The document compares the Anteromedial and Anterolateral viewing portals for ACL reconstruction surgery. It presents figures showing the positioning of the portals and working portal for each technique. A scatter chart is shown of the center of femoral tunnels created with each method, finding no statistical difference in tunnel position between the two techniques. The conclusion is that either the Anteromedial or Anterolateral viewing portal technique can be used effectively for ACL reconstruction without differences in tunnel placement.
The document compares the Anteromedial and Anterolateral viewing portals for ACL reconstruction surgery. It presents figures showing the positioning of the portals and working portal for each technique. A scatter chart is shown of the center of femoral tunnels created with each method, finding no statistical difference in tunnel position between the two techniques. The conclusion is that either the Anteromedial or Anterolateral viewing portal technique can be used effectively for ACL reconstruction without differences in tunnel placement.
The document compares the Anteromedial and Anterolateral viewing portals for ACL reconstruction surgery. It presents figures showing the positioning of the portals and working portal for each technique. A scatter chart is shown of the center of femoral tunnels created with each method, finding no statistical difference in tunnel position between the two techniques. The conclusion is that either the Anteromedial or Anterolateral viewing portal technique can be used effectively for ACL reconstruction without differences in tunnel placement.
The document compares the Anteromedial and Anterolateral viewing portals for ACL reconstruction surgery. It presents figures showing the positioning of the portals and working portal for each technique. A scatter chart is shown of the center of femoral tunnels created with each method, finding no statistical difference in tunnel position between the two techniques. The conclusion is that either the Anteromedial or Anterolateral viewing portal technique can be used effectively for ACL reconstruction without differences in tunnel placement.
reconstruction DR. PANKAJ SONI DIRECTOR & CONSULTANT ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEON NEW LIFE MULTISPECIALITY HOSPITAL BHAWANIMANDI , RAJASTHAN L M
AL AM
FAR MEDIAL
3 cm distance between AM portal
and far medial portal M L
M L
Fig. A: AM viewing portal with Fig. B: AL viewing portal with
Far Medial working portal Far Medial working portal Lateral wall of femoral notch view of making an impression with a bone awl for the femoral entry point FIG. A- AM VIEWING TECHNIQUE , FIG. B – AL VIEWING TECHNIQUE Drilling of femoral tunnel FIG. A- AM VIEWING TECHNIQUE , FIG. B – AL VIEWING TECHNIQUE Measuring the depth of the tunnel by a depth gauge FIG. A- AM VIEWING TECHNIQUE , FIG. B – AL VIEWING TECHNIQUE Femoral tunnel view after differential drilling FIG. A- AM VIEWING TECHNIQUE , FIG. B – AL VIEWING TECHNIQUE Scatter chart of centre of all femoral tunnels on lateral aspect of notch on the lateral femoral condyle Orange dot- AM VIEWING , Blue dot – AL VIEWING CONCLUSION – We found no statistical difference in position of femoral tunnel using either Technique AM VIEWING or technique AL VIEWING . THANK YOU ALL