Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
The simplest case of oligopoly is duopoly which prevails when there are
only two producers or sellers of a product. Duopoly is generally
regarded as a special case of oligopoly
Since there are only a few firms producing and selling a homogeneous or
differentiated products in an oligopoly market the action of each firm will
affect the other firms in the industry.
Interdependence
• In oligopoly, the action of each firm affects the other firm’s
decision. In other words, pricing strategies focus on strategic
interactions. Therefore, price competition can lead to ruinous
price war, and as such each firm tries to adopt various non-price
competition.
• prevalence of non-price competition
availability of close substitutes
Sources or Causes of Oligopoly
Economies of scale: one important reason that a market may have few
firms in the existence of economies of scale. When economies of scale
exists, average cost falls rapidly over a large range of increase in level of
output. Thus big firms have advantage over small firms on account of
economies of scale. The larger the scale of production, the lower the
average variable cost of production.
Barriers to entry: A few firms in the industry may exist due to the
barriers of entry. There are two types of barriers(A) technological (B)
Legal. A technological barriers to enter arises for the small firms . Hence
they cant compete with the large firms. A legal barriers arises when
government imposes restrictions on the entry of new firms to avoid
harmful competition among the firms. For example, government of many
countries permit only a few firms to provide long distance telephone calls
or air line services. Patents are another source of legal barriers to the
entry of firms imposed by government.
A few firms own a patent for the exclusive right to produce a commodity
or to use a particular production process.
Sources or Causes of Oligopoly continues..
These are not only the source of oligopoly but they also represent the
barriers to other firms entering the market in the long run.
Collusive vs. Non-collusive oligopoly
Collusive oligopoly
Sometimes, firms may try to remove uncertainty related to acting independently and
enter into price agreements with each other. One way of avoiding the uncertainty arising
from oligopolistic interdependence is to enter into collusive agreements. There are two
main types of collusion, cartels and price leadership. Both forms generally imply tacit
(secret) agreements, since open collusive action is commonly illegal in most countries at
present.
• is a form of market in which few firms form a mutual agreement to avoid competition.
They form a cartel and fix the output quotas and the market price.
•Non-collusive oligopoly: If firms in an oligopoly market compete with each other, it is
called a non-collusive or non-cooperative oligopoly. Each firm has its price and output
policy is independent of the rival firms in the market. The entire firms enable to increase
its market share through competition in the market. Eg. Augustin Cournot's Mode,
Bertrand's Model, Sweezy's Kinked Demand Curve Mode.
Pricing Strategy followed in oligopoly
market
In such market structure, the action of each firm affects the other firm’s decision. In
other words, pricing strategies focus on strategic interactions. Therefore, price
competition can lead to ruinous price war and as such each firm tries to adopt
various non-price competition. In general, firms follow
•limit pricing-if the entry of the new firms where not so restricted, the industry
could not remain oligopolistic in the long run. Limit pricing exists when an existing
firm charges a price low enough to discourage entry into the industry. By doing so
they voluntarily sacrifice short-run profits in order to maximize long-run profits.
•Predatory pricing-It happens when one big firm wants to enter the market. Here
the big firm deliberately keeps very low price to attract more number of customer
and discourage the entry of new firms to enter the markets. For instance, reliance
Jio.
Pricing Strategy followed in oligopoly
market
predictor pricing is a pricing strategy where the product/service is set at a
very low price, intending to drive competitors out of the markets or create
barriers to entry for potential new competitors. This pricing strategy is
employed by a dominant firm to keep the prices very low to eliminate
competition. Predatory pricing is illegal under the antitrust laws. Predatory
pricing is an anti competitive practice by a firm which aims at
monopolizing the market and drive out other competitors. It is done by
charging prices less than the cost that a firm incurred in the production
process. Eg. Reliance Jio. Predictor price is good for the consumer for a
short-run point of view as they have to pay less. But in the long run point
of view, it is bad for the consumer.
•Gillette pricing-Once the consumer buys the product then recurring
expenditure is there. For instance printer, DTH, saving razor etc
• Dominant firm pricing,
•Pricing determined by cartel etc
Price Leadership Model
• Price leadership is an important form of collusive oligopoly
• Under price leadership one firm sets the price and others follow it.
• The one which sets the price is a price leader and the others who
follow it are the followers.
• Price leadership come into existence either through secret or formal
(open) agreement
• The formal (open) agreement to establish price leadership are
generally illegal, price leadership is generally established as a result
of informal and secret understanding between the oligopolists.
• The followers firms adopt the price of the leader, even though they
have to depart from their profit maximising position, as they think
that it is to their advantage not to compete with their leader and
between themselves.
Types of Price Leadership
Price leadership is of various types (1) Price leadership by a low cost
firm(2) price leadership of the dominant firm (3) Barometric price leader
ship
Price leadership by a low cost firm-in order to maximise profits, the low
cost firm set a lower price than the high cost firm. Since, the high cost
firms will not be able to sell their product at higher price, they are forced to
agree to the low price set by the low cost firm. The low cost price leader
has to ensure that the price which he sets must yield some profits to the
high cost firm-their followers.
Price Leadership by a low cost firm
• Firm produce homogenous products
• Firm have different cost structures
• The low cost firm sets the lower price
• for the product by equalizing its MR and MC
• This price will be followed by the high-cost firm
• At this profit, the high cost firm(the follower) does not maximize profits
• However, prefers to follow the price leader in order to avoid the price war
Types of Price Leadership Continues….
• Price leadership of the dominant firm: Dominant firm may be producing
a very large proportion of the total production of the industry. The
dominant firm knows the total market demand. The dominant firm knows
the marginal cost of the small firms. The dominant firm fixes a price which
maximises its own profits. The other firms(followers) follows the
dominant firm and accept the price set by dominant firm and adjust their
output accordingly.
• Barometric price leader ship-All the firms agree to follow the price
change made by a firm which is very old firm, experienced firm, most
respected firm who has good knowledge of the market condition and can
forecast the future happenings in the market better than others. He will set
the price and others will follow.
Cartel
• What is Cartel?
Cartel is a group of firms who have joined together to control its
production, sales and the price in the hope of obtaining the
advantages of monopoly.
• Cartel formation is possible only for homogeneous product.
• Why Cartel?
(i) To reduce the uncertainty arising from the interdependence of
oligopoly firms
(ii) To maximize joint profits. Cartel aims at joint profit
maximization.
• Types of Cartel
There are two types of cartel. Centralized cartel and Market sharing
cartel.
Centralized cartel is the most well known type of cartel. For example,
OPEC. Centralized cartel is a formal agreement among the oligopoly
firms/producer of a product to set monopoly price, allocate output
among its member and determine how profits are to be shared.
Centralized cartel aims at joint profit maximization.
The Centralized Cartel
• They decide about the total quantity and the price at which it must be
sold. Distribute the maximum joint profit among the participating
members
• They have the authority to have the access to the cost figures of
individual companies
Failures
However, most cartels have failed to raise prices.
1. An international copper cartel operates till today, but it has
never had a significant impact on copper prices. Cattel’s attempt
to drive up the prices of tin, coffee, and tea has failed.
Problems with the Cartel
• Each oligopolist believes that if he lowers the price below the prevailing level,
his competitors will follow him and will accordingly lower their prices,
whereas if he raises the price above the prevailing level, his competitor will not
follow his increase in price.
• In other words, each oligopolist firm believes that though its rival firms will not
match his increase in price above the prevailing level, they will indeed match
its price cut. These two different types of reaction of the competitors to
increase in price on the one hand and to the reduction in price on the other hand
make the portion of the demand curve above the prevailing price level
relatively elastic and the lower the portion of the demand curve relatively
inelastic.
• Since the oligopolist will not gain a large share of the market by reducing his
price below the prevailing level, and will have substantial reduction of sales by
increasing his price above the prevailing level, he will be extremely reluctant to
change the prevailing price.
Price decrease: If an oligopolist reduces its price below the prevailing price
level OP in order to increase his sales, his competitors will fear that their
customers would go away from them to buy the product from the former
oligopolist which had made a price cut. Therefore, in order to retain their
customers, they will be forced quickly to match the price cut. Because of the
competitors quickly following the reduction in prices by an oligopolist, he will
gain in sales only very little. His sales will increase not at the expense of his
competitors but because of the rise in total quantity demand due to the reduction
in the price of the goods. Very small increase in sales of an oligopolist following
his reduction in price below the prevailing level means the demand for him is
inelastic. Thus the segment KD of the demand curve which lies below the
prevailing price OP is inelastic showing that very little increase in sales can be
obtained by a reduction in price by an oligopolist.
Price increase: If an oligopolist raises his price above the prevailing
level, there will be a substantial reduction in his sales. His customer
will leave him and go to his competitors who will welcome the new
customer. These happy competitors will have therefore no motivation
to match the price rise. The oligopolist who raises his prices will be
able to retain only those customer who either have a strong preference
for his product or are loyal customers. A large reduction in sales
following an increase in price above the prevailing level by an
oligopolist means that demand is highly elastic. The segment dK of the
demand curve which lies above the current price level OP is elastic
showing large fall in sales if a producer raises its price .
• The demand curve facing an oligopolist according to the kinked
demand curve hypothesis has a “kink” at the level of the prevailing
price. The segment of the demand curve above the prevailing price
level is highly elastic and the segment of the demand curve below the
prevailing price level is inelastic. A kinked demand curve dD with a
kink at point K. The prevailing price is OP and the firm producing
and selling OM units of output. Now upper segment of dK of the
demand curve dD is relatively elastic and lower segment of KD is
relatively inelastic.