The document discusses two models of economic growth and development: (1) The sectoral growth model which debates agricultural vs industrial growth and balanced vs unbalanced growth. It argues both agriculture and industry are important and that unbalanced growth may lead to more efficient resource allocation. (2) The Philippines' model which is based on the Solow-Swan exogenous growth model and endogenous growth theory that sees human and knowledge capital as driving growth.
The document discusses two models of economic growth and development: (1) The sectoral growth model which debates agricultural vs industrial growth and balanced vs unbalanced growth. It argues both agriculture and industry are important and that unbalanced growth may lead to more efficient resource allocation. (2) The Philippines' model which is based on the Solow-Swan exogenous growth model and endogenous growth theory that sees human and knowledge capital as driving growth.
The document discusses two models of economic growth and development: (1) The sectoral growth model which debates agricultural vs industrial growth and balanced vs unbalanced growth. It argues both agriculture and industry are important and that unbalanced growth may lead to more efficient resource allocation. (2) The Philippines' model which is based on the Solow-Swan exogenous growth model and endogenous growth theory that sees human and knowledge capital as driving growth.
The document discusses two models of economic growth and development: (1) The sectoral growth model which debates agricultural vs industrial growth and balanced vs unbalanced growth. It argues both agriculture and industry are important and that unbalanced growth may lead to more efficient resource allocation. (2) The Philippines' model which is based on the Solow-Swan exogenous growth model and endogenous growth theory that sees human and knowledge capital as driving growth.
• The Philippines’s Model of Economic Growth and Development
Presented by: Elisa de Guzman –Arpilleda SECTORAL GROWTH MODEL
(1) Agricultural vs. Industry Debate
(2) Balanced vs. Unbalanced Growth 1. Agricultural vs. Industry Debate
There is no doubt that without agriculture,
country cannot exist and without industry, country cannot develop. Agriculture and industry are like two wheels of a bicycle; one cannot survive without other. So it’s necessary for a country to have both- agriculture as well as industry. Like two faces of a coin, agriculture and industries, both are very much important. What is the difference between our ancestors and us? Our ancestors were fully dependent on agriculture and met their needs from it. Those days, they had very less scope of comfort. This was because of lack of industries. Although there were few small cottage industries, but however they cannot be classified as industries. This is the main difference between our ancestors and us. Today we can communicate with anybody, wherever he may be by a push of a little button. Every type of comfort is present before us. This is all because of industries. But, one can also not deny the fact that agriculture is equally important. Agriculture is the backbone of industry. But without industry means tea without milk. For a complete comfort, industry as well as agriculture should develop simultaneously. It is not the issue of Industry vs. Agriculture; it is the issue of Industry and Agriculture. 2. Balanced and Unbalanced Growth One of the earliest debates in development economics was about whether development would proceed more effectively with balanced or unbalanced growth. The advocates of balanced growth stressed that, as an economy grew, it needed all sectors to grow to support each other. In contrast, unbalanced growth theory, which is associated with the German political economist Albert Hirschman, suggests that overall growth is faster when it is unbalanced. If growth is unbalanced, resource prices will rise in those areas where output growth is relatively slow, and this will act as a signal for investors to allocate funds to opening up these bottlenecks. An imbalance is likely to result in greater investment and growth because it leads to a more efficient allocation of resources. THE PHILIPPINES’S MODEL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
The Solow-Swan Model of Economic
Growth Endogenous Growth Theory The Solow-Swan Model of Economic Growth The Solow–Swan model is an exogenous growth model, an economic model of long-run economic growth set within the framework of neoclassical economics. It attempts to explain long-run economic growth by
looking at capital accumulation, labor or population
growth, and increases in productivity, commonly referred to as technological progress. Solow extended the Harrod–Domar model by: •Adding labor as a factor of production; •And capital-labor ratios are not fixed as they are in the Harrod–Domar model. Endogenous Growth Theory Endogenous growth theory holds that economic growth is primarily the result of endogenous and not external forces. It holds that investment in human capital,
innovation, and knowledge are significant
contributors to economic growth. The theory also focuses on positive externalities
and spillover effects of a knowledge-based
economy which will lead to economic development. The endogenous growth theory was developed as a reaction to omissions and deficiencies in the Solow- Swan neoclassical growth model. It is a new theory which explains the long-run growth
rate of an economy on the basis of endogenous
factors as against exogenous factors of the neoclassical growth theory. The endogenous growth models emphasize technical
progress resulting from the rate of investment, the
size of the capital stock, and the stock of human capital.