Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Management and Leadership Theories in Entrepreneurship
Management and Leadership Theories in Entrepreneurship
Management and Leadership Theories in Entrepreneurship
in Entrepreneurship
The Great Man Theory of Leadership espouses that great
leaders are born, not made. These individuals come into the
world possessing certain characteristics and traits not found
in all people.
Behavioral Theories of Leadership, also known as “The style approach to leadership” focuses on the
behavior of the leader and what leaders do and how they act. In the 1940s, two parallel studies on leadership were
in progress, one based on traits displayed by leaders, another on the behaviors exhibited by leaders.
Traits theory assumes that leaders are born, rather than made.
Trait theory concentrates on, what the leaders are.
Great Man Theory and Traits Theory are focused on intrinsic personal characteristics
Behavioral theories are based upon the belief that great leaders are made, not born.
Behavioral theories concentrate on what leaders do.
Behavioral approach is based on the leader's beliefs, values, and interpersonal relations.
Considers the Leader's attitude, behavior, opinion, and concern about his followers/organization.
Studies leadership behavior from the point of view of motivation, supervision, and authority.
Behavioral theories assume that specific behavioral patterns of leaders can be acquired.
People can learn to become leaders through teaching and observation.
The contingency theory of leadership states the effectiveness of a leader is dependent on if
their leadership style and its appropriateness in the situation.
The contingency theory is an organizational theory that claims that there is no best way to
organize a corporation, to lead a company, or to make decisions. Instead, the optimal course of
action is contingent (dependent) upon the internal and external situation.
Contingency theories
Contingent leaders are flexible in choosing and adapting to succinct strategies to suit change
in situation at a particular period in time in the running of the organization.
Contingency Leadership Models
Fiedler’sContingency Theory
Situational Leadership Theory
Path-Goal Theory
Decision-Making Theory
Fiedler’s Contingency Theory
Fiedler's model assumes that personal leadership style can be either task-oriented or
relationship-oriented. Task-oriented leaders are focused on completing the job and tend to
be autocratic. Relationship-oriented leaders put people first and employ creativity and
teamwork to complete a project.
Fiedler’s Contingency Theory of Leadership states that your effectiveness as a leader is
determined by how well your leadership style matches the situation.
Situational Leadership Theory
More formally called Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational
Leadership Theory, this contingency model focuses on
leadership style and the maturity of those being led. Situational
leadership theory puts forth the idea that leadership styles
hinge on four behaviors: telling, selling, participating and
delegating.
The maturity levels range from an incompetence or
unwillingness to perform the task, to a willingness and ability to
perform. The idea is that a successful leader will adapt
leadership techniques to fit the maturity level of the group in
question on a situational basis.
Path-Goal Theory
Path-Goal Theory combines two popular theories – goal-setting
and expectancy – into one.
It puts forth the idea that effective leaders help those in their
direction attain their goals.
Under this contingency model, leaders have the responsibility
of making sure their subordinates have the support and
information required to achieve the goals set forth.
Essentially, this theory holds that effective leaders create
clear paths to help their subordinates achieve goals and that
they work to remove obstacles that stand in the way.
How does
Path-Goal Theory Work?
Transformational leadership is a theory of
leadership where a leader works with teams or
followers beyond their immediate self-interests to
identify needed change, creating a vision to guide
the change through influence, inspiration, and
executing the change in tandem with committed
members of a group. This change in self-interests
elevates the follower's levels of maturity and ideals,
as well as their concerns for the achievement.