Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit 2
Unit 2
2020_PHC528
B.M. Hlalele
E. Tshobeka
Key topics
1. Why have teams become so popular?
2. Differences between groups and teams
3. Types of teams
4. Creating effective teams
5. Turning individuals into team players
6. Different approaches to team roles
7. Summary and implications for managers
8. The five-stage model of group development.
9. Punctuated-equilibrium model
2
Why have teams become so popular?/why teams?
3
Why have teams become so popular?/why teams?
Time constraints can give teams less time to develop and may impact on
relations, trust and performance
Teams facilitate employee participation and are an effective means to
democratise organisations and increase motivation
4
Differences between groups and teams
Very important!
Work group: A group that interacts primarily to share information and to make decisions to help each
group member perform within his or her area of responsibility.
Work team: A group whose individual efforts result in performance that is greater than the sum of
the individual inputs.
Comparing groups and teams
5
Types of teams
Four types of teams
6
Creating effective teams
Context: What factors determine whether teams are successful
7
Creating effective teams
Context: What factors determine whether teams are successful
Climate of trust – members of effective teams trust each other and their leader, allowing them
to take risks and expose vulnerabilities
Five team dysfunctions must be overcome according to Lencioni:
1. Absence of trust – if there is enough trust, members will be open toward each other, won’t be afraid to
be honest and will shun organisational politics
2. Fear of conflict – when fear of conflict is overcome, members can disagree, challenge each other and
engage in passionate dialogue
3. Lack of commitment – teams committed to decisions hold one another accountable for adhering to
decisions and standards
4. Avoidance of accountability – teams that practice accountability will focus on what is best for the team
and will achieve results
5. Inattention to results – teams that focus on achieving results are able to achieve genuine buy-in around
important decisions
Performance evaluation and reward systems – reward system should reflect team
performance as well as individual contributions
8
Creating effective teams
Team composition
Abilities of members
Part of a team’s performance depends on knowledge, skills and abilities of its individual
members
These abilities set limits on what members can do and how effectively they will perform in a
team
High-ability teams perform better when the task entails considerable thought and they are
more adaptable to changing situations
The ability of a team’s leader also matters and can help less-intelligent team members when
they struggle
Personality of members
Teams that rate higher on mean levels of conscientiousness and openness to experience
perform better
Conscientious members are good at backing up other team members and sense when support
is needed. Open team members communicate better with one another and provide more ideas
9
Creating effective teams
Team composition
Allocation of roles
Teams have different needs
and members should be
selected to ensure all various
roles are filled
Managers need to understand
the individual strengths each
person can bring to a team,
select members with their
strength in mind and allocate
work assignments that fit with
members’ preferred styles
Diversity of members
Organisational demography: The degree to which members of a
work unit share a common demographic attribute, such as age, sex, race, educational
level or length of service in an organisation, and the impact of this attribute on
turnover.
Turnover will be greater among those with dissimilar experiences because communication is more
difficult and conflict is more likely
Demographic diversity seems to be unrelated to overall team performance
Proper leadership can improve the performance of diverse teams
Cultural diversity can interfere with team processes in the short term
It can be an asset for tasks that call for a variety of viewpoints, but culturally heterogeneous teams
have more difficulty working together and solving problems
These difficulties seem to dissipate over time (after about 3 months)
11
Creating effective teams
Team composition
Size of teams
Experts agree that keeping teams small is the key to improving group effectiveness
Most effective teams have five to nine members
Experts suggest using the smallest number of people who can do the task
Members of large teams have trouble coordinating, especially under time pressure
Member preference
Not every employee is a team player
Individuals who prefer to work alone create a threat to morale and member satisfaction when
forced to team up
High-performing teams are usually composed of individuals who prefer working as part of a group
12
Creating effective teams
Team processes
13
Creating effective teams
Team processes
Specific goals
Successful teams translate their common purpose into specific, measurable and realistic
performance goals
Specific goals help clear communication and maintaining focus on getting results
Goals should be challenging
Team efficacy
Team efficacy refers to teams’ confidence in their ability to succeed
14
Creating effective teams
Team processes
Mental models
Mental models: Team members’ knowledge and beliefs about how the work gets
done by the team.
Team’s performance suffers if members have the wrong mental models, which is likely to
happen with teams under acute stress
15
Creating effective teams
Team processes
Conflict levels
Conflict on a team isn’t necessarily bad
Relationship conflicts – based on interpersonal incompatibility, tension and animosity
toward others – are almost always dysfunctional
Disagreements about task content stimulate discussion, promote critical assessment of
problems and options and can lead to better team decisions
How conflicts are resolved can make the difference between effective and ineffective
teams
Social loafing
Effective teams undermine social loafing by making members individually and jointly
accountable for the team’s purpose, goals and approach
16
Creating effective teams
Turning individuals into team players
18
Creating effective teams
Turning individuals into team players
19
Different approaches to team roles
20
Different approaches to team roles
Margerison-McCann Team Management Systems
Work preferences
Law of four Ps – we always tend to practise what we prefer. The more you practise the
more proficient you become, in turn leading to gaining pleasure from your work.
Four key issues at the heart of managerial differences:
◦ Extrovert/introvert – how do people relate to others?
◦ Practical/creative – how do people prefer to gather and use information?
◦ Analytical/beliefs – how do people prefer to make decisions?
◦ Structured/flexible – how do people prefer to organise themselves and others?
21
Different approaches to team roles
Types of work
Margerison and McCann identified nine different work functions:
◦ Advising – gathering and reporting information
◦ Innovating – creating and experimenting with new ideas
◦ Promoting – exploring and presenting opportunities
◦ Developing – assessing and testing the applicability of new approaches
◦ Organising – establishing and implementing ways of making things work
◦ Producing – concluding and delivering outputs
◦ Inspecting – controlling and auditing the working of systems
◦ Maintaining – upholding and safeguarding standards and processes
◦ Linking – integrating and coordinating team efforts
22
Different approaches to team roles
Team Management Profile
TMP analysis identifies the following roles:
Reporter-adviser: excellent at gathering information and presenting it in a way that can be
understood, take action only once they have all the relevant information
Creator-innovator: people who are future-oriented, enjoy thinking about new ideas and
new ways about doing things
Explorer-promoter: excellent at taking ideas and promoting them to others, both inside
and outside organisation
Assessor-developer: good at taking ideas and implementing them, they are social outgoing
people who enjoy new opportunities
Thruster organiser: enjoy making things happen
Concluder-producer: highly practical people who see things through
Controller-inspector: quiet people who like details, facts and figures
Upholder-maintainer: strong personal values and principles
23
Summary and implications for managers
24
The five-stage model of group development.
5-stage model
Stages of Group Development
Stages of Group and Team Development
Stage I: Forming
◦ Characterized by much uncertainty
Stage V: Adjourning
◦ The final stage in group development for temporary groups, characterized by concern with wrapping up
activities rather than task performance
Putting the Five-Stage Model
Into Perspective (important!!)
Groups do not necessarily progress clearly through the stages one at a time.
Groups can sometimes go back to an earlier stage.
Conflict can sometimes be helpful to the group.
Context can matter: airline pilots can immediately reach performing stage.
The Punctuated-Equilibrium Model
Phase 1
◦ The first meeting sets the group’s direction.
◦ The first phase of group activity is one of inertia.
Transition
◦ A transition takes place at the end of the first phase, which
occurs exactly when the group has used up half its allotted time.
◦ The transition initiates major changes.
Phase 2
◦ A second phase of inertia follows the transition.
Last meeting is characterized by markedly accelerated activity.
The Punctuated-Equilibrium Model
(High)
Completion
Phase 2
Performance
First
Meeting
Transition
Phase 1
(Low)
A (A+B)/2 B
Time
Characteristics of an Effective Team
Once again!!!
Clear purpose Open communication
Informality Clear rules and work assignments
Participation Shared leadership
Listening External relations
Civilized disagreement Style diversity
Consensus decisions Self-assessment
A Model of Team Effectiveness
Context Composition
• Adequate resources • Skills
• Leadership and structure • Personality
• Climate of trust • Roles
• Performance evaluation • Diversity
and rewards • Size
• Member flexibility
• Member preference for
teamwork
Team
effectiveness
Work design Process
• Autonomy • Common purpose
• Skill variety • Specific goals
•Task identity •Team efficacy
•Task significance • Managed level of conflict
• Accountability
Creating Effective Teams – Context
Adequate Resources
Leadership and Structure
Climate of Trust
Performance Evaluation and Rewards
Creating Effective Teams – Composition
Skills
Personality
Roles
Diversity
Size
Member Flexibility
Members’ Preference for Teamwork
Skills
Teams need the following skills to perform effectively:
◦ Technical expertise
◦ Problem-solving and decision-making skills
◦ Interpersonal skills
Roles
Task-oriented roles
◦ Roles performed by group members to ensure that the tasks
of the group are accomplished.
Maintenance roles
◦ Roles performed by group members to maintain good
relations within the group.
Individual roles
◦ Roles performed by group members that are not productive
for keeping the group on task.
Roles That Build Task
Accomplishment
Initiating Stating the goal or problem, making proposals
about how to work on it, setting time limits
Social Loafing
◦ The tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working collectively than
when working individually.
◦ To reduce social loafing, teams should not be larger than necessary, and
individuals should be held accountable for their actions.
Team Member Attributes
Member Flexibility
◦ The ability of team members to complete each others’ tasks.
Cohesiveness
High Low
Performance Norms
High Moderate
High
productivity productivity
Low Moderate to
Low
productivity low productivity
Virtual Teams
Virtual Teams
◦ Use computer technology to tie together physically dispersed members in order to achieve a common
goal.
Managing Virtual Teams
Establish regular times for group interaction.
Set up firm rules for communication.
Use visual forms of communication where possible.
Copy the good points of on-site teams. For example, allow time for informal chitchat and
socializing, and celebrate achievements.
Give and receive feedback and offer assistance on a regular basis. Be persistent with people
who are not communicating with you or each other.
Agree on standard technology so all team members can work together easily.
Managing Virtual Teams
Consider using 360-degree feedback to better understand and evaluate team members.
This type of feedback comes from the full circle of daily contacts that an employee might
have, including supervisors, peers, subordinates, and clients.
Provide a virtual workspace via an intranet, website, or bulletin board.
Note which employees effectively use email to build team rapport.
Smooth the way for the next assignment if membership on the team, or the team itself, is
not permanent.
Be available to employees, but don’t wait for them to seek you out.
Encourage informal, off-line conversation between team members.
An Illustration of Virtual Workspace