Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Particle Size Distribution
Particle Size Distribution
Particle Size Distribution
PSD
To exploit the full potential of the different cement constituents
it is crucial to optimize their particle size distribution PSD
% % %
μm μm
Finess test methods
Method Determination of Comments
BET SSA and nano scale • Only useful for very fine materials (e.g. silica fume)
pores
Particle Size Distribution
PSD impacts:
Water demand
Workability
Setting time
Strength development
4
PSD in Compound Grinding
• Compound grinding of
separator tailings
[t/h]
[°C]
materials with different
[%R] grindabilities is affecting
GA
the product PSD
[g/t]
[°C]
[mbar]
Blaine: Some of the
[m3/h] components achieve the
°C
necessary fineness faster
[m3/h]
[t/h] inside the mill (could be
[%]
[kW
[%R,cm2/g]
[°C]
pozzolana, limestone, fly
]
ash)
[%R] [cm2/g]
acc. Blaine Waste of energy
Cumulated Low flexibility in terms
residues of influencing the PSD
% %
Clinker
Clinker
Limestone
Limestone
μm μm
Clinker high fineness, better strength Clinker PSD coarser and wider,
development may define residues
Limestone complementary PSD, Limestone too fine, defines Blaine
definesthe residue
Limestone is softer than the clinker and tend to concentrate in the finer
fractions of the cement
The slope of the cement particle size distribution
not
ideal
3 μm 30 μm μm
Ideal clinker PSD to achieve maximum reactivity
High fraction < 30 um
High fineness
(Narrow PSD)
In compound grinding the cement components
are distributed according to their grindabilities
Limestone
Limestone
μm μm
limestone cement the residue based fineness control
• The residue in blended cements is
Soft Limestone generally clinker
• For blended cements:
– Always control fineness on basis of
residue!
% – In particular when using soft
Clinker limestone
• Blaine
– Mainly influenced by very fine
Limestone particles (1 to 5 µm)
– Increase of gypsum or limestone
proportion can increase Blaine
significantly
μm
Product PSD and Separator Operation
%D
Good separation (raw meal & Good
coal): separator
% R 200 m
0.02 < < 0.05
% R 90 m
Bad separator
m
Comparison for compound grinding
Drying Control of achievable
potential PSD fineness
Roller press circuit 0 0 ++
Roller press circuit with hot gas + 0 ++
Horomill 0- ? ?
Horomill with hot gas + ? ?
Ball Mill + 0- ++
0
Ball Mill with hot gas ++ - ++
Vertical mill 0 ++ ++
+
Vertical mill with hot gas +++ ++ ++
+
++ Very good
Conclusion
In BM circuits the possibilities of influencing the PSD are limited and very
much depending on the separator type
The particle size distribution plays an important role for the cement
performance
The available test methods show different aspects of the fineness and should be used
complementary.
Blaine is neither a suitable control parameter for blended cements nor for pre-
hydrated materials.