ANALYSIS OF TIME AND COST OF PIPING SYSTEM

DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AT WASTE WATER

TREATMENT PLANT USING CRASHING METHOD AND
WHAT IF ANALYSIS
• Prospective Supervisor 1 :
Mochammad Choirul Rizal, S.T., M.T.
• Prospective Supervisor 2 :
Ika Erawati, SS., M.TEFL.
 INTRODUCTION
Name : Hud Hud Taufiq Yusni
Address : Desa Kejobo Lor, Kec. Bugul Kidul, Kota Pasuruan
Collage : Shipbuilding Institute of Polytechnic Surabaya -
Piping Engineering.
Email : hudyusni14@student.ppns.ac.id
 results of analysis and discussion
results of analysis and discussion

TABLE OF CONTENS
1 PRELIMINARY
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
2
(WWTP)

3 PROBLEM AND PURPOSE

4 METHODOLOGY & RESEARCH

5 ANALYSIS RESULT AND DISCUSSION

 1

PRELIMINARY
PRELIMINARY
PIPING SYSTEM OF
WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

ANALYSIS OF ACCELERATE DURATION OF

WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT
AT PURWAKARTA USING CRASHING METHOD
AND WHAT IF ANALYSIS
 2

LAYOUT BACKGROUND WWTP

 BACKGROUND

One of the EPC (Engineering, Procurement, and Construction) which is working

on the WWTP (Waste Water Treatmant Plant) located in Purwakarta. In this
work planned for 192 days starting from May 2022 to January 2023, but still
running 31.6%. WWTP work is happening delays in pipe construction work
(Carbon Steel, FRP, PPH). due to lack of manpower and materials used for
piping work experienced delays in the fabrication and shipment processes
which caused delays in hydrotest work. With this delay, the owner and the
contractor has made an agreement to extend the duration of work for 5 month
that must be completed in May 2023 with a penalty of 0.1% of the daily
contract value. The method used in this research is Crashing method to
accelerate the scheduling. And What If Analysis method to anticipate project
delays and catch up activities that should have been completed on time by
adding working hours or the number of workers.
 3

PROBLEM & PURPOSE

 PROBLEM
1 What is the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) for a Waste Water
Treatment Plant piping system development project?

2 How is work productivity calculated in a Waste Water Treatment

Plant piping system construction project?

3 How does the accelerated duration of the construction of the Waste

Water Treatment Plant piping system affect the critical path and
network planning using the What If Analysis and Crashing methods?
 PROBLEM
4 What is the calculation of the costs incurred before and
after the acceleration of the duration of the project?

How is the S-Curve analysis after being optimized with

5 the method
Crashing and What If Analysis?
 PURPOSE
1 Determine the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) in the
Waste Water Treatment Plant piping system
development project.

2 Determine the calculation of work productivity in the

Waste Water Treatment Plant piping system
development project.

3 Analyze the effect of accelerating the construction duration of

the Waste Water Treatment Plant piping system on critical
paths and network planning using the Crashing and What If
Analysis methods.
 PURPOSE
4 Calculating the amount of costs incurred before and
after the accelerated duration of project work.

5 Analyze the comparison of the S-Curve when it has been

optimized using the Crashing and What If Analysis methods
 4

METHODOLOGY & RESEARCH

METHODOLOGY &
RESEARCH
 RESEARCH EXPLANATION
PROBLEM
IDENTIFICATION
1 Researchers collect related theories and do observation.
DATA
COLLECTING
2
Collecting primary and secondary data from study literature
and observation object for example layout,pfd, p&id,
isometric, work duration, master schedule.
DATA PROCESSING
3
WBS, Gantt Chart, determine CPM, Calculating
productivity, Crashing Method and What If Analysis.
 RESEARCH EXPLANATION
DATA ANALYSIS
4
Data analysis will be carried out using Ms Project and
Ms Excel program.

5 CONCLUSION

The conclusion of this study is the acceleration of the

duration and cost comparison between the crashing
method and what if analysis
 5

ANALYSIS RESULT AND DISCUSSION

WORK BREAKDOWN
STRUCTURE
WORK VOLUME
CALCULATION OF WORK
PRODUCTIVITY
Material Activity Volume Prod/day Prod/Hour Duration
Stringging 2100 Kg 150.0 Kg 18.8 Kg 14 Day
Erection 331 Joint 41.4 Joint 5.2 Joint 8 Day
Support 2100 Kg 150.0 Kg 18.8 Kg 14 Day
Carbon steel
Fit Up 1962 Dia.inc 196.2 Dia.inc 24.5 Dia.inc 10 Day
Welding 1962 Dia.inc 196.2 Dia.inc 24.5 Dia.inc 10 Day
Inspection 331 Joint 41.4 Joint 5.2 Joint 8 Day
Stringging 1200 Kg 100.0 Kg 12.5 Kg 12 Day
Erection 226 Joint 15.1 Joint 1.9 Joint 15 Day
Support 1200 Kg 100.0 Kg 12.5 Kg 12 Day
FRP
Fit Up 2128 Dia.inc 266.0 Dia.inc 33.3 Dia.inc 8 Day
Lamination 2128 Dia.inc 212.8 Dia.inc 26.6 Dia.inc 10 Day
Inspection 226 Joint 28.3 Joint 3.5 Joint 8 Day
Stringging 750 Kg 50.0 Kg 6.3 Kg 15 Day
Erection 275 Joint 27.5 Joint 3.4 Joint 10 Day
Support 750 Kg 50.0 Kg 6.3 Kg 15 Day
PP-H
Fit Up 1546 Dia.inc 193.3 Dia.inc 24.2 Dia.inc 8 Day
Glueing 1546 Dia.inc 154.6 Dia.inc 19.3 Dia.inc 10 Day
Inspection 275 Joint 39.3 Joint 4.9 Joint 7 Day
Final Inspection 832 Joint 83.2 Joint 10.4 Joint 10 Day
CS, FRP, PP-H
Hydrotest 75 lot 15.0 lot 1.9 lot 5 Day
ACTUAL SCHEDULE
CRITICAL PATH METHOD
THANKS!