Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 4 - Cutting Mk4
Lecture 4 - Cutting Mk4
Dr Olivier Allegre
1.1. Vaporisation cutting (drilling)
Dr Olivier Allegre
• Material removed as vapour or ejected molten material.
• Shroud gas (N2, He, Ar, …) is used to help remove molten material
through cut kerf bottom opening.
Laser beam
Shroud gas
Vapour
flow
Keyhole
Workpiece
Melt
Dr Olivier Allegre
• A nozzle is used to provide high pressure shroud gas.
• Nozzle exit diameter < 1mm.
• Nozzle opening coaxial to optical axis of laser beam.
• Shroud gas protects optics from contamination from metal vapour
Focusing lens
Dr Olivier Allegre
• Relative motion work-piece / laser beam produces cut
• Striations and recast molten material affect cut quality
• Higher ratio vaporized/molten material improves quality
Relative motion of
the work-piece Stainless steel 304
1mm
Ti
200μm
Dr Olivier Allegre
•Typical pressure generated: 4x106 N/m2 = 40 bars (atmospheric pressure=1bar).
Thus high vapour pressure helps to eject melt and form hole.
pVc = nRT
Vc: volume of vapour R: gas constant T: temperature
p: pressure n: number of moles
V: speed of vapour
p: pressure
Dr Olivier Allegre
• Power density required: >107 W/cm2
• Suitable materials: Better for non-conductive materials or metals < 1.5 mm thick.
• Process (shroud) gas: N2, He, Ar. Helps to remove molten material through kerf
bottom opening. Typical gas pressure: 10-20bars. Too high gas pressure >20 bars
will cool the cut zone, increasing conduction losses and producing larger heat
affected zone.
• Disadvantage: High energy requirement and low efficiency compared with other
cutting methods.
Dr Olivier Allegre
1.2. Fusion cutting - melt and blow
• Same type nozzle/work-piece configuration as vaporisation cutting, but with
lower power density.
• The laser heats material to melting temperature (significantly lower than
boiling temperature !) through Fresnel absorption.
• Using high pressure inert or non-reactive gas (provided from nozzle coaxial
to laser beam) to blow the melt out through bottom opening of cut kerf.
• A hole piercing is required to initiate the cut.
• Very low HAZ (Heat Affected Zone) and clean cut.
Laser beam
Shroud
gas flow
Keyhole
Workpiece
Melt
Ejected molten Re-
debris solidified
Dr Olivier Allegre material
• Power density: lower than vaporisation cutting ; dependent on
materials. Minimum to cause melt.
• Process Gases: The function of the gas is to blow the laser generated
molten materials through the cut kerf bottom opening, as well as
protect the processed material from oxidation.
• N2, He, Ar can be used.
• Pressure: 10-20 Bar. Higher gas pressure will cool the cut zone,
producing larger heat affected zone. Lower gas pressure will not be
sufficient to blow the molten materials away.
• Using high pressure reactive gas (O2), coaxial to laser beam to blow out
the molten material.
• Gas pressure: O2 : 1-10 Bar. Higher gas pressure will cause excessive
side burning, producing larger Heat Affected Zone. Lower gas pressure
will lead to lower process efficiency.
• Issues: controlling the cracks in closed cutting paths (i.e. when the
laser spot comes back to its starting point) or if the cut path includes
angles; avoiding melt edges
Dr Olivier Allegre
Controlled Fracture Cutting Rates
Material Thickness (mm) Spot Diameter Laser Power Cutting speed (m/s)
(mm) (W)
Dr Olivier Allegre
• Chip-free Diode Laser Cutting of Glass – diode laser
Diode laser cutting CO2 laser cutting
S.Nisar, M.A.Sheikh,L.Li and S.Safdar, Optics and Laser Technology,41(3), 2009, pp318-
327.
Dr Olivier Allegre
1.5. Cold Cutting
• Principle: UV photons (produced from an excimer laser source) break carbon bonds
within target material, using short pulses with high peak power and high peak
intensity. The interaction is photo-chemical absorption.
• Suitable materials: organic and carbon based materials (polymers, diamond, etc…).
• Process speed: slow, with <1μm thickness removal for each pulse of laser. Pulse
energy of over 1J with nano- and pico-second
200m
pulse length.
Dr Olivier Allegre
1.6. Comparison of relative energy consumption with
different cutting methods
Method Relative Energy
1. Vaporisation cutting 40
2. Fusion cutting 20
4. Controlled fracture 1
cutting
5. “Cold cutting” 1
Dr Olivier Allegre
2. Cutting process parameters
2.1. Severance energy
• Heat balance equation: P w t h V (C p T L f m'Lv )
P : laser power (J/s)
: beam coupling coefficient
w : average kerf width (m)
th : materials thickness (m)
V : cutting speed (m/s)
ρ : material density (kg/m3)
Cp : heat capacity (J/kg.K)
ΔT : temperature rise to cause melt (K)
w
Lf : latent heat of fusion (J/kg)
m' : fraction of melt vaporised
Lv : latent heat of vaporisation (J/kg)
• The average severance energies for laser cutting have been found experimentally
(tables are available in specialized literature)
• Example: severance energy for cutting standard metal sheets with CW CO 2 laser:
Dr Olivier Allegre
2.2. Speed, power and cutting thickness
The severance energy allows to easily predict the required speed or power
required for cutting the work-piece material:
Dr Olivier Allegre
2.2. Speed, power and cutting thickness
The severance energy allows to easily predict the required speed or power
required for cutting the work-piece material:
Dr Olivier Allegre
Cross-section
2.3. Effect of laser power and cutting speed
0.36 m/min
Side-wall
2.3.1. Striation formation (6 mm/s)
•Striation formation on sidewalls is
affected by cutting speed: faster speed
reduces the size (pitch and amplitude) of
striations 0.90 m/min Side-wall
(24 mm/s)
Dr Olivier Allegre
2.3.3. Kerf width
•Kerf width increases linearly with laser power Steel
Dr Olivier Allegre
2.4. Effect of gas type and pressure:
Dr Olivier Allegre
2.4. Effect of gas type and pressure:
Dr Olivier Allegre
2.4. Effect of gas type and pressure:
Dr Olivier Allegre
2.4. Effect of gas type and pressure:
• Question: which process would you choose to cut thick (>5mm) mild
steel sheets, knowing the cut parts do not include any small features <1cm?
Dr Olivier Allegre
2.4. Effect of gas type and pressure:
• Question: which process would you choose to cut thick (>5mm) mild
steel sheets, knowing the cut parts do not include any small features <1cm?
• Answer: Reactive gas fusion cutting, with high purity (99.9%) O2 gas is
the recommended process due to its higher process efficiency. Note
however this is not an absolute rule, since the exothermic reaction with O2
gas will increase heat affected zone.
Dr Olivier Allegre
2.4. Effect of gas type and pressure:
• Question: which process would you choose to cut thick (>5mm) mild
steel sheets, knowing the cut parts do not include any small features <1cm?
• Answer: Reactive gas fusion cutting, with high purity (99.9%) O2 gas is
the recommended process due to its higher process efficiency. Note
however this is not an absolute rule, since the exothermic reaction with O2
gas will increase heat affected zone.
Dr Olivier Allegre
2.4. Effect of gas type and pressure:
Dr Olivier Allegre
2.4. Effect of gas type and pressure:
Dr Olivier Allegre
• Too low pressure does not
produce high cutting speed.
Dr Olivier Allegre
2.5. Effect of focal position
Dr Olivier Allegre
2.6. Effect of polarisation
• Linear polarised beams tend to produce non-uniform
channels: tilted at an angle, or with varying width
• This is due to the varying angle between the plane of linear
polarization and the cutting direction
Plane of linear
polarization Cutting
direction
Disadvantages
• Maximum cutting thickness < 100mm
• Laser safety requirement
• Optics requires expert maintenance
Dr Olivier Allegre
4. Example applications
• Carpets / fabric / cloth
• Car body prototyping
• Airframe (Ti or Al alloys and Stainless steel)
• Engineering components
• Epoxy based armour plate (defence)
• Furniture
• Printed Circuit Board (electronics)
• Underwater cutting (petrochemical)
• Coronary stent for medical implant (University of Manchester)
Dr Olivier Allegre
• Case studies come from Laser Ecosse:
Dr Olivier Allegre