Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Company Law
Company Law
Company Law
commerce in India
The Rules inter alia, require intermediaries to publish their rules and regulations, privacy policy and user
agreement on their websites/applications and periodically inform users of the same, place hosting, storing,
publishing, etc., prohibitions on intermediaries, and prescribe for an information retention period.
Consumer Protection Act, 2019 and Consumer
Protection (E-Commerce) Rules, 2020
The E-commerce industry is monitored by the Consumer Protection Act as it is working towards the
interest of the consumers.
The Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution has recently notified the Consumer
Protection Act, 2019 (CPA 2019) and the Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules, 2020 (
E-Commerce Rules). The CPA 2019 introduced significant changes to the 1986 consumer protection
law, to address unique issues arising in this era of digitization and e-commerce. The E-Commerce Rules
provide a framework to regulate the marketing, sale and purchase of goods and services online.
The E-Commerce Rules apply to: (a) all goods and services (including digital products) transacted over
an electronic/digital network; (b) all models of e-commerce, including marketplace and inventory
models (discussed below); (c) all e-commerce retail (including multi-brand and single brand retail
trading); and (d) all forms of unfair trade practices across all e-commerce models.1
While the E-Commerce Rules apply to e-commerce entities, they do not apply to a natural person if: (a)
the activities are performed in a personal capacity; and (b) the activities are not part of any professional
or commercial activity that is carried out on a regular or systematic basis.2 Simply put, where an
individual engages in a transaction in a personal capacity and not on a regular or systematic basis for
any professional or commercial activity, the E-Commerce Rules will not apply. As a result, natural
persons engaged in occasional transactions entailing consumer to consumer or business to consumer
interface may be excluded.
Sectorial and
Regulatory
Compliance
Foreign
E-Commerce entities/platforms with Foreign Direct
Investment (FDI) are presently regulated by the
Exchange
Foreign Exchange Management (
Non-Debt Instruments) Rules, 2019. E-commerce
Management
entity as per the aforementioned rules, means a
company incorporated under Companies Act 1956
(Non - Debt
or the Companies Act, 2013. Instruments)
Rules, 2019
Legal Metrology Act, 2009
Any e-commerce entity must comply with and meet the standards relating
to labelling and packaging set by the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 read with
Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodity) Rules, 2011 that state that the
online platform must display such mandatory information about the goods
on the network, as is required to be displayed on physical packages as well.
Display of mandatory information includes:
The Sale of Goods Act, 1930 covers what the sales and shipping policy of the
entity must contain. Additionally, terms such as the warranties, conditions, and the
transfer of property in goods are also outlined for regulating the sale of goods.
Further, the policy must also contain the fact of existence or non-existence of
return/refund options.
Competition Act, 2002
The Competition Act, 2002 identifies certain areas of the e-commerce ecosystem
which are likely to come within the ambit of competition issues. Exclusive
agreements between the online retailers (e-tailers) and the sellers, deep discounts
offered on the online platforms which are oftentimes predatory in nature, platform
neutrality and platform parity clauses. Provisions under Section 3, regarding anti-
competitive agreements and Section 4 regarding abuse of dominant position are
also applicable for e-commerce platforms.
Copyrights And Trademarks Act, 1957
E-commerce businesses may face legal issues related to infringement of
copyrights and trademarks. The Copyrights and Trademarks Act of 1957 protects the
owners of intellectual property rights and allows them to take legal action against
infringers.
All trademarks and copyrights for the products/text/symbols intended to be used must
be secured. While India has a well-defined legal and regulatory framework for the
protection of IP Rights. It is yet to completely update the laws for complete efficiency
in the virtual world.All trademarks and copyrights for the products/text/symbols
intended to be used must be secured. While India has a well-defined legal and
regulatory framework for the protection of IP Rights. It is yet to completely update the
laws for complete efficiency in the virtual world. For instance, there is no set law to
prevent domain name deception and misuse except for a few judicial pronouncements.
Case laws
Hill v. Gateway (2000), Inc., 105 F.3d 1147 (7th Cir. 1997)
Mr. and Mrs. Hill ordered a Gateway 2000 computer system. When they received the
computer, along with the packet of warrantees was an arbitration agreement, which
precluded Plaintiffs from bringing any action against Defendant, other than in the forum
of arbitration. To the terms of such agreement, Mr. Hill was dissatisfied and filed a suit
in federal court. The district court refused Gateway’s request that it honour the
arbitration clause, stating that the record did not support a finding of a valid arbitration
agreement, or that Hill had adequate notice of the arbitration clause. The case followed
up on the principle of “shrink- wrap license” where license agreement includes the
notice of agreement on the product packaging with full terms of the agreement inside the
packaging, and prohibit access to the product absent an express indication of acceptance.
In such circumstances the contract is not said to be formed at the time of purchasing the
product but when the purchaser making the express indication of acceptance such as by
declining to return the product within a specified time period.
Avnish Bajaj vs State, famously known as Bazee.com case (2005)
In this case, theCEO of E-Commerce Portal was arrested and given bail later under
Section 67 of IT Act on account of an obscene video uploaded on Bazee.com for sale.
He proved Due Diligence but in 2005, Information Technology Act did not have any
provisions related to ‘Intermediary’.
Sharat Babu Digumarti vs State, Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Petitioner was working as Senior Manager, Trust and Safety, BIPL on the day when
DPS MMS was put up for sale on Bazee.com. i.e., the office responsible for the
safety of the Portal, taking action on suspect lists when reported by the users, and
block the user or close items listed accordingly.
It was held that there is prima-facie sufficient material showing petitioner’s
involvement to proceed against him for the commission of offence punishable
under Section 292 IPC. Though he was already discharged of offences only under
Section 67 read with Section 85 of IT Act and Section 294 IPC.
Conclusion
The e-commerce sector's rapid expansion has raised issues
that the nation's legal system has been addressing, as well as
reflecting the public's growing acceptance of it. As there is
no separate codified law for e-commerce, the laws are quite
uncondensed. The businesses will need to evaluate this
viewpoint of the unique circumstance for which the
regulations must be taken into account. E-commerce
businesses need to be fully informed of the legal system, the
obstacles they may face, and effective risk management
strategies in order to flourish in this industry. Additionally,
the legislation governing the e-commerce industry is
dispersed and has a very dynamic nature. Hence, any
entrepreneurs intending to venture into the e-commerce
business must be mindful of the legal/regulatory
compliances and accountability expected out of e-commerce
activities in India. They must watch each step they take in
light of the current eco-system as well as projected future
changes.