Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 27

www.huawei.

com

GSM Expert for Network Parameter Optimization Report


(Ethio Telecom(ET) Project)
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
Contents

Analysis Result

Expert for Network Parameter Optimization Solution


Basic Network Information——BSC
BSC Name BSC Version Number Number of Frequency Number of Abis A interface
of sites cells carriers transmission transmission
mode mode
111055.BSC_01. V100R017ENGC 119 GSM900: 333 900M(61-109, 9.8M); GSM900: 1857 IP IP
HW.ARDTEL.WA 10SPC575 DCS1800: 1800M(712-872, 32.2M); DCS1800: 2298
AZ.AA 344

CS/PS Traffic(Erl)

AR9311-PS Traffic(Erl) K3014-CS Traffic(Erl)


8 16000
7 14000
6 12000
5 10000
4 8000
3 6000
2 4000
1 2000
0 0
0 0 00 00 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 00 00 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 00 00 0 0 00 00 0 0 00 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 00
0 0: 00 : 0 0 : 0 0 : 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 00 : 0 0: 0 0: 00 : 0 0 : 0 0 : 0 0: 0 0: 00: 0 0: 0 0: 00 : 0 0: 0 0: 00 : 0 0 : 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 00 : 0 0: 0 0: 00: 0 0: 0 0: 00 :
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2- 0 2- 0 2- 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2- 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2- 0 2- 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2 - 0
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 9- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19-
20 20 20 20 20 2 0 2 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 2 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 2 0 2 0 2 0 20 20 2 0 20 20 20 20
KPI Overview
Call Drop Rate (TCH drop rate) Access Success Rate (CSSR)
Handover Success Rate (HOSR)
Call Drop Rate (TCH drop rate) Standard line

1.20% Access Success Rate (CSSR) Handover Success Rate (HOSR) Standard line
1.00%
100.00%
0.80%
98.00%
0.60%
0.40% 96.00%
0.20% 94.00%
0.00% 92.00%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 :0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0 :0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0
:0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0
0 0 04 0 8 12 16 20 00 04 08 12 16 20 0 0 04 0 8 12 16 20 0 0 04 0 8 12 16 20 00 04 08 12 16 20 0 0 04 0 8 12 16 20
6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8
2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2- 0
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 9 - 19 - 1 9 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 1 9 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 1 9 - 1 9 - 19 - 1 9 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 1 9 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 1 9 -
20 20 20 2 0 20 2 0 20 2 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 2 0 20 2 0 20 20 20 2 0 20 2 0 20 2 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 2 0 20 2 0

Uplink HQI (0-4)


Downlink HQI (0-4)
Uplink HQI (0-4) Downlink HQI (0-4) Standard line
Call Drop Rate (TCH drop rate) is better than
100.00%
98.00%
the benchmark value.
96.00% Access Success Rate (CSSR) is better than the
94.00% benchmark value.
92.00%
Handover Success Rate (HOSR) is better than
0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 the benchmark value.
0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0 : 0 0: 0 0 : 0 0: 0 0 : 0 0: 0 0 : 0 0: 0 0 : 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0:
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
0 0 04 0 8 12 16 20 00 04 08 12 16 20 0 0 04 0 8 12 16 20 Uplink HQI (0-4) is less than the benchmark
6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8
2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2- 0 value.
- 1 -1 - 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 - 1 - 1 -1 - 1 -1 - 1 -1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1
0 1 9 0 19 01 9 0 19 0 19 0 19 0 19 019 01 9 0 19 0 19 0 19 0 19 0 19 0 19 019 0 19 01 9 Downlink HQI (0-4) is better than the
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
benchmark value.
Comprehensive Analysis-RF Channel Check

Board SndRcvMode Error may exist in 0 cells.


Number of Cells with Channel Type
Cable Connect Cross may exist in 0 cells.
8
Cable Connect Fault may exist in 7 cells.
7
7

0 0
0
Board SndRcvMode Er- Cable Connect Cross Cable Connect Fault
ror
Call Drop Analysis-KPI
Call Drop Cause(%)
Radio Drop Rate of TCH
Radio Drop Rate of TCH(%)

0.5
0.4 M3030K:Call Drops on TCH M3030H:Call Drops on TCH
0.3 Ratio(Other) Ratio(Uplink Quality)
0.2 4.54 2.36 M3030B:Call Drops on TCH M3030I:Call Drops on TCH
7.54 Ratio(Uplink Received Level) Ratio(Downlink Quality)
0.1
M3030J:Call Drops on TCH M3030D:Call Drops on TCH
0 8.37 42.5 Ratio(Uplink and Downlink Ratio(Uplink and Downlink
4 Quality) Received Level)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 :0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 M3030C:Call Drops on TCH M3030A:Call Drops on TCH
:0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 16.6 Ratio(Downlink Received Ratio(TA)
00 03 06 09 12 15 18 21 00 03 06 09 12 15 18 21 00 03 06 09 12 15 18 21 7 Level)
6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 17.97
2 - 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2 - 0
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 9 - 19 - 19 - 1 9 - 1 9 - 1 9 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 1 9 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 19 - 1 9 - 19 - 19 -
20 2 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 2 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 2 0 20 20 20 20
Number of call drops on each subcounter(Erl)
4 0 0 0 0 35559
28555
300 00
20568
200 00
100 00 2041
1907
1700
1138923702 53
0
51 12 1 1
The call drop is mainly caused by :
(1) M3030K:Call Drops on TCH Ratio(Other)
(2) M3030H:Call Drops on TCH Ratio(Uplink Quality).
The call drop rate is high.
The call drop counter mainly includes :
(1) Call Drops due to CONN FAIL Received on TCHH
(Traffic Channel) in Stable State (Radio Link Failure)
(2) Call Drops due to ERR IND Received on TCHH
(Traffic Channel) in Stable State (T200 Expired). The call
drop rate is high.
Call Drop Analysis-Parameter Check
PARA MO PARA ID PARA NAME network setting advise adjust reason License

SET GCELLCCCH FMSMAXOPCC MS_TXPWR_MAX_CCH 0(3)(900M),5(330) 5(900)0(1800) MS get the best the initial
(900M),0(344)(1800M) access power

SET GCELLBASICPARA FRDLDTX FR Use Downlink DTX YES(668),NO(9) YES reduce downlink
interference

SET GCELLBASICPARA HRDLDTX HR Use Downlink DTX YES(668),NO(9) YES reduce downlink
interference

SET GCELLBASICPARA MiccSwitch MICC Switch OFF(677) ON decrease the uplink


interference

SET PSDTX PS DTX ENHANCEDDTX(668),OFF(9) ENHANCEDDTX reduce the PS to CS


GCELLPRIVATEOPTPARA influence

SET GCELLPWR3 AMRCALLPCALLOWED Allow III Power Control For ON(659),OFF(18) ON enable AMR power
AMR control ,reduce intra-
network interference.

SET GCELLCCBASIC SATIMEROPTSW SA Multiframe Counter ON(656),OFF(21) ON SACCH frame decode timer
Optimization Switch begin from BSC receive EST
INDICATION message.

SET GCELLPSPWPARA SUPPSDLPC DL EGPRS Closed-Loop YES(662),NO(15) YES reduce the PS to CS


Power Control Support influence

SET GCELLBASICPARA HRULDTX HR Uplink DTX Shall_NOT_Use(9),Shall_Use( Shall_Use reduce uplink interference
668)

SET GCELLBASICPARA FRULDTX FR Uplink DTX Shall_NOT_Use(9),Shall_Use( Shall_Use reduce uplink interference
668)

SET GCELLCCBASIC REPEATSASET Repeated SACCH YES(662),NO(15) YES improve decode the
SACCH sucessful rate

SET GCELLCCBASIC AFRDSBLCNT AFR Radio Link Timeout 48_Times(1),44_Times(3),40_ 52_Times reduce the timer unproper
Times(5),36_Times(603),56_T settings' influence to drop.
imes(1),52_Times(16),64_Ti
mes(48)

SET GCELLPSPWPARA SUPGPRSDLPC DL GPRS Closed-Loop YES(656),NO(21) YES reduce the PS to CS


Power Control Support influence
Call Drop Analysis-RxLev RxQual Distribution
n of uplink level <= -90dBm is 6.58%, and the uplink coverage is Normal (threshold 50%).
>= -80]. quality [6/7]= 3.44%, uplink Interference (threshold 1%).
level <= -90dBm ratio is 3.47%, and the downlink coverage is Normal (threshold 40%).
l [>= -80]. quality [6/7]= 0.91%, downlink The interference is normal. (threshold 1%).

Uplink HQI Downlink HQI

1400000 3000000

1200000
2500000

1000000
2000000

800000
RxLev 1500000 RxLev
600000

1000000
400000
7 (>-70) 7 (>-70)
6 (-75~-70) 500000 6 (-75~-70)
200000
5 (-80~-75) 5 (-80~-75)
4 (-85~-80) 4 (-85~-80)
0 3 (-90~-85) 0 3 (-90~-85)
Quality Quality 2 (-95~-90) Quality Quality 2 (-95~-90)
level 0 level 1 Quality Quality 1 (-100~-95) level 0 level 1 Quality Quality 1 (-100~-95)
level 2 level 3 Quality Quality 0 (<-100) level 2 level 3 Quality Quality 0 (<-100)
level 4 level 5 Quality Quality level 4 level 5 Quality Quality
level 6 level 7 level 6 level 7
Call Drop Analysis-Summary of Optimization Measures
• Optimization Measures (For details, see the attachment.)
Call Drop
Before the optimization measures are implemented, strictly follow the three approvals and submit the RFC. Optimization Measure Summary.xl

PARAMETER PARAMETERNAME CURRENT VALUE AJUST VALUE

TCHBUSYTHRES TCH Traffic Busy Threshold TCHBUSYTHRES(1) TCHBUSYTHRES(0)

RXMIN Minum Access RXLEV RXMIN(12) RXMIN(14)

RACHACCLEV CS RACH Min. Access Level RACHACCLEV(-108) RACHACCLEV(-105)

CRO Cell Reselect Offset CRO(3) CRO(1)

INTELEVHOHYST Adjacent Cell Inter-layer HO Hysteresis INTELEVHOHYST(67) INTELEVHOHYST(57)

HOTHRES Inter-layer HO Threshold HOTHRES(22) HOTHRES(25)

ULQUALIMITAMRHR,DLQUALIMITAMRHR,ULQUALI UL Qual. Limit for AMR HR,DL Qual. Limit for AMR ULQUALIMITAMRHR(50),DLQUALIMITAMRHR(50),U ULQUALIMITAMRHR(40),DLQUALIMITAMRHR(40),U
MITAMRFR,DLQUALIMITAMRFR HR,UL Qual. Limit for AMR FR,DL Qual. Limit for LQUALIMITAMRFR(55),DLQUALIMITAMRFR(55) LQUALIMITAMRFR(40),DLQUALIMITAMRFR(40)
AMR FR
ULQUALIMIT,DLQUALIMIT UL Qual. Threshold,DL Qual. Threshold ULQUALIMIT(50),DLQUALIMIT(50) ULQUALIMIT(40),DLQUALIMIT(40)

DLQUALIMITAMRHR,DLQUALIMITAMRFR DL Qual. Limit for AMR HR,DL Qual. Limit for AMR DLQUALIMITAMRHR(49),DLQUALIMITAMRFR(49) DLQUALIMITAMRHR(40),DLQUALIMITAMRFR(40)
FR
DLQUALIMIT DL Qual. Threshold DLQUALIMIT(49) DLQUALIMIT(40)

INTERCELLHYST,PBGTMARGIN Inter-cell HO Hysteresis,PBGT HO Threshold INTERCELLHYST(68),PBGTMARGIN(68) INTERCELLHYST(66),PBGTMARGIN(66)

CALLRESTABDIS Call Reestablishment Forbidden CALLRESTABDIS(YES) CALLRESTABDIS(NO)

INTERCELLHYST Inter-cell HO Hysteresis INTERCELLHYST(68) INTERCELLHYST(66)

DLEDGETHRES,ULEDGETHRES Edge HO DL RX_LEV Threshold,Edge HO UL RX_LEV DLEDGETHRES(25),ULEDGETHRES(12) DLEDGETHRES(28),ULEDGETHRES(14)


Threshold
INTRACELLHOTIMER,OUTBSCHOCLEARTIMER,INTR T3103C,T8,T3103A INTRACELLHOTIMER(10000),OUTBSCHOCLEARTIME INTRACELLHOTIMER(25000),OUTBSCHOCLEARTIME
ABSCHOTIMER R(10000),INTRABSCHOTIMER(10000) R(25000),INTRABSCHOTIMER(25000)
Handover Analysis-KPI

handover is mainly Incoming Inter-RAT Inter-Cell Handover The handover is poor.


handover is mainly caused by Outgoing Inter-RAT Inter-Cell Handover handover difference.

Handover Analysis-KPI
Intra-Cell Handover Success Rate(%) Inter-BSC Incoming Handover Success Rate(%) Incoming Internal Handover Success Rate(%)
Overall Handover Success Rate(%) Outgoing Handover Success Rate of BSC(%) Inter-BSC Outgoing Handover Success Rate(%)
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 0 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 00
0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0 : 0 0: 0 0: 00 : 0 0 : 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 00: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0 : 00: 0 0: 0 0: 00 : 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 00 : 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0:
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8
1 2- 1 2- 12 - 1 2- 1 2- 12 - 1 2- 1 2- 12 - 1 2 - 1 2- 1 2 - 1 2- 1 2- 12 - 1 2- 1 2- 1 2- 1 2- 1 2 - 12 - 1 2- 1 2- 1 2 - 1 2- 1 2- 1 2- 1 2- 1 2- 1 2 - 1 2- 1 2- 1 2- 12 - 1 2- 1 2-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0 19 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Handover Analysis-Intra-BSC Handover
Inter-BSC Handover Failure Category
Number of Outgoing Internal Handover Times
Commands, Requests, Successes, and H312Dp:Number of Failed H312Dc:Number of Failed H312A:Number of Failed H312Da:Number of Failed H312Dq:Number of Failed The intra-BSC outgoing cell handover is
Outgoing Internal Inter-Cell Outgoing Internal Inter-Cell Outgoing Internal Inter-Cell Outgoing Internal Inter-Cell Outgoing Internal Inter-Cell
Failures Handovers(Protocol Error Un- Handovers(Abnormal Release, Handovers (No Channel Handovers(Abnormal Release, Handovers(Other Causes) mainly caused by :
specified) Timer Expired) Available) Unspecified)
CH310:Number of Outgoing Internal 410268H312Dd:Number of Failed CH312C:Number of Unsuc- H312Dh:Number of Failed H312Df:Number of Failed H312B:Number of Failed
(1) H312Dp:Number of Failed Outgoing
Inter-Cell Handover Requests 94 Outgoing Internal Inter-Cell
Handovers(Abnormal Release,
cessful Outgoing Internal In-
ter-Cell Handovers (Timer
Outgoing Internal Inter-Cell
Handovers(Frequency Un-
Outgoing Internal Inter-Cell
Handovers(Handover Failed,
Outgoing Internal Inter-Cell
Handovers (Terrestrial Re-
Internal Inter-Cell Handovers(Protocol Error
CH313:Number of Successful Outgoing 404821No Activity on the Radio Path) Expired) available) Timing Advance out of source Request Failed) Unspecified)
Range)
Internal Inter-Cell Handovers" 24 H312I:Number of Unsuccess- H4100J:Codec Change Re- H312G:Number of Failed H4100F:Codec Change Re- (2) H312Dc:Number of Failed Outgoing
CH312:Number of Unsuccessful Outgoing
ful Outgoing Internal Inter-
544770Cell Handovers (Channel Ac-
jected by the MSC(Other
Causes)
Outgoing Internal Inter-Cell
Handovers (A Interface
jected by the MSC(Requested
A-Interface Type Not Sup-
Internal Inter-Cell Handovers(Abnormal
Internal Inter-Cell Handovers tivation Failed) Failure) ported) Release, Timer Expired)
CH311:Number of Outgoing Internal 409490 failure.
Inter-Cell Handover Commands 03

Number of intra-BSC incoming handover Times Incoming Internal Handover Failure Category
requests, successes, detection, responses,
and failures
H322D:Number of Unsuccess- H3229A:Number of Unsuc-
The intra-BSC incoming cell handover is
CH320:Number of Incoming Internal 410269 ful Incoming Internal Inter- cessful Incoming Internal In- mainly caused by :
Inter-Cell Handover Requests 36 76 21298 515 471 66
Cell Handovers (Reconnection ter-Cell Handovers (No
to Old Channels Canceled) Channel Available) (TCH) (1) H322D:Number of Unsuccessful
CH323:Number of Successful Incoming 404821 76 CH322C:Number of Unsuc- H322B:Number of Unsuccess-
Internal Inter-Cell Handovers 66 7 cessful Incoming Internal In- ful Incoming Internal Inter- Incoming Internal Inter-Cell Handovers
CH324:Number of Incoming Internal 406732
ter-Cell Handovers (Timer
Expired)
Cell Handovers (Terrestrial
Resource Request Failed) (Reconnection to Old Channels Canceled)
Inter-Cell Handover Detection Messages 55
44565 H322I:Failed Incoming In- H322G:Number of Unsuccess- (2) H3229A:Number of Unsuccessful
2 ternal Inter-Cell Handovers ful Incoming Internal Inter-
Received by BSC (Channel Activation Failed) Cell Handovers (Failure on A Incoming Internal Inter-Cell Handovers (No
Interface)
CH321:Number of Incoming Internal 409490 Channel Available) (TCH)
Inter-Cell Handover Responses 45 failure.
CH322:Number of Unsuccessful Incoming 544770
Internal Inter-Cell Handovers
Handover Analysis-Inter-BSC Handover
Inter-BSC Outgoing Handover Failure Category
Inter-BSC Outgoing Handover Times
Commands, Requests, Successes, and CH332K:Failed Outgoing Ex- CH332D:Failed Outgoing Ex- H332Kc:Failed Outgoing Ex- H332Dp:Failed Outgoing Ex- H332Dc:Failed Outgoing Ex- H332Kn:Failed Outgoing Ex- The inter-BSC outgoing cell handover is
ternal Inter-Cell Handovers ternal Inter-Cell Handovers ternal Inter-Cell ternal Inter-Cell ternal Inter-Cell ternal Inter-Cell
Failures (Handover Request Rejected) (Reconnection to Old Chan- Handovers(No Radio Resource Handovers(Protocol Error Un- Handovers(Timer Expired ) Handovers(Other Causes) mainly caused by :
nels) Available) specified)
CH330:Outgoing External Inter-Cell 192247H332Ka:Failed Outgoing Ex- H332Da:Failed Outgoing Ex- H332Kb:Failed Outgoing Ex- H332Dq:Failed Outgoing Ex- CH332C:Failed Outgoing Ex- H332DD:Failed Outgoing Ex-
(1) CH332K:Failed Outgoing External Inter-
Handover Requests 8 ternal Inter-Cell ternal Inter-Cell
Handovers(OM Intervention) Handovers(Abnormal Release,
ternal Inter-Cell
Handovers(Equipment Fail-
ternal Inter-Cell
Handovers(Other Causes)
ternal Inter-Cell Handovers ternal Inter-Cell
(T8 Expired) Handovers(No Activity on the
Cell Handovers (Handover Request Rejected)
CH333:Successful Outgoing External 184655 Unspecified) ure) Radio Path) (2) CH332D:Failed Outgoing External Inter-
Inter-Cell Handovers 2 H332Dh:Failed Outgoing Ex- CH332L:Failed Outgoing Ex-
ternal Inter-Cell ternal Inter-Cell Handovers
H332Df:Failed Outgoing Ex-
ternal Inter-Cell
H332Kd:Failed Outgoing Ex-
ternal Inter-Cell
H332Kf:Failed Outgoing Ex- H332Dm:Failed Outgoing Ex-
ternal Inter-Cell ternal Inter-Cell Cell Handovers (Reconnection to Old
CH331:Outgoing External Inter-Cell
Handovers(Frequency Un-
188464available)
(T7 Expiry) Handovers(Handover Failed,
Timing Advance out of
Handovers(Requested Terres-
trial Resource Unavailable)
Handovers(Invalid Cell) Handovers(Message Type Not
Compatible with Protocol
Channels)
Handover Commands 9 Range) State) failure.
CH332:Failed Outgoing External Inter-Cell 75926
Handovers

Number of incoming inter-BSC handover Times Inter-BSC Incoming Handover Failure Category
requests, successes, detection, responses,
and failures
The incoming external inter-cell handover is
CH340:Incoming External Inter-Cell 180048 H342H:Failed Incoming Ex- H342HH:Cleared Incoming mainly caused by the :
Handover Requests 0 ternal Inter-Cell Handovers External Inter-Cell Handovers
546 (Clear Commands Sent By By MSC(Other Causes) (1) H342H:Failed Incoming External Inter-
CH343:Successful Incoming External 174635 6 5466 39 MSC)
Inter-Cell Handovers 6 CH342C:Failed Incoming Ex- H3429Ca:Failed Incoming Ex- Cell Handovers (Clear Commands Sent By
CH341:Incoming External Inter-Cell 180037
485 ternal Inter-Cell Handovers
(Timer Expired)
ternal Inter-Cell Handovers
(Timer Expired) (TCH) MSC)
94
Handover Responses 0 H3429A:Failed Incoming Ex- (2) H342HH:Cleared Incoming External Inter-
485 ternal Inter-Cell Handovers
CH344:Incoming External Inter-Cell 177729 89 (No Channel Available) (TCH) Cell Handovers By MSC(Other Causes)
Handover Detection Messages Received 2 failure.
by BSC
CH342:Failed Incoming External Inter-Cell 54124
Handovers
Handover Analysis-Parameter Check
PARA MO PARA ID PARA NAME network setting advise adjust reason License

SET GCELLSOFT ADAICFLAG Interference Cancel Mode OFF(677) ON decrease uplink interference
Adaptation

SET GCELLHOBASIC MRINTRPLOPTSWITCH MR Interpolation Optimize NO(677) YES the lost MR will be
compensated in linear way
for the rxqual and rxlev,
which will give more
handover chance to
improve drop.

SET GCELLBASICPARA ENCRY Encryption Algorithm A5/0-1&A5/1-0&A5/2- A5/0-1&A5/1-1&A5/2- decrease different


0&A5/3-0&A5/4-0&A5/5- 0&A5/3-1&A5/4-0&A5/5- Encryption Algorithms
0&A5/6-0&A5/7-0(3), 0&A5/6-0&A5/7-0 influence to handove
A5/0-1&A5/1-1&A5/2-
0&A5/3-1&A5/4-0&A5/5-
0&A5/6-0&A5/7-0(674)

SET GCELLBASICPARA DIRECTRYEN Directed Retry YES(15),NO(662) YES decrease the congestion
influence to handover

SET GCELLHOEMG NODLMRHOSTATTIME No Dl Mr. HO Statistic Time 1(21),6(656) 3 decrease less MS


measurement' inaccurate
influence to handover

SET GCELLBASICPARA MiccSwitch MICC Switch OFF(677) ON decrease the uplink


interference

SET PSDTX PS DTX ENHANCEDDTX(668),OFF(9) ENHANCEDDTX reduce the PS to CS


GCELLPRIVATEOPTPARA influence

SET GCELLPSPWPARA SUPPSDLPC DL EGPRS Closed-Loop YES(662),NO(15) YES reduce the PS to CS


Power Control Support influence

SET GCELLSOFT STIRCALLOWED EICC Allowed NO(677) YES decrease uplink interference

SET GCELLPSPWPARA SUPGPRSDLPC DL GPRS Closed-Loop YES(656),NO(21) YES reduce the PS to CS


Power Control Support influence

SET GCELLPSPWPARA DLPCINITPR P0 DB0(21),DB2(656) DB2 reduce the PS to CS


influence

SET GCELLHOEMG NODLMRHOLASTTIME No Dl Mr. HO Last Time 1(21),4(656) 2 decrease less MS


Handover Analysis-Handover Failure Scenario
Proportion of Failures in Handover Failure(%)

Handover failed The main scenario is 80.00%


69.7
(1) downlink interference 70.00% 63.81
(2) Low level handover success rate 60.00%

(3) TOP cell-cells handover failure. 50.00%


37.82
40.00% 35.3
31.08
30.00% 24.35
20.00% 15.26 13.95 12.98
Handover Failure Scenario Failure Ratio 9.22 6.46
10.00%
(%) 1.33
0.00%

ce te re ce e t l s n te ge ll
High incoming handover success 9.222 ra lu at ec al re o ra ce
re
n s ai re
n sr ej sm
ai
lu sti s ha
n
rate rfe es rf rfe e s rr i s f g e es c lid
te uc
c
v e te uc
c ve n ve
r
co
n
uc
c n va
in rs do in rs nd
o t io do of rs sio fi
n
k ve an k ve or ve er o
Low incoming handover success 31.083 nl
in o h l in o ha op an se o e v se
ow nd lls up nd SC pr t eh c au nd ic a u
rate h a ce ha ve
r
-si be ha vo be
c
d
el l l- ng rB ra ct g f
le
v ce i in
te nd
o
nt je in eo je
ct
P m a i e m us re
much inter BSC handover reject 24.348 w TO nc
o
uc
h lh an
y rr c o c a r
Lo i m el m ov
e in be ve
w rc d g h
ec
t o
Lo te n Hi ej nd
better cell handover proportion is 15.259 b et ha rr ha
SC ve
e C
small rB o r BS
te nd te
in ha in
many intra-site handover failures 13.954 h h h
uc uc uc
m m m
much handoveer reject because of 6.455
voice version change
uplink interference 35.305
much inter BSC handover reject 1.334
because of invalid cell
TOP cell-cells handover failure 37.817
Handover Analysis-Summary of Optimization Measures
• Optimization Measures (For details, see the attachment.)
Handover
Before the optimization measures are implemented, strictly follow the three approvals and submit the RFC. Optimization Measure Summary.xls

PARAMETER PARAMETERNAME CURRENT VALUE AJUST VALUE

BETTERCELLSTATTIME,INTERCELLHYST,BETTERCELLL Better Cell HO Watch Time,Inter-cell HO BETTERCELLSTATTIME(6),INTERCELLHYST(68),BETTE BETTERCELLSTATTIME(4),INTERCELLHYST(65),BETTE


ASTTIME Hysteresis,Better Cell HO Valid Time RCELLLASTTIME(4) RCELLLASTTIME(2)
LEVSTAT,LEVLAST,INTERCELLHYST,PBGTSTAT,PBGT Layer HO Watch Time,Layer HO Valid Time,Inter-cell LEVSTAT(8),LEVLAST(6),INTERCELLHYST(68),PBGTST LEVSTAT(6),LEVLAST(4),INTERCELLHYST(65),PBGTST
MARGIN,PBGTLAST HO Hysteresis,PBGT Watch Time,PBGT HO AT(6),PBGTMARGIN(68),PBGTLAST(3) AT(4),PBGTMARGIN(65),PBGTLAST(1)
Threshold,PBGT Valid Time
INTERCELLHYST,PBGTMARGIN Inter-cell HO Hysteresis,PBGT HO Threshold INTERCELLHYST(68),PBGTMARGIN(68) INTERCELLHYST(70),PBGTMARGIN(70)

LEVSTAT,LEVLAST,PBGTLAST,PBGTSTAT Layer HO Watch Time,Layer HO Valid Time,PBGT LEVSTAT(8),LEVLAST(6),PBGTLAST(6),PBGTSTAT(8) LEVSTAT(6),LEVLAST(4),PBGTLAST(4),PBGTSTAT(6)


Valid Time,PBGT Watch Time
BETTERCELLSTATTIME Better Cell HO Watch Time BETTERCELLSTATTIME(6) BETTERCELLSTATTIME(4)

DIRMAGANSITEFLAG Directly Magnifier BTS Flag DIRMAGANSITEFLAG(NO) DIRMAGANSITEFLAG(YES)

INTERCELLHYST,MINOFFSET Inter-cell HO Hysteresis,Min Access Level Offset INTERCELLHYST(68),MINOFFSET(0) INTERCELLHYST(70),MINOFFSET(3)

DLEDGETHRES,ULEDGETHRES Edge HO DL RX_LEV Threshold,Edge HO UL RX_LEV DLEDGETHRES(20),ULEDGETHRES(10) DLEDGETHRES(23),ULEDGETHRES(13)


Threshold
HOTHRES,HOCDCMINDWPWR Inter-layer HO Threshold,Min DL Level on Candidate HOTHRES(35),HOCDCMINDWPWR(15) HOTHRES(32),HOCDCMINDWPWR(12)
Cell
HOTHRES,HOCDCMINUPPWR,HOCDCMINDWPWR Inter-layer HO Threshold,Min UL Level on Candidate HOTHRES(22),HOCDCMINUPPWR(3),HOCDCMIND HOTHRES(25),HOCDCMINUPPWR(6),HOCDCMIND
Cell,Min DL Level on Candidate Cell WPWR(15) WPWR(22)
Access Analysis-KPI

: Assignment Success Rate(%) is better than the benchmark value.(98%)


G: Immediate Assignment Success Rate(%) is better than the benchmark value.(95%)
C:SDCCH Call Drop Ratio(%) is better than the benchmark value.(0.5%)

Access Theme KPI


RCA313: Assignment Success Rate(%) RA303G: Immediate Assignment Success Rate(%) ZTR104C:SDCCH Call Drop Ratio(%)
101 0.16
100 0.14
99
0.12
98
0.1
97
0.08
96
0.06
95

94 0.04

93 0.02
92 0
0 0 00 00 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0
0 0: 0 0 : 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 00 : 0 0: 0 0 : 0 0 : 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 00 : 0 0 : 0 0: 00: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0 : 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 00 : 0 0: 0 0: 00 : 0 0: 0 0:
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8
1 2- 1 2 - 1 2 - 1 2- 1 2- 12 - 1 2- 1 2 - 12 - 1 2- 1 2- 12 - 1 2- 1 2- 1 2 - 1 2- 12 - 1 2- 1 2- 12 - 1 2 - 1 2- 1 2- 12 - 1 2- 1 2 - 1 2- 1 2- 1 2- 1 2- 1 2 - 1 2- 1 2- 12 - 1 2- 1 2-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0 19 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019 019
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Access Analysis-Parameter Check
PARA MO PARA ID PARA NAME network setting advise adjust reason License

SET GCELLCCCH FMSMAXOPCC MS_TXPWR_MAX_CCH 0(3)(900M),5(330) 5(900)0(1800) MS get the best the initial
(900M),0(344)(1800M) access power

SET GCELLSOFT ADAICFLAG Interference Cancel Mode OFF(677) ON decrease uplink interference
Adaptation

SET GCELLTMR IMMREJWAITINDTIMER T3122 10(674),30(2),50(1) 10 Reduce the impact of


abnormal terminals.

SET GCELLBASICPARA DIRECTRYEN Directed Retry YES(15),NO(662) YES decrease the congestion
influence to handover

SET GCELLBASICPARA MiccSwitch MICC Switch OFF(677) ON decrease the uplink


interference

SET GCELLCCAD ASSRETRYMAX Max. Reassignments 1(408),3(269) 3 Increase the number of


reassignment times and
improve the assignment
success rate.

SET GCELLBASICPARA PDCH2SDEN Dynamic PDCH Conversion to YES(655),NO(22) YES Dynamic PDCHs can be
SDCCH Allowed converted to SDCCHs directly.

SET GCELLSOFT STIRCALLOWED EICC Allowed NO(677) YES decrease uplink interference

SET GCELLPSPWPARA SUPGPRSDLPC DL GPRS Closed-Loop Power YES(656),NO(21) YES reduce the PS to CS influence
Control Support

SET GCELLPSPWPARA DLPCINITPR P0 DB0(21),DB2(656) DB2 reduce the PS to CS influence

SET GCELLCCTMR N200PARASWITCH Use LAPDm N200 ON(662),OFF(15) ON reduce the timer unproper
settings' influence to drop.

SET GCELLSOFT ADAICADFLAG Enhanced Interference Cancel OFF(677) ON decrease uplink interference
Mode Adaptation

SET GCELLBASICPARA IMMASSEN TCH Immediate Assignment YES(4),NO(673) NO Increase the immediate
Allowed assignment success rate

SET GCELLPSPWPARA DLPCSTARTTHR DL EGPRS Power Control MCS9(6) MCS5 reduce the PS to CS influence
Enable Coding Scheme Thres.

SET GCELLCHMGBASIC DIFFBANDSDCCHUSINGOPTI Main B Inter-Band SDCCH NO(5) YES Reducing SDCCH congestion
MIZE Occupation Optimization
Access Analysis-Immediate Assignment

Access failures before assignment are mainly caused by:


(1) immediate assignment failure
(2) TCH failures
(3) CA304:Call Setup Indications Timed Out.

Number of occurrence times of each subcounter


3 0 00 00 0
284087527683872731182
2 5 00 00 0
2 0 00 00 0
1 5 00 00 0
1 0 00 00 0
5 000 0 0 72488 72453 23237 11639 1646 569 107 28 7 7
0
Access Analysis-Assignment

signment failure is mainly caused by the


12Aa:Failed Assignments during MOC on the A Interface (Including Directed Retry)
129C:Failed Assignments (First Assignment, Assignment Timed Out)
12Ca:Failed Assignments during MTC on the A Interface (Including Directed Retry).

Number of occurrence times of each subcounter


33384
40000
30000 25968
20431 18251
20000
10000 5594 2917 1129 152 121 83 3 1
0
Access Analysis-Access Failure Scenario
Proportion of Failures in Access Failure Scenarios(%)
100.00% 91.1 86.17
Access failure The main scenario is 90.00%
80.00%
(1) uplink interference 70.00% 58.43
60.00%
(2) downlink interference 50.00%
36.43
(3) good neighbours. 40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00% 2.55 2.29 1.15 0.56 0.52 0.35 0.33
0.00%

Access Failure Scenario Failure Ratio


(%)
SDCCH sequcence drops 2.551
assignment failure(transmission 0.352
error)
General Scenario 36.430
Congestion(TCH) 0.556
SDCCH equipment drops 0.332
Weak Coverage Access Increases 1.147
Because Neighboring Cells Are
Out of Service
uplink interference 91.096
good neighbours 58.432
Congestion(SDCCH) 0.515
downlink interference 86.167
Access Analysis-Summary of Optimization Measures
• Optimization Measures (For details, see the attachment.)
Access Optimization
Before the optimization measures are implemented, strictly follow the three approvals and submit the RFC. Measure Summary.xls

PARAMETER PARAMETERNAME CURRENT VALUE AJUST VALUE

CELLMAXSD Cell SDCCH Channel Maximum CELLMAXSD(150) CELLMAXSD(230)

TCHBUSYTHRES TCH Traffic Busy Threshold TCHBUSYTHRES(1) TCHBUSYTHRES(0)

RXMIN Minum Access RXLEV RXMIN(10) RXMIN(12)

CRO Cell Reselect Offset CRO(6) CRO(4)

RACHACCLEV CS RACH Min. Access Level RACHACCLEV(-108) RACHACCLEV(-105)

MSMAXRETRAN MS MAX Retrans MSMAXRETRAN(4_Times) MSMAXRETRAN(2_Times)

ULQUALIMIT,DLQUALIMIT UL Qual. Threshold,DL Qual. Threshold ULQUALIMIT(55),DLQUALIMIT(55) ULQUALIMIT(45),DLQUALIMIT(45)

DLQUALIMIT DL Qual. Threshold DLQUALIMIT(49) DLQUALIMIT(40)


HQI Analysis-KPI

Uplink HQI is better than the benchmark value.


Downlink HQI is better than the benchmark value.

HQI Analysis-KPI(%)
101

100

99

98

97

96
Standard line
95 Uplink HQI
94

93
Downlink HQI
92
0 0 0 0 0
00 00 0 00 000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
:0 :0 :0 :0 :0
0: 0: :0 0: :0
0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0:
00 00 00 00 00 0 0 00 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0
0:
0 0 3: 0 0 6: 1 19: 1 2:
21
:
00
:5: 03
: 8:
06
:
09
:
12
:
15
:
18
:
21
:
00
:
03
:
06
:
09
:
12
:
15
:
18
:
21
:
6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
2 - 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2- 0 2- 0 2- 0 2- 0 2- 0 2- 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2 - 0 2- 0 2- 0 2- 0 2- 0 2- 0 2- 0 2 - 0 2 - 0
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 9- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19- 19-
20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 2 0 2 0 2 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
HQI Analysis-RxLev RxQual Distribution
n of uplink level <= -90dBm is 6.58%, and the uplink coverage is Normal (threshold 50%).
>= -80]. quality [6/7]= 3.44%, uplink Interference (threshold 1%).
level <= -90dBm ratio is 3.47%, and the downlink coverage is Normal (threshold 40%).
l [>= -80]. quality [6/7]= 0.91%, downlink The interference is normal. (threshold 1%).

Uplink HQI Downlink HQI

1400000 3000000

1200000
2500000

1000000
2000000

800000
RxLev 1500000 RxLev
600000

1000000
400000
7 (>-70) 7 (>-70)
6 (-75~-70) 500000 6 (-75~-70)
200000
5 (-80~-75) 5 (-80~-75)
4 (-85~-80) 4 (-85~-80)
0 3 (-90~-85) 0 3 (-90~-85)
Quality Quality 2 (-95~-90) Quality Quality 2 (-95~-90)
level 0 level 1 Quality Quality 1 (-100~-95) level 0 level 1 Quality Quality 1 (-100~-95)
level 2 level 3 Quality Quality 0 (<-100) level 2 level 3 Quality Quality 0 (<-100)
level 4 level 5 Quality Quality level 4 level 5 Quality Quality
level 6 level 7 level 6 level 7
HQI Analysis-HQI Failure Scenario
Proportion of Failed HQIs in Failed Scenarios(%)

HQI failed The main scenario is 70.00%


62.83
(1) uplink interference 60.00%
(2) neighbor cell is better than serving cell 53.3
(3) TCH TRXs are better BCCH TRX. 50.00%

40.00% 36.73

30.00%
HQI Failure Scenario Failure Ratio 24.63
(%) 20.00%
13.12
TCH TRXs are better BCCH TRX 36.731 10.00%

strong uplink interference 0.841 0.84


0.00%

BCCH TRX is better TCH TRXs 13.117 ce ll X ce Xs e


n ce TR n nc
fe
re ng re TR fr e
re
e r rv
i CH rfe H
uplink interference 62.833 t C te TC te
in se r B in r in
k n k t e k
lin ha tt e li n et li n
downlink interference 24.632 up rt e
wn
b up
t te eb is
b e ar do X ng
neighbor cell is better than serving 53.305 l is Xs TR ts ro
c el TR C H
H
cell bo
r
TC BC
h
ig
ne
HQI Analysis-Parameter Check
PARA MO PARA ID PARA NAME network setting advise adjust reason License

SET GCELLBASICPARA FRDLDTX FR Use Downlink DTX YES(668),NO(9) YES reduce downlink interference

SET GCELLBASICPARA HRDLDTX HR Use Downlink DTX YES(668),NO(9) YES reduce downlink interference

SET GCELLBASICPARA MiccSwitch MICC Switch OFF(677) ON decrease the uplink


interference

SET GCELLPRIVATEOPTPARA PSDTX PS DTX ENHANCEDDTX(668),OFF(9) ENHANCEDDTX reduce the PS to CS influence

SET GCELLCHMGBASIC CHALLOCSTRATEGY Channel Allocate Strategy CAPABILITY(21),QUALITY(656) QUALITY Channel Allocation Quality
Factor First

SET GCELLPWR3 AMRCALLPCALLOWED Allow III Power Control For ON(659),OFF(18) ON enable AMR power
AMR control ,reduce intra-network
interference.

SET GCELLPSPWPARA SUPPSDLPC DL EGPRS Closed-Loop Power YES(662),NO(15) YES reduce the PS to CS influence
Control Support

SET GCELLBASICPARA HRULDTX HR Uplink DTX Shall_NOT_Use(9),Shall_Use(6 Shall_Use reduce uplink interference
68)

SET GCELLBASICPARA FRULDTX FR Uplink DTX Shall_NOT_Use(9),Shall_Use(6 Shall_Use reduce uplink interference
68)

SET GCELLPSPWPARA SUPGPRSDLPC DL GPRS Closed-Loop Power YES(656),NO(21) YES reduce the PS to CS influence
Control Support

SET GCELLPSPWPARA DLPCINITPR P0 DB0(21),DB2(656) DB2 reduce the PS to CS influence

SET GCELLPSPWPARA DLPCSTARTTHR DL EGPRS Power Control MCS9(6) MCS5 reduce the PS to CS influence
Enable Coding Scheme Thres.

SET GCELLPSCHM MAXPDCHRATE Maximum Rate Threshold of 50(3) 30 Reduce the PS interference to
PDCHs in a Cell the CS.
HQI Analysis-Summary of Optimization Measures
• Optimization Measures (For details, see the attachment.)
HQI Optimization
Before the optimization measures are implemented, strictly follow the three approvals and submit the RFC. Measures Summary.xls

PARAMETER PARAMETERNAME CURRENT VALUE AJUST VALUE

RXMIN Minum Access RXLEV RXMIN(12) RXMIN(14)

RACHACCLEV CS RACH Min. Access Level RACHACCLEV(-108) RACHACCLEV(-105)

CRO Cell Reselect Offset CRO(3) CRO(1)

ULQUALIMITAMRFR,DLQUALIMITAMRFR UL Qual. Limit for AMR FR,DL Qual. Limit for AMR ULQUALIMITAMRFR(55),DLQUALIMITAMRFR(55) ULQUALIMITAMRFR(50),DLQUALIMITAMRFR(50)
FR
ULQUALIMIT,DLQUALIMIT UL Qual. Threshold,DL Qual. Threshold ULQUALIMIT(60),DLQUALIMIT(65) ULQUALIMIT(50),DLQUALIMIT(50)

INTELEVHOHYST Adjacent Cell Inter-layer HO Hysteresis INTELEVHOHYST(67) INTELEVHOHYST(61)

HOTHRES Inter-layer HO Threshold HOTHRES(25) HOTHRES(28)

INTERCELLHYST,PBGTMARGIN Inter-cell HO Hysteresis,PBGT HO Threshold INTERCELLHYST(68),PBGTMARGIN(68) INTERCELLHYST(66),PBGTMARGIN(66)

INTERCELLHYST Inter-cell HO Hysteresis INTERCELLHYST(68) INTERCELLHYST(66)

DLEDGETHRES,ULEDGETHRES Edge HO DL RX_LEV Threshold,Edge HO UL RX_LEV DLEDGETHRES(18),ULEDGETHRES(12) DLEDGETHRES(21),ULEDGETHRES(14)


Threshold

ULQUALIMIT UL Qual. Threshold ULQUALIMIT(55) ULQUALIMIT(50)

ULQUALIMITAMRHR,DLQUALIMITAMRHR,ULQUALI UL Qual. Limit for AMR HR,DL Qual. Limit for AMR ULQUALIMITAMRHR(55),DLQUALIMITAMRHR(55),U ULQUALIMITAMRHR(50),DLQUALIMITAMRHR(50),U
MITAMRFR,DLQUALIMITAMRFR HR,UL Qual. Limit for AMR FR,DL Qual. Limit for LQUALIMITAMRFR(60),DLQUALIMITAMRFR(60) LQUALIMITAMRFR(50),DLQUALIMITAMRFR(50)
AMR FR
DLQUALIMIT DL Qual. Threshold DLQUALIMIT(65) DLQUALIMIT(50)

HOCDCMINDWPWR Min DL Level on Candidate Cell HOCDCMINDWPWR(15) HOCDCMINDWPWR(18)


Thank you
www.huawei.com
www.huawei.com

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.

You might also like