“The Power of Visibility Can Never Be Underestimated”

Discover . Plan . Act . Optimize .

1
www.vttglobal.com
CONCEPT FOR HIRING OF TSF & TPM CONSULTING FIRMS

Idea Management
Activity generates Capacity building of
opportunities Monitoring Wing

Research Connection
Developing more M&A
More awareness in Project
Goals consultant firms
management practices

Achievement Sales Up
Rejuvenating troubled Job creation & Wealth
project circulation
The Role Defined…
Upon by-in from the Client’s leadership, ToR's were finalized to engage the Transaction Support Firms as extended Advisory arm to the PPMI
wing

Assist in the preparation of Bidding Documents

TSF and Evaluation Criteria
Adequately defining objectives, outputs, and results of the proposed
contract, expected contract duration, obligations and functions of the
winning bidder, and the minimum eligibility requirements of bidders.

Preparation of TORs/RFPs End to end Vendor Management

Defining scope of the service (third-party Including provisions like the offer,
hiring of evaluation/monitoring firms) to acceptance, mutual assent,
be provided, the methods to be used, the consideration, capacity, legality, and
standard against which performance is to others, as per the set requirements.
be assessed, the resources and time
allocated, and the reporting requirements.

Review and Quality

Assurance
TPM Firms Database and
Transaction Dashboard Reviewing M&E Reports and
Development of software application that instilling quality assurance
facilities strategic, tactical and operational mechanisms in the M&E
view of high-priority projects Projects.
Technical Assistance
Providing sectoral and domain
experts to assist client in
informed decision making
 SECTORS PROJECTS VARIGATION

8 5 1 1 1
Road projects Highways Tunnel Bridge Metro Bus
Service
7 2 1 1 1 Parliament 1 1
Buildings projects University School Islamabad Lodges Prison Hospital
High Court
1 1 1 1 1 1
6 Karachi Punjab - I Punjab - II KPK - I KPK - II PM
SDG projects Scheme
2 1 1
Water Storage Dam Nai Gaj ISSO Barrier
1 1
Power project Hydropower
1 1
Water project Warsak Canal
1 1
Railway project Obsolete Single
STATUS OF PROJECTS AFTER TPM
Delivery Focus – Case Study

C o m p le te d In Pro g re s s s Ha lt e d C lo s e d

Total Projects = 26
6
Project Completed = 12
Projects In progress = 09
Projects Halted = 02
4
Projects Closed = 03

0
Ro a d s Bu ild in g s SDGs WS Da m Hy d ro p o w e r Ca n a l Ra ilw a y
 26 PSDP - SECTORAL VARIEGATION
IH
6
C
1
University
2

4
Prison
1

ROAD BUILDINGS
2

School Parliament Lodges

0 1 1
Tunnel Bridge Metro Bus Highways

Hospital
1

2
PM Scheme - Sindh Sindh - Karachi
1 1

1.5

OTHERS SGD’S
KPK -
II
Punjab - I
1
0.5 1

0
WS Dam Hydropower Canal Railway

KPK - Punjab - II
I 1
1
 ROADS BUILDINGS
Number of projects Number of projects

1 6 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1
Tunnels Highways Bridges Metro Bus Schools University PLs Hospital Prison HC

SDGS EXTRAS
Number of projects Number of projects

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1
PM Scheme- Sindh-
KPK-1 Punjab-1 KPK-2 Punjab-2 Hydropower WS Dam Canal Railway
Sindh Karachi
PRE-QUALIFIED FIRMS LIST

# Firm Name ROAD WATER HEALTH EDU- BUILD- CLIMATE POWER Awarded
CATION ING CHANGE Projects to
TPMF

REHMAN HABIB
1 CONSULTANTS (PVT) 1 1 04 Microsoft Word
Document
LTD.
CONSULTING
2 1 1 1 04
ASSOCIATES (PVT.) LTD.
Microsoft Word
Document

NEW VISION
3 ENGINEERING 1 1 1 04 Microsoft Word
Document

CONSULTANT (PVT.) LTD.

BARQAAB CONSULTING
4 1 1 1 01 Microsoft Word
SERVICES (PVT.) LTD. Document

ASIAN CONSULTING
5 1 1 1 1 04
ENGINEERS
Microsoft Word
Document

ROYAL ASSOCIATES
6 1 1 1 1 04 Microsoft Word

(PVT.) LTD.
Document

MASCON ASSOCIATES
7 1 1 1 1 1 05 Microsoft Word

(PVT) LTD Document

3
 8 ROAD SECTOR PROJECTS – FACING
Delivery Focus – Case Study
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT
G.SI Project Name ISSUES Technica RoW Change Time Cost Funds
l Issues Clearanc in Scope Overru Overrun Issue
e n
ZD ES.pdf
Construction of Road from Zeyara to Dabori,
184 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
District Orakzai
JS ES.pdf
Improvement, Upgradation and Widening of
67 No No No Yes Yes No
Jaglot - Skardu Road (S-1, 167KM)
Musa Khail Taunsa Road (35KM) Stretch Road
TM ES.pdf

435 Yes No No Yes Yes Yes

to Constructed and Links with Zhob
Construction of Bridge over River Ravi at Mal
TT Singh ES.pdf

398 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Fatyana District T. T. Singh
Dualization of Indus Highway (N-55) Sarai
Microsoft Word
Document

65 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Gambila to Kohat Section
Old Bannu Road ES.pdf Dualization and Improvement of old Bannu
63 Road from KM 1040+00 – 1050+000 & KM Yes Yes Yes No No No
1088+000 – 1167+000
Microsoft Word
Document
Lowari Road Tunnel and Access Road Projects
77 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes
(2nd Revised)
Microsoft Word
Document
Construction of Infrastructure and Allied
955 Works for Metro Bus Services Peshawar Morr Yes No Yes Yes No Yes
& NIIA (L= 25.6 km)
FLAGSHIP PROJECTS/VALUE ADDITION
1 CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD
FROM ZEYARA TO DABORI,
DISTRICT ORAKZAI
COR [1958.801 – 3213.217]
TOR [2016 - 2019] 4 Years
2 IMPROVEMENT, UPGRADATION
AND WIDENING OF JAGLOT -
SKARDU ROAD (S-1, 167KM)
COR [No Cost Overrun]
TOR [ 2017-2020] 3
years
3 MUSA KHAIL TAUNSA ROAD
(35KM) STRETCH ROAD TO
CONSTRUCTED AND LINKS
WITH ZHOB
COR [ 505.501 – 2718.318]
TOR [ 2006 -
2008] 15 years
• RoW was not clear.
• There was change in scope which affected cost of Rs.1254 million.
• TPM also observed that Rs. 110 million have been distributed but
RoW clearance issue still persists.
• PC-I was revised however Rs.885 million is required to complete the
project.
• FWO has complete the road work and inaugurated in
December,2021.
• Work was awarded on Supplier Buyer Credit basis – fixed cost.
• Initially, GoP has to provide 15% funds while 85% will be arranged by
contractor through bank loan.
• Later on all funds were provided by the GoP.
• Initially, project was handled Pak PWD – Quetta but later on
transferred to Pak PWD – Muzaffar Gerh
• TPM noticed that Project has been divided into 3 road sections.
• TPM reported high turning slope. It further pointed out that
unconventional way of laying culvert slabs.
• Follow up meeting revealed that one road section has been
completed and handed over to Highway Department and 2nd section
is under process of handing over. 10
FLAGSHIP PROJECTS/ VALUE ADDITION
4 DUALIZATION OF INDUS
HIGHWAY (N-55) SARAI
GAMBILA TO KOHAT
SECTION
COR [ No Cost Over-Run ]
TOR [ 2018
– 2020 ] 3 years
5 DUALIZATION AND
IMPROVEMENT OF OLD
BANNU ROAD FROM KM
1040+00 – 1050+000 & KM
1088+000 – 1167+000
COR [ No Cost Over - Run]
TOR [ 2018 -
2020] 3 years
• Delay due to land acquisition, removal of utility services and removal
of trees.
• NHA saved Rs.3720 million in competitive bidding.
• Change in scope of work due to addition of new 4 Lane bypass at
Speena Morr.
• Due to change in scope, NHA is submitting revised PC - I of Rs 3644
million
• TPM has the stance that 4 Lane bypass at Speena Morr should be
dealt independently to avoid shortage of funds for main project.
• Work divided into 3 packages.
• Bidding Process yielded saving of Rs. 432.9 million.
• Delay in land acquisition, land compensation payments and clearance
of Right of Way (RoW).
• Frequent mobilization and demobilization of resources and machinery
• Change in Scope of Work
• Project’s more than 50% work is still pending.
• Extension of time will be required for completion of work subject to
the submission of work plan by the contractor.
11
FLAGSHIP PROJECTS/ VALUE ADDITION
6 LOWARI ROAD TUNNEL AND
ACCESS ROAD PROJECTS (2ND
REVISED)
COR [ 7984 – 26855 ]
TOR [ 2004 - 2016]
12 years plus 7 years = 19
years
7 CONSTRUCTION OF
INFRASTRUCTURE AND ALLIED
WORKS FOR METRO BUS
SERVICES PESHAWAR MORR &
NIIA (L= 25.6 KM)
COR [ No Cost Over - Run]
TOR [ 2018 -
2020] 3 years
• EA changed Width of Tunnel thrice &E&C componenet was never
attended.
• In 2nd Revised PC-I EA demanded further PKR 20,000 million
• In this demand, E&C component share is PKR 12,345 million which
rises from PKR 495 million.
• TPM recommended to close the project due to sustained shear
negligence.
• The CDWP struck down 3rd revision of PC-I after approving liabilities.
• Saving of PKR 15000.0 million to exchequer.
• Project has been divided into 4 road sections with 10 stations.
• 1st 3 road sections, structures and road portion of Sri Nagar Highway
has been utilized.
• TPM points out that TS estimates, award of work and executed works
are in complete disarray which needs explanation.
• TPM also noted issuance of number of variation orders which shows
hasty approval of project drawings by EA and poor estimation by
consultants. It may need clarification.
• Despite availability of funds , 3 bus stations were abolished which is
shear violation of PC-I. Matter needs explanation to MoPD&SI.
12
FLAGSHIP PROJECTS/ VALUE ADDITION
8 CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGE • Pak PWD was executing agency.
OVER RIVER RAVI AT MAL • At the very outset, bridge location could not be decided for over a year
FATYANA DISTRICT T. T. SINGH and unfortunately this delay took place after award of work to
COR [ 915.706 – 1910.737] contractor.
TOR [ 2010 - • Project delayed due to non release of funds.
2012] 11 years • TPM carried out quality testing Ultra Pulse Velocity testing on piles and
piers apart from core cutting of deck slab
• The project is going to complete in double cost after 11 years.

13
 7 BUILDNG SECTOR
Delivery Focus – Case Study PROJECTS – FACING PROJECT
MANAGEMENT
G.SI Project Name ISSUES ) Technical RoW Change in Time Cost Funds
Issues Clearance Scope Overrun Overrun Issue

BUILDINGS
Renovation/Rehabilitation of Physical
Microsoft Word
Document 148 infrastructure of 200 Institutions under PM's Yes No Yes No Yes Yes
Education Sector Program ICT
Establishment of University of Engineering
Microsoft Word
Document 277
and Technology, Lahore, Narowal Sub campus
Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Construction of Additional Family Suits for the

Microsoft Word
Document
621 Members of Parliament including 500 Servant Yes No No Yes Yes Yes
Quarters at G-5/2
Construction of Islamabad High Court
ES IHC.pdf
698
Building
Yes No Yes Yes Yes No
Construction of Model Prison in H-16
ES MP H-16.pdf 679
Islamabad
Yes Yes No Yes Yes No

Microsoft Word
Document 254 Establishment of FATA University Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Establishment of 250 Bedded Hospital at
Updated ES Final Report - 250 bedded Skardu.pdf 681
Skardu
Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes
FLAGSHIP – BUILDINGS - PROJECTS / VALUE
1 Establishment of University of
ADDITION • Physical progress 86% & Financial utilization
Engineering and Technology,
Lahore, Narowal Sub campus.
COR [939.933 - 2960.632 ]
[2020.067]
TOR [2014 – 2017]
[6 Years]
2 Renovation/Rehabilitation of
Physical infrastructure of 200
Institutions under PM's
Education Sector Program ICT
COR [2742.001 - 3737.288 ]
[995.287]
TOR [2016 – 2017] 9 months
[30.06.2022]
[ 5 years ]
90%
• Project divided in 7 packages
• Increase in the scope of work - Increase in covered area of academic,
hostel buildings and external electrification.
• Funds utilization by contractors remained unsatisfactory throughout
project execution resulted into contracts’ rescindment and project
delays.
• Electricity connection from GEPCO (WAPDA) is pending since 2018.
• Physical progress 100 % & Financial utilization 92.4%
• TPM noted missing in planning in assessment and execution of the
project.
• Work divided in 4 clusters.
• 200 schools spread over ICT were allotted to two contractors.
• Rs.196 million paid in lieu of escalation.
• Low release of Funds during execution phase
• Financial closure – Verification of final bill.
• TPM claimed that defects conveyed for Immediate mitigations,
resulting in Rs. 112.234 million saving in favor of public exchequer.
• Project completed and PC-IV has been submitted.
15
FLAGSHIP – BUILDING - PROJECTS / VALUE ADDITION
3 Establishment of FATA • Project divided into 7 packages and awarded contracts of Rs. 1066.03 million to 5
University contracting firms. The physical progress is 90% and payment made up to 90.87 %
PC-I Allocation • All firms were granted extension of time without penalty.
PKR 1592.733 million • Negligence of EA and Design Consultant was noted as;
COR [Nil] Building levels were not inconformity with topographic survey which caused
TOR[2015-2020] changes in scope
3 years Vigorous changes in drawings
No Project Manager was appointed (March 2020 to 23 September 2020).
The contactors have halted project activities from March- October, 2022.
• Performance of Executing Agency, Design & Supervision consultant and contractor
is poor which may be clarified.
• The deficiencies in workmanship pointed out in the TPM Report may be rectified
and intimate to M/o PD&SI /HEC to this effect.
• Social Survey guides that Security of staff , provision of outdoor games for
students and clean drinking water may be provided.
• Survey also revealed that due to long strip of the 7 districts all along Afghan
border, the campus is not in easy approach to all districts and thus its campuses
are required at Bajur/ Mohmand and Waziristan.
FLAGSHIP – BUILDING - PROJECTS / VALUE ADDITION
Construction of Islamabad High
Court Building
COR [2852.023 – 4989.259]
PKR 2137.236 million
TOR [2015-2018]
5 Years
• The physical progress is 97% and payment made up to 91 %
• Consultant was not appointed as per guidelines of Pakistan
Engineering Council.
• The fee of consultant was commensurate with cost of work instead of
fixed emoluments. Hence, consultant has been favored. There is a
need to recover extra amount from the consultant.
• Pak PWD executed work without a permanent PD of Project.
• Site location could not be finalized before time.
• Changes in scope of work was started even at foundation level.
• After approval of revised PC-I in 2020, nobody clarified that either
work was retendered or contract was enhanced.
• In this case , the enhancement is 79.25% (Rs. 2474.049 to 4434.980
million) which is very very alarming.
• At the site 5th floor was slashed and a new block was constructed
without approval of competent authority and is against the spirit and
sanctity of PC-I.
• As the project s almost complete, Supervision Consultant should
ensure as-built drawings are available in final QA/QC dossier
17
FLAGSHIP – BUILDING - PROJECTS / VALUE ADDITION
5 Construction of Additional Family • PC-I of PKR 2908.369 million approved on 21.1.2010.
Suits for the Members of • The physical progress is 50% and payment made up to 47 %
Parliament including 500 Servant • M/s Habib Rafiq (Pvt.) Ltd. were the contractor of the project
Quarters at G-5/2 • 1st extension of 12 months were granted with or without imposition of
COR[Nil] penalty.
TOR[2011-2013] • EA executed encashment of guarantee on June 2014 followed by
10 years termination on 31.3.2015 which was challenged by contractor on
April,2015.
• Agreement deed signed on 22.5.2015.
• 2nd EoT of 22 months were granted wef 20.1.2014 – 30.9.2016
• Contractor applied 3rd EoT in August 2016.
6 Construction of Model Prison in • Stipulated Completion Date: December 31,2022
H-16 Islamabad • Anticipated Completion Date: June 30,2024
COR [No Cost Overrun] • 8 years June 30, 2016
TOR [4 Years] • The project completion time was 78 months which has now touching
to 96 months
• Time lag: 18 months

18
FLAGSHIP – BUILDING - PROJECTS / VALUE ADDITION
7 Establishment of 250 Bedded
Hospital at Skardu
COR [No Cost Overrun]
TOR [3 Months]
• The PD may be asked to clarify his position on the observation of
excess payment issued to the contractor without bank guarantee.
• TPM doubts that mechanism for release of advance has not been
properly implemented. PD should submit complete report to Project
Wing for review.
• The items in which secured advance was paid, there should be no
payment of price variation against these items of work.
• The PD may be directed to justify the change in the scope of work
w.r.t covered area.
• The PD may justify that why project was initiated if land disputes
were not resolved? Remaining issues may be resolved at earliest.
• The PMU should follow up with WAPDA officials to carry out timely
provision of grid line.
• Legitimate time of approved PC- 1 has been expired on Feb 09, 2022.
The same may be obtained from the Competent Authority
• Contractor may be asked to submit revised schedule of work and
after its approval from the PMU/Consultant, it may be followed in
letter and spirit.
5 SDG’S
Delivery FocusSECTOR
– Case Study PROJECTS & 1 PM SCHEMES – FACING PROJECT MANAGEMENT
ISSUES
G.SI
) Project Name Technical RoW Change in Time Cost Funds
Issues Clearance Scope Overrun Overrun Issue

C SDG’s
Sustainable Development Goals Achievement
20 Yes Yes No Yes No Yes
SDG SINDH ES.pdf
Program (SAP) Sindh

Sustainable Development Goals Achievement

20 Yes Yes No Yes No Yes
Program (SAP) Punjab Batch-I
SDG Punjab I ES.pdf

Sustainable Development Goals Achievement

20 Yes Yes No Yes No Yes
Program (SAP) KP Batch-I
SDG KP ES.pdf

Sustainable Development Goals Achievement

SDG KP -II ES.pdf 20 Yes No No Yes No Yes
Program (SAP) Punjab Batch-II
Sustainable Development Goals Achievement
20 Yes No No Yes No Yes
Program (SAP) KP Batch-II

Development Schemes under Prime Minister's

420 Programme in Sindh - Larkana, Sukkur and Yes No No Yes No Yes
Shaheed Benazir Abad
5
 FLAGSHIP - SDG - PROJECTS/ VALUE ADDITION
1 Sustainable Development
Goals Achievement Program
(SAP) Karachi - Sindh
Allocation [592.526 million]
Utilization [ 458.37 million ]
[77%]
2 Development Schemes under
Prime Minister’s Programme
in Sindh (Sukkur, Larkana, and
Benazir- abad Divisions)
Allocation [1886.243 million]
• Schemes 27 : Roads - 14, Tuff Pavers – 3, Water Supply – 3 &
Sanitation -7
• Status : 21 Completed - 02 In progress - 04 Not yet started
• Tenders are re - invited on 11.04.2022 for scheme No. 21, 22, 23 and 26
of (3 roads & 1 sanitation) on old rates.
• Enhancement of agreement is required for schemes where the
expenditure is more than the contract amount.
• Arrangements for the required Right of way should be made by the
concerned departments.
• Schemes spreads in 23 Tehsils, 8 districts ( 3 Divisions) of Sindh
• Commencement in 2020-2021 & Completion in 2022-2023
• Funding Agency :Federal Government under Prime Minister’s
Programme in Sindh.
• Execution Agency : Pakistan Public Works Division
• Number of Schemes – 239
• Number of Executed Schemes: 2 , Completed – 1, In progress - 1
• The matter is of grave concern and points poor performance of
execution agency . Hence matter needs investigation.
21
FLAGSHIP - SDG - PROJECTS/ VALUE ADDITION
3 Sustainable Development • Batch - I schemes spreads in 14 districts of Soth Punjab.
Goals Achievement Program • Schemes 52 : Roads - 18, Gas – 18 , Sanitation – 7, Electricity – 3
(SAP) Punjab Batch-I SDG/Uplift – 3, Education – 2 , Health – 1
Allocation [1389.341 million] • Status : 44 Completed - 04 In progress , 04 Abandoned (Gas)
Utilization [1239.623 million] • The relevant human resource may be trained for using the medical
[86%] equipment
• In road projects, the slope is mostly not as per design i.e., average 2%.
• 04 nos. of SNGPL projects have been reported as non-feasible amid Supply
and Demand gap.
• The EAs ensure timely acquisition of land for the schemes well before
issuance of the work order to Contractor(s) to avoid delay / litigation.

4 Sustainable Development • Batch - II schemes spreads in 11 districts of Punjab & ICT.

Goals Achievement Program • Schemes 59 : Sanitation – 25, Roads - 18, Gas – 8 , Education – 6 ,
(SAP) Punjab Batch-II Intervention – 1, Clean Drinking Water – 1
Allocation [1919.788 million] • Status : 48 Completed - 08 In progress - 03 Not approved (Gas}
Utilization [1442.196 million] • Gas schemes are problematic as out of 8 schemes, 2 have been
[75%] completed, 3 are in progress and remaining 3 are yet to be approved.
• Work on Gas schemes has stopped as Govt. is not allowing for new natural
gas connections.
• The quality of work is satisfactory.
22
FLAGSHIP - SDG - PROJECTS/ VALUE ADDITION
5 Sustainable Development • Batch - I schemes spreads in 6 districts of KPK.
Goals Achievement Program • Schemes 39 : Clean Drinking Water – 15, Electricity – 11, Roads -
(SAP) KPK Batch-I Sanitation – 3, Intervention – 1, Gas – 1
Allocation [1098.049 million] • Status : 25 Completed - 14 In progress
Utilization [931.326 million] • In Sanitation works, TPM recommends that “Sponsoring ministry may
[84%] inquire the executing agency” about the poor quality of work.
• In Clean Drinking Water schemes, PH level of the ground water is not as
per the standards.
• In roads works, Cylindrical and FDT tests for sub- grade of the road were
carried out in C&W material testing lab. FDT test and core cutting test
were carried out by TPM team experts and found OK.

6 Sustainable Development • Batch - II schemes spreads in 9 districts ( 4 Divisions) of KPK

Goals Achievement Program • Schemes 59 : Sanitation – 25, Roads - 18, Gas – 8 , Education – 6 ,
(SAP) KPK Batch-II Intervention – 1, Clean Drinking Water – 1
Allocation [1919.788 million] • Status : 48 Completed - 08 In progress - 03 Not approved (Gas}
Utilization [1442.196 million] • Gas schemes are problematic as out of 8 schemes, 2 have been
[75%] completed, 3 are in progress and remaining 3 are yet to be approved.
• Work on Gas schemes has stopped as Govt. is not allowing for new natural
gas connections.
• The quality of work is satisfactory.
23
 6 SDG’S SECTOR PROJECTS
Delivery Focus – Case Study
– FACING PROJECT
MANAGEMENT ISSUES ) Change in
G.SI Project Name Technical RoW Time Cost Funds
Issues Clearance Scope Overrun Overrun Issue

D WATER
Construction of Small Dams/Delay Action Dams,
ES ISSO Dams.pdf
1127 Yes No No No No No
Retention Weirs, and I.S.S.O Barriers in Sindh
Nai Gaj Dam Project Dadu (Sindh) T: No
1147 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
ES NAI GAJ.pdf

46,980,350, Prov: 1899.2 M

E CANALS
Microsoft Word
Document 1156 Remodeling of Warsak Canal System Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes

F HYDROPOWER
16 MW Hydro Power Project Nalter- III, District
Microsoft Word
679 Yes No No Yes Yes Yes
Gilgit
Document

G RAILWAYS
FLAGSHIP – VARIGATED - PROJECTS/VALUE ADDITION
1 REMODELING OF WARSAK • Project undergoes 3 revisions, takes 9 years extra time affecting
CANAL SYSTEM financial burden of over Rs.12000 million and still incomplete – in
COR [4097.07 – 16695.811] progress.
• Tunnel work - after 7th repeat tender, work has been awarded with
TOR [20011-2014] procedural lacunas, however, work has not yet been started.
• Pumping Set – Lift pumps could not be procured.
• Lift canal is still incomplete.
• Reduced scope of work as approved in PC-I : 9 km length reduced in lift
canal.

2 16 MW HYDRO POWER • Work awarded to Government entity through an MOU having no

PROJECT NALTAR- III, background of Construction of Hydropower Project.
DISTRICT GILGIT • Foreign Exchange Component is effecting the project cost.
COR [4097.07 – 16695.811] • TPM recommends to terminate contract and work may be carried out
at Risk & Cost of 1st contractor at the earliest.
TOR [20011-2014] • Project may be abandon and new PC-I proposal may be prepared
instead of Project Revision.

25
Questions? Clarifications?
Let us know!

Thank you!