Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Auditing and Investigation Lecture 3 Audit Strategy and Audit Evidence
Auditing and Investigation Lecture 3 Audit Strategy and Audit Evidence
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
Audit Strategy
Introduction
Audit strategies
Audit procedure
Audit plan
Benefits of planning for an audit
Audit strategy memorandum
Content of audit strategy memorandum
Audit planning steps
Audit Evidence
Introduction
Sources of audit evidence
Reliability of audit evidence
Prepared by Daniel O. Okyere 1
PRESENTATION OUTLINE CON’D
Procedures for generating audit evidence
Audit tests
Audit working papers
Purpose for preparing working papers
Qualities of good audit working papers
Contents of audit working papers
Current audit file
Permanent audit file
Ownership of working papers
Retention of audit working papers
Expert evidence
Reliance on experts
Introduction
Audit approach is a methodology that focuses on the strategies adopted to gather audit evidence through up to
date understanding of the client’s business. Audit approach helps in planning for an audit to reduce audit risk.
Audit strategies
Audit strategy is a plan directed to the gathering of relevant and reliable audit evidence in order to support
the expression of an opinion on financial statements.
Audit strategy memorandum is a document that details the points involved in the audit planning process and the
important planning decisions that have been reached.
• Accounting locations. Where there are a number of accounting locations, the strategy to be adopted to visit
and audit each location;
• Staff needed for the audit, allocation of staff between audit team;
• Likely risk areas and measures to be put in place to solve them should they occur;
• The need for an expert opinion;
• Audit programme;
• Analytical review showing key ratios from the previous year’s financial statements;
• Major changes in the organisation’s business or external changes that affects the client’s business;
• Audit approach to be adopted;
• Reliance on the work of the internal auditor;
• Audit fees to be charged.
Introduction
The International Standard on Auditing 500 requires an Auditor to obtain relevant and reliable audit evidence
sufficient to enable him draw reasonable conclusions therefrom. The Auditing Guidelines on Audit evidence
gives guidelines on what constitutes adequate audit evidence. Audit evidence is information, written or oral,
obtained by the Auditor to support the conclusions on which he bases his opinion on the financial statements.
Substantive tests
Substantive tests are those designed to substantiate the validity, accuracy and completeness of amounts
appearing in the financial statements and related notes.
Working papers belong to the Auditor. It is important to distinguish between working papers and the client’s
books and records. In principle, the books and records of the business given to the Auditors to examine and
from which they compile their working papers belong to the client.
The International Standard on Auditing (ISA) did not make provision for the period by which working papers
must be kept, but the Ghana Limitation Act – 1972 (NRCD 54) will be beneficial:
• Actions to recover contribution or forfeiture, a sum by way of penalty or forfeiture, recoverable under any
enactment are barred after two years.
• An action claiming damages for negligence or breach of duty is barred after three years.
• Action under simple contract is barred after six years.
On the basis of the above provisions, it is advisable to retain working papers for a minimum period of six (6)
years.
Prepared by Daniel O. Okyere 17
Expert evidence
Expert is defined as a firm or person possessing special skill, knowledge or experience in a particular field other
than accounting or auditing. Accountants are not expected to possess the specialist skills of a medical doctor,
engineer or a pharmacist. During the course of an audit, the Auditor may need to use audit evidence in the form
opinion on medicine, valuations or statement from experts such as valuers.
Circumstances under which the work and report of such experts may be used include the following:
1. Valuations of certain types of non-current assets including land and buildings;
2. The measurement of degree of completion on long term contracts for the purpose of revenue recognition;
3. Valuation of certain types of items such as diamond and gold.
4. Determination of mineral and petroleum reserves and the characteristics of those reserves;
5. Interpretation of legal documents;
It is noteworthy that the Auditor is ultimately responsible for the use of an expert’s work.
Limitations of CAATTs
• High setup costs;
• Changes are costly;
• Not suitable for small installations;
• Expensive to keep the programme up-to-date.
Prepared by Daniel O. Okyere 20
Steps in Using CAATTs
According to Karkar (2002), the major steps involved in using CAATTs are as follows:
• Set the objectives of the CAATTs application;
• Determine the content and accessibility of the entity’s files and data,
• Define the specific files or databases to be examined;
• Define the output requirements;
• Identify the personnel who may participate in the design and application of the CAATTs;
• Refine the estimates of costs and benefits;
• Ensure that the use of the CAATTs is properly controlled and documented;
• Arrange the administrative activities, including the necessary skills and computer facilities;
• Execute the CAATTs application;
• Evaluate the results.