Professional Documents
Culture Documents
KWESIGA PIUS. (Proposal)
KWESIGA PIUS. (Proposal)
BY
KWESIGA PIUS
2022/HD04/1613U
2200701613
Supervisor
Lugolole Robert (PhD)
Historical perspective
Science labs introduced in the late 1800s. (Isozaki,2017).
(Kali, 2008). Science education objectives have evolved over time. Evolution science
education objectives outlined.
o Four distinct phases of science education reform over the last half-century:
1.(1950s-1960s).Concerns about inadequate science education. 2. (1970s-1980s). Focused on
cognitive science research. 3. (1980s-1990s). Development of national and state standards. 4.
Emphasizes a systemic approach to fostering deep understanding.
Reforms placed greater emphasis on laboratory practicals in South African science
education. Jita (2019).
In Uganda reforms objective were to prioritize science, technology, and innovation.
UNESCO (2017). And emphasis on science practical and project work
Various practical approaches include. Cookbook, inquiry-based, and virtual laboratory
methods. Chen (2012).
Notes though CLEA is widely used, often limits students. Clark (2000).
Following steps and Lack of reflection on prior knowledge.
Criticized CLEA for not fostering critical thinking. (Dunnett K, 2000).
Highlights the benefits of guided-inquiry lab experiments. Fakayode (2014).
Theoretical perspective
Constructivism Theory. Jean Piaget. (1896-1980)
Learning through personal experiences by actively engaging with content.
Emphasis on questioning, investigation, and collaboration.
Constructivist Principles in Inquiry-Based Learning entails
Active Engagement.
Prior Knowledge
Social Interaction
Reflection: Encouragement of metacognition and reflection on the learning
process. (Bittinger, 2015).
Contextual background
Location; Kabarole District -western Uganda
Form five physics class at Nyakasula school. (government aided school)
Despite training efforts, low advanced-level physics performance persists.
Due to continued use of cookbook teaching methods.
In the context of transitioning to inquiry-based laboratory experiments for
enhanced physics understanding.
•Focus. Comparing inquiry-based vs. traditional (cookbook) approaches.
Exploring student attitudes and constraints in guided inquiry experiments.
Problem statement
The inquiry-based laboratory approach empowers students to independently navigate
experiments, allowing them to determine their procedures and analyze data without rigid
teacher instructions, fostering high levels of cognitive engagement and creativity (Jong,
2018).
In Ugandan education, the use of the cookbook laboratory approach in science particularly
in physics education and this has hindered students from connecting theory with physics
practicals, as seen in A-level physics results from 2017 to 2022 (UNEB data).
This method, where teachers provide step-by-step instructions during practical lessons
(Yalcin-Celik, 2017), leads to disengagement, limited cognitive activity, and challenges in
bridging theoretical concepts with real-world applications, raising concerns about students'
academic performance.
Without a study to assess the impact of different laboratory approaches, the issues
associated with the cookbook laboratory approach may persist, leading to ongoing poor
academic performance in A-level physics.
This study aims to assess the impact of different laboratory approaches on secondary
school student's performance in Uganda by comparing the cookbook laboratory experiment
approach and inquiry-based laboratory experiment approaches.
Main objective
To assess the impact of inquiry-based over cookbook laboratory experiment
approaches on learners' pedagogical processes.
Specific Objectives
To find out students' attitudes toward IBLE and CLE approaches.
To determine the impact of IBLE and CLE approaches in teaching and
learning physics in secondary schools.
Physics educators can use the study's insights on students' attitudes and
motivations towards IBLEA.
curriculum development will gain valuable insights into the challenges learners
face when implementing IBLEA.
Budget item Duration (weeks) Amount (Ugx) Work plan Week Process Responsible Duration Remarks
person (day)
1 Transport expenses 6 400,000
Obtaining a letter 1 Obtaining a letter of 1
2 Stationary 6 100,000 of introduction introduction
from the Dean
3 Accommodation 6 1,000,000 CEES
4 Airtime 6 100,000
Arriving at school 1 Obtaining a letter of 1
and reporting to consent from the
5 Participants allowance 6 500,000
school headteacher
6 Research assistant allowances 6 500,000
Teacher training 1 Training of physics 2
7 Training for research assistant 6 200,000 on IBLEA teachers
12 Miscellaneous 6 500,000
Assessment 6 Evaluation 7
Total expenses 5,100,000 Data analysis Analysis using
IBMSPSS
Thank You for listening