Group 1 - Classical Management Theory

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 23

C l a ss i c a l

Ma n a g e m e nt
The o r y
Table of contents
01 Historical Context

02 Three Main Theories

03 Relevance Today
t r i a l R e v o l u t i o n
Ind u s
io d o f p ro fo un d and
l R e v o lu t i on w as a per
The Industr ia at began
ic a l c h a n g e th
ec o n o m ic a n d te chnolog
rapid socio t o t h e 1 9 th c en tury.
e n tu ry a n d co n ti nued in
in the late 18th c ia n , h a n d cra ft-b ased
n i fic an t s h ift fro m agrar
It marked a sig z e d ones.
in d u stri a li
economies to
Power Machinery Innovations Transportation
Most manufacturing was done Machinery innovations were Innovations in transportation
using human labor and basic instrumental in transitioning played a crucial role in the
tools. However, the Industrial from manual labor to movement of goods, people,
Revolution brought about mechanized production, and ideas, facilitating the
major changes in the sources of increasing efficiency, and growth of industries and
power used in manufacturing, driving economic growth. urbanization.
leading to the rise of factories
and mechanized production.
Classical Management
Theory
The classical theories of management are a set of
early management principles and approaches that
emerged during the late 19th and early 20th
centuries. These theories laid the foundation for
modern management practices and are still
relevant today in various organizational contexts.
Founding Fathers

Max Weber Frederick W. Taylor Henri Fayol


Bureaucratic Scientific Administrative
Management Management Management
Weberian
Bureaucracy
Max Weber, a German sociologist and
economist, developed the concept of
bureaucratic management as he studied
various types of organizations. His
work started in the late 19th century
and continued into the early 20th
century. Weber was interested in
understanding how organizations could
achieve rationality and efficiency
through a formalized structure and
clearly defined roles.
6 Major Principles of Max Weber’s
Bureaucracy
Formal Hierarchical Rules-based Functional Specialty
Structure Management Organization
In a bureaucratic organization, each The organization uses rules to exert Specialists do the work. Also, the
level controls the level below it. Also, control. Therefore, the lower levels organization divides employees into
the level above it controls it. A formal seamlessly execute the decisions made units based on the type of work they
hierarchy is the basis of central at higher levels. do or the skills they possess.
planning and centralized decision-
making.
6 Major Principles of Max Weber’s
Bureaucracy
Up-focused or In-focused Impersonal Employment-based on Technical
Mission Qualifications
If the mission of the organization is to Bureaucratic organizations treat all Selection as well as the promotion of
serve the stockholders, board, or any employees equally. They also treat all employees is based on technical
other agency that empowered it, then customers equally and do not allow qualifications and skills.
it is up-focused. On the other hand, if individual differences to influence
the mission is to serve the them.
organization itself and those within it
(like generating profits, etc.), then it is
in-focused.
Critiques on Bureaucracy
Lack of Flexibility Teamwork Emphasis
The rules are inflexible and rigid. Informal groups do not receive any
Further, there is too much emphasis on importance. In current times, informal
these rules and regulations. groups play a huge role in most
business organizations.
Critiques on Bureaucracy
Bureaucratic Red Tape Bureaucratic Dysfunction

Involves a lot of paperwork which The rules and formalities lead to an


leads to a waste of time, money, and unnecessary delay in the decision-
also effort. making process.
Taylorism
Frederick W. Taylor, an engineer and
management consultant, is often
considered the father of scientific
management. He began his work in the
late 19th century while observing
industrial workplaces. Taylor's
approach emerged from his desire to
find better ways to organize work and
optimize employee performance. He
introduced concepts like time and
motion studies to analyze work
processes scientifically and improve
productivity.
Taylorism
• In 1909, Taylor published “The Principles of
Scientific Management”.
• Promoted the idea of “a fair day's pay for a fair
day's work.”
• Designed workplace experiments to determine
optimal performance levels that he called time
studies, (also known as time and motion studies).
• Experimented with shovel design until he had a
design that would allow workers to shovel for
several hours straight. With bricklayers, he
experimented with the various motions required
and developed an efficient way to lay bricks.
• He found that by calculating the time needed for
the various elements of a task, he could develop
the "best" way to complete it.
4 Major Principles of
Taylorism
Standardization of Work Division of Labors Incentive Systems
Process
Replace working by "rule of thumb," Rather than simply assign workers to Monitor worker performance, and
or simple habit and common sense, just any job, match workers to their provide instructions and supervision
and instead use the scientific method jobs based on capability and to ensure that they're using the most
to study work and determine the most motivation, and train them to work at efficient ways of working.
efficient way to perform specific maximum efficiency.
tasks.
4 Major Principles of
Taylorism
Time and Motion Studies

Allocate the work between managers


and workers so that the managers
spend their time planning and training,
allowing the workers to perform their
tasks efficiently.
Critiques on Taylorism
Dehumanization Ignoring Social Context

Taylorism promotes rigid approaches, Taylorism breaks tasks into steps;


while modern methods value worker modern practices focus on holistic
autonomy and adaptability. efficiency and collaboration.
Critiques on Taylorism
Manual vs. Mental Work Motivation and Workplace
Satisfaction
Taylorism separates work types; Taylorism overlooks motivation and
modern approaches integrate workers' job satisfaction, key elements for
knowledge and experiences. productivity.
Fayolism
Henri Fayol, a French mining engineer
and management theorist, began his
work around the same time as Taylor.
Fayol's approach was rooted in his
experiences managing large
organizations. He aimed to provide a
comprehensive set of principles that
could guide managers in various
aspects of organization and
administration. His ideas emphasized
the managerial functions that help
organizations operate smoothly.
Management Activities
• Planning – Look ahead, chart a course
• Organization – Select and arrange people
• Command – Oversee, lead, drive
• Coordinate – Harmonize and facilitate
• Control – Ensure Compliance
Critiques on Fayolism
Management Oriented Lack of Importance to
Theory Informal Organisation
The administrative management theory The administrative management theory
is management oriented. It does not does not give any importance to
give much attention to the problems of informal organisation or groups. It
the workers. gives importance only to the formal
organisation structure.
Critiques on Fayolism
Concepts Borrowed from Mechanical Approach
Military Science
Some of the concepts of administrative The administrative management theory
management theory were borrowed has a mechanical approach. It does not
from military science. They tried to deal with some of the important
apply these concepts to the social and aspects of management such as
business organisations. For e.g. Henri motivation, communication and
Fayol gave importance to leading.
"commanding" and not "directing" the
workers.
Commonalities & Overlap
• Hierarchy
• Division of Labor
• Standardized Approach to Work
• Centralization of Authority
• Separation of Personal and Work Life
• Wanted to Select the Best Employees
• Wanted People Paid Fairly, in Theory
Relevance
The classical management theories, despite being
developed over a century ago, still hold relevance in
contemporary management practices. While modern
management approaches have evolved and integrated
new concepts, the foundational principles of the
classical theories continue to provide valuable insights
and frameworks for managing organizations.

You might also like