Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Uber Innovation Case - Group 2
Uber Innovation Case - Group 2
Term V
Innovation at
t h e l a u n c h of E x p re s s Po o l
Group 12
Why does Uber have so many
different ways to run
experiments? What are the pros
and cons of each type?
SWITCHBACKS:
Pros – Simple to explain, Proactive, and
Accurate due to randomization.
Cons – Choice of time interval can be subjective,
may overlap groups
2
Why does Uber have so many
different ways to run
experiments? What are the pros
and cons of each type?
3
Evaluate the Express development project. What did Uber do well on this project? What could have
been improved?
One area where Uber could have improved is in Uber could also have improved the matching
terms of communication with riders. Some riders algorithm for Uber Express rides. Some riders
What could have have complained that they did not understand have complained that they were matched with
been improved how Uber Express worked, or that they were not other riders who were traveling in a different
informed about the potential for delays. direction, or that they had to wait a long time
for a ride.
4
2 Mins Wait Ride and Cancellations Driver Payout Trips POOL Trips Express
Considering the supplementary dataset,
3245 256 0.0789 34458 1415 3245 what is the effect of extending wait times
2184 118 0.0540 27437 1362 2184
2580 181 0.0702 27583 1371 2580 from two to five minutes on the total
2543 103 0.0405 29642 1216 2543
2481 131 0.0528 23238 1248 2481
number of shared rides completed (that
2773 166 0.0599 28053 1594 2773 is rides taken via both the existing shared
3290 236 0.0717 39912 1640 3290
2305 159 0.0690 33299 1853 2305 rides product-Uber POOL-and the new
1949 125 0.0641 25419 1490 1949
3469 245 0.0706 44871 1916 3469
shared rides product, Express), the
3188 168 0.0527 29259 1039 3188 proportion of shared rides that were
Average 6.222% 31197.4 1467.6 2727.9 matched, and driver payout per trip?
5 Mins Wait Ride and Cancellations Driver Payout Trips POOL Trips Express
2363 203 0.0859 29764 1461 2363
3584 355 0.0991 44995 1984 3584
2022 135 0.0668 23888 1401 2022
2018 150 0.0743 25794 1691 2018
2539 284 0.1119 34047 1815 2539 As per Exhibit 11, a 2-minute wait time resulted in 6.22% cancellation
2380 185 0.0777 25964 1629 2380 of rides on an average compared to 8.24% cancellations of rides on
1891 144 0.0762 22029 1173 1891 average for a 5-minute wait time, while drivers warned an additional
2419 182 0.0752 25062 1145 2419 0.5 to 1 USD for every additional rider. Assuming on average 2 riders
2309 180 0.0780 25104 1560 2309 are there, the driver earns 0.75 USD extra for the same route.
2320 183 0.0789 27626 1664 2320
As per the experiment, almost half of all POOL trips were left
unmatched.
Average 8.239% 28427.3 1552.3 2384.5
5
Based on the data available to you, other insights from the dataset
and additional qualitative considerations, what would you
recommend that Stock do? Should he increase wait times from two
to five minutes in the six treatment cities of the experimental
launch? If so, when should he do so?
If Uber does decide to increase wait times in the future, we recommend that it
do so in a gradual manner. Uber could start by increasing wait times to three
minutes, and then evaluate the impact on riders, drivers, and the overall
profitability of the service before making any further changes.
6
Product and Brand Management
Term V
THANK YOU
Group 2
MBA22260 Arnav Mehta
MBA22229 R. Lalrinsanga