Malpractice occurs when a health care provider causes harm to a patient due to negligent or substandard care. For malpractice to be established, there must be both an error in care and evidence that the error caused harm. Simply having complications does not necessarily imply malpractice as long as the patient was fully informed of risks and alternatives. Physicians must ensure patients understand treatment options and risks of refusing treatment in the patient's preferred language. Patients also have a responsibility to fully disclose their medical history.
Malpractice occurs when a health care provider causes harm to a patient due to negligent or substandard care. For malpractice to be established, there must be both an error in care and evidence that the error caused harm. Simply having complications does not necessarily imply malpractice as long as the patient was fully informed of risks and alternatives. Physicians must ensure patients understand treatment options and risks of refusing treatment in the patient's preferred language. Patients also have a responsibility to fully disclose their medical history.
Malpractice occurs when a health care provider causes harm to a patient due to negligent or substandard care. For malpractice to be established, there must be both an error in care and evidence that the error caused harm. Simply having complications does not necessarily imply malpractice as long as the patient was fully informed of risks and alternatives. Physicians must ensure patients understand treatment options and risks of refusing treatment in the patient's preferred language. Patients also have a responsibility to fully disclose their medical history.
• Malpractice: harmful, incorrect, or negligent practice or
treatment of a patient by a health care provider. • Definition: is a preventable error in care resulting in harm to a patient • Evidence of harm is an important part of establishing malpractice. There must be both an error in the care, as well as evidence that there has been an adverse effect on the patient • Malpractice has occurred with the following and if harm has occurred • If a physician has acted with deviations from local standards of care: for example performing laparotomy to stage patient rather than doing CT scan in a patient with cancer Complications of therapy do not imply malpractice. The main issue in determining malpractice is whether the patient was fully informed that the harm could occur and whether or not he was informed of other valid options in therapy. If he was fully informed and he signed consent anyway, then malpractice has not necessarily occurred Informed refusal is as important as informed consent • lf a patient refuses therapy it is not sufficient to say that the patient was a competent adult who had the ability to refuse therapy. The patient must be fully informed of the effects and possible outcomes of refusing therapy including all the harm that could occur. If the patient still refuses then there has been no malpractice. • It is also not acceptable to say that a patient was difficult, abusive, or unable to understand a language. The physician has an obligation to provide information to adult patients with decision-making capacity in a language that they can understand. • In addition to informing a patient of the complications of therapy, you must also inform them of the complications of not receiving the therapy Patients must fully inform the physician of their past or recent medical problems, physicians are not responsible if harm occurs due to lack of full information from patients a patient comes with new onset of DVT, physician asked for past medical history, patient says no. The physician administered heparin and warfarin, patient develops ICH. Family suit physician for malpractice of giving anticoagulant for a patient who had ICH 3 months back. >>> no malpractice if patient does not have record in same hospital