Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Slot 4 Minds at Work - Scientific Skills HOTS and LOTS
Slot 4 Minds at Work - Scientific Skills HOTS and LOTS
MA LAY S
N
UCAT IO AY SIA
ED AL
A CHER T ION M
FT E UC A
I T UTE O Y O F E D
INST MINISTR
1
At the end of the session, participants will be able to :
1. identify the various scientific skills in a given activity
2. refresh Bloom’s Taxonomy and formulate HOTS
and LOTS questions based on a stimulus.
• Construct Hypothesis:
The null hypothesis is that there will be no difference in how
long it takes the water to freeze, whether or not it has sugar
added to it. The alternative hypothesis is that there will be a
statistically significant difference in freezing time between
the two scenarios.
• Draw Conclusion:
Based on the results of your experiment, come to a conclusion
as to whether water with sugar freezes faster, slower, or at
the same rate as water without sugar added.
•
.
INSTITUTE OF TEACHER EDUCATION MALAYSIA
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION MALAYSIA 10
Procedures:
Step 4: Observe whether or not each substance dissolves and record the
findings
DSKP:
DSKP:
DOKUMEN STANDARD
KURIKULUM dan PENTAKSIRAN
.
INSTITUTE OF TEACHER EDUCATION MALAYSIA
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION MALAYSIA 33
Procedures:
Step 4: Observe whether or not each substance dissolves and record the
findings
Part 2:
The Revised Bloom’s
Taxonomy
Bloom’s Taxonomy (Revised)
(Penilaian)
HOTS (Mencipta)
(KBAT)
(Sintesis) (Menilaian)
(Analisis) (Menganalisis)
(Aplikasi) (Mengaplikasi)
(Kefahaman) (Memahami)
(Pengetahuan) (Mengingat)
Evaluation Creating
Synthesis Evaluating
Analysis
Analyzing
Application
Applying
Comprehension
Knowledge
Understanding
Remembering
Noun Verb
INSTITUTE OF TEACHER EDUCATION MALAYSIA
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION MALAYSIA
Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy
Based upon the How would you What criteria would you
evidence, explain prove/disprove ____? use to assess ____?
your choice. Rate the ____. What choice would you
How else would State a case that would have in ____ situation?
you ____? support/reject ____. What is your opinion of
How would you What is the most ____?
critique ____? important ____? Which ____ is valid?
How would you What data was used to Would it be better if ____?
verify ____? evaluate ____? Why/why not?
What would you conclude
about ____?
What design you think
most appropriate to solve
the problem?
THANK YOU