Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Proposal Development
Proposal Development
1614440014440001
Background
Theoretical benefit
The theoretical benefits of this research are expected to provide
information about the development of practicum Student Worksheets
Practical benefits
1. Students
2. teacher
3. School
Literature review
Types of research
The research carried out is research and development (Research and
Development). Research and development methods aim to produce products that
meet valid and practical criteria. The product developed is a worksheet for class
XI SMA Practicum students
Research time and place
Research time
This research will be carried out from September to November 2020
Research Place
The research took place at the Department of Biology, FMIPA UNM and SMA 2
Sidrap
Design and Research Subjects
This R&D research uses the ADDIE model where this model has five stages,
namely Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, and Evaluate. However, this
research only reached the Implement stage because of the limited time and
ability of the researchers
Research subject
The subjects of this study were 35 students of Class XI IPA at SMA Negeri 2
Sidrap and 1 teacher of biology subject at SMAN 2 Sidrap.
Research Instruments
3. Development (Develop)
The development stage aims to realize all the steps that have been carried
out previously and to produce the final product of the student worksheets.
Implements
The implementation stage was carried out with limited trials of some class XI
students at SMAN 2 Sidrap to get practical worksheets for students. The
practicality of student worksheets is measured by the responses of students
and teachers in the field of study using student worksheets (LKPD)
Evaluation
The evaluation stage is carried out in two forms, namely formative and
summative evaluation. Formative evaluation is carried out at the end of each
face-to-face (weekly) while summative evaluation is carried out after the
activity ends as a whole (semester).
Data collection instruments
V ji
K
j 1
i
n
K average criteria to - i
i
V ji
the score of the results of the jth validator's assessment
against the i-th criteria
n : number of validators
Determine the background of each aspect
n
K ji
A
j 1
i
n
A i
V
j 1
a
n
𝑉𝑎 total average
A average i-th aspect
i
n many aspects-i
The total mean (𝑉𝑎) value refers to the interval for determining the validity
of the learning device (Hobri, 2010) as listed in Table 3.1.
value explanation
=5 Very Valid
4≤ ≤5 Valid
2≤ ≤3 Invalid
1≤ ≤2 Very invalid
Practicality test
%Ṙ=
% Ṙ : the percentage mean value of the response
: Average response value
The average value is referred to in the interval determining the level of
practicality of the media which is presented in the Table