Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10

CASE STUDY

SANDEE

DONE BY:
PAVITHRA S(22/05/2002)
MBA - D
ABSTRACT
• The case Sandee describes about that Prof. Leela
received a faculty representation on teacher
mannerisms.
• She’s reviewing faculty profiles to make a decision.
• The case suggests that an open in-class discussion
about Sandy’s case could help in exploring the
merits of organizational behaviour.
CHARACTERS INVOLVED

Prof. Leela
Sandee
Faculty members
• Students
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR
• Organizational behavior refers to the study of how
individuals, groups, and structures interact within
an organization.
• It examines various aspects such as
communication, motivation, leadership, and
decision-making.
• In this case it involves analyzing how individuals
and group within the organization interact,
communicate, and work together to achieve
common goals.
OBJECTIVES OF THE CASE
• The objective of the case study are to
analyze the situation, identify key issues,
and propose solutions.
SWOT ANALYSIS OF THE CASE
Strengths:
- Prof. Leela’s extensive academic background and
experience.
- Sandy’s passion for an unconventional teaching style.
Weaknesses:
- The dissenting feedback from 10 faculty members
regarding teacher mannerisms.
Opportunities:
- Prof. Leela’s proactive approach to reviewing
faculty profiles and files.
- The potential for an open in-class discussion on
Sandy’s case to address organizational behavior.

Threats:
- Resistance to change from faculty members.
- The challenge of creating a performing culture
within the institution.
SOLUTION
• My approach as Prof. Leela sounds well-considered
and comprehensive. Thoroughly reviewing the faculty
profiles and having one-on-one meetings to address
concerns and perspectives is a good strategy for
building, understanding and trust.
• Organizing an open in-class discussion can indeed
promote open dialogue and collaboration.
• This would help in making informed decisions and
fostering a performing culture within the institution.
CONCLUSION
• Prof. Leela should conduct a thorough review of faculty profiles to
verify their details and qualifications. Additionally, reaching out to
students to gather information about Sandee’s character, behavior,
and role in their lives is crucial for understanding the situation
fully.
• When it comes to decision-making, considering different
perspectives and weighing the potential impact on everyone
involved is essential.
• Prof. Leela should strive for a fair and balanced decision that
benefits the institution and maintains a positive working and
learning environment.
THANK YOU

You might also like