2022 ANTI-DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL

PERFORMANCE AUDIT
(MC No. 2023-062)

May 10-12, 2023

Conference Hall, DILG La Union, City of San Fernando, La Union
PURPOSE

Assess functionality and effectiveness of local ADACs

Determine ADAC-initiated and/or -endorsed innovations and best practices

at all levels

Create an evaluation and assessment platform

Recognize the best, effective, and performing ADACs

 COVERAGE

This policy shall cover:

● Provincial ADACs, City ADACs, and
Municipal ADACs which shall be subjected to
the performance audit.
POLICY CONTENT AND GUIDELINES:
FUNCTIONALITY AUDIT
CRITERIA
C/MADAC INDICATORS
Indicator 1 Indicator 4
Creation/Reorganization of Supervision and Support
ADACs to Component ADACs
(10 Points) (20 Points)

Indicator 2
Indicator 5
Allocation of Substantial
Conduct of Meetings
Amount as Indicated in the
(10 Points)
ADAC Plan
(15 Points)

Indicator 3
Formulation and Indicator 6
Implementation of Plans Innovation/s
and Programs (5 Points)
(40 Points)
PREREQUISITES: TOOLS

Anti-Drug Abuse Council- ADAC Performance ADAC Performance

Functionality Monitoring Audit Protocol Auditor Indicator
System (ADAC-FMS)
a document that details
an information system used by a document that provides
encoders, auditors, and regional
the phases, processes,
and timeline of the the indicators, MOVs,
managers for the submission
point allocation, and
and verification of Means of conduct of the
Verification (MOVs) for ADAC considerations that
performance audit.
audit. measures the functionality
and effectiveness of local
ADACs
PREREQUISITES:
AUDIT TEAM STRUCTURES AND COMPOSITIONS
ADAC Provincial Audit Teams
(APT)
● Organized by the DILG
Provincial Office
● Chaired by the DILG Provincial
Director or representative
● Composed of representatives
from the provincial PNP, PDEA,
and two (2) accredited CSOs
ADAC Regional Audit Teams
(ART)
● Organized by the DILG Regional
Office
● Chaired by the DILG Regional
Director or representative
● Composed of representatives
from the regional PNP, PDEA,
and two (2) accredited CSOs
ADAC National Audit Team
(ANT)
● Organized by the PADS DILG in
coordination with BLGS and
NBOO
● Chaired by the DILG Secretary
● Composed of the heads of DDB,
PNP, PDEA, and one (1)
accredited CSO
PREREQUISITES: AUDIT MECHANISM
ADAC Provincial Audit
Teams (APT)
Shall audit all Component Cities
and Municipalities within their
respective areas of jurisdiction
ADAC Regional Audit Teams
(ART)
Shall audit all Provinces, Highly
Urbanized Cities and
Independent Component Cities
within their respective areas of
jurisdiction
ADAC National Audit Team
(ANT)
Shall conduct national
calibration and finalization of
results
PHASES OF IMPLEMENTATION AND
RESPONSIBILITIES OF DIFFERENT
STAKEHOLDERS
PHASE 1: DATA GATHERING AND UPLOADING
PHASE

LGU ADAC Focal Persons LCE to endorse the same After uploading, e-
LGU ADAC Focal to endorse all gathered back to the LGU ADAC focal copies of all MOVs
Persons to gather all MOVs to the Local Chief persons for encoding and shall be submitted to
required MOVs Executives for signature uploading in the ADAC- the concerned audit
and issuance of a FMS. Attestation executed by teams for the process
document containing an
the LCE should also be of assessment
Attestation
uploaded
PHASE 2: AUDIT PHASE

The concerned DILG After the conduct of the

The APT and ART shall audit, the APT and ART shall
Office shall convene the conduct the audit, through
APT, and ART to generate the audit report with
ADAC-FMS, based on communicating results
conduct the audit MOVs submitted/uploaded
process. through the ADAC-FMS, &
by the LGU ADAC Focal have it signed by the
Persons. members of the audit team
prior to re-uploading the
same.
PHASE 3: SUBMISSION OF AUDIT RESULTS

All Provincial and PADS-PMO shall

Regional reports consolidate the All Audit teams shall
submitted to ANT submitted reports and submit their audit
through the PADS- endorse to ANT in reports in electronic
PMO shall be preparation for the copy
treated as valid and calibration, &
final. finalization of audit
results
PHASE 4: AUDIT RESULTS CALIBRATION &
FINALIZATION

Convening of the
ANT to conduct the PADS-PMO shall
calibration and generate the
finalization of audit National Reporting
Form (NRF) using
results
the ADAC-FMS
PHASE 5: PRESENTATION OF FUNCTIONAL AND
NON-FUNCTIONAL ADACS

NRF shall be presented

ART and APT may opt to
to SILG, and once conduct exit conferences or
approved, shall be similar activities with their
declared as valid and respective Local Government
final Units to discuss the results of
the performance audit
PHASE 5: PRESENTATION OF FUNCTIONAL AND
NON-FUNCTIONAL ADACS
Adjectival Rating of Functionality – The adjectival rating of ADAC performance and
functionality are as follows:
Audit Score Adjectival Rating Classification

85-100 High Functional Ideal

51-84 Moderate Functional Progressive

50 and below Low Functional Basic

PHASE 5: PRESENTATION OF FUNCTIONAL AND
NON-FUNCTIONAL ADACS

Certificates shall be Low functional ADACs and

prepared and given to consequently low functional
for previous years audit shall
all Moderate and High
be recommended for
Functional ADACs appropriate intervention and
legal action
 INDICATIVE TIMELINE
PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4

DATA GATHERING AUDIT RESULTS PRESENTATION OF

AND UPLOADING ADAC AUDIT PHASE CALIBRATION AND AUDIT RESULTS TO
PHASE FINALIZATION SILG

Component Component
April 1-May
Cities/Munic
5, 2023
Cities/Munici May 8-19 June June
ipalities palities
RECOGNITION AND AWARDS
 ● An ADAC may only be eligible for
awards if it garners an overall
performance score in the functionality
audit of at least 85 points (High
Functional).
● The ANT through the PADS-PMO
shall consolidate all highly functional
ADACs from the NRF.

ELIGIBILITY
 ADAC AWARDING CRITERIA

Criteria 1 ADAC Functionality

(50 Points)

80 points and
Criteria 2 Sustainability higher shall be
(25 Points) recognized and
awarded.

Criteria 3 CBDRP Graduates

(25 Points)
ASSESSMENT PROCESS

● The ADAC National Audit Team (ANT) shall be

convened to conduct the awarding assessment for
purposes of awards.
● The ANT shall use the National Report Form (NRF) for
the assessment process.
● The ANT shall use the data of the PDEA (Drug Clearing
and Drug Affectation) and the DILG - NBOO (BADAC
Functionality).
IDENTIFICATION OF
PASSING RATE AND
AWARDEES
Based on the awarding criteria, ADACs who
garnered 80 points during the assessment
process shall be recognized and awarded.
PRESENTATION OF
RESULTS
A final list of all best and effective ADACs
shall be prepared based on the awarding
criteria. Said list, shall be endorsed to the
SILG for presentation, and approval.
 AWARDING
An awarding ceremony shall be scheduled and conducted to recognize and
incentivize the best performing or most effective / outstanding ADACs.
THANK YOU!