Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kanban 1
Kanban 1
Kanban 1
कनबन (KANBAN) एक जापानी प्रणाली है जो लीन (LEAN) मैन्युफै क्चरिंग और जस्ट-इन-टाइम (JIT)
मैन्युफै क्चरिंग का Scheduling सिस्टम है। कनबन से जस्ट-इन-टाइम (JIT) सिस्टम को आसानी से प्राप्त किया
जा सकता है। कनबन सम्पूर्ण रूप से उत्पादन प्रणाली में बेहतर सुधार के लिए बढ़ावा देना का शानदार
सिस्टम है।
Kanban definition – कनबन की परिभाषा
Kanban definition in hindi: कनबन यह एक जापानी प्रणाली है जिसका उपयोग
lean manufacturing और just-in-time manufacturing (JIT) के लिए एक
शेड्यूलिंग सिस्टम के रूप में किया जाता है। जो आपको यह बताता है की, उत्पादन क्या करना है,
कितना उत्पादन करना है और कब उत्पादन करना है।
What is kanban system – kanban in hindi
kanban system यह एक दृश्य प्रणाली है जिसे कार्य को प्रबंधित करने और उसे ट्रैक रखने
के लिए किया जाता है क्योंकि यह एक प्रक्रिया से गुजरता है।
कनबन का लक्ष्य आपकी प्रक्रिया में संभावित अड़चनों की पहचान करना और उन्हें ठीक करना है,
ताकि काम को एक बेहतर गति मिल सके या प्रोसेस पर की लागत प्रभावी रूप से प्रवाहित हो सके ।
kanban यह एक ऐसा तरीका है जो काम के सभी क्षेत्रों में लागू होता है, जिससे टीम को लागत
कम करने में मदद मिलती है और वर्क फ़्लो को विज़ुअलाइज़ करने और सुधारने के द्वारा अधिक
कु शल हो जाता है। कानबन आपको एक स्थायी प्रतिस्पर्धी लाभ बनाने और अपनी टीम को और
अधिक, तेजी से पूरा करने के लिए सशक्त बनाने की सुविधा देता है।
कनबन के सिद्धांत
कनबन पद्धति से संबंधित चार महत्वपूर्ण सिद्धांत निम्नलिखित अवधारणाओं से संबंधित हैं:
Kanban history – कनबन प्रणाली का इतिहास
कनबन एक inventory control system है, जिसका उपयोग सिर्फ समय निर्माण में ही
किया जाता है। Toyota के एक industrial engineer “Taiichi Ohno” (ताइची
ओहनो) ने 1940 के दशक में manufacturing efficiency और process में सुधार
के लिए कनबन इस scheduling system को विकसित किया था, जो pull system पर
आधारित है।
इसे एक साधारण नियोजन प्रणाली के रूप में बनाया गया था, जिसका उद्देश्य उत्पादन के प्रत्येक
चरण में काम और inventory को नियंत्रित करना और उसका प्रबंधन करना था। कनबन
प्रणाली की जरिये शेड्यूलिंग सिस्टम द्वारा कार्य की प्रगति के बारे में साइन बोर्ड पर सूचित किया
जाता है।
1.Visualize Workflow: शब्द को देखते हुए कि कनबन का पहला सिद्धांत दृश्य से
संबंधित है। कनबन के पहले सिद्धांत के अनुसार कार्य स्थल पर हो रहे कार्यों को और उनकी प्रगति
को दर्शाए। जिससे निरीक्षण करने में आसानी रहेगी और यदि किसी प्रक्रिया में कोई समस्या उत्पन्न
होगी तो उसका पता लगा के समय रहते निस्तारण किया जा सके गा, जिससे कार्य अपने प्रवाह के
साथ आगे बढ़ता रहे।
2.Limit work in Process: कनबन की पूरी अवधारणा हर काम को शुरू से अंत तक
कु शलतापूर्वक आगे बढ़ाने की ही है। इस सिद्धांत के अनुसार कार्यों की सभी प्रक्रियों को नज़दीकी से
देखा जाता है और सभी कार्यों के पूरा करने की एक तय समय सीमा होती है जिससे कार्य को तय
समय सीमा में ही समाप्त किया जाता है। इस सिद्धांत के माध्यम से Wastage और लागत में
कमी आती है। इस सिद्धांत के माध्यम से ग्राहक की मांग के अनुसार ही कार्य को किया जाता है।
3.Focus on flow: तीसरा सिद्धांत उत्पादन के प्रवाह और प्रक्रिया पर ध्यान कें द्रित करने
से संबंधित है। जब कनबन के पहले दो सिद्धांत लागू होंगे, तो काम स्वतंत्र get Completed
4. continuous Improvement :
Nine values :
Understanding
Agreement
Respect
Leadership
Flow
Customer Focus
Transparency, Balance
Collaboration
1. Understanding
Understanding is one of the less obvious values of Kanban. I read it into the first foundational
principle, “Start with what you do now”. Understand the thing you’re changing, whether it’s the
nitty-gritty details of a process, the way a process performs under conditions of stress, or something
as abstract as your organization's overall approach to change.
Insist on understanding because a healthy process that can’t defend itself is a sign that
you’ve forgotten what you believe.
The Process Myth, Rands in Repose
In our Kanban training we teach a Systems Thinking approach that places understanding very high
on our list of priorities. It’s right there in our early introductions to the method, the basis of the very
first class exercise. Where does work come from? What characterizes different kinds of work? What
approaches to the problems of change and improvement tend to succeed or fail, both generally and in
your organization specifically? Why might that be?
By definition, the absence of understanding is what characterizes cargo cult implementations. Even
with good intentions there’s a likelihood that understanding will be lost when change is driven top-
down, justified weakly (over-relying on appeals to best practice for example) and passed
unthinkingly between organizational layers. It’s no small surprise therefore that change projects have
a tendency to disappoint. Unfortunately for the lazy or unskilled manager, understanding and its
allied values of learning and alignment take effort.
2. Agreement
Agreement is right there in the second foundational principle, “Agree to pursue
incremental, evolutionary change”. I like to turn this around: would you reasonably
expect to be successful in implementing change without it? Could it be that it’s lack of
agreement that’s limiting your progress? Or perhaps there is some agreement but it’s not
deep enough – you’re agreed on the existence of a problem but not on its impact or
causes (see understanding)?
This principle might seem to suggest another value, that of incrementalism. I would
however shy away from describing this this as a core value, for the reason that we
promote incremental, evolutionary change because it has a high chance of success, not
because its alternatives in radicalism or conservatism are never better alternatives. And
if pragmatism is a value, it is a rather slippery one.
3. Respect
“Respect for people” is a pillar of Lean. Kanban applies this to the problem of organisational change in its third
principle, “Initially, respect current roles, responsibilities & job titles”.
As in life, respect is a good guide when implementing change. Will it increase your chances of success if you start
by implying that people are doing a bad job, or their roles are worthless? Probably not. Is it helpful to assume bad
motives? Again, probably not. But does respect just mean “be nice”? Again no:
Showing respect for people does not mean you have to like them, agree with their views, and fail to
challenge any half baked reasoning.
Stephen Parry
That kind of respect takes courage, taking us to our next value.
4. Leadership
Leadership features in most stories of success but it was only in 2012 that it was added as
a foundational principle, in the form “Encourage acts of leadership at all levels in your
organization – from individual contributor to senior management”.
Much has been written on leadership and I won’t add to it here except to make a few quick
observations:
i. You might wish for an autocrat – a Steve Jobs (or a Steve Ballmer) perhaps – but
the “at every level” kind of leadership is something different.
ii. Not only is leadership something to value, management isn’t inherently something
to despise either (remember respect?).
iii. Furthermore, neither leadership nor management precludes self organization,
where individuals, teams and systems have the capacity to adapt without central or senior
direction. Rather, good leadership and good management create the conditions in which
self organization thrives.
iv. Good leadership involves challenge (we’ve used this word already). As agents of
change we must be prepared both to challenge and to be challenged .
5. Flow
Turning to the practices, we start with the third one, “Manage flow”.
Insist on understanding because a healthy process that can’t defend itself is a sign that you’ve forgotten
what you believe.
The Process Myth, Rands in Repose
In our Kanban training we teach a Systems Thinking approach that places understanding very high on our
list of priorities. It’s right there in our early introductions to the method, the basis of the very first class
exercise. Where does work come from? What characterizes different kinds of work? What approaches to
the problems of change and improvement tend to succeed or fail, both generally and in your organisation
specifically? Why might that be?
By definition, the absence of understanding is what characterises cargo cult implementations. Even with
good intentions there’s a likelihood that understanding will be lost when change is driven top-down,
justified weakly (over-relying on appeals to best practice for example) and passed unthinkingly between
organizational layers. It’s no small surprise therefore that change projects have a tendency to disappoint.
Unfortunately for the lazy or unskilled manager, understanding and its allied values of learning and
alignment take effort.
2. Agreement
Agreement is right there in the second foundational principle, “Agree to pursue
incremental, evolutionary change”. I like to turn this around: would you reasonably
expect to be successful in implementing change without it? Could it be that it’s lack
of agreement that’s limiting your progress? Or perhaps there is some agreement but
it’s not deep enough – you’re agreed on the existence of a problem but not on its
impact or causes (see understanding)?
This principle might seem to suggest another value, that of incrementalism. I would
however shy away from describing this this as a core value, for the reason that we
promote incremental, evolutionary change because it has a high chance of success,
not because its alternatives in radicalism or conservatism are never better
alternatives. And if pragmatism is a value, it is a rather slippery one.
3. Respect
“Respect for people” is a pillar of Lean. Kanban applies this to the
problem of organisational change in its third principle, “Initially, respect
current roles, responsibilities & job titles”.
Showing respect for people does not mean you have to like them, agree
with their views, and fail to challenge any half baked reasoning.
Stephen Parry
4. Leadership
Leadership features in most stories of success but it was only in 2012 that it was added as a
foundational principle, in the form “Encourage acts of leadership at all levels in your
organization – from individual contributor to senior management”.
Much has been written on leadership and I won’t add to it here except to make a few quick
observations:
i. You might wish for an autocrat – a Steve Jobs (or a Steve Ballmer) perhaps – but the “at
every level” kind of leadership is something different.
ii. Not only is leadership something to value, management isn’t inherently something to
despise either (remember respect?).
iii. Furthermore, neither leadership nor management precludes self organisation, where
individuals, teams and systems have the capacity to adapt without central or senior direction.
Rather, good leadership and good management create the conditions in which self organisation
thrives.
iv. Good leadership involves challenge (we’ve used this word already). As agents of change
we must be prepared both to challenge and to be challenged.
DEFINITION
kanban