The document discusses Kai He's analysis of the three perspectives - realism, liberalism, and constructivism - for understanding the Indo-Pacific region. It outlines Kai He's criticisms of each perspective, including that realism does not adequately consider China as a threat, liberalism lacks regional institutions, and constructivism overlooks differing values and backgrounds. The document also discusses the US pivot to Asia, minilateralism, and argues the region is multipolar with countries pursuing double hedging strategies. In conclusion, the author believes Kai He's arguments generalize too much and differ geopolitical conditions across Indo-Pacific countries.
The document discusses Kai He's analysis of the three perspectives - realism, liberalism, and constructivism - for understanding the Indo-Pacific region. It outlines Kai He's criticisms of each perspective, including that realism does not adequately consider China as a threat, liberalism lacks regional institutions, and constructivism overlooks differing values and backgrounds. The document also discusses the US pivot to Asia, minilateralism, and argues the region is multipolar with countries pursuing double hedging strategies. In conclusion, the author believes Kai He's arguments generalize too much and differ geopolitical conditions across Indo-Pacific countries.
The document discusses Kai He's analysis of the three perspectives - realism, liberalism, and constructivism - for understanding the Indo-Pacific region. It outlines Kai He's criticisms of each perspective, including that realism does not adequately consider China as a threat, liberalism lacks regional institutions, and constructivism overlooks differing values and backgrounds. The document also discusses the US pivot to Asia, minilateralism, and argues the region is multipolar with countries pursuing double hedging strategies. In conclusion, the author believes Kai He's arguments generalize too much and differ geopolitical conditions across Indo-Pacific countries.
072111233013 Margaret Keane [SOH-338] Tata Regional Indo Pasifik week 1 “Three Faces” (1969) Based on the work of Kai He,
“Three Faces of the Indo-Pacific:
Understanding the Indo-Pacific from an IR Theory Perspective” Analysis Perspectives Notion Kai He’s Criticisms The US being US My Arguments Realism vis-à-vis China Threat Deficiency Pivoting Multipolar, double Balancing hedging strategy Liberalism Chance for No institution????? Minilateralism On its way institutionalism Constructivism Ideational and norm Different values and Wave of democracy Another Formula construct backgrounds Analysis Perspectives Notion Kai He’s Criticisms The US being US My Arguments Realism vis-à-vis China Threat Deficiency Pivoting Multipolar, double Balancing hedging strategy Liberalism Chance for No institution????? Minilateralism On its way institutionalism Constructivism Ideational and norm Different values and Wave of democracy Another Formula construct backgrounds Analysis Perspectives Notion Kai He’s Criticisms The US being US My Arguments Realism vis-à-vis China Threat Deficiency Pivoting Multipolar, double Balancing hedging strategy Liberalism Chance for No institution????? Minilateralism On its way institutionalism Constructivism Ideational and norm Different values and Wave of democracy Another Formula construct backgrounds Analysis Perspectives Notion Kai He’s Criticisms The US being US My Arguments Realism vis-à-vis China Threat Deficiency Pivoting Multipolar, double Balancing hedging strategy Liberalism Chance for No institution????? Minilateralism On its way institutionalism Constructivism Ideational and norm Different values and Wave of democracy Another Formula construct backgrounds Analysis Perspectives Notion Kai He’s Criticisms The US being US My Arguments Realism vis-à-vis China Threat Deficiency Pivoting Multipolar, double Balancing hedging strategy Liberalism Chance for No institution????? Minilateralism On its way institutionalism Constructivism Ideational and norm Different values and Wave of democracy Another Formula construct backgrounds
“ Karenanya, penulis melihat bahwa argumen-argumen He terlalu ekstrem dan
“ menggeneralisasi, kendati negara-negara Indo-Pasifik berasal dari latar belakang dan kondisi geopolitik yang berbeda-beda. Question! Kacamata mana yang akan kalian gunakan untuk memandang paras indah Kawasan Indo-Pasifik?