Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Topic 1 Introduction Macroeconomics Master
Topic 1 Introduction Macroeconomics Master
Macroeconomics II
Spring term – 2013-2014
Topic I - INTRODUCTION
1
The evolution
of GDP in
some Western
countries
2
Formal definition
3
Nazi vote share
Unemployment rate
4
WHY UNDERSTANDING BUSINESS CYCLES IS
IMPORTANT
5
DATING BUSINESS CYCLES
7
MEASURING BUSINESS CYCLES
• We need a method for separating the growth trend from the cyclical component
of a variable like GDP
where is the log of GDP, is the growth trend, and the cyclical component.
yt gt ct (2)
yt gt
ct
8
How do we disentangle the two components of y?
9
MEASURING BUSINESS CYCLES
• Hodrick-Prescott filter. When detrending an
economic time series, the growth component
is found by minimizing
T
HP yt g t
2
t 1 (3)
with respect
T 1 to all of the .
gt 1 gt gt gt 1
2
t 2
gt
10
Real GDP
and trend
With HP
filter
11
Detrending time series with the HP filter, we obtain
estimates of the g ts, which can be used to determine our
estimates of the ct s.
12
WHAT HAPPENS DURING BUSINESS CYCLES?
1 T
xt x
2
sX
T 1 t 1
(4)
13
Volatility,
UK and
USA
14
Volatility,
Denmark
and Finland
15
Volatility,
Belgium
and
Netherlands
16
WHAT HAPPENS DURING BUSINESS CYCLES?
• Stylized business cycle fact 1:
Investment is much more volatile over the business cycle than GDP.
It is the most volatile component of aggregate demand.
x t x ct c
xt , ct T
t 1
T
(6)
x x c c
2 2
t t
t 1 t 1
18
Correlation,
UK and USA
19
Correlation,
Denmark
and Finland
20
Correlation,
Belgium
and
Netherlands
21
WHAT HAPPENS DURING BUSINESS CYCLES?
22
WHAT HAPPENS DURING BUSINESS CYCLES?
23
WHAT HAPPENS DURING BUSINESS CYCLES?
Last but not least, we want to study the degree of persistence in the economic variables.
That is, we compute the coefficient of autocorrelation
xt , xt n
24
Autocorrelation,
UK and USA
25
Autocorrelation,
Denmark and
Finland
26
Autocorrelation,
Belgium and
Netherlands
27
WHAT HAPPENS DURING BUSINESS CYCLES?
28
THE PRODUCTION FUNCTION APPROACH
Lt 1 ut N t H t (8)
29
THE PRODUCTION FUNCTION APPROACH
• Suppose that the above variables fluctuate around som long-run trend values. Trend output can then be written as (capital is fully utilized):
1
Yt Bt K t 1 ut N t H t t
(9)
1
Yt Bt K t 1 ut N t H t t (10)
30
THE PRODUCTION FUNCTION APPROACH
• Taking logs on both sides of (9) and (10), and subtracting one from the other, yields:
yt yt ln Bt ln Bt 1 ln N t ln N t
1 ln H t ln H t 1 ln ut ln ut
(11)
31
The US output gap and its
components estimated by
the production function
method
32
THE PRODUCTION FUNCTION APPROACH
33
International Business Cycles
Rebelo (2005)
International
Business
Cycles
Ambler et al. (2004)
Cross-correlations
are positive (with
very few exceptions)
Corr(y,y*)>corr(z,z*)>
corr(c,c*)
Five Schools of Thought
• Keynesian Economics (General Theory,
1936). Role of AD and authorities’ power to affect it.
• Monetarism (Friedman, 1960s). AS back to the
fore (AS=Mon. Phillips C., AD:IS-LM) Authorities much smaller role.
Demand side:
•I is exogenous and can suffer from shocks.
Criticism:
•Based exclusively on goods market
•Addressed by Hicks with IS-LM and Mundell and Fleming for open eco:
caring about r, sticky prices and XR regime.
Main conclusion:
We should manage demand (both in the short and long run) with policies and we
will be able to sustain permanent increases in Ȳ.
37
School 2: Monetarism
Laidler (1976) kind of model
•Money growth is the only source of fluctuations.
Supply side:
_
• Ȳ and L (long run) linked to supply-side factors
•There’s no Phillips Curve in the long run.
•There’s an accelerationist Phillips Curve: changes in π are linearly related to
output→supply-side relevant again.
Demand side:
•Market forces are efficient
Criticism:
•Dunlop-Tarshis critique applies: counter-cyclical real wages.
•Initially, only frictional u.
• Layard et al. (1991) intro unions to get structural u.
_
h
y
No demand side parameters appear!
Main conclusion:
•Accurate timing difficult for authorities: better to establish stable and predictable
policies. 38
School 3: New Classical Economics
Lucas (1972, 1973) adds rational expectations.
Supply side:
• Producers have imperfect information on P. After some algebra:
y P E P
Authority:
• CB has an imperfect control of m and follows:
mt a b j mt j c j yt j d j pt j t ,
j 1 j 1 j 1
a, b, c, d policy parameters.
Demand side:
•Quantity theory holds.
Main conclusion:
•Fluct due to mistaken perceptions of relative prices.
•CB policies ineffective because predicted. Keep a stable and predictable m.
39
School 3: New Classical Economics
Criticism:
• Anticipated monetary policy can be effective too
(Mishkin, 1982; Boschen&Grossman, 1982,…)
1) 1 E P and
p2
2) = 2
p 2
41