Directorate for Investigation and Detective Management

Field Immersion
------------- Police Station

1
 SEQUENCE OF PRESENTATION
A. NARRATIVE REPORT
A. NARRATIVE REPORT
Summary of Activities
Observation and Recommendation
B. RECORDING OF CRIME DATA
C. INVESTIGATION FOLDER
 Geographical Profile of City
The City of _______is
situated in the Northern
District of the National Capital
Region (NCR).

Caloocan City is where we

can find _________, the
biggest and most populated
barangay in the country. It
has a land area of 950
hectares with almost 1/3 of
the city residents live in the
area.
General Information POLICE COMMUNITY PRECINCT-2

PCP 2
POLICE TO POPULATION RATIO – 1:1,507 LAND AREA: - 630.74 SQ KM
TOTAL POPULATION: 337,578
(as of 2010 census
NO. OF BARANGAYS: 80
NO. OF BANKS: 50
NO. OF CHURCH: 25
NO. OF SCHOOL. 34
NO. OF MARKET: 14
NO. FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENT:71
POLICE STRENGTH: 224
MOBILE CAR: 9
MOTOR CAR: None
BICYCLE: 0
LONG ARMS: 4
SHORTARMS: 212
HAND HELD RADIOS: 14

ADDRESS: A. Del Mundo St., 9th Avenue

 DISPOSITION OF PERSONNEL

PCO PNCO TOTAL NUP

14 226 240 8

ACTUALTOTAL POPULATION (Census 2015): 167, 119

ACTUAL POLICE TO POPULATION RATIO (1:696)
 DISPOSITION OF PERSONNEL
ASSIGNED IN INVESTIGATION SECTION
(SIDMB)
WITH WITHOUT FORMAL TOTAL
FORMAL TRAINING
TRAINING
PCO 1 0 1
PNCO 16 6 (2 ongoing CIC) 22
PNCO (SWCPD) 4
0 4

TOTAL 21 10 31
7
NARRATIVE REPORT
Day 1

Blotter Entry Report

Find out whether blotter entry are updated or not?
Details are complete or not?
 NARRATIVE REPORT

DAY 1
Photo inside the
Crime Research and
Analysis Section
(CRAS) with Pat
Zaldy Talatad, CRAS,
PNCO and the NUP’s

CIRAS-Who is in-charge and from Data on ID Cases

2016 to date how many drug
cases are still under investigation
& referred to Prosecutors office?
Data on ILLEGAL DRUG CASES January 01, 2016 to February 17,
2021
How many referred to Prosecutors office? -
How many cases filed in Prosecutors Office were dismissed?
How many were filed in Court?
How many filed in Court were Dismissed?
How many filed in Court were resulted in conviction?
 NARRATIVE REPORT
Day 1

Photos during the preparation of the booking sheet and taking of

fingerprints of the suspect (Mr. Rasdy M Saumay) inside the SIDMB office
HOW MANY ARRESTED PERSON VS MUGSHOT UPLOADED
E-ROUGE- arrested persons vs uploaded mugshot
CIRAS- CIRAS-Who is in-charge and 2016 to date how many drug cases are still under
investigation referred to Prosecutors office
E-WARRANT CHECK WHETHER UPDATED
CIDMS – HOW MANY CASES VS NUMBER OF CASE FOLDER UPLOADED
RECORDS KEEPING
 NARRATIVE REPORT
 
NPCS- how much is the collection from Jan 1 2021 to date?
- how many clearances were issued?
 NARRATIVE REPORT
Day 1
Courtesy call to C, DIDMB
PLTCOL SANDRO JAY DC
TAFFALLA

Discussion of objectives of the 3

day immersion
 NARRATIVE REPORT
Day 1

PS 10 Station Commander C, SIDMB PS 10 C, Admin and Pers Br

Team 2 of Class 725-2020 had a courtesy call to PLTCOL

ALEX DJ ALBERTO, Station Commander, PMAJ BENJAMIN
D MAYOR JR,Chief, SIDMB and PCPT ELMER B RABANO,
Chief, Admin and Pers Br.
NARRATIVE REPORT
Day 1

Observation in the entry of data of Police

Blotter with the duty desk officer PSSg
Christopher B Bacolod.
 NARRATIVE REPORT
Day 1

BREAKDOWN OF PUPC

MALE CUSTODIAL FACILITY FEMALE CUSTODIAL

FACILITY

Observation of custodial facility at Kamuning Police Station

with PCpl Higinio C Wayan
NARRATIVE REPORT
Day 2

PEMS Jimmy D Sanyuran

Jr., C, Investigation Section
gave a lecture about the
arrangement of case folder
NARRATIVE REPORT
Day 2
NUP Joel S. Caparas
discussed about the process
of CIRAS and generation of
report.
CIRAS-Who is in-charge of CIRAS from
2016 to date?

NUP Mary Ann D. Biag – 2016 to 2017

NUP Marife P Acorda – 2018
PCpl Nar A Allauigan – 2019
NUP Joel S Caparas – 2020 to 2021
 NARRATIVE REPORT
Day 2
Data on ILLEGAL DRUG CASES January 01, 2016 to February 17, 2021

How many referred to Prosecutors office? - 301

How many drug cases are still under investigation? - 1
How many cases filed in Prosecutors Office were dismissed? - 0
How many were filed in Court? – 301
How many filed in Court were Dismissed? - 1
How many filed in Court were resulted in conviction? - 4
How many filed in Court were resulted in conviction through PLEA BARGAINING? - 4

DISMISSED
CONVICTED -
REFERRED (TO UNDER (Prosecutor’s FILED IN DISMISSED Ongoing Grand
CASE CONVICTED WITH PLEA
PROSECUTOR) INVESTIGATION Office) COURT (Court) Trial Total
BARGAINING

RA 9165 301 1 0 301 1 4 4  292 301

SOURCE: CIRAS
 NARRATIVE REPORT
Day 2
E-ROUGES UPDATE (Jan 2016 to Feb 2021)
Year Arrested Encoded Encoded 24 Hours Encoded more than
Person 24 Hours
2016 529 0 0 0
2017 405 0 0 0
2018 586 0 0 87
2019 755 623 0 593
2020 585 643 223 362
2021 152 150 148 4
TOTAL 3012 1416 371 1046

E WARRANT: STATISTIC (Jan 2016 to Feb 2021)

STATION FILED UNSERVED SERVED FOR FEEDBACK TOTAL

PS-10 43 32 4 17

PEMS Jimmy D Sanyuran Jr., C, CIDMS CASES VS NUMBER OF CASE FOLDER UPLOADED (Jan 2016 to Feb 2021)
Investigation Section gave a
lecture about the booking CASES OCCURED CASE FOLDER ENCODED
procedures and NUP Randy G
TOTAL 969 969
Estacio. E-Rouges Encoder
discussed about the Data on E-
Rouges E-ROUGE- arrested persons vs uploaded mugshot
SOURCE: E-ROUGES
E-WARRANT E-WARRANT - check whether updated
CIDMS
CIDMS – how many cases vs number of case folder uploaded
 NARRATIVE REPORT
Day 2

Photo of Joanne Marie Veronio Santos while on process at NPCS Section of

Kamuning Police Station
 National Police Clearance System- Jan 1 to February 17, 2021
PRINTED 503 PAID 521
ON PROCESS 41 FREE 23
TOTAL 544 TOTAL 544

TOTAL FEES COLLECTED : 521 x 150 = PhP 78 150.00 CLICK SHOW

DETAILS
NARRATIVE REPORT
Day 3

PSSg Beverly C
Marquez showed the
Case folder to Team
2.
NARRATIVE REPORT
Day 3

Observation at SWCPD with

PEMS Minerva DA Casem
and PMSg Virginia B
Balberona.
 NARRATIVE REPORT
Day 3

PS 10 Station Commander C, SIDMB

The team rendered their exit call with PLTCOL ALEX DJ ALBERTO,
Station Commander and at the same day with Chief, SIDMB, PMAJ
BENJAMIN D MAYOR JR
 OBSERVATION
 We observed that nobody is checking the temperature of all personnel/visitors entering the
Station, likewise equipment (thermometer) is not usable.
 We observed that the station does not have proper filing of Incident Record Form same with
CIRAS.
 Custodial Facility is loaded more than its capacity.
 A comfort room was used as Female Custodial Facility.
 The entry and data in the blotter book were updated and complete
 Street Dogs were inside the lobby area of the station.
 SWCPD is headed by a PNCO with the rank of PEMS.
 RECOMMENDATION
 All personnel/visitors should be assessed before entering the premises Station 10 for
symptoms of COVID-19 and ensure that equipment are usable.
 Proper filling of documents should be observed at all times.
 The population of the PUPC should be addressed by the station commander to
prevent sickness and infections especially Covid-19 and request for additional facility
to accommodate the volume of PUPC.
 Give consideration to the Female PUPC for their health and safety.
 It is recommended that the station sustain their complete and updated entry on the
blotter book and consider as one of their best practices
 Street Dogs inside the lobby area of the station should be addressed by the station.
 The WCPD should have its own chief, preferably PCO for handling Gender Based and
minor related incidents.
OBSERVATION
RECOMMENDATION
Directorate for Investigation and Detective Management

Crime Environment
October 1, 2019- December 31, 2019
vs
October 1, 2019- December 31, 2020

28
 Sequence of Presentation
• Comparative Total Crime Incidents
• Comparative Peace and Order Index
• POI Distribution
• Index Crimes (8 Focus Crimes)
• 2 most prevalent
• Provide and discuss the trend in line graph
• Mode of commission
• Place of commission
• Crime clock
• Crime prone day
• Comparative
• AMPOICR (Comparative)
• Public Safety Index-Crimes
• PSI Distribution
• Comaparative AMPSICR
 Sequence of Presentation
•.
• Comparative CSE
• POI
• PSI
• Comparative CCE
• POI
• PSI
• Assessment
• Recommendation
• Forecast
 Comparative Total Crime Incidents (TCI)
300

116
250 OR
41.43%
200

150
280

100
164

50

-
Total Crime Incidents

4th Quarter 2019 4th Quarter 2020

Source: CIRAS
 Comparative Peace and Order Indicator(POI)

300

250
74
200 OR
203 36.45%
150

100 129
42
OR
50
77 54.55%
35
-
4th Qurter 2019 4th Quarter 2020

4th Quarter 2019 4th Quarter 2020

Index Crime Non Index-Crime

Source: CIRAS
 Peace and Order Indicator (POI)
Distribution

4th Quarter 2019 4th Quarter 2020

3
5
21.34%
77
27.5%

203
72.5% 129
78.66
%

TCI- 280 TCI-164

Index Crime Non-Index Crime Index Crime Non-Index Crime

Source: CIRAS
 Index Crimes (8 Focus Crimes)

October to December 2019 2020 VARIANCE

CRIMES AGAINST PROPERTY
Theft 30 12 -18
Robbery 12 6 -6
Carnapping MV 2 1 -1
Carnapping MC 9 7 -2
TOTAL 53 26 -27
CRIMES AGAINST PERSON
Physical Injuries 11 2 -9
Murder 0 4 4
Rape 12 2 -10
Homicide 1 1 0
TOTAL 24 9 -15

OVERALL TOTAL 77 35 -42

Source: CIRAS
 8 Focus Crime Distribution

35 14
Theft
30 12
30 Theft 12
Robbery
25 Robbery 10
Carnapping MV
20 Carnapping MV
Carnapping MC 8
7
Carnapping MC 6
Physical Injuries 15
12 12 6
11 Physical Injuries
Murder 10 9 4
4
Murder
Rape 5 2 2
2 Rape 2
0 1 1 1
Homicide 0
4th Quarter 2019 Homicide 0
4th Quarter 2020

Source: CIRAS
 8 Focus Crime Distribution
Theft 4th Quarter 2019
Robbery
Carnapping MV; 2 Homicide; 1
Rape Carnapping MC; 9
Theft; 30

Physical Injuries Physical Injuries; 11

Carnapping MC
Carnapping MV
Homicide
Murder Rape; 12
Robbery; 12

Rape; 2
Theft;
th 12
Theft Homicide; 1 Carnapping MV; 1 4 Quarter 2020
Carnapping MC Physical Injuries; 2
Murder; 4
Robbery
Murder
Rape
Physical Injuries
Homicide Robbery; 6
Carnapping MV Carnapping MC; 7
 8 Focus Crimes Comparative
35

30
30

-10 or
25 -18 or
-9 or 83.3
81.9% %
60.0% -5 or -1 or
50.0% 50.0%
20
-2 or
22.2
%
15
12 12 12
11 4 or
10 9 400%
7
6
5 4
2 1 2 2 1 1
-
-
s

pe

e
C
eft

r
ry

rie

de

d
M
M
be

ici
Ra
Th

ur
ju
g
ng

m
b

in

l In

M
Ro

pi

Ho
pp
ap

ica
ap

4th Quarter 2019 4th Quarter 2020

rn

ys
rn
Ca

Ph
Ca

FORMULA:
Percentage:
Source: CIRAS 37 Current - Previous=total / Previous x 100
 Crime Map Eight Focus Crimes
(October 1 2019-December 31, 2019)

Source: CIRAS 38
Source: CIRAS
 Crime Map Eight Focus Crimes
(October 1 2019-December 31, 2020)

Source: CIRAS 39
 Crime Clock of 8 Focus Crime
(October 1 2019-December 31 2019)

TIME PHYSICAL CARNAPPING CARNAPPIN

COMMMITTED MURDER HOMICIDE INJURIES RAPE ROBBERY THEFT MV G MC TOTAL
12 MN to 1 AM     1 1 2     4
1 AM to 2 AM     2   1     3
2 AM to 3 AM         1     1
3AM to 4 AM   1 1   1     3
4 AM to 5 AM   1 1 1 1     4
5 AM to 6 AM   1     1     2
6 AM to 7 AM   1   1 1     3
7 AM to 8 AM     1 1 1   1 4
8 AM to 9 AM       1 4   1 6
9 AM to 10 AM     1   2     3
10 AM to 11 AM   1     5     6
11 AM to 12 NN     1   1     2
12 NN to 1 PM       1 1   2 4
1 PM to 2 PM   1     1   1 3
2 PM to 3 PM   1 2   2 2 1 8
3 PM to 4 PM         1   1 2
4 PM to 5 PM       1 2     3
5 PM to 6 PM         1     1
6 PM to 7 PM       2       2
7 PM to 8 PM     1         1
8 PM to 9 PM   1     1   1 3
9 PM to 10 PM       1     1 2
10 PM to 11 PM 1 1 1 1       4
11 PM to 12 MN   2   1       3
TOTAL 0 1 11 12 12 30 2 9 77
Source: CIRAS
 Crime Clock of 8 focus Crime
(October 1 2019-December 31 2019)

6
MURDER

5
HOMICIDE

4
PHYSICAL
INJURIES

3
RAPE

2
ROBBERY

1 THEFT

0 CAR-
NAP-
PING MV

CAR-
NAP-
PING MC

Source: CIRAS
 Crime Clock Eight Focus Crimes
(October 1 2020-December 31 2020)

PHYSICAL CARNAPPING CARNAPPING

TIME COMMMITTED MURDER HOMICIDE INJURIES RAPE ROBBERY THEFT MV MC TOTAL
12 MN to 1 AM         1   1   2
1 AM to 2 AM         1       1
2 AM to 3 AM         1       1
3AM to 4 AM                 0
4 AM to 5 AM                 0
5 AM to 6 AM               1 1
6 AM to 7 AM           1     1
7 AM to 8 AM 1       1       2
8 AM to 9 AM           1     1
9 AM to 10 AM                 0
10 AM to 11 AM                 0
11 AM to 12 NN           1     1
12 NN to 1 PM                 0
1 PM to 2 PM 1       1 1     3
2 PM to 3 PM           1     1
3 PM to 4 PM           1   2 3
4 PM to 5 PM               1 1
5 PM to 6 PM           1   1 2
6 PM to 7 PM           3   1 4
7 PM to 8 PM 1               1
8 PM to 9 PM         1     2 3
9 PM to 10 PM 1 1 1           3
10 PM to 11 PM       2   2     4
11 PM to 12 MN                 0
TOTAL 4 1 1 2 6 12 1 8 35

Source: CIRAS
 Crime Clock Eight Focus Crimes
(October 1 2020-December 31 2020)

3.5
MURDER
3
HOMICIDE
2.5
PHYSICAL
2 INJURIES

1.5 RAPE

1 ROBBERY

0.5 THEFT

0 CARNAPPING
MV

CARNAPPING
MC

Source: CIRAS
 2 Most Prevalent Index Crime
October to December 2019 2020
CRIMES AGAINST PROPERTY
Theft 30 12
Robbery 12 6
Carnapping MV 2 1
Carnapping MC 9 7
TOTAL 53 26
CRIMES AGAINST PERSON
Physical Injuries 11 2
Murder 0 4
Rape 12 2
Homicide 1 1
TOTAL 24 9

Source: CIRAS
 2 Most Prevalent Index Crime
(Crime Against Property)
THEFT (MODUS) 2019 2020
Akyat Bahay 1 1
Basag Kotse/Salamin 0 1
Applied as driver 2 0
Applied as helper 3 0
Cable/electric meter 2 0
Committed by an employee
(commercial/store/shop) 3 3
Laglag Barya - 1
Pick-Pocketing 2 1
Salisi 8 2
Snatching 0 1
Sungkit 0 1
Shoplifting 2 0
Taken without owner's consent (TWOC) 5 1
TOTAL 30 12

Source: CIRAS
 2 Most Prevalent Index Crime
(Against Person)
RAPE (MODUS) 2019 MURDER (MODUS) 2020
Deprived of Reason or Mauling 1
Unconcious (Under the influence Shooting 1
of Liquior) 5 Stabbing 2
Force, Threat and Intimidation 2
Fraudulent Machinations 1
TOTAL 4
Statutory rape 4
TOTAL 12

Source: CIRAS
 Crime Clock of 2 Most prevalent Crime
(October 1 2019-December 31 2019)

TIME PHYSICAL CARNAPPING CARNAPPIN

COMMMITTED MURDER HOMICIDE INJURIES RAPE ROBBERY THEFT MV G MC TOTAL
12 MN to 1 AM     2     2
1 AM to 2 AM     1 1
2 AM to 3 AM     1 1
3AM to 4 AM   1 1
4 AM to 5 AM   1 1
5 AM to 6 AM   1 1
6 AM to 7 AM   1 1
7 AM to 8 AM   1 1
8 AM to 9 AM   4 4
9 AM to 10 AM   2 2
10 AM to 11 AM   5 5
11 AM to 12 NN   1 1
12 NN to 1 PM   1 1
1 PM to 2 PM   1 1
2 PM to 3 PM   2 2
3 PM to 4 PM   1 1
4 PM to 5 PM   2 2
5 PM to 6 PM   1 1
6 PM to 7 PM    
7 PM to 8 PM    
8 PM to 9 PM   1 1
9 PM to 10 PM    
10 PM to 11 PM  
11 PM to 12 MN  
TOTAL 0 30 30
Source: CIRAS
 Crime Clock Eight Focus Crimes
(October 1 2020-December 31 2020)

PHYSICAL CARNAPPING CARNAPPING

TIME COMMMITTED MURDER HOMICIDE INJURIES RAPE ROBBERY THEFT MV MC TOTAL
12 MN to 1 AM  
1 AM to 2 AM  
2 AM to 3 AM  
3AM to 4 AM  
4 AM to 5 AM  
5 AM to 6 AM  
6 AM to 7 AM 1 1
7 AM to 8 AM  
8 AM to 9 AM 1 1
9 AM to 10 AM  
10 AM to 11 AM  
11 AM to 12 NN 1 1
12 NN to 1 PM  
1 PM to 2 PM 1 1
2 PM to 3 PM 1 1
3 PM to 4 PM 1 1
4 PM to 5 PM  
5 PM to 6 PM 1 1
6 PM to 7 PM 3 3
7 PM to 8 PM  
8 PM to 9 PM  
9 PM to 10 PM  
10 PM to 11 PM 2 2
11 PM to 12 MN  
TOTAL 12 12

Source: CIRAS
 Crime Clock of 8 focus Crime
(October 1 2019-December 31 2019)

1
Theft
0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

Source: CIRAS
 Crime Clock of 2 most prevalent crimes
(October 1 2019-December 31 2019)

TIME PHYSICAL CARNAPPING CARNAPPIN

COMMMITTED MURDER HOMICIDE INJURIES RAPE ROBBERY THEFT MV G MC TOTAL
12 MN to 1 AM     1
1 AM to 2 AM     2
2 AM to 3 AM      
3AM to 4 AM   1
4 AM to 5 AM   1
5 AM to 6 AM    
6 AM to 7 AM    
7 AM to 8 AM   1
8 AM to 9 AM    
9 AM to 10 AM   1
10 AM to 11 AM    
11 AM to 12 NN   1
12 NN to 1 PM    
1 PM to 2 PM    
2 PM to 3 PM   2
3 PM to 4 PM    
4 PM to 5 PM    
5 PM to 6 PM    
6 PM to 7 PM    
7 PM to 8 PM   1
8 PM to 9 PM    
9 PM to 10 PM    
10 PM to 11 PM 1
11 PM to 12 MN  
TOTAL 0 12
Source: CIRAS
 Crime Clock
(October 1 2019-December 31 2019)

1
Rape
0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

Source: CIRAS
 Crime Clock Eight Focus Crimes
(October 1 2020-December 31 2020)

PHYSICAL CARNAPPING CARNAPPING

TIME COMMMITTED MURDER HOMICIDE INJURIES RAPE ROBBERY THEFT MV MC TOTAL
12 MN to 1 AM      
1 AM to 2 AM      
2 AM to 3 AM      
3AM to 4 AM      
4 AM to 5 AM      
5 AM to 6 AM      
6 AM to 7 AM      
7 AM to 8 AM 1    
8 AM to 9 AM      
9 AM to 10 AM      
10 AM to 11 AM      
11 AM to 12 NN      
12 NN to 1 PM      
1 PM to 2 PM 1    
2 PM to 3 PM      
3 PM to 4 PM      
4 PM to 5 PM      
5 PM to 6 PM      
6 PM to 7 PM      
7 PM to 8 PM 1    
8 PM to 9 PM      
9 PM to 10 PM 1
10 PM to 11 PM  
11 PM to 12 MN  
TOTAL 4

Source: CIRAS
 Crime Clock
(October 1 2019-December 31 2019)

1
Rape
0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

Source: CIRAS
 Public Safety Indicator (PSI)
1,200
Comparative
1,000
648
800 OR

64.16%
600
1010
400

200 362

-
Public Safety Index

4th Quarter 2019 4th Quarter 2020

Source: CIRAS
 Public Safety Indicator (PSI) Distribution

900 839 350

800 300 289
RIR DAMAGE TO 700
PROPERTY RIR DAMAGE TO 250
600 PROPERTY

500 200
RIR PHYSICAL
INJURY
400 RIR PHYSICAL 150
INJURY
300 100
170 71
200
50
RIR HOMICIDE 100 RIR HOMICIDE
2
1 0
0 4th Quarter 2020
4th Quarter 2019

Source: CIRAS
 Public Safety Indicator(PSI)
Distribution
4th Quarter 2019
RIR DAMAGE TO RIR PHYSICAL
PROPERTY INJURY; 170 RIR HOMICIDE; 1

RIR PHYSICAL
INJURY

RIR HOMICIDE RIR DAMAGE TO

PROPERTY; 839

RIR PHYSICAL
INJURY; 71 RIR HOMICIDE; 2 4th Quarter 2020
RIR DAMAGE TO
PROPERTY

RIR PHYSICAL
INJURY
RIR DAMAGE TO
PROPERTY; 289
RIR HOMICIDE

Source: CIRAS
 Average Monthly Public Safety Index Crime Rate
(AMPSICR)
AMPOICR
1200 TOTAL POPULATION OF
PS 10 Kamuning = 167,119
1000 TCR = 604.36
AMCR = 201.45
800
-648
-129.25
600

1010
400

200
362
TCR = 216.61
0 AMCR = 72.20
Series1

Total Crime Volume

4th Quarter 2019 4th Quarter 2020

Source: CIRAS
Average Monthly Peace and Order Index Crime Rate (AMPOICR

AMPOICR
300 TOTAL POPULATION OF
PS 10 Kamuning = 167,119
250 AMCR = 55.85

200
-116
-23.68
150 AMCR = 32.71
280
100
164
50

0
Series1

Total Crime Volume

4th Quarter 2019 4th Quarter 2020

Source: CIRAS
 Comparative Peace and Order Index Crime Solution Efficiency (POICSE)

4TH QUARTER 2019 4TH QUARTER 2020

CRIME CRIME CRIME CRIME
CRIME CRIME
VOLUME SOLVED VOLUME SOLVED
POI 280 177 POI 164 107

80%
%70%
%60%
%50%
%40% POI = % POI = %
%30%
%20%
10%
% 0%
4th Quarter 2019 4th Quarter 2020

INDEX CRIME NON INDEX CRIME

Comparative Public Safety Indicator Crime Solution Efficiency (PSICSE)

4TH QUARTER 2019 4TH QUARTER 2020

CRIME CRIME CRIME CRIME
CRIME CRIME
VOLUME CLEARED VOLUME CLEARED
PSI 1010 969 PSI 362 349

120.00%
%
100.00%
%
%80.00%
%
PSI CCE% PSI CCE%
%60.00%
%40.00%
%
20.00%
%
0.00%
4th Quarter 2019 4th Quarter 2020

Source: CIRAS
 Comparative Peace and Order Indicator Crime Clearance Efficiency (POICCE)

4TH QUARTER 2019 4TH QUARTER 2020

CRIME CRIME CRIME CRIME
CRIME CRIME
VOLUME CLEARED VOLUME CLEARED
POI 280 253 POI 164 144

80%
%70%
%60%
%
%50% %
%40% POICCE = % POICCE =%
%30%
%20%
10%
% 0%
4th Quarter 2019 4th Quarter 2020

INDEX CRIME NON INDEX CRIME

61
Source: CIRAS
 Comparative Public Safety Indicator Crime Clearance Efficiency (PSICCE)

4TH QUARTER 2019 4TH QUARTER 2020

CRIME CRIME CRIME CRIME
CRIME CRIME
VOLUME CLEARED VOLUME CLEARED
PSI 1010 969 PSI 362 355

120.00%
%
%100.00%
% 80.00%
%
PSI CCE% PSI CCE%
% 60.00%
% 40.00%
%
20.00%
%
0.00%
4th Quarter 2019 4th Quarter 2020

Source: CIRAS
 THEFT
Interpretation, Analysis, Assessment & Recommended Interventions
INTERPRETATION, ANALYSIS & ASSESSMENT
• Crime statistics shows significant trends when
linked to the movement and economic
restrictions imposed by the IATF.
• Concentrated in Barangays with Central
Business Districts
• Compared to 2019, there was an increase in
theft in the Ortigas Business District in Brgy.
Wack-Wack Greenhills and is attributed to the
presence of shipping centers such as St.
Francis, Star Mall, Shangrila & SM Megamall
• Green Field-BD & Pioneer BD, where hotels &
office buildings are mostly located,
experienced a drop in occupancy rates when
“work from home” arrangements were
established and encouraged, theft incidents
were directly proportional to the decrease in
economic activities & foot traffic.
63
RECOMMENDED INTERVENTION
• Conduct pro-active measures such as regular
visitations of PNP personnel to
commercial/business establishments, so as to
strengthen partnership and strategize on how
to deter theft incidents inside their
establishments.
• Intensify tactical deployment of mobile,
motorcycle and beat patrollers at business
districts particularly during identified crime
prone period (Tuesday, Saturday and
Sunday/2pm-10pm).
• Strict implementation of city ordinances,
OPLAN SITA/GALUGAD, checkpoints,
• Conduct lectures and distribution of fliers
about crime prevention, modus operandi and
safety tips.
• Utilize social media platforms (Facebook,
Youtube, etc.) regarding Information
Operation on crime prevention related
strategies.
 Physical Injuries
Interpretation, Analysis, Assessment & Recommended Interventions

INTERPRETATION, ANALYSIS & ASSESSMENT RECOMMENDED INTERVENTION

• Mostly occurs in the streets as early as late in •
the afternoon, until dawn.
• Evenly distributed throughout different
barangays within the city, with 2 incidents as
the highest number of incidents a barangay
has experienced within the 4th quarter of 2020.
• Occurs closer to the weekends, with Friday
thru Monday experiences the most number of
cases
Intensify tactical deployment of mobile,
motorcycle and beat patrollers at residential
areas particularly during identified crime prone
period (Friday and Sunday/9pm-10pm).
• Strict implementation of city ordinances,
OPLAN SITA/GALUGAD, checkpoints.
• Continue to strengthen the existing
partnership with the local barangay officials
with regard to the maintenance of peace and
order.

64
 Physical Injuries
Interpretation, Analysis, Assessment & Recommended Interventions

INTERPRETATION, ANALYSIS & ASSESSMENT RECOMMENDED INTERVENTION

• Mostly occurs in the streets as early as late in •
the afternoon, until dawn.
• Evenly distributed throughout different
barangays within the city, with 2 incidents as
the highest number of incidents a barangay
has experienced within the 4th quarter of 2020.
• Occurs closer to the weekends, with Friday
thru Monday experiences the most number of
cases
Intensify tactical deployment of mobile,
motorcycle and beat patrollers at residential
areas particularly during identified crime prone
period (Friday and Sunday/9pm-10pm).
• Strict implementation of city ordinances,
OPLAN SITA/GALUGAD, checkpoints.
• Continue to strengthen the existing
partnership with the local barangay officials
with regard to the maintenance of peace and
order.

65
 CRIME ENVIRONMENT
FORECAST

FORECAST

Source: CIRAS
 Investigation Case Folder
1- Illegal Drug Case
1- Heinous/Crime of Importance
 Table of Contents

A. Brief Narrative of the Case

B.Spot Report
C. IRF
D. Booking Sheet
E. Affidavit of Arrest
F. Sworn Statement of Victim/Witnesses
G. Case Referral
H. Investigation Report
I. Physical/Medical Examination
J.Other Documents/Evidence:
1.Progress Report
2. Investigation Data Form
3. Other Evidence/Form
* For ID Case include documents in compliance to DIDM ID 2015-03
Investigation Case Folder
(Illegal Drugs)

69
 Table of Contents:
OVERVIEW OF THE CASE
A. SPOT REPORT
B. INCIDENT RECORD FORM (IRF)
C. BOOKING PROCEDUR
• MUG SHOT
• ARREST & BOOKING SHEET
D. JOINT AFFIDAVIT OF ARREST
E. SWORN STATEMENT
F. CASE REFERALS
G. OTHER DOCUMENTS
• REQUEST FOR DRUG TEST
• REQUEST FOR LABORATORY TEST/EXAMINATION
• CHEMISTRY REPORT FORM
• INVESTIGATION DATA FORM
• CERTIFICATE OF COORDINATION
• BLOTTER
• PROGRESS REPORT
• EVIDENCES
• CERTIFICATION OF COP
ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

70
 Overview:
OFFENSE ILLEGAL DRUGS- Violation of Sec 5 and 11 of Art II, RA 9165

TIME/DATE February 18, 2021 1:30 AM

PLACE OF INCIDENT Blk 40, Brgy Addition Hillsm Mandaluyong City.

On the said date, time and place suspect was caught in the act selling one (1) heat-sealed transparent plastic
sachet allegedly containing Php500.00 worth of Shabu to a poseur buyer. The marked money was recovered
from the suspect and another two pcs of heat-sealed transparent plastic sachets also containing what is
FACTS OF THE CASE alleged to be shabu. The conduct of markings and inventory of seized items was done at the place of
operation and in the presence of the suspect, Brgy. Councilor Danilo Salvador, and a media representative. A
laboratory examination was conducted on the three pieces of heat-sealed transparent plastic sachets
containing the alleged shabu, and yielded positive results for Methamphetamine Hydrochloride, a prohibited
and dangerous drug.

SUSPECT Salahuden Mantikayan y Kam, “21” years old and a resident of Baseco Compound, Tondo Manila
VICTIM People of the Philippines
STATUS For arraignment
I-O-C PSSg Danilo A Patoc (09974339281)

71
 A. Spot Report

 Conflicting data

 No Reference

 Standard
reporting format
not followed

72
B. Incident Record Form

Not included in
Case Folder.

73
 C. Booking Procedure
Mug Shot Arrest & Booking Sheet

• No Blotter
Entry No.
• Unfilled
Entries
• Too much
ink and
fingers
should be
rolled to
capture a
wider
fingerprint
area.

74
D. Joint Affidavit of Arrest

75
 E. Case Referral

• Officer on case
instead of
Investigator on
case

76
F. Investigation Report

Not included in
Case Folder.

77
 G. Other Documents
Request for Drug Test Request for Laboratory Test Chemistry Report Form

• Conflicting Data

78
 G. Other Documents
Investigation Data Form PDEA Certificate of Coordination

79
Blotter Entry

Not included in
Case Folder.

80
Progress Report

Not included in
Case Folder.

81
Evidence

82
Certification from COP

Not included in
Case Folder.

83
 Assessment

• Documents not included in the case folder:

• Blotter Entry
• Progress Report
• Investigation Report
• Chain of Custody Form
• Investigator on Case listed as Officer on Case
• DOB of Suspect is December 15, 2000, but they indicated that he is 21
years old. He will not reach 21 years of age until December this year.

84
 Recommendation

• Observe standard reporting format in documents.

• Complete all documents in the case folder
• Check and verify all facts and documents prior to reporting.
• Coordination letter should be given to witnesses for them to
appear in the conduct of inventory.

85
 Investigation Case Folder
(Heinous/Crime of Importance)
Murder

86
 Table of Contents:
OVERVIEW OF THE CASE
A. SPOT REPORT
B. INCIDENT RECORD FORM (IRF)
C. COMPLAINT SHEET
D. COMPLAINT AFFIDAVITS
E. SWORN STATEMENT
F. CASE REFERALS
G. INVESTIGATION REPORT
H. OTHER DOCUMENTS
• INVESTIGATION DATA FORM
• DEATH CERTIFICATE
• BLOTTER ENTRY
• PROGRESS REPORTS
• EVIDENCES- SUSPECT IDENTIFICATION FROM DATABASE
ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

87
 Overview:
OFFENSE Murder

TIME/DATE December 18, 2020 12:00 PM

PLACE OF INCIDENT 428, Block 40, Welfareville Compound, Brgy. Addition Hills, Mandaluyong City

On the said DTPO, victim and the two suspects were having a verbal altercation inside the victim's room and
not long after, successive gunshots were heard by the witnesses. The suspects fled away and the household
FACTS OF THE CASE occupants discovered the victim lying on the bed filled with blood. The victim was brought to Madaluyong
City Medical Center but was pronounced dead on arrival by the attending physician. Ronel Cater Hondrada
later attested to witnessing the incident and identified the suspects.

SUSPECT Alfredo Nunez y Villar and Bonifacio Labaguis, both of Block 40, Brgy Addition Hills Mandaluyong City
VICTIM -Fulgencio Montano y Alarcon, 48 years old, on call delivery man and resident of 428, Block 40, Welfareville
Compound, Brgy Addition Hills, Mandaluyong City
PLACE CATEGORY
STATUS For resolution in Mandaluyong Prosecutor’s Office
I-O-C PSMS Laurence Punzalan

88
 A. Spot Report

 Wrong alignment

 No Reference

 Standard reporting
format not followed

 No contact number from

Investigator on case

 “Progress report to
follow” not indicated

89
B. Incident Record Form (IRF)

Not included
in Case
Folder.

90
C. Complaint Sheet

Not included in
Case Folder.

91
D. Complaint Affidavits

92
E. Sworn Statement

93
 F. Case Referral

 No indentation

 Line spacing is
inappropriate

94
G. Investigation Report

Not included in
Case Folder.

95
 H. Other Documents
Investigation Data Form Death Certificate

96
Blotter Entry

Not included in
Case Folder.

97
 Progress Reports

 Wrong
alignmen
t

• Wrong
numberin
g

98
Suspect Identification from Database

99
 Observation
• Incident Record Form, Complaint Sheet, Investigation Report and Blotter Entry were not included in the
case folder;
• Spot Report:
• Standard Format in the alignment tabs in the Spot Report was not followed;
• “Reference” was not included in the spot report;
• “Progress report to follow” was not included in the spot report;
• Contact number of the Investigator-On-Case was not included.
• Proper Case Referral format was not observed
• No indentations;
• Line spacing was inappropriate.
• The investigators & the SOCO should’ve been more diligent in collecting pieces of evidence from the
crime scene in identifying the suspect specially since, at the time of initial investigation, there were no
identifiable eye-witness accounts on who the perpetrator(s) was/were.
• Statements from complainants & witnesses indicate that the cause is drug-related in nature and the
victim could’ve possibly been a drug personality, but this was left out and no longer indicated in the
reports.

100
 Recommendations

 Investigating team should exercise more diligence and

vigilance in handling the investigative process.
 Investigators should be more organized in filing case
folder documents: IRF, Investigation Report, & Excerpts
of the Police Blotter should be included in the Case
Folder.
 Good working relationship between investigators &
intelligence operatives should be maintained.

101
 THANK YOU
.

102