Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Organizing in The Twenty-First Century: (Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation)
Organizing in The Twenty-First Century: (Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation)
Organizing in The Twenty-First Century: (Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation)
Organizing in the
Twenty-First
Century
Chapter Objectives
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–2
Chapter Objectives (cont’d)
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–3
Contingency Design
• Organizing
• The structuring of a coordinated system of authority
relationships and task responsibilities.
• Contingency Design
• The process of determining the degree of
environmental uncertainty and adapting the
organization and its sub units to the situation.
• How much environmental uncertainty is there?
• What combination of structural characteristics is
most appropriate?
• There is no single best organization design.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–4
Contingency Design (cont’d)
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–6
Contingency Design (cont’d)
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–7
Contingency Design (cont’d)
• The Lawrence and Lorsch Model
• The relationship of two opposing structural forces and
environmental complexity.
• Differentiation: the tendency of specialists to think
and act in restricted ways.
• Integration: the collaboration among specialists
needed to achieve a common purpose.
• A dynamic equilibrium between differentiation and
integration is necessary for a successful organization.
• Both differentiation and integration increase as
environmental complexity increases.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–8
Figure 10.1
Differentiation and Integration: Opposing Organizational Factors
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–9
Basic Structural Formats
• Departmentalization
• The grouping of related jobs or processes into major
organizational units.
• Overcomes some of the effect of fragmentation
caused by differentiation (job specialization).
• Permits coordination (integration) to be handled in
the least costly manner.
• Sometimes refers to division, group, or unit in large
organizations.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–10
Basic Structural Formats (cont’d)
• Functional Departments
• Categorizing jobs according to the activity performed.
• Product-Service Departments
• Grouping jobs around a specific product or service.
• Geographic Location Departments
• Adopting a structural format based on the physical
dispersion of assets, resources, and customers.
• Customer Classification Departments
• Creating a structural format centered on various
customer categories.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–11
Figure 10.2
Alternative Departmentalization
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–12
Figure 10.2
Alternative Departmentalization (cont’d)
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–13
Figure 10.2
Alternative Departmentalization (cont’d)
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–14
Basic Structural Formats (cont’d)
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–15
Contingency Design
Alternatives
• Span of Control (Management)
• The number of people who report to a manager.
• Narrow spans of control foster tall organizations with
many organizational/managerial layers.
• Flat organizations have wider spans of control.
• Is There an Ideal Span of Control?
• The right span of control efficiently balances too little
and too much supervision.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–16
Figure 10.3
Narrow and Wide Spans of Control
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–17
Contingency Design
Alternatives (cont’d)
• The Contingency Approach to Spans of Control
• Both overly narrow and overly wide spans of control
are counterproductive.
• Situational factors dictate the width of spans of
control.
• Wide spans of control are appropriate for
departments where many workers work close
together and do the same job.
• Narrow spans of control are best suited for
departments where the work is complex and/or the
workers are widely dispersed.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–18
Figure 10.4
Situational Determinants of Span of Control
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–19
Contingency Design
Alternatives (cont’d)
• Centralization
• The retention of decision-making authority by top
management.
• Decentralization
• The sharing of decision-making authority by
management with lower-level employees.
• The Need for Balance
• The challenge is to balance the need for
responsiveness to changing conditions
(decentralization) with the need to create low-cost
shared resources (centralization).
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–20
Figure 10.5
Factors in Relative Centralization/Decentralization
Contingency Design
Alternatives (cont’d)
• Decentralization Through Strategic Business
• Strategic business units (SBU) are organizational
subunits that
• serve a specific market outside the parent
organization.
• face outside competitors.
• are in a position of controlling their own destiny.
• are profit centers, with their effectiveness
measured in terms of profit and loss.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–22
Contingency Design
Alternatives (cont’d)
• Line and Staff Organizations
• Organizations in which line managers make decisions
and staff personnel provide advice and support.
• Personal staff are assigned to a specific manager in
supporting roles.
• Specialized staff constitute a reservoir of specialized
talent available to the entire organization.
• Functional authority gives staff temporary and limited
authority for specified tasks.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–23
Figure 10.6
A Line and Staff Organization
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–24
Matrix Organization
• Matrix Organization
• A structure with both vertical and horizontal lines of
authority.
• Advantages
• Increased coordination
• Improved quantity of information flow.
• Disadvantages
• Violates unity-of-command principle.
• Authority gap (lack of line authority) for project
managers.
• Decreases quality of information flow.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–25
Figure 10.7
A Simplified Matrix Organization Chart
Effective Delegation
• Delegation
• Assigning various degrees of decision-making
authority to lower-level employees.
• The Advantages of Delegation
• Frees up managerial time for other important tasks.
• Serves as a training and development tool for lower-
level managers.
• Increases subordinates’ commitment by giving them
challenging assignments.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–28
Effective Delegation (cont’d)
• Barriers to Delegation
• Belief that only you can do the job right.
• Lack of confidence and trust in subordinates.
• Low self-confidence.
• Fear of being called lazy.
• Vague job definition.
• Fear of competition from subordinates.
• Reluctance to take risks that depend on others.
• Lack of early warning controls.
• Poor example of bosses who do not delegate.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–29
Figure 10.8
The Delegation Continuum
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–30
The Changing Shape of
Organizations
• Characteristics of New Organizations
• Fewer organizational layers
• More teams
• Smallness within bigness
• New Organizational Configurations
• Hourglass organization: a three-layer structure with
constricted middle (management) layer.
• Cluster organization: collaborative structure in which
teams are the primary unit.
• Virtual organizations: internet-linked networks of
value-adding subcontractors.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–31
Figure 10.9
Reshaping the Traditional Pyramid Organization
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Lecture Outline and Line Art Presentation, 10–32