Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 38

LECTURE 4.

REGISTER AND STYLE OF


RESEARCH PAPERS
PLAN

• 1. Language and speech, literary language norms

• 2. Speech Styles

• 3. Scientific method, its peculiarities: scientific accuracy,


standards.

• 4. Editing and formalizing scientific text.


KEY WORDS

• science, conversational, artistic, popular, scientific,


formal, pure scientific, scientific-methodological and
scientific-popular directions, quotations, cause and
effect
1.Language and speech, literary language norms

• Literary norms linguistic


norm
They become established during the evolution of a literary language in
the course of national development.

The linguistic norm is one of the essential characteristics of a


language, ensuring its functioning and historical continuity.

Literary norms represent a special kind of linguistic norm.


They become established during the evolution of a literary
language in the course of national development. The specific
features of the norms of a developed literary language are the
relative stability and unity of linguistic means and their rich
The literary norm is recorded in normative grammars and
dictionaries, which are periodically revised in conformity with
changes in the language itself and in society’s evaluation of its
means.
Speech style is identified into five types:
Frozen style

• Also known as fixed speech, it is the highest form of


communicative style which is often used in respectful
situations or formal ceremonies like Shakespearean
plays, weddings, funerals, and more. It uses the complex
grammatical sentence structure and vocabulary that are
only known by experts in that field
Formal Style

• This type uses formal words and expressions and is


mostly seen in writing rather than speaking. It also
disallows the use of ellipsis, contractions, and qualifying
modal adverbials.
Consultative Style

• The third level of language. It is basically


unplanned speech since the speaker uses the
participation and feedback of the listener. The
speaker will supply background information,
while again, the listener participates
continuously.
Casual style

• Language used between friends .Often very relaxed and


focused on just getting the information out.

• Slangs are quite often used in these instances. This style


is used in informal situations and language. Relationship
between speaker and hearer is closed.
• Examples: casual conversations with friends, family
members, chats, phone calls and messages
Informal style

• Completely private language used within


family of very close friends or group. Uses
personal language codes. Grammar is
unnecessary. Does not need complete
language. Certain terms of endearment,
slangs or expressions whose meaning is
shared with a small subset.
The scientific method is the process by which
scientists, collectively and over time, endeavor to
construct an accurate (that is, reliable, consistent
and non-arbitrary) representation of the world.
• Recognizing that personal and cultural beliefs influence both our
perceptions and our interpretations of natural phenomena, we aim
through the use of standard procedures and criteria to minimize
those influences when developing a theory. As a famous scientist
once said, "Smart people (like smart lawyers) can come up with
very good explanations for mistaken points of view." In summary,
the scientific method attempts to minimize the influence of bias or
prejudice in the experimenter when testing an hypothesis or a
theory.
I. The scientific method has four steps
I. The scientific method has four steps

• 1. Observation and description of a phenomenon or group


of phenomena.
• 2. Formulation of an hypothesis to explain the
phenomena. In physics, the hypothesis often takes the
form of a causal mechanism or a mathematical relation.
• 3. Use of the hypothesis to predict the existence of other
phenomena, or to predict quantitatively the results of new
observations.
• 4. Performance of experimental tests of the predictions by
several independent experimenters and properly
performed experiments.
II. Testing hypotheses

• As just stated, experimental tests may lead either to the


confirmation of the hypothesis, or to the ruling out of the
hypothesis. The scientific method requires that an
hypothesis be ruled out or modified if its predictions are
clearly and repeatedly incompatible with experimental
tests
• In physics, as in every experimental science, "experiment
is supreme" and experimental verification of hypothetical
predictions is absolutely necessary. Experiments may test
the theory directly (for example, the observation of a new
particle) or may test for consequences derived from the
theory using mathematics and logic (the rate of a
radioactive decay process requiring the existence of the
new particle). Note that the necessity of experiment also
implies that a theory must be testable. Theories which
cannot be tested, because, for instance, they have no
observable ramifications (such as, a particle whose
III. Common Mistakes in Applying the Scientific
Method
• The most fundamental error is to mistake the
hypothesis for an explanation of a phenomenon,
without performing experimental tests. Sometimes
"common sense" and "logic" tempt us into believing
that no test is needed. There are numerous
examples of this, dating from the Greek
philosophers to the present day.
Another common mistake

• Another common mistake is to ignore or rule out data


which do not support the hypothesis. Ideally, the
experimenter is open to the possibility that the hypothesis
is correct or incorrect. Sometimes, however, a scientist
may have a strong belief that the hypothesis is true (or
false), or feels internal or external pressure to get a
specific result.
1.Editing and formalizing scientific text

• Developmental editing is about structuring the scientific


content, so it logically flows. Co-authors will help make
sure you “tell the story”. This type of editing looks at the
overall structure of the paper, what’s extra and what’s
missing, and the order of material. A developmental edit
examines the narrative of the story and the way the data,
interpretation, and context is presented and offers advice
on potential structural changes that could improve the
overall paper.
• THANKS FOR ATTENTION

You might also like