
value of the solubility product, which in general is different
from the apparent solubility product.
2
 Ag   Cl   
Since 
2 2 K os
K   K sp or  
o
Then we can write s   K sp
15/07/23 09:48
Taking the logarithm of both sides of the above equation and
rearranging, we obtain
1
K  2

 log   log  o   0.509 z z  I


sp
 
 K sp 

which comes to the DH limiting law!


For a 1:1 electrolyte, the solubility product can directly be
related to the solubility S itself because K 
1
sp 2  S and
1
S  K
o o 2
sp 
Where S and S are apparent and thermodynamic solubilities
o

in moles per liter.

S
Hence log S o  0.509 z z  I
15/07/23 09:48
The solubility of solute may increase or decrease with the
increase of ionic strength.

The increase in solubility, caused by the increase in ionic


strength, is called SALTING-IN EFFECT whereas the decrease
in solubility with increasing ionic strength of the solution is
called the SALTING-OUT EFFECT.

15/07/23 09:48
Extended Debye-Huckle limiting law
 The simple DH equation, or limiting law, has been found to
give useful results only in dilute solutions. As the ionic
strength increases, mean activity coefficients calculated from
the equation are significantly smaller than the experimental
value.
 For example, the calculated value for the mean activity
coefficient in 0.10 M HCl is 0.69, whereas the experimental
value is 0.8!
 Debye and Huckel later extended their theoretical treatment,
assuming that ions are not point charges, but have significant
size, and that they are present in solutions of greater ionic
strength than originally assumed. They derived the so called
extended Debye-Huckel equation,

15/07/23 09:48
0.512Z A Z B I
 log  

1  B I
where  is the diameter of the ion in angstrom (1 Å= 10 -10 m), and B
a term which depends on the absolute temperature and the dielectric
constant of the solvent.
 Its value at 298 K using the dielectric constant for pure water is
0.328. The term  , sometimes called the ion-size parameter, is
said to correspond to the distance of closest approach of the
cation and anion.
Note: Activity coefficients calculated by the extended DH
equation are in good agreement with experimentally measured
mean values up to ionic strengths of about 0.1. For solution of
higher ionic strength, a number of modifications of the DH
equation have been proposed.
15/07/23 09:48
 The energy, and therefore the chemical potential, of any given
central ion is lowered as a result of its electrostatic interaction
with its ionic atmosphere.
 This lowering of energy appears as the difference between the
ideal
molar Gibbs energy Gm and the ideal value G m of the solute,
and hence can be identified with RT ln   .
NB:The stabilization of ions by their interaction with their ionic
atmospheres is part of the explanation as to why chemists
commonly use dilute solutions, in which the stabilization is less
important, to achieve precipitation of ions from electrolyte
solutions. In other words, as the solution becomes diluted, the
solute becomes increasingly stabilised and the practical
consequence of this is that it is very difficult to remove traces of a
solute from such a solution!

15/07/23 09:48
Example: Q. Calculate the mean activity coefficient   , of 5.0
x10-3 molkg-1 KCl(aq) at 298 K.
1

Ans: We start by writing log     z z AI 2

1 b
But I b  b  / b
=
2 b
Where b is the molality of the solution (note b- = b+ = b) and
therefore we have
1
1
b  2
log    0.509 I  0.509  
2

b 
1 1

log    0.509 I  0.509 5 x10
2

3 2

= -0.036
log  
Hence   = 0.92
15/07/23 09:48
END

END

END

15/07/23 09:48
Lecture on 2 May 2006

15/07/23 09:48
Electrochemistry
• Electrochemistry is the science which deals with
the consequences of the transfer of electric charge
from one phase to another.
• Electron transfer occurs at interfaces between a
metallic conductor (an electrode) and an ionic
conductor (an electrolyte).
• •An electrochemical reaction is a heterogeneous
process which involves electron transfer across a
phase boundary or interface.
•Electrochemical reactions are labelled as redox
(Reduction / oxidation) processes.
•Oxidation is the loss of electrons (LEO) and
Reduction is the gain of electrons (GER).
15/07/23 09:48
Why do we study electrochemistry?
•Every battery is an electrochemical cell and indeed the
measure of its voltage is a Gibbs free energy indicator.
•In nerve impulses in biological systems there are
electrochemical potentials
•Concentration gradients across cell and other membranes
cause electrochemical potential differences.
•In manufacturing and chemical etching, electrochemical
reactions abound.
•Photosynthesis, where carbon is fixed in living matter is a basic
electrochemical process
•The transport of oxygen in blood by hemeogloblin and the
change of the oxidation states of iron involves electrochemistry
•Therefore:A basic understanding of the principles behind
electrochemical processes to understand all these processes is
needed.
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
Know
The
Differen
ces
Betwe
en
These!

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
Basic Concepts

15/07/23 09:48
END

END

END

15/07/23 09:48
Lecture on 8 May 2006

15/07/23 09:48
An overview of electrochemical cells (RECAP):
 Electrochemical cells are grouped based on the general
thermodynamic nature of the reaction (i.e expressed as
whether the change in Gibbs energy is -ve or +ve)
 A galvanic cell uses a spontaneous reaction inside it (-∆G ) to
generate electrical energy) i.e The reacting system does work
on the surrounding and all batteries are voltaic!
 An electrolytic cell on the other hand uses electrical energy to
drive a non-spontaneous reaction (+∆G) i.e The surroundings
do work on the reacting system
 It is important to note that all electrochemical cells have
several common features:Have two electrodes (Anode and
Cathode) and the oxidation half-reaction takes place at the
anode and the reduction half-reaction takes place at the
cathode
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
Shorthand nomenclature
• Rather than writing out the full chemical
equation, we use a shorthand notation:

Zn(s) + Cu2+(aq)  Zn2+(aq) + Cu(s)

Salt bridge

Anode half-cell Cathode half-cell

Zn(s) | Zn2+(aq) || Cu2+(aq) | Cu(s)

Electrons flow this way


Phase boundary Phase boundary

15/07/23 09:48
Cell reaction

 The current produced by a galvanic cell arises from the


spontaneous chemical reaction taking place inside it

 To write the cell reaction corresponding to a cell diagram,


we first write the RH half reaction as a reduction
Thus in the cell Zn(s)|ZnSO4(aq)||CuSO4(aq)|Cu(s) above, the
two electrodes and their reduction half-reactions are:
2+
Right hand electrode: Cu (aq) + 2e- Cu(s) .....1

2+
Left hand electrode: Zn (aq) + 2e- Zn(s) .....2

Hence the overall cell reaction is the difference i.e eqn 1 - eqn 2 resulting into
2+ 2+
Cu (aq) + Zn(s) Cu(s) + Zn (aq)

15/07/23 09:48
THE CELL POTENTIAL
 A cell in which the overall cell reaction has not reached
chemical equilibrium can do electrical work as the reaction
drives electrons through an external circuit
 The work that a given transfer of electrons can accomplish
depends on the potential difference between the electrodes
The potential difference is called the cell potential and is
measured in volts, V
When the cell potential (potential difference) is large, a given
number of electrons travelling between the electrodes can do a
large amount of electrical work and vice versa
A cell in which the overall reaction is at equilibrium can do no
work, and the cell potential is zero
The resulting potential difference when the cell (not the cell
reaction) is at equilibrium is what is called the electromotive
force 09:48
15/07/23 (emf), E, of the cell
THE CELL POTENTIAL
 From thermodynamics, the maximum electrical work that a system
(the cell) can do is given by the value of ∆G, Welec., max = ∆G
(RECALL: The reaction Gibbs energy, ∆rG, is defined as the slope of
the graph of the Gibbs energy plotted against the extent of reaction)

Note: F is the Faraday constant, F = eN A, the magnitude of the charge


per mole of electrons. This equation is the key connection between
electrical
15/07/23 09:48
measurements on the one hand and thermodynamic
properties on the other.
 The equation - FE = ∆rG, forms a key connection between
electrical energy on the one hand and the thermodynamic properties
on the other i.e

i) By knowing the reaction Gibbs energy at a specified


composition, we can state the cell emf at that composition

ii)The -∆G corresponds to a spontaneous cell reaction and to a +ve


emf
iii) The driving power of a cell (i.e its emf) is proportional to the
slope of the Gibbs energy with respect to the extent of reaction

iv) It is plausible that a reaction that is far from equilibrium (when


the slope is steep) has a strong tendency to drive electrons through an
external circuit and when the slope is close to zero (when the cell
reaction is close to equilibrium) the emf is small

15/07/23 09:48
Nernst equation:
 We can extend the relation of the emf to the activities of the
participants in the cell reaction
(Recall: , where Q is the reaction quotient)
NOW

 From the Nernst equation, we see that the standard emf of a


cell can be interpreted as the emf when the reactants and
products are in their standard states, for then all activities are
15/07/23 09:48
1, so Q = 1 and InQ = 0
Lecture on 9 May 2006

15/07/23 09:48
 A concentration cell is a galvanic cell in which the
electrode materials and the solutions in both half-cells are
composed of the same substances; only the
concentrations of the two solutions differ
 Consider a concentration cell where the solution M has L
and R molalities


15/07/23 09:48 ).
 Because a cell cannot drive a
current through a circuit when the two electrode
compartments are identical! (i.e ∆
rG = 0 ).

15/07/23 09:48
 We know that a galvanic cell is a combination of two
electrodes , and each one can be considered as making a
characteristic contribution to the overall cell potential
 Because it is impossible to measure the contribution of a single
electrode, we define the potential of one electrode as zero and
then assign values to others on that basis

 The specially selected electrode is the standard hydrogen


electrode (SHE) at all temperatures:
Pt(s)|H2(g)|H+(aq)
 The standard potential, ( E  ), of another couple is assigned by
constructing a cell in which it is RH electrode and the standard
hydrogen electrode is the LH electrode.
 For instance, the standard potential of the Ag+/Ag couple is the
standard emf of the following cell
+ +
Pt(s)|H
15/07/23 09:48
2 (g)|H (aq)||Ag (aq) |Ag(s), ( E  ) = (Ag+/Ag) = +0.80 V
The standard emf of a cell can be obtained EITHER

OR

 From the difference of the standard potentials of electrodes i.e


upon subtracting the standard potential of the LH electrode
(cathode) from the standard potential of the RH electrode
(anode)
THUS

NOTE

15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48
Applications of Standard Potentials:
 Cell emfs are a convenient source of data on the Gibbs
energies, enthalpies and entropies of reactions

NOTE:

i.e The metallic elements (and hydrogen)


 Electrochemical series arranged in order of their reducing power
as measured by their standard potentials
in aqueous solution
15/07/23 09:48
15/07/23 09:48

dInK  r H dInK rH 
 
i.e
dT RT 2
or 1
d( ) R
T

 After combining the results we obtain the standard


reaction enthalpy to be
    dE  
15/07/23 09:48 rH  rG  TrS  F  E  T 
 dT 
 Thus, an electrochemical technique is used to obtain
standard reaction entropies and through them entropies of ions
in solution
 It is interesting to note that the above expressions provide a

noncalorimetric method for measuring  r H and, through the
convention, fH  H  , aq   0 , the standard enthalpies of formation
of ions in solution
 This means electrical measurements can be used to calculate
15/07/23 09:48
all thermodynamic properties!!!
CH 344: CHEMICAL KINETICS AND
ELECTROCHEMISTRY (2 units)
Dr. E.B. Mubofu

• Course Outline (2 lectures/w and 2Tutorial/w)


– Microscopic theories of reaction rates: Collision and
transition state theories
– Rates and mechanisms of chemical reactions (reactions
rates and equilibria, Elementary reactions and enzyme
catalysed reactions)
– Electrolytes in solutions
– The Debye-Hückel theory of interionic interaction and
ionic activity coefficients
– Electromotive force and electrochemical cells
15/07/23 09:48

You might also like