Screening tests are used to detect potential health issues in asymptomatic individuals. Effective screening programs can lead to early detection and treatment, while reducing disease risk. However, screening also carries potential harms, like false positive and false negative results which can delay diagnosis or create unnecessary anxiety. For a screening program to be effective, the condition must be an important health problem, there must be an accepted treatment, and facilities for diagnosis and treatment should be available. The costs and benefits of screening programs must be carefully considered.
Screening tests are used to detect potential health issues in asymptomatic individuals. Effective screening programs can lead to early detection and treatment, while reducing disease risk. However, screening also carries potential harms, like false positive and false negative results which can delay diagnosis or create unnecessary anxiety. For a screening program to be effective, the condition must be an important health problem, there must be an accepted treatment, and facilities for diagnosis and treatment should be available. The costs and benefits of screening programs must be carefully considered.
Screening tests are used to detect potential health issues in asymptomatic individuals. Effective screening programs can lead to early detection and treatment, while reducing disease risk. However, screening also carries potential harms, like false positive and false negative results which can delay diagnosis or create unnecessary anxiety. For a screening program to be effective, the condition must be an important health problem, there must be an accepted treatment, and facilities for diagnosis and treatment should be available. The costs and benefits of screening programs must be carefully considered.
health disorders or diseases in people who do not have any symptoms of disease. – Early detection – Lifestyle changes – Surveillance – Reduce the risk of disease – Detect it early enough to treat it most effectively • The condition should be an important health problem • There should be a recognisable latent or early symptomatic stage • The natural history of the condition, including development from latent to declared disease, should be adequately understood • There should be an accepted treatment for patients with recognised disease • There should be a suitable test or examination that has a high level of accuracy • The test should be acceptable to the population • There should be an agreed policy on whom to treat as patients • Facilities for diagnosis and treatment should be available • The cost of screening (including diagnosis and treatment of patients diagnosed) should be economically balanced in relation to possible expenditure on medical care as a whole • Screening should be a continuing process and not a ‘once and for all’ project. Potential harms from screening
• Adverse outcomes for some individuals.
• False negative results – Delays in diagnosis and treatment. – False sense of security and ignore warning symptoms. – Legal action by people whose cancers appear to have been missed. Potential harms from screening
• False positive result
– People without the disease undergo follow-up testing that may be uncomfortable, expensive, and, in some cases, potentially harmful. – Psychological consequences such as anxiety for both the patient and their family. • Screening for cancer can lead to overdiagnosis – the detection of cancer that would never harm the individual in their lifetime. • The reasons for this include: – Detection of slow-growing or indolent cancers – High-resolution technologies detecting smaller and often the least aggressive types of cancer – People dying from other causes (competing mortality). Strategies for cancer screening • Continuing education strategies • Guidelines development and implementation • Innovative organizational initiatives • Financial incentives • Patient-based approaches Methods of screening – Case-finding – Mass screening – Multiphasic screening – Opportunistic screening – Periodical health examination – Prescriptive screening – Targeted screening SCREENING PROGRAMMES • Organized – There should be a documented policy – The screening test should be part of a pathway of care – The eligible/target population should be defined – The eligible/target population should be invited to screening at regular intervals – Diagnosis and treatment of screen-positive individuals • Opportunistic screening – Does not have systematic invitation mechanisms – Service user–service provider interactions – On demand or on an ad hoc basis – Individuals outside of the eligible group. Cancer screening registries • Maintaining a database of screening records of individuals along the screening pathway • Inviting eligible persons to commence screening • Holding a single, consistent screening record for each participant • Maintaining records of screen-positive individuals related to their participation to evaluate outcomes • Holding a record of diagnosis (both pre-cancer and cancer as applicable) • Reminding participants when they are due or overdue for screening • Providing a safety net/failsafe mechanism for participants who are screened positive • Linking with other relevant information systems to enable quality assurance, monitoring and evaluation of the screening programme