Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LANGUAGE ATTITUDES, EMOTION WORDS AND IDENTITY CONSTRUCTION - PHD Proposal
LANGUAGE ATTITUDES, EMOTION WORDS AND IDENTITY CONSTRUCTION - PHD Proposal
IDENTITY CONSTRUCTION:
A CASE STUDY AMONG TWO L1 ATTRITORS
• Age
-Education – L1 retention (Kopke & Schmid, 2004)
Immigration • L1 use -Adolescence – L1 more deeply encoded (Schmid, 2011)
-Psychological & Emotional Experiences
(Pavlenko and Blackledge, 2002) (Jimenez, 2004)
❖ stances –a socially recognized point of view (i.e. mothers care for their babies, students should study).
❖ through the expression of language inheritance, language affiliation, and language
expertise that the multilingual constructs their identity
Research Aims:
1. How are multilingual and multicultural L1 attritors’
perceptions and beliefs expressed about their language use
in terms of language attitudes, awareness of emotion words,
and their perceived attrition in relation to objective attrition
tests?
2. How do these perceptions evolve over time and are there
certain factors contributing to this evolution? Does the
DMM provide a theoretical and testable framework into
explaining these changes?
3. And how do they construct their identities based off of
these proposed perceptions?
Participants in Case Study
LUIZ MARIJETA
▪ 26 male, born in Brazil, living in Los Angeles ▪ 27 female, born in Germany, living in Berlin
▪ L1 Portuguese L2 English L3 Spanish ▪ L1 Croatian L2 German L3 English L4 French
▪ Child & adolescent immigrant ▪ Immigrant family
▪ Additive Bilingual ▪ Heritage Speaker/Additive Bilingual
▪ Socioeconomic status: upper
▪ Socioeconomic status: lower
▪ L1 education:
▪ 5 years immersion/4 years bilingual in ▪ L1 education:
Brazil ▪ 6-7 years weekly class in Germany
▪ L1 attritor: ▪ L1 attritor:
▪ Onset: 3 years after immigration at 15-16 ▪ Onset: after leaving home at 19
▪ Increased loss in last 2 years at Uni ▪ Gradual loss
Procedure
▪In order to promote reflection and display of
sociolinguistic identity in discourse, and to obtain
background and linguistic information, questionnaires and
interviews will be used and/or video recorded
▪Interviews will be transcribed, analyzed and coded using
Discourse Analysis and MCA (Day, 1992) (Baker, 2002) (Mann, 2010)
(Ochs, 1993)